openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
21002 discussions

(ITS#8550) aa
by aa＠aa.com 15 Dec '16

15 Dec '16

Full_Name: aa Version: 2.4.44 OS: win7 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (106.37.236.166) aa

1 0

Re: (ITS#8543) CVE-2015-3276: incorrect multi-keyword mode cipherstring parsing
by he＠NetBSD.org 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

>> CVE-2015-3276 appears to be unfixed in 2.4.44, and from several >> attempts at finding the bug reported in your mailing list archive >> I came up empty. So ... The best I've found from this CVE is >> RedHat's bugzilla entry at >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1238322 >> >> which contains a (suggested) patch. > > We can integrate a suggested fix if the patch author submits their > patch to our ITS directly. Due to IPR concerns we don't accept or act= > on 3rd party patch submissions. Hm, ok. I've submitted an update to the above bug entry petitioning for them to release the fix. We'll see if they act on it. Regards, - H=E5vard

1 0

(ITS#8545) Undesired timeout when polling for results
by shalopo＠gmail.com 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

Full_Name: Shahar Lupu Version: 2.4.44 OS: Ubuntu URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (81.218.29.26) When calling ldap_result with a timeout={0,0} (polling), it returns LDAP_TIMEOUT even though there are available messages in the socket. This occurs when calling ldap_results with all=true and a multi-message response has arrived. In this case, if the client has already received on the socket every message for the response, it is desirable that all the messages are collected within this ldap_result call. Instead of only polling for the specified timeout, ldap_result applies the timeout (zero when polling) on the wait4msg loop. Consequently, ldap_result returns LDAP_TIMEOUT after the first message if the response is composed of more than one message. While it may be a good idea to apply a timeout for the wai4msg loop (rather than only the polling on the socket), it is undesirable in some cases and should at least be configurable. Or perhaps timeout=polling should never be applied on the wait4msg loop.

1 0

Re: (ITS#8543) CVE-2015-3276: incorrect multi-keyword mode cipherstring parsing
by quanah＠symas.com 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

--On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 10:44 AM +0000 hyc(a)symas.com wrote: > he(a)NetBSD.org wrote: >> Full_Name: Havard Eidnes >> Version: 2.4.44 >> OS: NetBSD >> URL: >> Submission from: (NULL) (2001:700:1:0:eeb1:d7ff:fe59:fbaa) >> >> >> Hi, >> >> CVE-2015-3276 appears to be unfixed in 2.4.44, and from several >> attempts at finding the bug reported in your mailing list archive >> I came up empty. So ... The best I've found from this CVE is >> RedHat's bugzilla entry at >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1238322 >> >> which contains a (suggested) patch. > > We can integrate a suggested fix if the patch author submits their patch = > to=20 > our ITS directly. Due to IPR concerns we don't accept or act on 3rd party= > =20 > patch submissions. I would also note that MozNSS is not an officially supported TLS library for OpenLDAP, and the hack that was added for 2.4 will be removed in the future (likely OpenLDAP 2.5 and later). End administrators should generally avoid MozNSS entirely. Regards, Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: <http://www.symas.com>

1 0

(ITS#8544) manpage fixes
by sca+openldap＠andreasschulze.de 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

Full_Name: Andreas Schulze Version: git OS: linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/andreas-schulze-161213.patch Submission from: (NULL) (2001:a60:f0b4:e502::152) I uploaded a patch to polish some manpages. All changes are suggested by debian lintian - phrase "allows one to" instead of "allows to" - some occurences of -foo have to be written as \-foo in a manpage Andreas

1 0

Re: (ITS#8543) CVE-2015-3276: incorrect multi-keyword mode cipherstring parsing
by hyc＠symas.com 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

he(a)NetBSD.org wrote: > Full_Name: Havard Eidnes > Version: 2.4.44 > OS: NetBSD > URL: > Submission from: (NULL) (2001:700:1:0:eeb1:d7ff:fe59:fbaa) > > > Hi, > > CVE-2015-3276 appears to be unfixed in 2.4.44, and from several > attempts at finding the bug reported in your mailing list archive > I came up empty. So ... The best I've found from this CVE is > RedHat's bugzilla entry at > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1238322 > > which contains a (suggested) patch. We can integrate a suggested fix if the patch author submits their patch = to=20 our ITS directly. Due to IPR concerns we don't accept or act on 3rd party= =20 patch submissions. > > Summarized: > > The openldap (for NSS) emulation of the openssl cipherstring parsing= code > incorrectly implements the multi-keyword mode. > As a consequence anyone using a combination like: > > ECDH+SHA > > will not get the expected set of ciphers [...] > > (I'm somewhat dismayed that this was apparently not reported upstream > earlier...) > > Best regards, > > - H=C3=A5vard > > > --=20 -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#8543) CVE-2015-3276: incorrect multi-keyword mode cipherstring parsing
by he＠NetBSD.org 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

Full_Name: Havard Eidnes Version: 2.4.44 OS: NetBSD URL: Submission from: (NULL) (2001:700:1:0:eeb1:d7ff:fe59:fbaa) Hi, CVE-2015-3276 appears to be unfixed in 2.4.44, and from several attempts at finding the bug reported in your mailing list archive I came up empty. So ... The best I've found from this CVE is RedHat's bugzilla entry at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238322 which contains a (suggested) patch. Summarized: The openldap (for NSS) emulation of the openssl cipherstring parsing code incorrectly implements the multi-keyword mode. As a consequence anyone using a combination like: ECDH+SHA will not get the expected set of ciphers [...] (I'm somewhat dismayed that this was apparently not reported upstream earlier...) Best regards, - Håvard

1 0

(ITS#8542) mdb_dbi_open() can break mainDB cursors
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 10 Dec '16

10 Dec '16

Full_Name: Hallvard B Furuseth Version: LMDB_0.9.18 OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/Hallvard-Furuseth-161210.c Submission from: (NULL) (81.191.45.31) Submitted by: hallvard ...because mdb_dbi_open() does not track its cursor. Demo enclosed. Fix: Put the mdb_cursor_put() in WITH_CURSOR_TRACKING(mc, ...). I do wonder why failing to track one cursor apparently breaks another cursor, instead of the un-tracked one. Though maybe the un-tracked cursor is broken, and writing through it goes to the wrong place.

1 0

Re: (ITS#8541) test062 periodically core dumps
by quanah＠symas.com 08 Dec '16

08 Dec '16

--On Thursday, December 08, 2016 11:57 PM +0000 quanah(a)openldap.org wrote: > Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount > Version: HEAD > OS: Linux > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (47.208.148.26) > > > When running test062, it sometimes core dumps in syncprov abandon. I will > directly email the backtrace as the ITS software breaks them horribly. build@c7build:~$ gdb ~/git/symas-packages/thirdparty/openldap/build/RHEL7_64/symas-openldap/rpm/BUILD/openldap-2.4.45/servers/slapd/.libs/lt-slapd /tmp/core-lt-slapd-11-503-503-4174-1481240987 GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-80.el7 Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... Reading symbols from /home/build/git/symas-packages/thirdparty/openldap/build/RHEL7_64/symas-openldap/rpm/BUILD/openldap-2.4.45/servers/slapd/.libs/lt-slapd...done. [New LWP 4264] [New LWP 4189] [New LWP 4174] [New LWP 4204] [New LWP 4265] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `/home/build/git/symas-packages/thirdparty/openldap/build/RHEL7_64/symas-openlda'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007f799db90b7b in syncprov_op_abandon (op=0x7f799db898c0, rs=0x7f799db89700) at syncprov.c:1154 1154 if ( so->s_op->o_connid == op->o_connid && (gdb) thr apply all bt full Thread 5 (Thread 0x7f799d389700 (LWP 4265)): #0 0x00007f79a35dacb1 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x00007f79a47f9d00 in ?? () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00007f799d389700 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #3 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () No symbol table info available. Thread 4 (Thread 0x7f799e59b700 (LWP 4204)): #0 0x00007f79a47fff4d in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #1 0x00007f79a47fbd02 in _L_lock_791 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00007f79a47fbc08 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x00007f79a51e5873 in ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x20ecbb0) at thr_posix.c:300 No locals. #4 0x000000000043dbd8 in connection_operation (ctx=0x7f799e59abb0, arg_v=0x7f7990002670) at connection.c:1150 rc = 0 cancel = 32633 op = 0x7f7990002670 rs = {sr_type = REP_RESULT, sr_tag = 107, sr_msgid = 2, sr_err = 0, sr_matched = 0x0, sr_text = 0x0, sr_ref = 0x0, sr_ctrls = 0x0, sr_un = {sru_search = {r_entry = 0x0, r_attr_flags = 0, r_operational_attrs = 0x0, r_attrs = 0x0, r_nentries = 0, r_v2ref = 0x0}, sru_sasl = {r_sasldata = 0x0}, sru_extended = {r_rspoid = 0x0, r_rspdata = 0x0}}, sr_flags = 0} tag = 74 opidx = SLAP_OP_DELETE conn = 0x20ecb98 memctx = 0x7f7990002ba0 memctx_null = 0x0 memsiz = 1048576 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "connection_operation" #5 0x000000000043e0d0 in connection_read_thread (ctx=0x7f799e59abb0, argv=0x9) at connection.c:1283 rc = 0 cri = {op = 0x7f7990002670, func = 0x0, arg = 0x0, ctx = 0x7f799e59abb0, nullop = 0} s = 9 #6 0x00007f79a51e416a in ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper (xpool=0x2083dc0) at tpool.c:956 pq = 0x2083dc0 pool = 0x2083cb0 task = 0x7f79980008c0 work_list = 0x2083e30 ctx = {ltu_pq = 0x2083dc0, ltu_id = 140160324450048, ltu_key = {{ltk_key = 0x43d647 <conn_counter_init>, ltk_data = 0x7f7990002a90, ltk_free = 0x43d499 <conn_counter_destroy>}, { ltk_key = 0x4b206b <slap_sl_mem_init>, ltk_data = 0x7f7990002ba0, ltk_free = 0x4b1e90 <slap_sl_mem_destroy>}, {ltk_key = 0x4587e9 <slap_op_free>, ltk_data = 0x0, ltk_free = 0x45873c <slap_op_q_destroy>}, {ltk_key = 0x0, ltk_data = 0x7f79901088a0, ltk_free = 0x0}, {ltk_key = 0x0, ltk_data = 0x0, ltk_free = 0x0} <repeats 28 times>}} kctx = 0x0 i = 32 keyslot = 486 hash = 3071177190 pool_lock = 0 freeme = 0 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper" #7 0x00007f79a47f9dc5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #8 0x00007f79a35daced in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 3 (Thread 0x7f79a564c740 (LWP 4174)): #0 0x00007f79a47faef7 in pthread_join () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #1 0x00007f79a51e5761 in ldap_pvt_thread_join (thread=140160332842752, thread_return=0x0) at thr_posix.c:201 No locals. #2 0x000000000043aa65 in slapd_daemon () at daemon.c:2910 i = 0 rc = 0 #3 0x0000000000415be4 in main (argc=8, argv=0x7fff32256928) at main.c:1018 i = -1 no_detach = 1 rc = -12 urls = 0x204e0b0 "ldap://localhost:9011/" username = 0x0 groupname = 0x0 sandbox = 0x0 syslogUser = 160 pid = 32633 waitfds = {841312160, 32767} g_argc = 8 g_argv = 0x7fff32256928 configfile = 0x0 configdir = 0x204e090 "./slapd.d" serverName = 0x7fff322584cb "lt-slapd" serverMode = 1 scp = 0x0 scp_entry = 0x0 debug_unknowns = 0x0 syslog_unknowns = 0x0 serverNamePrefix = 0x4fd618 "" l = 140734034700584 slapd_pid_file_unlink = 0 slapd_args_file_unlink = 0 firstopt = 0 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "main" Thread 2 (Thread 0x7f799ed9c700 (LWP 4189)): #0 0x00007f79a35db2c3 in epoll_wait () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x00000000004398a6 in slapd_daemon_task (ptr=0x22acd80) at daemon.c:2517 ns = 1 at = 0 nfds = 4 revents = 0x2057db0 tvp = 0x0 cat = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0} i = 1 nwriters = 0 now = 1481240987 tv = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0} tdelta = 1 rtask = 0x0 l = 1 last_idle_check = 1481240984 ebadf = 0 tid = 0 #2 0x00007f79a47f9dc5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x00007f79a35daced in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f799db8a700 (LWP 4264)): #0 0x00007f799db90b7b in syncprov_op_abandon (op=0x7f799db898c0, rs=0x7f799db89700) at syncprov.c:1154 on = 0x7f7990112790 si = 0x7f7990111dd0 so = 0x20 sop = 0x7f7990002270 #1 0x000000000046765b in fe_op_abandon (op=0x7f799db898c0, rs=0x7f799db89700) at abandon.c:136 No locals. #2 0x000000000043cb11 in connection_abandon (c=0x20ecb98) at connection.c:732 rs = {sr_type = REP_RESULT, sr_tag = 0, sr_msgid = 0, sr_err = 0, sr_matched = 0x0, sr_text = 0x0, sr_ref = 0x0, sr_ctrls = 0x0, sr_un = {sru_search = {r_entry = 0x0, r_attr_flags = 0, r_operational_attrs = 0x0, r_attrs = 0x0, r_nentries = 0, r_v2ref = 0x0}, sru_sasl = {r_sasldata = 0x0}, sru_extended = {r_rspoid = 0x0, r_rspdata = 0x0}}, sr_flags = 0} o = 0x7f7990002670 next = 0x7f7994100930 op = {o_hdr = 0x7f799db89770, o_tag = 80, o_time = 0, o_tincr = 0, o_bd = 0x20a7870, o_req_dn = {bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, o_req_ndn = {bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, o_request = { oq_add = {rs_modlist = 0x2, rs_e = 0x0}, oq_bind = {rb_method = 2, rb_cred = {bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, rb_edn = {bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, rb_ssf = 0, rb_mech = { bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}}, oq_compare = {rs_ava = 0x2}, oq_modify = {rs_mods = {rs_modlist = 0x2, rs_no_opattrs = 0 '\000'}, rs_increment = 0}, oq_modrdn = {rs_mods = { rs_modlist = 0x2, rs_no_opattrs = 0 '\000'}, rs_deleteoldrdn = 0, rs_newrdn = {bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, rs_nnewrdn = {bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, rs_newSup = 0x0, rs_nnewSup = 0x0}, oq_search = {rs_scope = 2, rs_deref = 0, rs_slimit = 0, rs_tlimit = 0, rs_limit = 0x0, rs_attrsonly = 0, rs_attrs = 0x0, rs_filter = 0x0, rs_filterstr = { bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}}, oq_abandon = {rs_msgid = 2}, oq_cancel = {rs_msgid = 2}, oq_extended = {rs_reqoid = {bv_len = 2, bv_val = 0x0}, rs_flags = 0, rs_reqdata = 0x0}, oq_pwdexop = {rs_extended = {rs_reqoid = {bv_len = 2, bv_val = 0x0}, rs_flags = 0, rs_reqdata = 0x0}, rs_old = {bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, rs_new = { bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, rs_mods = 0x0, rs_modtail = 0x0}}, o_abandon = 0, o_cancel = 0, o_groups = 0x0, o_do_not_cache = 0 '\000', o_is_auth_check = 0 '\000', o_dont_replicate = 0 '\000', o_acl_priv = ACL_NONE, o_nocaching = 0 '\000', o_delete_glue_parent = 0 '\000', o_no_schema_check = 0 '\000', o_no_subordinate_glue = 0 '\000', o_ctrlflag = '\000' <repeats 31 times>, o_controls = 0x0, o_authz = {sai_method = 0, sai_mech = {bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, sai_dn = {bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, sai_ndn = { bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, sai_ssf = 0, sai_transport_ssf = 0, sai_tls_ssf = 0, sai_sasl_ssf = 0}, o_ber = 0x0, o_res_ber = 0x0, o_callback = 0x0, o_ctrls = 0x0, o_csn = { bv_len = 0, bv_val = 0x0}, o_private = 0x0, o_extra = {slh_first = 0x0}, o_next = {stqe_next = 0x0}} ohdr = {oh_opid = 0, oh_connid = 1004, oh_conn = 0x20ecb98, oh_msgid = 0, oh_protocol = 0, oh_tid = 0, oh_threadctx = 0x0, oh_tmpmemctx = 0x0, oh_tmpmfuncs = 0x0, oh_counters = 0x0, oh_log_prefix = '\000' <repeats 255 times>} #3 0x000000000043cebd in connection_closing (c=0x20ecb98, why=0x505940 <conn_lost_str> "connection lost") at connection.c:802 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "connection_closing" #4 0x000000000043ea0f in connection_read (s=9, cri=0x7f799db89b60) at connection.c:1472 rc = -2 c = 0x20ecb98 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "connection_read" #5 0x000000000043e031 in connection_read_thread (ctx=0x7f799db89bb0, argv=0x9) at connection.c:1276 rc = 0 cri = {op = 0x7f7994100930, func = 0x0, arg = 0x0, ctx = 0x7f799db89bb0, nullop = 0} s = 9 #6 0x00007f79a51e416a in ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper (xpool=0x2083dc0) at tpool.c:956 pq = 0x2083dc0 pool = 0x2083cb0 task = 0x7f7998000b40 work_list = 0x2083e30 ctx = {ltu_pq = 0x2083dc0, ltu_id = 140160313894656, ltu_key = {{ltk_key = 0x4b206b <slap_sl_mem_init>, ltk_data = 0x7f79940008c0, ltk_free = 0x4b1e90 <slap_sl_mem_destroy>}, { ltk_key = 0x0, ltk_data = 0x0, ltk_free = 0x0} <repeats 31 times>}} kctx = 0x0 i = 32 keyslot = 84 hash = 4081317972 pool_lock = 0 freeme = 0 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper" #7 0x00007f79a47f9dc5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #8 0x00007f79a35daced in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: <http://www.symas.com>

1 0

(ITS#8541) test062 periodically core dumps
by quanah＠openldap.org 08 Dec '16

08 Dec '16

Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount Version: HEAD OS: Linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (47.208.148.26) When running test062, it sometimes core dumps in syncprov abandon. I will directly email the backtrace as the ITS software breaks them horribly.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs