openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20946 discussions

[Issue 10306] New: epoll, kqueue etc. are not used when cross compiling
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Feb '25

11 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10306 Issue ID: 10306 Summary: epoll, kqueue etc. are not used when cross compiling Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hi(a)alyssa.is Target Milestone: --- OpenLDAP's build system relies on running test programs to see whether epoll or kqueue are available, after checking the headers are available. When cross compiling, test programs can't be run, and even if they could, they wouldn't produce useful results because they'd be testing the build machine. Running test programs like this isn't even a great idea for native builds, because the package is still quite likely to end up running on a different machine than it was built for — think about distro packages. This means that cross-compiled OpenLDAP ends up using select, even though it could almost certainly use epoll or kqueue. The best thing to do for this sort of thing is to check at runtime whether the epoll/kqueue/whatever is available, and fall back if not, but this would probably be hard to implement in OpenLDAP. Other, easier, things that could be done to improve the situation would be: • Assume that epoll/kqueue are available if the headers are. It's very unlikely nowadays that a system with the headers won't actually have the API available. • If the AC_RUN_IFELSE checks are staying, make sure that they're all overridabel with configure flags or at least AC_CACHE_CHECK. There are also uses of AC_RUN_IFELSE for pthreads, which presumably have the same problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 10308] New: Implement cn=monitor for back-asyncmeta
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Feb '25

11 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10308 Issue ID: 10308 Summary: Implement cn=monitor for back-asyncmeta Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Currently back-asyncmeta has no cn=monitor capabilities. It will be useful to implement some, specifically to monitor targets and target connection states. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 10304] New: Unable to remove item from directory as part of transaction if it is the last item in that directory
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Feb '25

11 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10304 Issue ID: 10304 Summary: Unable to remove item from directory as part of transaction if it is the last item in that directory Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sophie.elliott(a)arcticlake.com Target Milestone: --- I am running my ldap server on Debian 11.3, with the mdb backend, using the backported openldap version 2.5.13. I am not 100% certain if this is an issue with OpenLDAP or liblmdb, but I have been running tests in the repo and it looks like the liblmdb tests work fine, so I think it's with OpenLDAP itself. I have been performing a transaction, and deleting entries from a directory during this transaction. This works fine if the item that I am deleting isn't the last entry in its directory, but when it is I get a MDB_NOTFOUND error on the commit transaction call and the delete doesn't go through. Here is an excerpt of the logs when this happens: ``` 67a64334.14e1fc32 0x766ad2a00700 => index_entry_del( 108, "accessGroupID=f23de82f-3a1c-4f88-86bb-bb07f9a0992d,o=[COMPANY],ou=accessGroups,dc=local,dc=[COMPANY],dc=com" ) 67a64334.14e21912 0x766ad2a00700 mdb_idl_delete_keys: 6c [62d34624] 67a64334.14e22812 0x766ad2a00700 <= index_entry_del( 108, "accessGroupID=f23de82f-3a1c-4f88-86bb-bb07f9a0992d,o=[COMPANY],ou=accessGroups,dc=local,dc=[COMPANY],dc=com" ) success 67a64334.14e23a91 0x766ad2a00700 mdb_delete: txn_commit failed: MDB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found (-30798) ``` Please let me know if I should submit this issue elsewhere, or if this is something that has already been fixed in a more recent version. I'm also happy to provide more details if necessary. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 10139] back-config discloses existence of entries contrary to ACL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Feb '25

10 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10139 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=10307 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10056] New: test069-delta-multiprovider-starttls failures on static builds
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Feb '25

08 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10056 Issue ID: 10056 Summary: test069-delta-multiprovider-starttls failures on static builds Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.4 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: kaction(a)disroot.org Target Milestone: --- Hello. I am getting following test error when trying to build `openldap` statically: ``` [nix-shell:/tmp/openldap-static/openldap-2.6.4/tests]$ ./run test069-delta-multiprovider-starttls Cleaning up test run directory leftover from previous run. Running ./scripts/test069-delta-multiprovider-starttls for mdb... running defines.sh Initializing server configurations... Starting server 1 on TCP/IP port 9011... Using ldapsearch to check that server 1 is running... Waiting 5 seconds for slapd to start... Using ldapadd for context on server 1... Starting server 2 on TCP/IP port 9012... Using ldapsearch to check that server 2 is running... Waiting 5 seconds for slapd to start... Using ldapadd to populate server 1... Waiting 7 seconds for syncrepl to receive changes... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from server 1... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from server 2... Comparing retrieved entries from server 1 and server 2... Using ldapadd to populate server 2... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from server 1... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from server 2... Comparing retrieved entries from server 1 and server 2... Breaking replication between server 1 and 2... Using ldapmodify to force conflicts between server 1 and 2... Restoring replication between server 1 and 2... Waiting 7 seconds for syncrepl to receive changes... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from server 1... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from server 2... Comparing retrieved entries from server 1 and server 2... test failed - server 1 and server 2 databases differ (561) ``` I added line number (561) into error message to pinpoint it more precisely. And here is difference between databases: ``` --- /tmp/openldap-static/openldap-2.6.4/tests/testrun/server1.flt 2023-05-23 22:53:51.000965129 -0400 +++ /tmp/openldap-static/openldap-2.6.4/tests/testrun/server2.flt 2023-05-23 22:53:51.005965136 -0400 @@ -289,13 +289,10 @@ userPassword:: amFq dn: cn=James A Jones 2,ou=Alumni Association,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com -carLicense: 123-XYZ cn: James A Jones 2 cn: James Jones cn: Jim Jones -description: Amazing description: Bizarre -description: Mindboggling description: Stupendous employeeNumber: 64 employeeType: deadwood @@ -307,7 +304,7 @@ pager: +1 313 555 3923 postalAddress: Alumni Association $ 111 Maple St $ Anytown, MI 48109 seeAlso: cn=All Staff,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com -sn: Surname +sn: Jones telephoneNumber: +1 313 555 0895 title: Mad Cow Researcher, UM Alumni Association uid: jaj ``` Suggestions on what more information I can provide are welcome. You can also try to build `pkgsStatic.openldap` in this nixpkgs [commit](f9e32f61282275eb5fa9064e08bbd0a92d1187de) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

[Issue 10149] New: [PATCH] Allow certificates and keys to be read from URIs.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10149 Issue ID: 10149 Summary: [PATCH] Allow certificates and keys to be read from URIs. Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: minfrin(a)sharp.fm Target Milestone: --- Add the LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_URIS and LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_CACERTURIS options to allow certificates and keys to be set using OpenSSL provider URIs. The attached patch file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Graham Leggett minfrin(a)sharp.fm. I have not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. The attached modifications to OpenLDAP Software are subject to the following notice: Copyright 2023 Graham Leggett Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP Public License. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

[Issue 10300] New: Add detailed instructions for MRs to "Guidelines for Contributing" page
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10300 Issue ID: 10300 Summary: Add detailed instructions for MRs to "Guidelines for Contributing" page Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: smckinney(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- The current page covers submitting patches but doesn't adequately cover creating merge requests. This provides a barrier for new developers. In addition to clarifying when a change should be submitted with a patch or merge request, it could provide a set of steps including creating a fork, branch, squash, fixup, naming conventions and other info that would be lost on a new contributor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Bug 9245] New: devel/programming needs rewrite
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9245 Bug ID: 9245 Summary: devel/programming needs rewrite Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The information on the devel/programming web page is at least a decade out of date and needs a complete overhaul. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Issue 10301] New: Use assertion control in lastbind chaining
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10301 Issue ID: 10301 Summary: Use assertion control in lastbind chaining Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Take a setup with a bunch of consumers tracking lastbind information and replicating this back from the provider. If a client sends a lot of successful binds to it in a very short window, the changes might not have a chance to replicate down so each of these binds has to trigger a new modification to be forwarded. This results in a lot of DB churn and replication traffic that is actually meaningless (the pwdLastChange values before and after each of the mods will be the same). We probably can't avoid having to send something, but the change we send could have an assertion control attached that lets the provider skip it if pwdLastChange>=new_value, saving on all of the additional processing (and additional useless replication traffic). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10298] New: cannot find DN in memberOf attribute when dynlist overlay contains multiple memberOf definitions
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Jan '25

22 Jan '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10298 Issue ID: 10298 Summary: cannot find DN in memberOf attribute when dynlist overlay contains multiple memberOf definitions Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: jan.pekar(a)imatic.cz Target Milestone: --- I'm using dynlist to define multiple static objectClasses (static-oc) to be searched for member attributes and added to memberOf attribute. My configuration is in cn=config, so I defined it using multiple olcDlAttrSet attributes groupOfURLs memberURL member+memberOf@groupOfMembers* groupOfURLs memberURL member+memberOf@groupOfNames* I noticed, that memberOf attribute contains users from both groups (groupOfMembers and groupOfNames) but I can use search operation to only first defined configuration (in above example groupOfMembers) and user membership from groupOfNames groups is not found. Maybe it must be defined in one line but I was not able to find proper syntax. Maybe attribute must be mapped somehow but when it works for first definition, should be working for next one so it is bug? Thank you -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
2095
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs