openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20969 discussions

[Bug 9156] latest ppolicy draft support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Mar '20

27 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9156 --- Comment #2 from David Coutadeur <david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com> --- Hello, Just for tracability, I have made some tests about this feature some time ago, when it was available only at https://github.com/mistotebe/openldap/tree/ppolicy10 I have basically tested these at 2020-01-20: - pwdMaxLength - pwdLastSuccess, pwdMaxIdle - pwdStartTime, pwdEndTime - basic integration with ppm (https://github.com/ltb-project/ppm) I am planning do test again on RE25 branch of OpenLDAP soon. David -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8676] openldap source uses implicit function declarations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Mar '20

27 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8676 --- Comment #12 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 57b7003a by Sergei Trofimovich at 2020-03-26T22:06:41+00:00 thr_posix.c: fix implicit function declaration for 'pthread_setconcurrency' thr_posix.c: In function 'ldap_pvt_thread_set_concurrency': thr_posix.c:96:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pthread_setconcurrency' return pthread_setconcurrency( n ); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pthread_setcanceltype Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox(a)gentoo.org> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8676] openldap source uses implicit function declarations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Mar '20

27 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8676 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|has_patch, IPR_OK, | |OL_2_5_REQ, | |openldap-scratch | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8676] openldap source uses implicit function declarations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Mar '20

27 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8676 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |TEST Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8837] fix pw-pbkdf2 manpage name to get it installed
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '20

26 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8837 --- Comment #5 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Howard Chu from comment #4) > The totp module is actually an overlay. There is nothing to rename there. OK. Sorry, that was an assumption based on it being under passwd/. Thanks for the correction. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8837] fix pw-pbkdf2 manpage name to get it installed
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '20

26 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8837 --- Comment #4 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> --- (In reply to Ryan Tandy from comment #2) > (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #1) > > Actually, since it is an overlay, the slapo prefix is correct (o=overlay) > > and the slapd prefix is incorrect (used for backends). > > I don't think calling a password module an "overlay" is accurate. > > I agree with Peter, it should be called slapd-pw-pbkdf2.5 (and slapo-totp.5 > to slapd-pw-totp.5 while we're at it). Or introduce a new "slapp-" > convention if it must be distinguished from backends, but that seems > overkill... The totp module is actually an overlay. There is nothing to rename there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6958] slapd segmentation fault with TLSCRLCheck all
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '20

26 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6958 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED Target Milestone|2.5.0 |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6958] slapd segmentation fault with TLSCRLCheck all
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '20

26 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6958 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Unable to reproduce on FreeBSD 12.1 patch level 3 include ./schema/core.schema include ./schema/cosine.schema include ./schema/corba.schema include ./schema/java.schema include ./schema/inetorgperson.schema include ./schema/misc.schema include ./schema/nis.schema include ./schema/openldap.schema include ./schema/duaconf.schema include ./schema/dyngroup.schema pidfile /home/build/git/openldap/tests/testrun/slapd.1.pid argsfile /home/build/git/openldap/tests/testrun/slapd.1.args TLSCACertificatePath /home/build/git/openldap/tests/testrun/tls/ca/certs/ TLSCACertificateFile /home/build/git/openldap/tests/testrun/tls/ca/certs/testsuiteCA.crt TLSCertificateKeyFile /home/build/git/openldap/tests/testrun/tls/private/localhost.key TLSCertificateFile /home/build/git/openldap/tests/testrun/tls/certs/localhost.crt TLSVerifyClient allow TLSCRLCheck all ../servers/slapd/slapindex -f testrun/slapd.1.conf -v [build@freebsd12 ~/git/openldap/tests]$ echo $? 0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8847] New LDAP URL syntax to support binding to specific IP address at client side
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '20

26 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847 --- Comment #29 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8837] fix pw-pbkdf2 manpage name to get it installed
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '20

26 Mar '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8837 --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Ryan Tandy from comment #2) > (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #1) > > Actually, since it is an overlay, the slapo prefix is correct (o=overlay) > > and the slapd prefix is incorrect (used for backends). > > I don't think calling a password module an "overlay" is accurate. > > I agree with Peter, it should be called slapd-pw-pbkdf2.5 (and slapo-totp.5 > to slapd-pw-totp.5 while we're at it). Or introduce a new "slapp-" > convention if it must be distinguished from backends, but that seems > overkill... Pretty sure we actually discussed slapm- for module in the past, actually. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs