openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20970 discussions

[Bug 7084] Password Modify Extended Operation to set pwdReset: TRUE
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 Apr '20

06 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7084 --- Comment #2 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- How about deciding whether this is an administrator by checking whether the authorization identity is the same as the entry DN? For those, we can add pwdReset to the modify unless already specified. The concern is there might be management frontends that use a common identity for their LDAP requests and don't do ProxyAuthZ, do we just force them to do the right thing now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8769] Docs: Fix oid search extension syntax
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 05 Apr '20

05 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8769 --- Comment #2 from lukas.juhrich(a)agdsn.de <lukas.juhrich(a)agdsn.de> --- Updated source URL: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4_45/c… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6207] Build farm
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 Apr '20

04 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6207 --- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- AFAIK Need to figure out first how to make a windows environment look like gitlab runner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8245] slapo-unique constraints bypassed by manageDsaIt, change to relax?
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8245 --- Comment #13 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Michael Ströder from comment #6) > Please correct if I'm wrong but AFAIK you need 'manage' privilege to > circumvent constraints (e.g. slapo-constraint and slapo-ppolicy). That doesn't appear to be the case. A user with only 'write' privilege can actually use Relax to modify attributes freely, bypassing slapo-constraint. Personally I find this behaviour quite surprising. I would have expected both overlays to behave like slapo-unique does (Relax honoured only with manage access). As an administrator, configuring an overlay such as slapo-constraint seems fairly pointless if users can simply ignore it any time they choose. I don't understand the global Relax handling for Add/Rename, but not Modify, either. If I understand the two options Ondřej described, either we should require manage access _always_ in the presence of Relax, or only if the request actually needs some rules to be relaxed. But AFAICT neither of those is (consistently) the case right now... (I guess this gets rather off-topic for this ticket, sorry!) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8454] slapo-auditlog man page needs some improvement
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8454 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|audit-log overlay man pag |slapo-auditlog man page |needs some improvement |needs some improvement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8511] Rename "mirrormode" to "multimaster", deprecate "mirrormode" parameter
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8511 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7878] OpenLDAP MinGW Build Problem
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7878 Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #5 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7878] OpenLDAP MinGW Build Problem
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

1 0

[Bug 7878] OpenLDAP MinGW Build Problem
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7878 Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- I'm reopening this, because my MSYS2/MinGW environment still reproduces it (after fixing ITS#8383): make[3]: Entering directory '/home/ryan/openldap/servers/slapd/back-mdb' /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=disable-shared --mode=compile cc -g -O2 -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -I./../../../libraries/liblmdb -c init.c cc -g -O2 -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -I./../../../libraries/liblmdb -c init.c -o init.o In file included from ../slap.h:39, from back-mdb.h:21, from init.c:25: ../../../include/ac/socket.h:101: warning: "EWOULDBLOCK" redefined 101 | #define EWOULDBLOCK WSAEWOULDBLOCK | In file included from ../../../include/ac/errno.h:21, from init.c:23: C:/msys64/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/errno.h:166: note: this is the location of the previous definition 166 | #define EWOULDBLOCK 140 | In file included from ../slap.h:39, from back-mdb.h:21, from init.c:25: ../../../include/ac/socket.h:102: warning: "EINPROGRESS" redefined 102 | #define EINPROGRESS WSAEINPROGRESS | In file included from ../../../include/ac/errno.h:21, from init.c:23: C:/msys64/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/errno.h:158: note: this is the location of the previous definition 158 | #define EINPROGRESS 112 | In file included from ../slap.h:39, from back-mdb.h:21, from init.c:25: ../../../include/ac/socket.h:103: warning: "ETIMEDOUT" redefined 103 | #define ETIMEDOUT WSAETIMEDOUT | In file included from ../../../include/ac/errno.h:21, from init.c:23: C:/msys64/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/errno.h:223: note: this is the location of the previous definition 223 | #define ETIMEDOUT 138 | In file included from init.c:25: back-mdb.h:71:2: error: unknown type name 'uint32_t' 71 | uint32_t mi_dbenv_flags; | ^~~~~~~~ back-mdb.h:85:2: error: unknown type name 'uint32_t' 85 | uint32_t mi_rtxn_size; | ^~~~~~~~ back-mdb.h:87:2: error: unknown type name 'uint32_t' 87 | uint32_t mi_txn_cp_min; | ^~~~~~~~ back-mdb.h:88:2: error: unknown type name 'uint32_t' 88 | uint32_t mi_txn_cp_kbyte; | ^~~~~~~~ init.c: In function 'mdb_db_open': init.c:90:2: error: unknown type name 'uint32_t'; did you mean 'wint_t'? 90 | uint32_t flags; | ^~~~~~~~ | wint_t make[3]: *** [Makefile:343: init.lo] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6207] Build farm
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6207 --- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Be great if we can add MSYS2/MINGW into the build stack, along the lines of what's done here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-ci -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs