https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |TEST
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
--- Comment #12 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• ce2c5173
by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2021-02-17T18:42:46+00:00
ITS#9161 - Fix various typos
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
--- Comment #11 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Do you have a link for the liblmdb report? ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8132
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |TEST
--- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 71213e69
by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2021-02-17T17:33:48+00:00
ITS#8132 - Clarify wording on serverID.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
--- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #9)
> (In reply to jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org from comment #8)
>
> > c) "MERCHANTIBILITY" I have seen but I was unsure because the license seemed
> > OpenLDAP specific to me (but probably partially text was taken from a more
> > general one as the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE).
>
> There was one instance that's fixed in the merge request that did need
> fixing. The other one is in include/sysexits-compat.h, that one is an
> ancient University of Berkeley license:
Actually, both instances are of UC Berkeley licenses that contain the typo, and
as such we cannot modify the text.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9180
--- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to OndÅ™ej KuznÃk from comment #3)
> What's done by c4eaa5416dcc45e8d7c768a46d5bbf9fe154a308 looks to be enough?
No, as per comment#2, the man page should be updated to note that the memberOf
overlay is deprecated and that dynlist should be used as an alternative. ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9102
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.5.2
--- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• d3fca136
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-02-17T13:24:00+00:00
ITS#9102 Update secprop documentation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9180
--- Comment #3 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
What's done by c4eaa5416dcc45e8d7c768a46d5bbf9fe154a308 looks to be enough?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8865
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|ondra(a)mistotebe.net |bugs(a)openldap.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
--- Comment #9 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org from comment #8)
> c) "MERCHANTIBILITY" I have seen but I was unsure because the license seemed
> OpenLDAP specific to me (but probably partially text was taken from a more
> general one as the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE).
There was one instance that's fixed in the merge request that did need fixing.
The other one is in include/sysexits-compat.h, that one is an ancient
University of Berkeley license:
/* Portions Copyright (c) 1987 Regents of the University of California.
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms are permitted
* provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
* duplicated in all such forms and that any documentation,
* advertising materials, and other materials related to such
* distribution and use acknowledge that the software was developed
* by the University of California, Berkeley. The name of the
* University may not be used to endorse or promote products derived
* from this software without specific prior written permission.
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED
* WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
*
* @(#)sysexits.h 4.5 (Berkeley) 7/6/88
*/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
--- Comment #8 from jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org <jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org> ---
Ah yes,
a) "everytime" I have overseen
b) "tread" I have also overseen (it's also in my eyes a bug in "codespell" so I
try to detect such kind of false positives manually)
c) "MERCHANTIBILITY" I have seen but I was unsure because the license seemed
OpenLDAP specific to me (but probably partially text was taken from a more
general one as the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE).
The liblmdb library is now excluded.
In doc/drafts only draft*.txt files were excluded but since there draft*.xml
files were added, now all drafts* files in that directory are excluded. But the
README file is still scanned ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.