openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20997 discussions

[Issue 8197] slapo-constraint and delold=0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8197 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8197] slapo-constraint and delold=0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8197 --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- List message: When bulk-renaming entries in web2ldap I do *not* alter the RDN of the entry but also send delold: 0 in the MODRDN operation. IMO this is most minimal invasive approach. This works ok in most setups. But in a more strict setup (release 2.4.41) with slapo-constraint and constraints on the RDN's characteristic attribute those MODRDN requests trigger a constraint and fails with 'Constraint violation' although the RDN value is not changed. I can't tell whether this was different with older OpenLDAP releases. Even more strange: It works with delold: 1. So I could easily alter web2ldap's behaviour to send delold: 1. But I'm not sure whether that's the right general approach especially when thinking about all the other LDAP servers out there. So the question is: Is this an overzealous misbehaviour of slapo-constraint and should it be fixed therein? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8183] ldap_init() failed at sub thread but runs ok at main.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8183 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED Target Milestone|2.5.3 |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8183] ldap_init() failed at sub thread but runs ok at main.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8183 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FEEDBACK --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Can you reproduce this with the OpenLDAP 2.5 alpha? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8180] back-sock should not return sucess in case of error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8180 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8178] back-sock: Timeout to avoid locking
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8178 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8171] slapd-sock(5): Details for CONTINUE response missing
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8171 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|backends |documentation Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- man page needs updating -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8119] ldapsearch: put empty line after result not before next result
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8119 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED Target Milestone|2.5.3 |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8119] ldapsearch: put empty line after result not before next result
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8119 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |SUSPENDED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Feel free to provide a merge request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8044] openldap 2.4.39-8.el6: issue causing server unavailability
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8044 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |--- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs