openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20996 discussions

Re: Contrib: addpartial overlay (ITS#3593)
by hyc＠symas.com 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

dhawes(a)vt.edu wrote: > On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:18, ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com wrote: >> <quote who="dhawes(a)vt.edu"> >> >>> On Thursday 19 July 2007 05:35, Gavin Henry wrote: >>>>> An updated version of addpartial is available at: >>>>> >>>>> ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/david_hawes-addpartial-070126.tgz >>>>> >>>>> This version includes changes to work with OpenLDAP 2.3 as well as >>>>> ensuring syncrepl works properly. >>>>> >>>>> david hawes >>>> If this hasn't been added to 2.4/HEAD yet, would you consider updating >>>> it >>>> for inclusion in 2.4 contrib? >>> Absolutely, I've been meaning to test with 2.4. I'll bump it to the top >>> of >>> the list. >> Can you make sure that is dynamically configurable via cn=config like >> everything else in 2.4. >> >> Thanks. > > I have tested the overlay at > ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/david_hawes-addpartial-070126.tgz, and it > works with 2.4.4alpha, including dynamic loading via cn=config. > > Apart from using "overlay addpartial", there is no slapd configuration for > addpartial. I believe this means it doesn't need its own schema to work > correctly. Please correct me if I am wrong about this. That's correct. If there was no config needed under the old mechanism, then none is needed with the new either. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: Contrib: addpartial overlay (ITS#3593)
by dhawes＠vt.edu 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:18, ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com wrote: > <quote who="dhawes(a)vt.edu"> > > > On Thursday 19 July 2007 05:35, Gavin Henry wrote: > >> > An updated version of addpartial is available at: > >> > > >> > ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/david_hawes-addpartial-070126.tgz > >> > > >> > This version includes changes to work with OpenLDAP 2.3 as well as > >> > ensuring syncrepl works properly. > >> > > >> > david hawes > >> > >> If this hasn't been added to 2.4/HEAD yet, would you consider updating > >> it > >> for inclusion in 2.4 contrib? > > > > Absolutely, I've been meaning to test with 2.4. I'll bump it to the top > > of > > the list. > > Can you make sure that is dynamically configurable via cn=config like > everything else in 2.4. > > Thanks. I have tested the overlay at ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/david_hawes-addpartial-070126.tgz, and it works with 2.4.4alpha, including dynamic loading via cn=config. Apart from using "overlay addpartial", there is no slapd configuration for addpartial. I believe this means it doesn't need its own schema to work correctly. Please correct me if I am wrong about this. Thanks, dave

1 0

Re: (ITS#5056) ldap_add_result_entry crashes when starting a new list
by pturgyan＠umich.edu 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

On Jul 20, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Howard Chu wrote: > pturgyan(a)umich.edu wrote: >> Full_Name: Paul Turgyan >> Version: 2.3.35 >> OS: linux 2..6.18 from source URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ >> Submission from: (NULL) (141.213.231.171) >> When calling ldap_add_result_entry with an empty list or when >> starting a new >> list, ldap_add_result_entry crashes >> with a SEGFAULT at line 67. >> Here is a patch: > > A different fix is now in HEAD, please test. > > -- > -- Howard Chu > Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com > Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ > Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/ Works for me! Thanks.

1 0

Re: (ITS#5056) ldap_add_result_entry crashes when starting a new list
by hyc＠symas.com 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

pturgyan(a)umich.edu wrote: > Full_Name: Paul Turgyan > Version: 2.3.35 > OS: linux 2..6.18 from source > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (141.213.231.171) > > > When calling ldap_add_result_entry with an empty list or when starting a new > list, ldap_add_result_entry crashes > with a SEGFAULT at line 67. > > Here is a patch: A different fix is now in HEAD, please test. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#5056) ldap_add_result_entry crashes when starting a new list
by pturgyan＠umich.edu 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

Full_Name: Paul Turgyan Version: 2.3.35 OS: linux 2..6.18 from source URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (141.213.231.171) When calling ldap_add_result_entry with an empty list or when starting a new list, ldap_add_result_entry crashes with a SEGFAULT at line 67. Here is a patch: *** addentry.c Tue Jan 2 16:43:48 2007 --- addentry.c+ Fri Jul 20 13:48:41 2007 *************** *** 64,69 **** --- 64,72 ---- assert( e != NULL ); e->lm_chain = *list; + if (*list) e->lm_chain_tail = (*list)->lm_chain_tail; + else + e->lm_chain_tail = NULL; *list = e; }

1 0

Re: (ITS#5054) AVA in slapd-meta(5) and slapo-rwm(5)
by ghenry＠suretecsystems.com 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

<quote who="hyc(a)symas.com"> > ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: >> Full_Name: Gavin Henry >> Version: HEAD >> OS: >> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ >> Submission from: (NULL) (80.229.93.1) >> Submitted by: ghenry >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> It's not clear or explained what AVA means in slapd-meta(5) and >> slapo-rwm(5) > > Standard terminology in X.500/LDAP. "Attribute Value Assertion" >> >> A user was asking in #ldap >> >> I presume it means "Attribute Value"? >> >> If so, I will add an explaination in each man page. > > OpenLDAP docs are not intended to explain the basics of LDAP. You're > expected > to already know LDAP or refer to the RFCs for basic terminology. Closing ITS. > > -- > -- Howard Chu > Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com > Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ > Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/ > > >

1 0

Re: (ITS#5055) index generation failure with empty suffix
by hyc＠symas.com 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote: > Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount > Version: 2.3.34 > OS: NA > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (71.202.148.128) > > > If a database has a zero-length suffix, the NULL context entry gets an entry ID > of zero, which is usually an invalid ID number and always omitted from indexing. > But it looks like with slapadd -q, it is possible for this entry to get > included in various indices, which will totally confuse them. > > (per Howard) I actually filed this already instead of waiting for you (ITS#5052). A patch is already in HEAD for testing. This ITS will be closed. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5054) AVA in slapd-meta(5) and slapo-rwm(5)
by hyc＠symas.com 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > Full_Name: Gavin Henry > Version: HEAD > OS: > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (80.229.93.1) > Submitted by: ghenry > > > Dear All, > > It's not clear or explained what AVA means in slapd-meta(5) and slapo-rwm(5) Standard terminology in X.500/LDAP. "Attribute Value Assertion" > > A user was asking in #ldap > > I presume it means "Attribute Value"? > > If so, I will add an explaination in each man page. OpenLDAP docs are not intended to explain the basics of LDAP. You're expected to already know LDAP or refer to the RFCs for basic terminology. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#5055) index generation failure with empty suffix
by quanah＠zimbra.com 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount Version: 2.3.34 OS: NA URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (71.202.148.128) If a database has a zero-length suffix, the NULL context entry gets an entry ID of zero, which is usually an invalid ID number and always omitted from indexing. But it looks like with slapadd -q, it is possible for this entry to get included in various indices, which will totally confuse them. (per Howard) --Quanah

1 0

Re: (ITS#5054) AVA in slapd-meta(5) and slapo-rwm(5)
by ghenry＠suretecsystems.com 20 Jul '07

20 Jul '07

<quote who="Ralf Haferkamp"> > On Friday 20 July 2007 16:45, ghenry(a)openldap.org wrote: >> Full_Name: Gavin Henry >> Version: HEAD >> OS: >> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ >> Submission from: (NULL) (80.229.93.1) >> Submitted by: ghenry >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> It's not clear or explained what AVA means in slapd-meta(5) and >> slapo-rwm(5) >> >> A user was asking in #ldap >> >> I presume it means "Attribute Value"? > It means "Attribute Value Assertion", normally. Doh, helped if I read the RFCs. Oh but look who has a nice page in it: https://www.opends.org/wiki//page/DefinitionAttributeValueAssertion Maybe we need a nice OpenLDAP Wiki? (one for -devel list I think) > >> If so, I will add an explaination in each man page. > > -- > Ralf >

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs