openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
21001 discussions

Re: (ITS#5655) add option for setting minimum TLS/SSL protocol
by guenther＠sendmail.com 20 Aug '08

20 Aug '08

I have an updated patch, but can't post it: ftp.openldap.org's incoming is full: ftp> cd incoming 250 CWD command successful. ftp> put guenther-080820.patch local: guenther-080820.patch remote: guenther-080820.patch 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for 'guenther-080820.patch'. 100% |**************************************************| 9215 00:00 452 Error writing file: No space left on device. 9215 bytes sent in 0.13 seconds (66.79 KB/s) ftp> (Once we get a patch that looks good, I'll follow it with a patch for the docs.)

1 0

Re: (ITS#5655) add option for setting minimum TLS/SSL protocol
by hyc＠symas.com 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

Philip Guenther wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Howard Chu wrote: >> guenther(a)sendmail.com wrote: > ... >>> TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN<major>,<minor> >> Let's use US convention<major>.<minor>... > > Ok. > >>> C: >>> struct ldap_tls_protocol { unsigned char major, minor; } val; >>> val.major = 3; val.minor=0; >>> ldap_set_option(ld, LDAP_OPT_TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN,&val); >> I would just use an int, and have the caller OR in the appropriate >> values. > > So: > /* force TLS 1.0 or later */ > ldap_set_option(ld, LDAP_OPT_TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN, (3<< 8) + 1); The set_option interface requires a pointer. So min = (3<<8)+1; ldap_set_option(ld, LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN, &min); > > >> You could also define a few macros for the currently known versions. > > Preferences on the format of those macros? > > #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_SSLv2 (2<< 8) > #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_SSLv3 (3<< 8) > #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_TLSv1_0 ((3<< 8) + 1) > #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_TLSv1_1 ((3<< 8) + 2) > #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2 ((3<< 8) + 3) > > ? > Drop the 'v' and I think it'll be fine -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5655) add option for setting minimum TLS/SSL protocol
by guenther＠sendmail.com 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Howard Chu wrote: > guenther(a)sendmail.com wrote: ... > > TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN<major>,<minor> > > Let's use US convention <major>.<minor>... Ok. > > C: > > struct ldap_tls_protocol { unsigned char major, minor; } val; > > val.major = 3; val.minor=0; > > ldap_set_option(ld, LDAP_OPT_TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN,&val); > > I would just use an int, and have the caller OR in the appropriate > values. So: /* force TLS 1.0 or later */ ldap_set_option(ld, LDAP_OPT_TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN, (3 << 8) + 1); > You could also define a few macros for the currently known versions. Preferences on the format of those macros? #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_SSLv2 (2 << 8) #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_SSLv3 (3 << 8) #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_TLSv1_0 ((3 << 8) + 1) #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_TLSv1_1 ((3 << 8) + 2) #define LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2 ((3 << 8) + 3) ? > What are the values for TLS1.1, 1.2, etc? So far, TLS 1.x == SSL version 3.(x+1). Philip Guenther

1 0

Re: (ITS#5655) add option for setting minimum TLS/SSL protocol
by hyc＠symas.com 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

guenther(a)sendmail.com wrote: > On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Philip Guenther wrote: > ... >> That said, it's more important to me that *some* option gets in so that I >> (and Sendmail) don't have to maintain forever a patch to add it. If >> someone 'official' will make a decision and simply state what the option >> should look like in its three forms (C API, ldap.conf, slapd config), I'll >> munge the patch to match. > > Any opinions? > > ldap.conf: > TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN<major>,<minor> Let's use US convention <major>.<minor>... > C: > struct ldap_tls_protocol { unsigned char major, minor; } val; > val.major = 3; val.minor=0; > ldap_set_option(ld, LDAP_OPT_TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN,&val); I would just use an int, and have the caller OR in the appropriate values. You could also define a few macros for the currently known versions. What are the values for TLS1.1, 1.2, etc? > > ? > > > (I'm running out of time to get _something_ into Sendmail's local copy, at > which point I'll just commit something there and have to leave you guys to > hack whatever you get around into the official repository.) > > > Philip Guenther > > > -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5655) add option for setting minimum TLS/SSL protocol
by guenther＠sendmail.com 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Philip Guenther wrote: ... > That said, it's more important to me that *some* option gets in so that I > (and Sendmail) don't have to maintain forever a patch to add it. If > someone 'official' will make a decision and simply state what the option > should look like in its three forms (C API, ldap.conf, slapd config), I'll > munge the patch to match. Any opinions? ldap.conf: TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN <major>,<minor> C: struct ldap_tls_protocol { unsigned char major, minor; } val; val.major = 3; val.minor=0; ldap_set_option(ld, LDAP_OPT_TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN, &val); ? (I'm running out of time to get _something_ into Sendmail's local copy, at which point I'll just commit something there and have to leave you guys to hack whatever you get around into the official repository.) Philip Guenther

1 0

Re: (ITS#5661) contextCSN gets corrupted on the stand by mirror
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

----- "ali pouya" <ali.pouya(a)free.fr> wrote: > Hi Gavin; > > Below you find the answers to your questions : > > > Can we get your bdb version, your config and the logs of an empty > mirrormode > > node B pulling in the data loaded in mirrormode A (posted/hosted > online > > somewhere). > > The BDB version is 4.6.21. > You find here attached the file conf.tar.gz containing the > configuration of B. Thanks. > The file syncrepl.conf.simple works well, but the file > syncrepl.conf.double > garbles the contextCSN (I write more than 1000 entries per minute). > Do you want a log for the 10 million entries ? Which loglevel ? Nope, not yet. loglevel sync > The problem only happens if there are write operations on A, not if > the server A > is stationary. Also note that serverID is a *global* directive not per database. Move that out of "database bdb". > > Also, has this always happened on the same machine? What are the > specs of the > > servers? > > The problem happens on the stand by server : If I write on B the > contextCSN of > A gets corrupted (I have already tested this). > > My servers are quadri-processor Xeon 2.2 GHz. > I think this is not related to the hardware but the "year" part of > contextCSN is > not well protected against concurrent operations (?). > > > > > Is this a fresh install? > Yes for 2.4.11, but I use OpenLdap since 5 years for my different > projects. OK, well you should then know that "rootdn cn=admin,ou=ressources-dgi,ou=mefi,o=gouv,c=fr" by passes all ACLs, so you don't need: access to * by dn.base="cn=admin,ou=ressources-dgi,ou=mefi,o=gouv,c=fr" write -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/

1 0

Fwd: (ITS#5661) contextCSN gets corrupted on the stand by mirror
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

------=_Part_5_5686568.1219150476998 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit For Ticket records. Please keep to openldap-its ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "ali pouya" <ali.pouya(a)free.fr> To: ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org Sent: Tuesday, 19 August, 2008 1:48:53 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: (ITS#5661) contextCSN gets corrupted on the stand by mirror Hi Gavin; Below you find the answers to your questions : > Can we get your bdb version, your config and the logs of an empty mirrormode > node B pulling in the data loaded in mirrormode A (posted/hosted online > somewhere). The BDB version is 4.6.21. You find here attached the file conf.tar.gz containing the configuration of B. The file syncrepl.conf.simple works well, but the file syncrepl.conf.double garbles the contextCSN (I write more than 1000 entries per minute). Do you want a log for the 10 million entries ? Which loglevel ? The problem only happens if there are write operations on A, not if the server A is stationary. > > Also, has this always happened on the same machine? What are the specs of the > servers? The problem happens on the stand by server : If I write on B the contextCSN of A gets corrupted (I have already tested this). My servers are quadri-processor Xeon 2.2 GHz. I think this is not related to the hardware but the "year" part of contextCSN is not well protected against concurrent operations (?). > > Is this a fresh install? Yes for 2.4.11, but I use OpenLdap since 5 years for my different projects. Best Regards Ali > -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. OpenLDAP Engineering Team. E ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org Community developed LDAP software. http://www.openldap.org/project/ ------=_Part_5_5686568.1219150476998 Content-Type: application/x-gzip; name=conf.tar.gz Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=conf.tar.gz H4sIAJrAqkgAA+2Z3VMbNxDAeT39FRp4SELJfWI7YeYeaNym6aTUKSXN9E0+ybbSO+miD4Lb6f/e vTsbjI1rHLAZEv2YwWd97Z6kXa3WfrCzcUKg02rVn8D8Z/0cRWErbh1CwwTKO52wvYNbm1dtZ8dq QxTGO0pK83/tVtU/UvxAj0WmWJn7mRQDX/OizNn9yqgWuH14uHT9D8PW9fWPkk6Y7ODwftW4mW98 /ffQdP2x4jQNwxjhUslzTplKc0rKoyCIQj9qtf3EjzrJUfLiJcJmXLJUsYFienQsaI8pzbVBWDGj xuluFOPvdhHWjKhs1CeapbtZOlBQNOC5gYF3n8r+R5aZVznROt1/VjXOJIypbb96HLGCwL/sLy6G qRwMEO5zQQtmRpKmzRZtiqiAoUVavcOBtKCS1tKqjOnndMirkoIN4DMdSnt+MNEB3pYyYTjJdd0R oYdehAcE7D8nJa2Nf1MyVth/EiVT+0/gmIjB/qN2J3b2vw327gbawwv0lPzIjMZECEu4YpgynBPc ff1moSn0v7P8H3k24kxVUqpNzIdWEcOlqMU+uVTi15KJt93jHi7BQczIn21DmcYlUYZnNoch9eK7 bUD/95XzBHWPcOh3VkpckI+7xFSaKwEaM1xIygc8a2YAw6DRyyBsB3EYvljS/9gaZtWSEY7wcc5x T9ox2cz7c5HlljLPC6xWQS4zkgfMZAEcBqI6foLmMAgyqZjfPK/RR3Oxdi/oYqQalrAsUqzbuSxl zrPxut3gsMpkUdj15V3t1mlXtJfLYc7OWe49jxAqOYVD9/pI50QFyoqJ64cWiKihrpstbVW1QKv1 Ihkcvro+ThCixJDq+MdeIQWHWb0q8vq0jzRT50y96Xox0nYw4BeeNwkUKm9LhefB2U5owcXtDve6 W/nZw94/p6c/Hf8bvbMn3T+S8tO7bu9lYn7Jxh9k+1X+5/c/x+97rQ+vEQWrz0CvsRdA0EMtNzoA xYJKy9XvCvEHu5i8ah2tlJIL40XNsYbbIdq7oTgKbzGNOS9Al8nYqzfDbAiPCq6UVGDGMO9SICRh jnMyxlWrKrRD04fnV9rhWr1Kt8tKDdMNLgA2U1N5VSNkCWsBIZT3+29nP1yVK5ZLQkd8WvEtx1WP hfn7H5W2v+X7XwR/c/Ff0m63XPy3DRbuf9F93P/Cx3X/W+sK3HJXYMdXw5z/34iM2+f/Kv8fgf+P D2N3/98KLv/3bTs/f/aqsSEZK+2/fThv/2Encva/DZrVx5gKn12QzKxrTtjwgqVW1OMwijX/e+Yr QpPxvWvjw14TYP3Mqk1KATd2Ma6GI2WZTxJauvo+m+L7EnEPvWb3iT+TxdiUjFX3v6QdLeb/3f1v K9w9f73AlvP/V7yFGKRJ4td7GlvDc67hKyVC45zhjNBGndn893We4vzJ8dLfA55tQP/Z/H/7xiz/ ch5//h/VS+XNhIMHEJup8avTk+bh7OxN1/M89gntNU2pINkpUxC+ndiiz5TX1DaVllPPu1aSiWnB QRVcflXO+x7wZzP2G5Kxyv/HnXjO/8dhEjr/vw1Qs/zYSEyMUTq1mqkemOFnqSiqbLw/Bk8uxbiQ Fny6NaNpKQRbk7vdehGjYoTeNMZlvLayCxhyuvtFgd0y2etHpJ8VxILTofYxzBBDM5O5f5OUNX7K mhNwj7o+9mWbzvVDW47D4XA4HA6Hw+FwOBwOh8PhcDgcDofD4XA4HA6Hw+FwOBwPx39608HTAFAA AA== ------=_Part_5_5686568.1219150476998--

1 0

Trans.: Re: (ITS#5661) contextCSN gets corrupted on the stand by mirror
by ali.pouya＠free.fr 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

----- Message transféré de ali.pouya(a)free.fr ----- Date : Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:48:53 +0200 De : ali.pouya(a)free.fr Adresse de retour :ali.pouya@free.fr Sujet : Re: (ITS#5661) contextCSN gets corrupted on the stand by mirror À : ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org Hi Gavin; Below you find the answers to your questions : > Can we get your bdb version, your config and the logs of an empty mirrormode > node B pulling in the data loaded in mirrormode A (posted/hosted online > somewhere). The BDB version is 4.6.21. You find here attached the file conf.tar.gz containing the configuration of B. The file syncrepl.conf.simple works well, but the file syncrepl.conf.double garbles the contextCSN (I write more than 1000 entries per minute). Do you want a log for the 10 million entries ? Which loglevel ? The problem only happens if there are write operations on A, not if the server A is stationary. > > Also, has this always happened on the same machine? What are the specs of the > servers? The problem happens on the stand by server : If I write on B the contextCSN of A gets corrupted (I have already tested this). My servers are quadri-processor Xeon 2.2 GHz. I think this is not related to the hardware but the "year" part of contextCSN is not well protected against concurrent operations (?). > > Is this a fresh install? Yes for 2.4.11, but I use OpenLdap since 5 years for my different projects. Best Regards Ali > ----- Fin du message transféré -----

1 0

Re: (ITS#5661) contextCSN gets corrupted on the stand by mirror
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

> I think there is a documentation issue for OpenLdap 2.4.11 : > The chapter 17.4.4 of the Admin Guide recommends configuring TWO > sycrepl > directives for each mirror side. If I do so, the contextCSN of the > stand by > mirror gets corrupted very easily. But if I confugure the mirrors > with only ONE > syncrepl directive it's OK. The documentation is correct. > The test environment : > I have a test directory with two mirrors A (sid=1) and B (sid=2) > configured as > recommended in the Admin's Guide, and a replica C connected to A. > The directory contains 10 million objects, and I use the server A for > writing > 500 000 new ones. > > Very often and without any apparent reason the contextCSN in the > memory of B > gets suddenly corrupted while those of A and C are OK. > In this situation the contextCSN of B gets stuck but B continues to > receive data > from A. > > The value of contextCSN in base 64 is : > > contextCSN: 20080727021429.070493Z#000000#000#000000 > contextCSN:: +HYDCTA4MDIwMzM3MTguMzAwMTExWiMwMDAwMDAjMDAxIzAwMDAwMA== perl -MMIME::Base64 -e 'print decode_base64("+HYDCTA4MDIwMzM3MTguMzAwMTExWiMwMDAwMDAjMDAxIzAwMDAwMA=="), "\n";' does look very funny :-( Can we get your bdb version, your config and the logs of an empty mirrormode node B pulling in the data loaded in mirrormode A (posted/hosted online somewhere). Also, has this always happened on the same machine? What are the specs of the servers? Is this a fresh install? -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/

1 0

(ITS#5661) contextCSN gets corrupted on the stand by mirror
by ali.pouya＠free.fr 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

Full_Name: Ali Pouya Version: 2.4.11 OS: Linux 2.6 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (145.242.11.4) I think there is a documentation issue for OpenLdap 2.4.11 : The chapter 17.4.4 of the Admin Guide recommends configuring TWO sycrepl directives for each mirror side. If I do so, the contextCSN of the stand by mirror gets corrupted very easily. But if I confugure the mirrors with only ONE syncrepl directive it's OK. The test environment : I have a test directory with two mirrors A (sid=1) and B (sid=2) configured as recommended in the Admin's Guide, and a replica C connected to A. The directory contains 10 million objects, and I use the server A for writing 500 000 new ones. Very often and without any apparent reason the contextCSN in the memory of B gets suddenly corrupted while those of A and C are OK. In this situation the contextCSN of B gets stuck but B continues to receive data from A. The value of contextCSN in base 64 is : contextCSN: 20080727021429.070493Z#000000#000#000000 contextCSN:: +HYDCTA4MDIwMzM3MTguMzAwMTExWiMwMDAwMDAjMDAxIzAwMDAwMA== I note that only the part indicating the year (2008) is garbled. May be this part is handled differently ? At service shutdown B writes the corrupt contextCSN to the disk. At service startup B reads the corrupt contextCSN from the disk and begins to scan ALL of the data base. Also it sends a sync request to A (a persitent search containing the corrupt contextCSN in the control field) causing A to scan the WHOLE data base. The replica C remains safe. If I reverse the roles of A and B the corruption occurs on A (always on the stand by mirror). I have already encountered the contextCSN corruption problem in OpenLdap 2.3 and this was one of my reasons to migrate to 2.4.11. Thanks for your HELP Best Regards Ali Pouya

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs