https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5344
--- Comment #13 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to OndÅ™ej KuznÃk from comment #12)
> Do we document API changes for people maintaining external modules?
slap.h is the documentation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5344
--- Comment #12 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Do we document API changes for people maintaining external modules?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5344
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #11 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/373
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #34 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
Indexer fix in https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/372
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958
--- Comment #33 from Hallvard Furuseth <h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no> ---
On 04.08.2021 13:26, openldap-its(a)openldap.org wrote:
> https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958
>
> --- Comment #32 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---.
> (...)
> If you still believe there's a potential problem with more than
> one pause request a time, your patch might still be useful but
> it will need to be adapted for the multiple queues in 2.5. Nothing
> is going to be changed for 2.4.
Right. The patch is demo code for 2.4 because that was simplest. I
wasn't going to do more work for a feature which might get rejected.
Ondřej, I'm guessing the use of a "scratch" database belongs in
a separate issue and will get lost if left lingering in this one,
since it's a much bigger issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6949
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |TEST
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 9f4de680
by Howard Chu at 2021-08-05T15:45:19+00:00
ITS#6949 add support for logfile rotation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6785
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|ondra(a)mistotebe.net |bugs(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone|2.6.0 |---
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Not fully fixed, needs additional work
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7239
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|ondra(a)mistotebe.net |hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone|2.6.0 |2.7.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9122
--- Comment #2 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
I thought we might let the backend know if it's in dryrun mode, but a large
part of slapadd is gated on !dryrun and that would need sweeping changes.
One of those options would be to change bi_tool_entry_open() signature and pass
dryrun in, letting the backend decide whether this should be preserved. bconfig
could then set cfb->cb_use_ldif = 0 and thus any changes would be transient
while still loading all modules etc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.