openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20963 discussions

Re: (ITS#7605) Configuration entries (under cn=config) does not allow 'objectclass' attribute modification to include full object classes hierarchy
by pa＠marcelot.net 24 May '13

24 May '13

On 23 mai 2013, at 19:41, Michael Ströder <michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote: > pa(a)marcelot.net wrote: >> On 23 mai 2013, at 16:31, Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote: >>> Don't do that. >> >> Sure, that's why I have a *bad* workaround to not update the 'objectClass' >> attribute even if the original and my generated one don't match. > > IMO this is not a *bad* workaround. I think it's good practice in a UI client > to *not* automagically modify attribute 'objectClass' without explicit user > interaction asking for modification. In the case of our UI, we don't even present the entries or attributes as is to the user but in an "abstracted" way. They may not even know it's read/stored internally from/as attributes or entries. So, yeah, so it's not so *bad*. It's more of an implementation tuning I wish would have not been required, because the modification seemed harmless and legit (according to LDAP standards). > Ciao, Michael. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud

1 0

Re: (ITS#7605) Configuration entries (under cn=config) does not allow 'objectclass' attribute modification to include full object classes hierarchy
by pa＠marcelot.net 24 May '13

24 May '13

On 23 mai 2013, at 19:26, Michael Ströder <michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote: > pa(a)marcelot.net wrote: >> It looks like it's not possible to modify the 'objectClass' attribute of >> configuration entries. >> >> I have some code generating entries for OpenLDAP configuration from a UI utility >> and updating existing configuration entries in DIT. >> This code generates entries with the 'objectClass' attribute containing the full >> object class hierarchy (all the way to 'top') and not only the highest >> structural object class (which is the case of default OpenLDAP configuration). >> >> When updating the configuration in the DIT, the code then tries to complete the >> 'objectClass' attribute with the full list of object classes. >> That operations ends with "error code 53- UnwillingToPerform". >> >> >> Here's an example on the "cn=config" entry: >> #!RESULT ERROR >> #!CONNECTION ldap://10.211.55.13:389 >> #!DATE 2013-05-22T14:56:03.039 >> #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 53 - UnwillingToPerform] >> dn: cn=config >> changetype: modify >> replace: objectClass >> objectClass: olcConfig >> objectClass: olcGlobal >> objectClass: top > > It's not necessarily a bug. > > I think LDAP clients should not act too "smart" and therefore should not > automagically add object classes from the structural object class chain if > they are not already present. You will run into issues with various LDAP > server implementations - at least according to experiences I made with > conducting interop testing with web2ldap and several server implementations. Right, it's just that this kind of modifications is perfectly valid. I mean, I'm not breaking any LDAP rule or concept and if I add the same entry (as a new entry) with the full object class hierarchy, the server is allowing it without a hitch. I still think it should be possible to modify the objectclass but I'll take into account that the implementation does not allow it (yet? ;-)). > A schema-aware client could auto-complete structural object class chain if > adding a new entry though. But again: Don't be too smart. Exactly, that's why I updated my code to do. Let's be dumb, sometimes... > May I ask which UI utility you're using? Sure, that's an internal application we wrote to edit some parts of the OpenLDAP configuration. > Ciao, Michael. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud

1 0

Re: (ITS#7448) "assertion failed" in MDB
by dhawes＠vt.edu 23 May '13

23 May '13

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com> wrote: > This is ITS#7536. There were more fixes for it in RE24 after 2.4.35 was > released. I just wanted to verify that RE24 does indeed fix this issue.

1 0

reference through null pointer and memory leak (related to ITS#7588)
by jdhgit＠yahoo.com 23 May '13

23 May '13

Full_Name: John Hardin Version: master OS: Centos 6.4 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (50.23.115.111) The commit for ITS#7588 causes a crash if next_node is NULL: /* Set the first entry to send for the next page */ so->so_tree = next_node; + next_node->avl_left = NULL; next_node will be NULL if all entries have been sent, or if slapd_shutdown is true. Another issue related to ITS#7588 is a memory leak when a sorted search with paged results is aborted. This may be because so->so_tree is not the root of the tree when free_sort_op() calls tavl_free().

1 0

Re: (ITS#7583) ldap_init_fd() does not work with LDAP_PROTO_UDP
by hyc＠symas.com 23 May '13

23 May '13

stefw(a)redhat.com wrote: > Full_Name: Stef Walter > Version: 2.4.35 > OS: Fedora 18 > URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~stefw/patches/openldap-02/0001-Make-ldap_init_fd-w… > Submission from: (NULL) (77.3.95.123) > > > The ldap_init_fd() function does not work with UDP sockets (ie: LDAP_PROTO_UDP > passed in as the proto argument). Later uses of the LDAP connection returned > fail unceremoniously. > > This patch fixes the issue: Thanks, patch applied to git master. > > http://fedorapeople.org/~stefw/patches/openldap-02/0001-Make-ldap_init_fd-w… > > Some test code to exercise and demonstrate the problem. The code does not > actually wait for a UDP response, but should exit with a zero return code when > successful. > > http://fedorapeople.org/~stefw/patches/openldap-02/frob-cldap-initfd.c > > $ gcc -o frob-cldap-initfd -Wall -lldap -llber frob-cldap-initfd.c > $ ./frob-cldap-initfd > frob-cldap-initfd: ldap_search_ext: -1 > > The above result occurs before the patch is applied. > > -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#7582) Access to uninitialized memory when sending cldap packet
by hyc＠symas.com 23 May '13

23 May '13

stefw(a)redhat.com wrote: > Full_Name: Stef Walter > Version: 2.4.35 > OS: Fedora 18 > URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~stefw/patches/openldap-01/0001-Fix-usage-of-uninit… > Submission from: (NULL) (77.3.95.123) > > > When sending a cldap (UDP) packet, like a search request, uninitialized memory > is accessed. This shows up in valgrind like this: > > ==31445== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) > ==31445== at 0x36632244E6: ldap_send_server_request (request.c:377) > ==31445== by 0x36632247C2: ldap_send_initial_request (request.c:166) > ==31445== by 0x36632142F8: ldap_pvt_search (search.c:128) > ==31445== by 0x366321454F: ldap_search_ext (search.c:69) > ==31445== by 0x400838: main (in /data/projects/openldap/frob-cldap-search) > ==31445== > > This is due to parsing the resulting packet to pull out a requestDN. UDP packets > have different BER layout, and therefore the assumptions made when parsing the > outgoing request are invalid. > > It does not seem necessary to track the request DN for UDP packets. The linked > patch disables this code path for UDP packets. > > Patch which fixes the issue: > http://fedorapeople.org/~stefw/patches/openldap-01/0001-Fix-usage-of-uninit… > > Test code for the issue: > http://fedorapeople.org/~stefw/patches/openldap-01/frob-cldap-search.c > > Note that the test code doesn't detect the issue on its own (or do anything > useful). Use valgrind to detect the issue: > > $ gcc -o frob-cldap-search -Wall -lldap -llber frob-cldap-search.c > $ valgrind ./frob-cldap-search Your patch doesn't fix the issue. The behavior under valgrind is unchanged either way. Seems you're missing a '!' in your test. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#7594) incomplete MDB subdb cursor cleanup
by hyc＠symas.com 23 May '13

23 May '13

h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no wrote: > Full_Name: Hallvard B Furuseth > Version: mdb.master 0cdd9dffddf66c730a35f48db2bb02d8bb3e5731 > OS: Linux x86_64 > URL: > Submission from: (NULL) (193.69.163.163) > Submitted by: hallvard > > > If a cursor is at a clean subDB page, and its current item is deleted > by another cursor, then MDB_GET_CURRENT returns the deleted item. Fixed now in mdb.master. The subcursor on the clean page will be invalidated when the page is touched. > Test program below, run with no args, the "m2/del" output line. > > If the page was dirty, I instead got (key = old, data = size 0). > I don't know if it should give MDB_NOTFOUND instead. > That's the test program run with one arg. > I did not check what happens if the other cursor rearranged > the pages, e.g. split the item off to another page. > > #include "lmdb.h" > #include <assert.h> > #include <stdio.h> > #include <stdlib.h> > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > { > char *fname = "test.mdb"; > MDB_env *env; > MDB_txn *txn; > MDB_dbi dbi; > MDB_cursor *mc, *m2; > MDB_val key, data; > int rc; > # define STR2VAL(s) (&(MDB_val){sizeof(s), s}) /* includes final \0 */ > # define SHOW(name) printf("%s:\t%s[%zd] -> %s[%zd]\n", name, \ > (char*)key.mv_data, key.mv_size, (char*)data.mv_data, data.mv_size) > # define E(e) { rc = (e); if (rc) { fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d: %s: %s\n",\ > __FILE__, __LINE__, #e, mdb_strerror(rc)); abort(); } } > > remove(fname); > E(mdb_env_create(&env)); > E(mdb_env_open(env, fname, MDB_NOSUBDIR, 0666)); > E(mdb_txn_begin(env, NULL, 0, &txn)); > E(mdb_dbi_open(txn, NULL, MDB_DUPSORT, &dbi)); > > E(mdb_cursor_open(txn, dbi, &mc)); > E(mdb_cursor_put(mc, STR2VAL("a"), STR2VAL("x"), 0)); > E(mdb_cursor_put(mc, STR2VAL("a"), STR2VAL("y"), 0)); > > if (argc < 2) { > E(mdb_txn_commit(txn)); > E(mdb_txn_begin(env, NULL, 0, &txn)); > E(mdb_cursor_open(txn, dbi, &mc)); > puts("With clean page:"); > } > E(mdb_cursor_open(txn, dbi, &m2)); > > E(mdb_cursor_get(mc, &key, &data, MDB_FIRST)); > E(mdb_cursor_get(m2, &key, &data, MDB_FIRST)); > SHOW("Name:\tKey -> Data (mv_data[mv_len]):\n" "m2"); > > E(mdb_cursor_del(mc, 0)); > E(mdb_cursor_get(m2, &key, &data, MDB_GET_CURRENT)); > SHOW("m2/del"); /* Should output the same as... */ > E(mdb_cursor_get(mc, &key, &data, MDB_GET_CURRENT)); > SHOW("mc/del"); /* ...this: "a[2] -> [0]". */ > > mdb_txn_abort(txn); > mdb_env_close(env); > return 0; > } > > -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#7581) adding meta backend in cn=config with ldapadd / ldapmodify
by hyc＠symas.com 23 May '13

23 May '13

hyc(a)symas.com wrote: > dcoutadeur(a)linagora.com wrote: >> Full_Name: dcoutadeur >> Version: 2.4.35 / git >> OS: openSuse 11.3 x86_64 >> URL: >> Submission from: (NULL) (80.67.162.201) >> >> >> I apologize in advance if this is not considered as a bug, but I thought this >> ticket should help the community anyway... >> >> The problem is that it seems impossible to add meta backend in cn=config thanks >> to ldapadd / ldapmodify clients. I thought the major interest for cn=config was >> precisely to let administrators change the configuration in a remote way, but >> maybe new database configuration is an exception ? > > Seems we need some rework here to allow this case. Currently bconfig assumes > that the olcDatabaseConfig entry is sufficient by itself, and any child > entries underneath are just optional. It doesn't handle the case where the > olcDatabaseConfig entry is basically an incomplete config. Should work now in git master, please test. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#7605) Configuration entries (under cn=config) does not allow 'objectclass' attribute modification to include full object classes hierarchy
by michael＠stroeder.com 23 May '13

23 May '13

pa(a)marcelot.net wrote: > On 23 mai 2013, at 16:31, Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote: >> Don't do that. > > Sure, that's why I have a *bad* workaround to not update the 'objectClass' > attribute even if the original and my generated one don't match. IMO this is not a *bad* workaround. I think it's good practice in a UI client to *not* automagically modify attribute 'objectClass' without explicit user interaction asking for modification. Ciao, Michael.

1 0

Re: (ITS#7605) Configuration entries (under cn=config) does not allow 'objectclass' attribute modification to include full object classes hierarchy
by michael＠stroeder.com 23 May '13

23 May '13

This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms090403020009030408070805 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable pa(a)marcelot.net wrote: > It looks like it's not possible to modify the 'objectClass' attribute o= f > configuration entries. >=20 > I have some code generating entries for OpenLDAP configuration from a U= I utility > and updating existing configuration entries in DIT. > This code generates entries with the 'objectClass' attribute containing= the full > object class hierarchy (all the way to 'top') and not only the highest > structural object class (which is the case of default OpenLDAP configur= ation). >=20 > When updating the configuration in the DIT, the code then tries to comp= lete the > 'objectClass' attribute with the full list of object classes. > That operations ends with "error code 53- UnwillingToPerform". >=20 >=20 > Here's an example on the "cn=3Dconfig" entry: > #!RESULT ERROR > #!CONNECTION ldap://10.211.55.13:389 > #!DATE 2013-05-22T14:56:03.039 > #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 53 - UnwillingToPerform] > dn: cn=3Dconfig > changetype: modify > replace: objectClass > objectClass: olcConfig > objectClass: olcGlobal > objectClass: top It's not necessarily a bug. I think LDAP clients should not act too "smart" and therefore should not automagically add object classes from the structural object class chain i= f they are not already present. You will run into issues with various LDAP server implementations - at least according to experiences I made with conducting interop testing with web2ldap and several server implementatio= ns. A schema-aware client could auto-complete structural object class chain i= f adding a new entry though. But again: Don't be too smart. May I ask which UI utility you're using? Ciao, Michael. --------------ms090403020009030408070805 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILHzCC BT8wggQnoAMCAQICDwCmSwABAAIAivjZQ8SBvzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADB8MQswCQYDVQQG EwJERTEcMBoGA1UEChMTVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgR21iSDElMCMGA1UECxMcVEMgVHJ1c3RD ZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBMMSBDQTEoMCYGA1UEAxMfVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBM MSBDQSBJWDAeFw0xMjA2MDYxOTAyMTZaFw0xMzA2MDcxOTAyMTZaMCgxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRkwFwYDVQQDDBBNaWNoYWVsIFN0csO2ZGVyMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIB CgKCAQEAxXZGav40rnGNLxEggBW94MILWHlfC8a23Jew5U1gPlfRTXOjjzmoaZ1uCyGdgF6M VvuO9T1aTQNGH+OdeGe3P7Tfc/NsLJFJ2wtd8blvhmodUgse2eypiWjNOd4gZuhalBhgsQ0K b5D6/1foghII4E264iZlJ7AJ+UYcO+GxvFWT0YMTbLckgDkZk7c3qwTozdhYvXarvqx+8Ou/ kuxpQQhac/ebzxpu0N+RHSf2KIUS0g0tEGnPtGv6iL+9QNHc4JKo9Y9KKVw3tQy+Re+FQLxB 1fPE5F+qxuD3AUENpOwkMsqWLM94ohtx3CFqLpxfUPrnKFLAHOhHEbByYGvFPwIDAQABo4IC EDCCAgwwgaUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGYMIGVMFEGCCsGAQUFBzAChkVodHRwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0 Y2VudGVyLmRlL2NlcnRzZXJ2aWNlcy9jYWNlcnRzL3RjX2NsYXNzMV9MMV9DQV9JWC5jcnQw QAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGNGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLml4LnRjY2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1 c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAU6bgoHUbP/M34TpvF7ktg69g7P9EwDAYDVR0TAQH/ BAIwADBKBgNVHSAEQzBBMD8GCSqCFAAsAQEBATAyMDAGCCsGAQUFBwIBFiRodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnRydXN0Y2VudGVyLmRlL2d1aWRlbGluZXMwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgTwMB0GA1UdDgQWBBS2 KAWfTfgJ/JQ63qLGwTXYLnI+LzBiBgNVHR8EWzBZMFegVaBThlFodHRwOi8vY3JsLml4LnRj Y2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY3JsL3YyL3RjX0NsYXNzMV9M MV9DQV9JWC5jcmwwMwYDVR0lBCwwKgYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDBwYK KwYBBAGCNxQCAjAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRtaWNoYWVsQHN0cm9lZGVyLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFAAOCAQEAQ3bvVUpEq+cQrLpcogyt5BJNk/WvUvOHqhzyj28M9pg9hcDl1+MYl5qqj6tR GSTLPQZyf287pcmbMwbcTGZO/gbW9v7RYcut6RauWdwKMCUmKC3J4fVfDq9ZETA2WOV68ef4 B3Gzdhghsbp3Rhp5dDmrCVKAHlafm6ZwJrEQ9P76fxnQZzRLgeKpZep5ePH5YHUB3+YaOQvJ FG0bOXvfHhRiRG7/HW2G+yDgjHSxDz8AFzMWL/RFePqZ4pn6T/SM/qU6WEpW39MWyJNoH/Kx QDYK8gGYuesn1ciMCTnjrvZQj0fonGTO4SfWekJRkuGrJ7dYSZRjYbDcWBBkdFLWzzCCBdgw ggTAoAMCAQICDgboAAEAAkqWLSQM/sXJMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHkxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSQwIgYDVQQLExtUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBVbml2ZXJzYWwgQ0ExJjAkBgNVBAMTHVRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIFVuaXZlcnNhbCBDQSBJ MB4XDTA5MTEwMzE0MDgxOVoXDTI1MTIzMTIxNTk1OVowfDELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxHDAaBgNV BAoTE1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIEdtYkgxJTAjBgNVBAsTHFRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNz IDEgTDEgQ0ExKDAmBgNVBAMTH1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNzIDEgTDEgQ0EgSVgwggEi MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC75pBuz2Lp6QuqthDVR+V8XSsncZpozVVt 5KLv5P7yemMRwleKyH3PjmYfZUVL64Biab1GjovFblqVGCrep/EfdRonq20yU+P7TVhiLP8Z 5cegDZotIYhZhM0d8cPIij6w5d4IJM/8QCy6QSOUu4ASiTVItoYE4AFPjLqpmPwcie0fiqHH hpgmHnJla/7PZdkMZEsaCfVDEWBmJuMzVprJPT40anjG5VBLyM2I5DlsUCaeQCy2O3w3sqf1 3dyzUcv03IICuNc63towXA31Qt0TaVNU6YAmQjMepdfMbspmCZ+G8D2+xophEPPR/1vkstst smUMqX0XrLonTUJczglPAgMBAAGjggJZMIICVTCBmgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgY0wgYowUgYIKwYB BQUHMAKGRmh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY2VydHNlcnZpY2VzL2NhY2VydHMv dGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcnQwNAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGKGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnRjdW5p dmVyc2FsLUkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUkqR1LKSevoFE63n8isWVpesQ dXMwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBSBgNVHSAESzBJMAYGBFUdIAAwPwYJKoIUACwBAQEB MDIwMAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvZ3VpZGVsaW5lczAO BgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOm4KB1Gz/zN+E6bxe5LYOvYOz/RMIH9BgNVHR8E gfUwgfIwge+ggeyggemGRmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGN1bml2ZXJzYWwtSS50cnVzdGNlbnRlci5k ZS9jcmwvdjIvdGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcmyGgZ5sZGFwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0Y2Vu dGVyLmRlL0NOPVRDJTIwVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIlMjBVbml2ZXJzYWwlMjBDQSUyMEksTz1UQyUy MFRydXN0Q2VudGVyJTIwR21iSCxPVT1yb290Y2VydHMsREM9dHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIsREM9ZGU/ Y2VydGlmaWNhdGVSZXZvY2F0aW9uTGlzdD9iYXNlPzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAOcjE m+6+mO5Icm+N53G2DpCM07LBFSGoRpBoX0oE8TrJaIQh2KXmBHVdn9LU8kt3QzLclctgvwJV 0KwcsMUUl5tlCsMPpR3s2Ek5lbWpvvr0HqtW56blAQiINV9nBd1EJFASIkRjefGbV2nOq9Yz UU+N8HA7jq1ROhd/NZZraGhjthwKyfjfHV7PKxGlY+3M0MbTIG+q/GhIfm0euDpFqhKG88e9 ALXr/uoSn3MzeOcoOWjTpW3adtFO4VWVgKbgG7jNrFbvRVlHmFLbOm4msjE5aXWxLiTwpJ2X iF4zKca1vAdAOgw9us90jEtOeiH6GzjNxEMvb7TfeO6Zkuc6HDGCA84wggPKAgEBMIGPMHwx CzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQLExxU QyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBD bGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAhMwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTMwNTIzMTcyNjAwWjAjBgkq hkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUigp5LllXS15xuHzQioG6nuOqOi0wbAYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMV8wXTALBglg hkgBZQMEASowCwYJYIZIAWUDBAECMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggq hkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDCBoAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMYGSMIGP MHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQL ExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wgaIGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYGS oIGPMHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYD VQQLExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENl bnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAKbzYGPYLZcAWjv0/WTjtlgavVd5dN7dbpT+jLvQpMT32iabw4pq+S4R1giJFoTpmy9PT bhM6G4EI2k0G62FScEMTYSrARYtm4S6MafnNOqntIYFqEY0VrSzK7Zc0Xpcw49SIoNrSQ8zT PlqtPVzvSMOLHFwYJSzdmvYgw2SYUGsibYaeG0VqlWzL693QVSDIb2Mn9jaCBvd7LHFwuOlN stfl7ITPkm6eJ79LcA9l6NVx/bWnDx/sgSDFciFz3NvA5NCyzLmJq1ObFukvI3qPYUS2xtLY glQ4lTiM7EbfGrXwKDO72J6FueGj6PLQ831+hh6gZr9PMKBvazoPhUvSEQAAAAAAAA== --------------ms090403020009030408070805--

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs