openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20894 discussions

[Issue 9643] New: back-wt: entry_decode failure.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Oct '21

25 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9643 Issue ID: 9643 Summary: back-wt: entry_decode failure. Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp Target Milestone: --- https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9463 ondra mentioned: > e.g. ./run -b wt -l 50 test034 I reproduced the issue by iterating test034. And I figure out the issue is in entry_encode/decode. It happens stochastically by reading memory outside the malloc area when decoding special entry (only dn entry without attributes). Since entry_encode/decode was originally used by back-bdb and back-hdb, these backends also had this problem. Currently It seems that only back-wt is using entry_encode/decode. I'll fork entry_encode/decode and create wt_entry_encode/decode. Then, we can remove entry_encode/decode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 9636] New: delete back-shell
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Oct '21

25 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9636 Issue ID: 9636 Summary: delete back-shell Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The back-shell backend was removed starting with OpenLDAP 2.5. It should also be removed from the head development branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9635] New: Delete back-ndb
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Oct '21

25 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9635 Issue ID: 9635 Summary: Delete back-ndb Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The back-ndb backend is deprecated and given Oracle's unwillingness to further defvelopment it is a dead project. Time to remove it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 7080] post read control in back-config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Oct '21

25 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7080 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6949] OpenLDAP Logging
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Oct '21

25 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6949 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9720] New: accesslog mincsn needs initialization
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Oct '21

25 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9720 Issue ID: 9720 Summary: accesslog mincsn needs initialization Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.8 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- As reported on the -technical list, if using slapcat/slapadd to migrate an accesslog db from 2.4 to 2.5, the mincsn attribute will not be initialized causing a segfault on startup. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

[Issue 9670] New: Roadmap has bogus items for 2.6/2.7
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Oct '21

25 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9670 Issue ID: 9670 Summary: Roadmap has bogus items for 2.6/2.7 Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All URL: https://openldap.org/software/roadmap.html OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- - lloadd has supported "all" LDAP operation types since being merged in 2.5 - both ppolicy enhancements are bogus too - logging landed in 2.6 already -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9724] New: FreeBSD: fetch(3) should not require com_err library
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Oct '21

25 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724 Issue ID: 9724 Summary: FreeBSD: fetch(3) should not require com_err library Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: delphij(a)freebsd.org Target Milestone: --- This is reported at https://bugs.freebsd.org/259345 . fetch(3) support was added in 48d5465ab76af3739294584e25985b0cf368ad05 and com_err library was added as a dependency, at the time it was a dependency. However, shortly after that in 2000 (https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=ba101983d5c240f191e3f233907ebb4a6c7…), the dependency was removed, and beginning from FreeBSD 5.0 (released on January 14, 2003), the dependency was gone and do not exist in modern FreeBSD versions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 8874] --with-fetch incorrectly links libcom_err
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Oct '21

24 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8874 Xin Li <delphij(a)freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |delphij(a)freebsd.org --- Comment #6 from Xin Li <delphij(a)freebsd.org> --- *** Issue 9724 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9722] New: UX defect in screen to specify new password
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Oct '21

22 Oct '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9722 Issue ID: 9722 Summary: UX defect in screen to specify new password Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: christos.hayward(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- On a Debian 10 Linode, I ran: "aptitude install slapd ldap-utils". The screen prompting for a password was written in a way that led me to believe I was being asked for a password previously set as an LDAP password. This reflects a UX defect. I suggest a wording that shows clearly that one is being asked to assign a new password to LDAP, not enter a pre-existing password already assigned to LDAP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs