https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8528
--- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #3)
> Not saying it's a bad idea, but the interactions with a delete mod might be
> a little confusing:
Well, that's why I limited the scope of this bug purely to replace ops where
the entire structure is getting replaced. For add/delete, it must not re-order
anything.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9182
--- Comment #9 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
commit 2d87a1c7b5417223de888d9dec1cd93f1aefdf06
Author: Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org>
Date: Wed Mar 11 19:17:10 2020 +0000
ITS#9182 pcache: fix private DB init
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8639
--- Comment #11 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
commit d34d2c39457ac1d8b1896c17611e247f87abba55
Author: Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)nardis.ca>
Date: Fri Feb 28 13:18:48 2020 -0800
ITS#8639 Delete LM hash support from smbk5pwd
commit 0de74408f2f33e252a71aa9dd39b71fb8b888dd1
Author: Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)nardis.ca>
Date: Fri Feb 28 12:13:50 2020 -0800
ITS#8639 Regenerate configure and portable.hin
commit 6f5cc45f93c8c4f15b258c63db3d5da8995a4904
Author: Andrew Lawrence <andrew.lawrence(a)siemens.com>
Date: Fri Feb 9 23:32:28 2018 +0000
ITS#8639 remove LANMAN hashed passwords
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6035
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Keywords|has_patch, IPR_OK, |
|OL_2_5_REQ, |
|openldap-scratch |
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
--- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 822ed8c1
by Ryan Tandy at 2020-04-02T09:10:51-07:00
ITS#6035 saslauthz cleanups (no functional change)
- give authid-rewrite's argument a name
- tidy saslauthz.c whitespace (mixed spaces/tabs)
- always declare slap_sasl_regexp_destroy: fixes an implicit declaration
warning when configured without librewrite
- delete dead code: ENABLE_REWRITE implies SLAP_AUTH_REWRITE, so this
code is never compiled
- make slap_sasl_regexp_rewrite_config static
- omit sasl_regexp unused fields when built with librewrite
• c4db9061
by Ryan Tandy at 2020-04-02T09:10:51-07:00
ITS#6035 olcAuthzRegexp insert/delete support
• 1d562a7a
by Ryan Tandy at 2020-04-02T09:10:51-07:00
ITS#6035 olcAuthIDRewrite insert/delete support
• 2b01b8dd
by Ryan Tandy at 2020-04-02T09:10:51-07:00
ITS#6035 Create test script
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9086
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 7732cb27
by Ryan Tandy at 2020-04-02T15:52:31+00:00
ITS#9086 Add debug logging for more GnuTLS errors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9046
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8935
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8935
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9156 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9156
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |quanah(a)openldap.org
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
*** Bug 8935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7738
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6084
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8628
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |TEST
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
--- Comment #18 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 52fad51d
by Peter Marschall at 2020-04-01T22:29:10+00:00
ITS#8628 - contrib/passwd/pbkdf2: new Makefile variables SSL_LIB & SSL_INC
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6084
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|TEST |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
ppolicy draft 10 has a way to set a password validity and is implemented now.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9156 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9156
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |guillomovitch(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
*** Bug 6084 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7738
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 8866 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8866
--- Comment #14 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
*** Bug 7738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9046
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Hi,
if you want to enforce any kind of policy on passwords, the constraint overlay
is not the one you want to use: passwords might be hashed along the way (as
seen in response to PASSMOD extended operation).
Have a look at ppolicy and its password checking modules for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8935
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=9156
--- Comment #6 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
In master, ppolicy now carries the schema internally.
We still need to document the upgrade procedure for 2.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9156
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=8935
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9098
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |2.4.50
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9098
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|VERIFIED |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1 |0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8628
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |quanah(a)openldap.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #17 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9057
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8837
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8456
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8511
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |quanah(a)openldap.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8511
--- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #5)
> Can't see the patch anywhere, could you create a merge request for this?
Yeah, I need to rebase it. ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9196
Bug ID: 9196
Summary: Problem using ldapsearch across forests with trust
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: client tools
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: kleber.s.carvalho(a)avanade.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 695
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=695&action=edit
Problem using ldapsearch across forests with trust
Hello,
We are in a project where the client has an application developed in Java that
has a library developed by the client himself that uses the openldap tool to
authenticate users that exist in the minca.com domain. However, this company is
undergoing a drastic business change and this minca.com domain that belongs
only in one forest must have a one-way trust relationship with another forest
called klabs.com and its respective domains children (subtree), the general
drawing can be checked in the file 1_forest_trust.pdf.
The trust relationship between the two forests was successfully carried out as
can be seen in the files 2_trust_minca.JPG and 3_trust_klabs.JPG
A user named minca was created in the minca.com domain, that is,
minca(a)minca.com according to files 4_mincauser_1.JPG and 4_mincauser_2.JPG (to
observe the SID). Meanwhile, in the domain child.klabs.com, the group
CHILDADMINS was created and the user minca from the forest minca.com was
successfully added according to file 5_childadminsgroup.JPG.
First, we performed a valid test by performing authentication and a simple
query directly to the minca.com domain, with the command:
ldapsearch -H 'LDAP: //minca.com: 3268' -D 'cn = Administrator, cn = users, dc
= minca, dc = with' -w Avanade @ 2020! -b 'cn = users, dc = minca, dc = com'
According to the 6_openldap_direct_sucess.JPG file, it is possible to observe
that the result became what was expected.
However, when performing this procedure and authenticating the user
minca(a)minca.com in the child.klabs.com domain using the ldapsearch tool, the
result was an error according to file 7_openldaperror_indirectaccess.JPG
stating invalid credentials
In addition, searching the internet, we verified that the LDAP call should be
LDAP: //child.klabs.com/dc=minca,dc=com, however, ldapsearch returned PARSE
LDAP URI (s) error, as per file 8_openldaperror_parse.JPG.
However, a .net application was created to perform this same function and it
worked, as per file 9_dotNetApp_success.JPG
After that, we tried to understand if the openldap tool would be able to
perform the same action on the same tree (subtree) and we obtained the expected
success result according to the file 10_openldap_subtree_success.JPG
So, we tried to list the members of the CHILDADMINS group that are in the
child.klabs.com domain and have as a member a user from the minca.com forest,
using the command:
ldapsearch -H 'LDAP: //child.klabs.com: 3268' -D 'cn = Administrator, cn =
users, dc = child, dc = klabs, dc = with' -w Avanade @ 2020! -b 'cn =
CHILDADMINS, cn = users, dc = child, dc = klabs, dc = com'
and it was observed that openldap I find the user in question bringing his SID
according to the figure 11_openldap_GroupMemberOf_SSID.JPG and, afterwards with
a treatment in the openldap tool itself through the command:
ldapsearch -H 'LDAP: //child.klabs.com: 3268' -D 'cn = Administrator, cn =
users, dc = child, dc = klabs, dc = with' -w Avanade @ 2020! -b "cn =
ForeignSecurityPrincipals, dc = child, dc = klabs, dc = com" "CN =
S-1-5-21-1644185942-511557352-3723172775-1107" msDS-PrincipalName
We managed to get the PrincipalName property of the user the figure
12_openldap_SSID_to_PrincipalName.JPG
Finally, the conclusion we are reaching is that the openldap tool does not work
directly between forests, but only on the same tree. We would like to know if
this understanding is correct or if this is really a bug in the tool.
Well, I tried to detail the situation as much as possible, please help us
understand this.
Thank you very much for your attention.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7706
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|RFE: contrib/slapo-lastbind |Update lastbind behavior to
|extension |allow specific attribute
| |restrictions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9003
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |TEST
Keywords|has_patch, IPR_OK, |
|OL_2_5_REQ, |
|openldap-scratch |
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• a5b8a41c
by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2020-04-01T19:40:27+00:00
ITS#9003
Note that with slapd-ldap, the special character "*" actually allows anonymous
rather than denies, as is the case with authz-policy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8628
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=8205
--- Comment #16 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Everything except attachment 671 is already applied as part of
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8205
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8205
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=8628
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8485
--- Comment #11 from ahnolds(a)gmail.com <ahnolds(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Howard Chu from comment #10)
> (In reply to Michael Ströder from comment #9)
> > I concur that lacking support for encrypted private keys is a real
> > deficiency!
> >
> > In general OpenLDAP should aim to reach more flexibility for the TLS
> > configuration, e.g. like Apache httpd. Encrypted private keys for both
> > server and client side is one aspect of that.
>
> We have never needed to add explicit support, since OpenSSL prompted for
> a passphrase itself, when needed.
>
> https://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200210/msg00718.html
It prompts for the passphrase on the controlling terminal, which is only
helpful for command-line based applications. For any application run through a
GUI/web server/etc, there won't be any way for the user to enter the passphrase
as is. And in fact, the call to use the key will hang (forever IIRC) waiting
for a passphrase to be typed on the terminal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8485
--- Comment #10 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Ströder from comment #9)
> I concur that lacking support for encrypted private keys is a real
> deficiency!
>
> In general OpenLDAP should aim to reach more flexibility for the TLS
> configuration, e.g. like Apache httpd. Encrypted private keys for both
> server and client side is one aspect of that.
We have never needed to add explicit support, since OpenSSL prompted for
a passphrase itself, when needed.
https://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200210/msg00718.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8485
Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=7221
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7221
Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=8485
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8446
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=8734
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8734
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=8446
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8446
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8446
--- Comment #10 from nivanova(a)symas.com <nivanova(a)symas.com> ---
This ITS is no longer relevant, since a lot of changes were made to the design
and implementation, and all changes were already submitted as ITS#8734.
asyncmeta in master is currently up-to-date.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8485
--- Comment #9 from Michael Ströder <michael(a)stroeder.com> ---
I concur that lacking support for encrypted private keys is a real deficiency!
In general OpenLDAP should aim to reach more flexibility for the TLS
configuration, e.g. like Apache httpd. Encrypted private keys for both server
and client side is one aspect of that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8485
--- Comment #8 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Do I understand it correctly that libldap doesn't currently support using
encrypted keys at all, not even for client certificates?
If that is so, there are scenarios where supporting that does improve security
(e.g. interactive tools).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8528
--- Comment #3 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Not saying it's a bad idea, but the interactions with a delete mod might be a
little confusing:
changetype: modify
delete: olcAccess
olcAccess: {2}to dn.exact="cn=2" by * none
olcAccess: {1}to dn.exact="cn=1" by * none
olcAccess: {0}to dn.exact="cn=0" by * none
I think the above might fail if sorted. Worse still if you sent this modify
request (I think we implement this?):
changetype: modify
delete: olcAccess
olcAccess: {2}
olcAccess: {1}
olcAccess: {0}
You would get the wrong values deleted if we do and you need to make 100% sure
that you send this instead:
changetype: modify
delete: olcAccess
olcAccess: {2}
-
delete: olcAccess
olcAccess: {1}
-
delete: olcAccess
olcAccess: {0}
-
Similar with adds.
Would need to reread the draft, but I think the text also needs changing if we
want to make this change.
Question is whose job would it be to reorder the values? Frontend or later?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8511
--- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Can't see the patch anywhere, could you create a merge request for this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8479
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Probably the same issue as ITS#9077
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9077 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9077
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |william.b.clay(a)acm.org
--- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
*** Bug 8479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8446
--- Comment #9 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:08:09PM +0000, openldap-its(a)openldap.org wrote:
> https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8446
Hi Nadya,
do you know if this is applied in master yet? Is this patch series still
valid for current master?
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8446
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|slapd |backends
Keywords| |OL_2_5_REQ
Target Milestone|--- |2.5.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.