- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Bug 9059] session log parsing triggers cascading REFRESH
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 30 Apr '20

30 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9059 --- Comment #4 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- The response is triggered by https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/fd23680a447b9efe1a481dd64… but it looks like the sessionlog has already been replayed correctly. In that case, we are either finished or have a persistent search set up and all remaining responses are queued up to be sent, so we shouldn't even care if we can still find the CSN in the DB... Moving that whole `if` under `do_present == 1` should then be enough and it might not be related to bug 8125 at all. But then I might be missing something. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9240] New: Can't log to stdout/stderr
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9240 Bug ID: 9240 Summary: Can't log to stdout/stderr Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hadmut(a)danisch.de Target Milestone: --- Hi, slapd can send its logs and messages to syslog, which is nice and good in common Unix/Linux environments, but I didn't see any way to have the logs sent to stdout/stderr instead of syslog. When run in a docker/kubernetes container, which is a typical use nowadays, it should be run as a single process, and not require a separate syslog process just to write some logs to a file. There are dirty workarounds, but if run cleanly, it should be a standalone process. Therefore, it would be nice if slap had a container mode, where - it doesn't fork (currently available only through debugging mode) - sends logging to stdout/stderr instead of syslog regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 9202] Should limit depth of nested filters
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9202 --- Comment #9 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Michael Ströder from comment #8) > Please add the CVE-Id to CHANGES so downstream packagers take note of it. That's currently not a tracked item in the format of the CHANGES file. I have been thinking of adding a customized field to bugzilla to track CVEs (we did that at a prior job I worked at). We may want to consider a format change for RE25 to allow for CVEs in the CHANGES file as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9202] Should limit depth of nested filters
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9202 --- Comment #8 from Michael Ströder <michael(a)stroeder.com> --- Please add the CVE-Id to CHANGES so downstream packagers take note of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9202] Should limit depth of nested filters
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9202 --- Comment #7 from carnil(a)debian.org --- (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #3) > CVE-2020-10704 FWIW: Note that there is a dedicated CVE id for this issue in OpenLDAP, which is CVE-2020-12243. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9233] New: Add argon2 module to contrib
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9233 Bug ID: 9233 Summary: Add argon2 module to contrib Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.50 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Now that the argon2 module is complete, add it to contrib for 2.4.50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 9230] New: slapindex man page states that truncate option (-t) only works with Quick Mode (-q)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9230 Bug ID: 9230 Summary: slapindex man page states that truncate option (-t) only works with Quick Mode (-q) Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: requate(a)univention.de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 712 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=712&action=edit Patch proposal for doc/man/man8/slapindex.8 The slapindex man page states that truncate option (-t) only works with Quick Mode (-q), but from the source code I cannot see a reason for this restriction. Git blame shows that the statement predates back-mdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 9214] New: back-mdb: memory leak in dnSuperiorMatch search filter
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9214 Bug ID: 9214 Summary: back-mdb: memory leak in dnSuperiorMatch search filter Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: grapvar(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 709 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=709&action=edit Fix for cursor leak This is a MDB backend issue. Each time when a dnSuperiorMatch rule of a search filter matches DN that exists in the DIT, the matching operation leaks one MDB cursor. Leak happens in servers/slapd/back-mdb/dn2id.c`mdb_dn2sups(). Leak exists since MDB backend inception, i.e. commit 2011-09-01 0ba4206 Import back-mdb Fix attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 9206] New: contrib/passwd/argon2: consolidate libsodium implementation
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9206 Bug ID: 9206 Summary: contrib/passwd/argon2: consolidate libsodium implementation Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: peter(a)adpm.de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 702 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=702&action=edit patch to consolidate pw-argon2 implementation based on libsodium Hi, current libsodium implementation of pw-argon2 has 2 issues: - it uses crypto_pwhash_str(), which only guarantees a "memory-hard, CPU-intensive hash function", but not necessarily Argon2. - it uses a different unit for the 'memory' parameter than the libargon2 implementation: bytes instead of KiB. The attached patch aims to fix both issues. (The patch is is git format, you can merge it using 'git am') I'd appreciate if you include them into OpenLDAP. The referenced files are derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Peter Marschall <peter(a)adpm.de>. I have not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. The referenced modifications to OpenLDAP Software are subject to the following notice: Copyright 2020 Peter Marschall Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP Public License. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 9203] New: No manual page for module 'pw-argon2'
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9203 Bug ID: 9203 Summary: No manual page for module 'pw-argon2' Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: peter(a)adpm.de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 698 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=698&action=edit add manual page to pw-argon2 contrib module Hi, the pw-argon2 password module lacks a manual page. Please find attached patches to upstream to fix the issue. I'd appreciate if you include them into OpenLDAP. The referenced files are derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Peter Marschall <peter(a)adpm.de>. I have not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. The referenced modifications to OpenLDAP Software are subject to the following notice: Copyright 2015 Peter Marschall Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted only as authorizedy y the OpenLDAP Public License. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 9202] Should limit depth of nested filters
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9202 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9198] New: libraries: memory leak in UTF8bvnormalize()
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9198 Bug ID: 9198 Summary: libraries: memory leak in UTF8bvnormalize() Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.49 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1259039012(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 9182] slapd crash with invalid pcache config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9182 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9181] Non-initialised global options mutex causes problems on Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9181 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9175] ldapsearch segfault
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9175 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9171] slapd with ppolicy and pwdAccountLockedTime crashes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9171 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9003] Update slapd-ldap(5) idassert-authzfrom for policy difference
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9003 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8683] SLAPD_META_CLIENT_PR hidden behind LDAP_DEVEL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8683 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8650] EAGAIN from gnutls_handshake not respected
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8650 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8575] Argon2 Password hashing contrib module
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8575 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8383] msys build error "portable.h:1116:19: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers"
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8383 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7878] OpenLDAP MinGW Build Problem
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7878 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7384] Assert Crash in ppolicy_ctrls_cleanup
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7384 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7074] back-ldap module compilation issue with gcc 4.6.1
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7074 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9202] Should limit depth of nested filters
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9202 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|OpenLDAP-devs | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8758] New Mirror in the Netherlands
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8758 --- Comment #2 from mirror(a)koddos.net <mirror(a)koddos.net> --- Hello, Yes we still are interested. We run mirrors in Hong Kong and the Netherlands. We can setup both locations if you wish. Regards, Martin > https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8758 > > Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Resolution|--- |FEEDBACK > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > > --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- > Hi Martin, > > rsync is available for use. Are you still interested in doing this? > > Sorry that this fell through the cracks. > > Regards, > Quanah > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9083] Broken link in the list of commercial support partners
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9083 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Fixed. This will go live later today. Regards, Quanah -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8758] New Mirror in the Netherlands
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8758 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FEEDBACK Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Hi Martin, rsync is available for use. Are you still interested in doing this? Sorry that this fell through the cracks. Regards, Quanah -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6035] slapd requires restart after modifying olcAuthzRegexp
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6035 --- Comment #12 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • df46c07a by Ryan Tandy at 2020-04-26T01:46:43+00:00 ITS#6035 Skip test076 if chosen SASL mech not supported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9176] libldap support for TLS SNI
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9176 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ | Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |TEST --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 5c0efb9c by Howard Chu at 2020-04-27T03:41:12+01:00 ITS#9176 Add TLS SNI support to libldap • b8f34888 by Howard Chu at 2020-04-27T18:25:49+01:00 ITS#9176 check for numeric addrs before passing SNI • 4265849b by Howard Chu at 2020-04-27T18:54:02+01:00 ITS#9176 check for failure setting SNI • e96f90e2 by Ryan Tandy at 2020-04-27T11:01:01-07:00 ITS#9176 Implement SNI for GnuTLS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7573] back-perl not working with cn=config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7573 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |TEST Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.5.0 --- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- commit 8f174209e112d6937d871de7eb410105e076d3d4 Author: Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)nardis.ca> Date: Sun Apr 26 10:46:22 2020 -0700 ITS#7573 Fix back-perl dynamic config with threaded slapd commit 10cc52ca4cbaa2d3ac365c6223969b42725c9854 Author: Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)nardis.ca> Date: Sun Apr 26 17:38:29 2020 +0000 ITS#7573 Create regression test -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9176] libldap support for TLS SNI
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9176 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: b8f34888 by Howard Chu at 2020-04-27T18:25:49+01:00 ITS#9176 check for numeric addrs before passing SNI - - - - - 4265849b by Howard Chu at 2020-04-27T18:54:02+01:00 ITS#9176 check for failure setting SNI - - - - - -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9112] Fixup socket error handling
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9112 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |2.5.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9091] mdb attribute get mixed up in slapadd continue (-c) mode
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9091 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |2.5.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6844] AIX 6.1 | 7.1 not supported in "configure"
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6844 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |2.5.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9176] libldap support for TLS SNI
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9176 Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|ldap.google.com requires |libldap support for TLS SNI |TLS SNI | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9176] ldap.google.com requires TLS SNI
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9176 Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ryan(a)openldap.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #1 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: 5c0efb9c by Howard Chu at 2020-04-27T03:41:12+01:00 ITS#9176 Add TLS SNI support to libldap Implemented for OpenSSL, GnuTLS just stubbed Assigning to myself to fill in the GnuTLS side. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9176] ldap.google.com requires TLS SNI
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9176 Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|libldap support for TLSv1.3 |ldap.google.com requires |Encrypted SNI |TLS SNI -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7573] back-perl not working with cn=config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Apr '20

26 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7573 Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #6 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/57 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7573] back-perl not working with cn=config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Apr '20

26 Apr '20

1 0

[Bug 8591] back-perl: segmentation fault when loading SampleLDAP.pl
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Apr '20

26 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8591 Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7573 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7573] back-perl not working with cn=config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Apr '20

26 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7573 Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hark(a)puscii.nl --- Comment #5 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- *** Bug 8591 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9017] Improving performance of commit sync in Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Apr '20

25 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017 --- Comment #22 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 8d0cbbc9 by Howard Chu at 2020-04-25T00:46:58+01:00 ITS#9017 cleanup Windows off_t -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9017] Improving performance of commit sync in Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Apr '20

25 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017 --- Comment #21 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to kriszyp(a)gmail.com from comment #20) > > You ought to be able to use int64_t instead, or any other explicitly > > 64-bit signed integer type. > > Yes, that (#define MDB_OFF_T int64_t) compiles and works fine in all > my tests (including with >2GB dbs). I assume you can commit/fix this > (or do we want me to make a patch)? > Thanks, > Kris Committed with int64_t. Thanks for testing/verifying. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9017] Improving performance of commit sync in Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Apr '20

25 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017 Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |TEST Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9017] Improving performance of commit sync in Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Apr '20

25 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017 --- Comment #20 from kriszyp(a)gmail.com <kriszyp(a)gmail.com> --- > You ought to be able to use int64_t instead, or any other explicitly > 64-bit signed integer type. Yes, that (#define MDB_OFF_T int64_t) compiles and works fine in all my tests (including with >2GB dbs). I assume you can commit/fix this (or do we want me to make a patch)? Thanks, Kris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8125] MMR throws away valid changes causing drift
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Apr '20

25 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8125 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9017] Improving performance of commit sync in Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '20

24 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017 --- Comment #19 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- openldap-its(a)openldap.org wrote: > https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017 > > --- Comment #18 from kriszyp(a)gmail.com <kriszyp(a)gmail.com> --- >> I've committed your first two patches as-is, > Thank you so much, appreciate the review and including this code. I > hope it helps other Windows users leverage the awesome LMDB > performance and integrity! > >> and taken a different approach for the off_t issue. > Unfortunately, this commit didn't work for me. LMDB no longer compiles > when using LARGE_INTEGER for offsets. Perhaps ULONG would work better? > I get the following compilation errors (or is there possibly something > I need to define to address this?): > > \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3739): error C2440: '=': > cannot convert from 'pgno_t' to 'LA > RGE_INTEGER' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] > \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3744): error C2088: '!=': > illegal for union [C:\dev\node-lmd > b\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] > \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3767): error C2088: '&': > illegal for union [ > \build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] Apparently LARGE_INTEGER isn't an integer at all, it appears to be a structure. You ought to be able to use int64_t instead, or any other explicitly 64-bit signed integer type. Since offsets can be forward or backward from a designated reference point, off_t and MDB_OFF_T must be a signed type. size_t is explicitly unsigned, so it is an error to use that for this purpose. It's also only 32 bits wide on a 32bit machine, so it'd be unsuitable for larger DBs. The use of MDB_OFF_T/off_t for env->me_size is a bit bogus, since a file size should be unsigned. But we don't have address spaces large enough yet for the difference between 2^63 and 2^64 to matter. (And also, the me_size field has actually never been used. Probably should just be deleted...) >> Do you still want the corresponding patch in 0.9? And can you please remind >> me where the 0.9 patch is? Thanks. > I could if you want, but you convinced me that using mdb.master and > focusing 1.0 was the way to go, so that's what we have been using for > the last few months (with my patches applied locally), and it has been > working great on our servers. I don't need an 0.9 patch, but I could > work on creating one if you think it is important. No, that's fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9017] Improving performance of commit sync in Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '20

24 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017 --- Comment #18 from kriszyp(a)gmail.com <kriszyp(a)gmail.com> --- > I've committed your first two patches as-is, Thank you so much, appreciate the review and including this code. I hope it helps other Windows users leverage the awesome LMDB performance and integrity! > and taken a different approach for the off_t issue. Unfortunately, this commit didn't work for me. LMDB no longer compiles when using LARGE_INTEGER for offsets. Perhaps ULONG would work better? I get the following compilation errors (or is there possibly something I need to define to address this?): \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3739): error C2440: '=': cannot convert from 'pgno_t' to 'LA RGE_INTEGER' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3744): error C2088: '!=': illegal for union [C:\dev\node-lmd b\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3767): error C2088: '&': illegal for union [ \build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3768): error C2088: '>>': illegal for union [C:\dev\node-lmd b\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3832): error C2088: '+': illegal for union [ \build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3667): error C2440: 'initializing': cannot convert from 'int ' to 'LARGE_INTEGER' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(3680): error C2440: 'initializing': cannot convert from 'int ' to 'LARGE_INTEGER' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(4333): error C2440: '=': cannot convert from 'size_t' to 'LA RGE_INTEGER' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(4334): error C2088: '+': illegal for union [ \build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(4335): error C2088: '-': illegal for union [ \build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(4336): error C2088: '+=': illegal for union [C:\dev\node-lmd b\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(4346): error C2440: '=': cannot convert from 'LARGE_INTEGER' to 'DWORD' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(4369): error C2440: '=': cannot convert from 'LARGE_INTEGER' to 'DWORD' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5319): error C2440: '=': cannot convert from 'DWORD' to 'LAR GE_INTEGER' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5324): error C2440: '=': cannot convert from 'size_t' to 'LA RGE_INTEGER' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5325): error C2088: '<': illegal for union [ \build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5327): error C2440: 'function': cannot convert from 'LARGE_I NTEGER' to 'LONG' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5327): warning C4024: 'SetFilePointer': different types for formal and actual parameter 2 [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5328): error C2440: 'type cast': cannot convert from 'LARGE_ INTEGER' to 'DWORD' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5335): error C2088: '-': illegal for union [ \build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5336): error C2088: '/': illegal for union [ \build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5344): error C2440: 'function': cannot convert from 'LARGE_I NTEGER' to 'SIZE_T' [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] \dependencies\lmdb\libraries\liblmdb\mdb.c(5344): warning C4024: 'MapViewOfFileEx': different types for formal and actual parameter 5 [\build\node-lmdb.vcxproj] (and it all compiles fine when I use size_t > Do you still want the corresponding patch in 0.9? And can you please remind > me where the 0.9 patch is? Thanks. I could if you want, but you convinced me that using mdb.master and focusing 1.0 was the way to go, so that's what we have been using for the last few months (with my patches applied locally), and it has been working great on our servers. I don't need an 0.9 patch, but I could work on creating one if you think it is important. > And please don't send HTML emails, plaintext only. My apologies. Missed some settings, I despise that HTML cruft as well. Thanks, Kris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 8847] New LDAP URL syntax to support binding to specific IP address at client side
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '20

24 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |CONFIRMED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs