https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10001
Issue ID: 10001
Summary: Potential memory leak in libraries/libldap/urltest.c
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com
Target Milestone: ---
Version: Github:master
Potential memory leak in urltest.c line 75.Calling ldap_url_parse() without
calling ldap_free_urldesc() to free the memory will cause a memory leak.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9994
Issue ID: 9994
Summary: Potential memory leak in tests/progs/slapd-modify.c
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: test suite
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com
Target Milestone: ---
Version: Github:master
Potential memory leak in slapd-modify.c line 164 and 191.Calling
ldap_modify_ext_s() without calling ldap_mods_free() to free the memory will
cause a memory leak.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9992
Issue ID: 9992
Summary: Requesting information about libraries/ldap_r
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.12
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: jjrobert(a)lexmark.com
Target Milestone: ---
Apologies if this is a duplicate - the tracking system seemed to glitch when I
submitted so I'm typing it up again.
We are upgrading our stack from using openldap 2.4.57 to 2.5.12 and one of our
dependencies is missing lldap_r.
I searched and only really found this, which gives me some idea of its purpose:
https://marc.info/?l=openldap-devel&m=95218635611825
Is it simply gone now, or does it exist as a separate library?
Is there any guidance on what to do if you were using it previously?
Thanks,
-Jeff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7933
--- Comment #8 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 01:53:22PM +0000, openldap-its(a)openldap.org wrote:
> Could this be the reason why I get `attribute 'olcPasswordHash' not allowed`
> when trying to apply an .ldif file such as:
>
> dn: olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config
> changetype: modify
> add: olcPasswordHash
> olcPasswordHash: {CRYPT}
>
> This has popped up in Fedora
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061966) which seem to have copied
> the respective default frontend config file before this patch (see
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openldap/blob/f37/f/slapd.ldif#_105).
As you suggest, this seems to be a Fedora packaging issue: them shipping
an out of date ldif file where they might have been able to copy it from
upstream source. Pretty sure in that case there's nothing that can be
done on the OpenLDAP project side.
Someone might need to step up and help Fedora package maintainers deal
with it if they say the existing team don't have the capacity.
Regards,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9718
Issue ID: 9718
Summary: test022 can fail on expiry
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
>>>>> Starting test022-ppolicy for mdb...
running defines.sh
Starting slapd on TCP/IP port 9011...
Using ldapsearch to check that slapd is running...
Testing redundant ppolicy instance...
Using ldapadd to populate the database...
Testing account lockout...
Waiting 13 seconds for lockout to reset...
Testing password expiration
Waiting seconds for password to expire...
sleep: missing operand
Try 'sleep --help' for more information.
Password expiration test failed
>>>>> test022-ppolicy failed for mdb after 43 seconds
(exit 1)
The issue here is apparently that line 122-123 failed to populate the DELAY
variable.
121
122 DELAY=`$LDAPSEARCH -D "$MANAGERDN" -H $URI1 -w $PASSWD \
123 -b "$USER" -E accountUsability 1.1 | sed -n -e
's/.*expire=\(\d*\)/\1/p'`
124
125 echo "Testing password expiration"
126 echo "Waiting $DELAY seconds for password to expire..."
127 sleep $DELAY
128 sleep 1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8102
--- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
head:
• 868309c9
by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T12:06:24+00:00
ITS#8102 Do not continue if deconfigured during pause
RE26:
• 0b2f5ad7
by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T19:01:00+00:00
ITS#8102 Do not continue if deconfigured during pause
RE25:
• 6733fe4d
by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T19:02:48+00:00
ITS#8102 Do not continue if deconfigured during pause
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9045
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.6.4 |2.5.14
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
--- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
head:
• 12bf5a95
by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-23T11:53:36+00:00
ITS#9045 rlock only if there may be other threads
RE26:
• 66c2b5ad
by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T18:57:18+00:00
ITS#9045 rlock only if there may be other threads
RE25:
• 2f3b77d4
by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2023-01-30T18:58:16+00:00
Revert "Revert "ITS#9045 Do not share cn=config entries with outside code""
This reverts commit 393308ac1c3eb9d65b682c06826d60a0bf856070.
• 5936d721
by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T18:59:26+00:00
ITS#9045 rlock only if there may be other threads
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8698
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=9990
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8698
--- Comment #3 from subbarao(a)computer.org <subbarao(a)computer.org> ---
Part of the fix for this change breaks exop overlay callbacks. Fortunately the
fix is simple, just revert the change to passwd.c. The rest works fine. Please
see ITS#9990 for more details:
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9990
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7933
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to nilskemail+github from comment #6)
> Could this be the reason why I get `attribute 'olcPasswordHash' not allowed`
> when trying to apply an .ldif file such as:
>
> dn: olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config
> changetype: modify
> add: olcPasswordHash
> olcPasswordHash: {CRYPT}
>
> This has popped up in Fedora
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061966) which seem to have
> copied the respective default frontend config file before this patch (see
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openldap/blob/f37/f/slapd.ldif#_105).
I'd open a bug with redhat as to why they're doing this at all. {CRYPT} hashes
are not portable. If they want to support secure hashes, they should use the
ARGON2 module.
You also fail to state what version of OpenLDAP you're reporting against. This
bug was fixed in 2014, so unless RH is using an absolutely ancient version of
OpenLDAP, this would not be related. You probably should describe the issue(s)
you are encountering in a post to the openldap-technical email list
(https://lists.openldap.org)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9967
Issue ID: 9967
Summary: Please register my company on the support page, again
(www.openldap.org)
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: sjsong(a)aboutdap.kr
Target Milestone: ---
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org>
송상준 <sjsong(a)aboutdap.kr>
Hi,
you can submit a ticket against "website" in the ITS for this. Thanks.
송상준 wrote:
>
> Hello. openldap page administrater.
> My name is sang jun song.
>
> I want to register my company on the support page.
> I registered before, but it seems to have disappeared.
> Our company has been attending ldapcon since 2015.
>
> The sysmas employees who attended the LDAPCON in 2019 may remember me.
>
> Please register my company on the support page. Please contact me if you need additional information..
>
> thank you.
>
> Song.
>
> Registration phrase
>
> Seojindsa Co., Ltd. (Aboutdap Co., Ltd.)- Korea
>
> Provides consultancy, development, training and user support for OpenLDAP software in Korea.
>
> URL : seojindsa : www.seojindsa.kr
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> (주) 어바웃답 기술영업팀 송상준 부장
> TEL. 010-9780-6746
> email: sjsong(a)aboutdap.kr
> homepage: www.aboutdap.kr
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Issue ID: 9987
Summary: OpenLdap does not set large-file-support flags
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: allenwebb(a)google.com
Target Milestone: ---
I understand that 2.4 isn't supported, but 2.6 is blocked by other config
related issues, so I wasn't able to test if it has the same problem.
Ideally, the openldap configure/build scripts would be aware of large
file support and would enable it when supported (arm/x86, etc).
Here are the places where it would matter:
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.552 * QA Notice: The following files
were not built with LFS support:
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.565 * Please see
https://issuetracker.google.com/201531268 for details.
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.581 * fopen,fstat /usr/bin/ldapdelete
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.584 * fopen,fstat /usr/bin/ldapmodrdn
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.588 * fopen,fstat /usr/bin/ldapwhoami
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.591 * fopen,fstat /usr/bin/ldapmodify
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.595 * fopen,mkstemp,fstat /usr/bin/ldapsearch
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.599 * fopen,fstat /usr/bin/ldappasswd
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.602 * fopen,fstat /usr/bin/ldapexop
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.606 * fopen,fstat /usr/bin/ldapcompare
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.609 * fopen /usr/lib/libldap-2.4.so.2.11.6
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.613 * fopen /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2.11.6
openldap-2.4.58-r2: 18:33:38.627 * Full build files:
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/ldapdelete.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/.libs/ldapdelete
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/.libs/ldapmodrdn
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/.libs/ldapwhoami
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/.libs/ldapmodify
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,mkstemp,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/.libs/ldapsearch
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/.libs/ldappasswd
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/.libs/ldapexop
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/.libs/ldapcompare
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/ldapmodrdn.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/ldapmodify.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,mkstemp
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/clients/tools/ldapsearch.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/liblutil/getpass.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: lockf
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/liblutil/lockf.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/liblutil/passfile.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: __open_2
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/liblutil/detach.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: __open_2
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/liblutil/sha1.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: open,fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap_r/.libs/ltest
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap_r/.libs/ldif.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap_r/.libs/fetch.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap_r/.libs/libldap_r-2.4.so.2.11.6T
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap_r/.libs/init.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap_r/.libs/libldap_r-2.4.so.2.11.6
openldap-2.4.58-r2: open,fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap_r/test.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/librewrite/rewrite.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/librewrite/.libs/rewrite
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/librewrite/xmap.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: open,fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap/.libs/ltest
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap/.libs/ldif.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap/.libs/libldap-2.4.so.2.11.6T
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap/.libs/fetch.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap/.libs/init.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap/.libs/libldap-2.4.so.2.11.6
openldap-2.4.58-r2: open,fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/libraries/libldap/test.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/tests/progs/.libs/slapd-addel
openldap-2.4.58-r2: readdir,fopen,fstat
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/tests/progs/.libs/slapd-tester
openldap-2.4.58-r2: readdir,fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/tests/progs/slapd-tester.o
openldap-2.4.58-r2: fopen
/build/arm-generic/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.58-r2/work/openldap-2.4.58-.arm/tests/progs/slapd-addel.o
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9045
--- Comment #8 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Oh yeah, config_back_entry_get actually wants to distinguish three situations
coming from ldap_pvt_thread_pool_pausequery:
- not paused - keep going, rlock cfb->cb_rwlock so the entry is safe to read
- paused - keep going, we are the thread that wlocked cfb->cb_rwlock
- WANT_PAUSE - a pause is starting, but we're *not* paused!
We should either rlock anyway and make it the calling thread's responsibility
to check for a pause if they care - should make ldap_pvt_thread_pool_pausequery
return (pool->ltp_pause != PAUSED)
Or we return LDAP_BUSY or something of the sort - would need
ldap_pvt_thread_pool_pausequery to return pool->ltp_pause and expose the `enum
{ NOT_PAUSED = 0, WANT_PAUSE = 1, PAUSED = 2 };` in ldap_pvt.h
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9045
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|TEST |---
Status|RESOLVED |CONFIRMED
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Still hitting this crash even with this fix in place in openldap-head:
(gdb) bt
[2/19314]
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
#1 0x00007f623066b535 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2 0x00007f623066b40f in __assert_fail_base (fmt=0x7f62307ccef0 "%s%s%s:%u:
%s%sAssertion `%s' failed.\n%n",
assertion=0x559bb9d494bf "a->a_nvals != NULL", file=0x559bb9d494b8
"attr.c", line=230, function=<optimized out>)
at assert.c:92
#3 0x00007f62306791a2 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x559bb9d494bf
"a->a_nvals != NULL",
file=0x559bb9d494b8 "attr.c", line=230, function=0x559bb9d495b0
<__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.12465> "attr_dup2")
at assert.c:101
#4 0x0000559bb9c70227 in attr_dup2 (tmp=0x559bbb005068, a=0x559bbb005c08) at
attr.c:230
#5 0x0000559bb9c70440 in attrs_dup (a=0x559bbb005c08) at attr.c:282
#6 0x0000559bb9c742bd in entry_dup2 (dest=0x559bbaff0658,
source=0x559bbaff02e8) at entry.c:940
#7 0x0000559bb9c74301 in entry_dup (e=0x559bbaff02e8) at entry.c:949
#8 0x0000559bb9c4d635 in config_back_entry_get (op=0x7f622f541400,
ndn=0x7f622f541448, oc=0x0, at=0x0, rw=0,
ent=0x7f622f540998) at bconfig.c:6923
#9 0x0000559bb9d042ac in overlay_entry_get_ov (op=0x7f622f541400,
dn=0x7f622f541448, oc=0x0, ad=0x0, rw=0,
e=0x7f622f540998, on=0x0) at backover.c:378
#10 0x00007f622d52e577 in syncprov_matchops (op=0x7f622f541400,
opc=0x7f6220002f98, saveit=1) at syncprov.c:1312
#11 0x00007f622d5343ff in syncprov_op_mod (op=0x7f622f541400,
rs=0x7f622f540eb0) at syncprov.c:2810
#12 0x0000559bb9d04cbe in overlay_op_walk (op=0x7f622f541400,
rs=0x7f622f540eb0, which=op_modify, oi=0x7f62201de3a0,
on=0x7f62201dde50) at backover.c:691
#13 0x0000559bb9d04fe1 in over_op_func (op=0x7f622f541400, rs=0x7f622f540eb0,
which=op_modify) at backover.c:766
#14 0x0000559bb9d0516e in over_op_modify (op=0x7f622f541400, rs=0x7f622f540eb0)
at backover.c:808
#15 0x0000559bb9cf5fb7 in syncrepl_updateCookie (si=0x7f622410b130,
op=0x7f622f541400, syncCookie=0x7f622f541190, save=1)
at syncrepl.c:5366
#16 0x0000559bb9ce9ba2 in do_syncrep2 (op=0x7f622f541400, si=0x7f622410b130) at
syncrepl.c:1953
#17 0x0000559bb9ceabcb in do_syncrepl (ctx=0x7f622f541b10, arg=0x7f622410c690)
at syncrepl.c:2219
#18 0x0000559bb9c5d43a in slapd_rtask_trampoline (ctx=0x7f622f541b10,
arg=0x7f622410c690) at daemon.c:2432
#19 0x00007f6230f5337f in ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper (xpool=0x559bbafc69c0)
at tpool.c:1053
#20 0x00007f6230810fa3 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:486
#21 0x00007f623074206f in clone () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95
(gdb) frame 8
#8 0x0000559bb9c4d635 in config_back_entry_get (op=0x7f622f541400,
ndn=0x7f622f541448, oc=0x0, at=0x0, rw=0,
ent=0x7f622f540998) at bconfig.c:6923
6923 *ent = entry_dup( e );
(gdb) print locked
$1 = 0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9988
Issue ID: 9988
Summary: typo in documentation lmdb:open_db
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
URL: https://lmdb.readthedocs.io/en/release/#lmdb.Environme
nt.open_db
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: anthon(a)mnt.org
Target Milestone: ---
There is a minor typo in the description of the 'integerdup' argument to
open_db
https://lmdb.readthedocs.io/en/release/#lmdb.Environment.open_db
integers encode din native byte
should be:
integers encoded in native byte
Sorry could not find the source for the lmdb documentation online to make
aproper diff.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
Issue ID: 9961
Summary: LMDB: -sizeof is an error because sizeof is unsigned
Product: LMDB
Version: 0.9.29
Hardware: All
OS: Windows
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: liblmdb
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: openldap(a)serice.net
Target Milestone: ---
MSVC++ defaults to having "SDL checks" enabled which causes -sizeof(size_t) in
mdb.c to cause the following compilation error:
error C4146: unary minus operator applied to unsigned type
With "SDL checks" disabled, this is still results in a warning which can be
avoided by using the following instead:
(~sizeof(size_t) + 1)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9986
Issue ID: 9986
Summary: create account bug
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: Android
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: fenwaykick(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9981
Issue ID: 9981
Summary: Apropos man page search on openldap.org appears to
never return any results
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: max.spicer(a)york.ac.uk
Target Milestone: ---
The Apropos feature at https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi does not seem
to ever return any results. This makes it difficult to search the
documentation.
For example, with the defaults selected, enter any of the following terms and
click the Apropos button: "ldap", "slapd", "olcPasswordHash".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9980
Issue ID: 9980
Summary: LDAP connectivity issue
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: client tools
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: soniyayadav.kamakoni(a)clorox.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 941
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=941&action=edit
Please find the attached screenshot of error
I'm unable to connect to LDAP. Can you please assist me with it. Please find
the screenshot of the error attached
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9979
Issue ID: 9979
Summary: Fails to build against OpenSSL 3.0.7 when pasing
--with-tls-openssl
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.3
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Windows
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: mehdi.chinoune(a)hotmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Fails to build against OpenSSL 3.0.7 when pasing --with-tls-openssl
Configuration:
configure \
--with-tls=openssl \
--with-cyrus-sasl \
--enable-modules=yes \
--enable-hdb=no \
--enable-bdb=no \
--disable-slapd
Error:
...
checking openssl/ssl.h usability... yes
checking openssl/ssl.h presence... yes
checking for openssl/ssl.h... yes
configure: error: Could not locate TLS/SSL package
checking for SSL_export_keying_material_early in -lssl... no
==> ERROR: A failure occurred
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9978
Issue ID: 9978
Summary: vrf support for openldap
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: tishamol(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
I would like to know is there any support for passing vrf-id to openldap
library ?
Thanks,
Smitha
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9977
Issue ID: 9977
Summary: ContourCafe
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: countourcafe7061(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 940
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=940&action=edit
ContourCafe
Contour Cafe is a popular website that offers numerous articles, contents about
the things that make you beautiful, classy, and trendy. One can find fabulous
content in the contour cafe. The quality of the articles of contour cafe on
every topic let it be appearance, clothes, hair, cosmetics, nails or skincare
is a great one. Contour Cafe is the best site to explore every category.
Read More:-
https://www.contourcafe.com/2021/06/26/best-purple-shampoo-for-blonde/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9975
Issue ID: 9975
Summary: Tattoomagz
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: tattoomagz3(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 939
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=939&action=edit
Tattoomagz
Tattoomagz is our sole enthusiasm in wonderful tattoo plans and ink works,
manufactured and created as an online accumulation display serving a large
number of the coolest tattoo structures and stunning custom ink-works.
Read More:-
https://tattoomagz.com/eyes-tattoos-on-arms/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9974
Issue ID: 9974
Summary: Einsteinhorsemag
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: einsteinhorsemag(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 938
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=938&action=edit
Einsteinhorsemag
Einsteinhorsemag.com is a blogging website with the best blogs in beauty,
health, nutrition, lifestyle, news, technology, and entertainment. Our website
includes blogs covering various topics, from fractions to conversions in our
day-to-day life, lyrics of your favourite song to food recipes you love- you
will get it all. Visit our website for more entertaining blogs.
Read Blog-
https://einsteinhorsemag.com/80-kg-to-lbs/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9973
Issue ID: 9973
Summary: Fashionhikes
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: fashionhikes(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 937
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=937&action=edit
Fashionhikes
We at Fashionhikes.com are here to serve all your requirements! Check out our
website that offers you a plethora of answers to your queries on health,
technology, geography, economics, global knowledge and what not!
Read Blog-
https://fashionhikes.com/0-3-as-a-fraction/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9971
Issue ID: 9971
Summary: Tech99
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: tech99.856(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 936
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=936&action=edit
Tech99
The Tech99.co website delivers blogs with the latest breaking news and videos.
It is the perfect online destination for all entertainment lovers. More swiftly
than any website, it offers helpful guidance on various how-tos, health,
lifestyle and trending topics for netizens. There are some fantastic
entertaining blogs on this website.
Visit our website to read more!
https://tech99.co/how-to-check-ufone-number/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9970
Issue ID: 9970
Summary: 2plus2four
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: 2plus2four896(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 935
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=935&action=edit
2plus2four
2plus2four.net is your ultimate gateway to the latest movies, queries and hacks
that you wish to know. We provide you the perfect plinth on which you can place
all your doubts! Check our site out to know more!
Read Blog-
https://2plus2four.net/time-today-lyrics-moneybagg-yo/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9969
Issue ID: 9969
Summary: Sharetok
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: sre79132(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 934
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=934&action=edit
Sharetok
ShareTok is your place where you can advertise your services, goods and
everything else as well; we do it with the help of various well-designed
advertising campaigns on social media and with the help of some impressive good
persuading content. You can connect with us online through the website.ShareTok
is your place where you can advertise your services, goods and everything else
as well; we do it with the help of various well-designed advertising campaigns
on social media and with the help of some impressive good persuading content.
You can connect with us online through the website.
Read Blog-
https://www.sharetok.com/transformar-powerpoint-em-pdf/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9968
Issue ID: 9968
Summary: Sportspassion
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: sportspassion456(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 933
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=933&action=edit
Sportspassion
Sports-passion.net is the best stop point for all types of how-to guides,
blogs, articles, and all such content related to differentiation. Here, in the
form of articles and all other such content, you will get all the important
latest information related to a lot of things around the world.
Read Blog-
https://sports-passion.net/difference-between-parameter-and-statistic/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9965
Issue ID: 9965
Summary: Byte Bell
Product: JLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: JDBC
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: bellbyte46(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Bytebell.com is the place where you can get to read many featured stories about
a lot of things like mental health, food, nutrition and many more. To read
more: https://bytebell.com/spectrum-wave-2-router/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9964
Issue ID: 9964
Summary: He and she Fitness
Product: JLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: JDBC
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: heandshefitness1(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
He and she fitness is here for you with all the secrets that can be helpful for
you in the proper maintenance of the fitness of your body. To read more:
https://www.heandshefitness.com/2021/06/01/how-many-calories-does-skipping-…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9963
Issue ID: 9963
Summary: Wheels Inpak
Product: JLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: JDBC
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: wheelsinpak1(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Wheelsinpak.com is the right place for you if you are looking for some kind of
services, here you can search for the right providers of many needed services
along with car and bike info. To read more:
https://www.wheelsinpak.com/2021/12/08/kia-cars-price-in-pakistan-2021/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9600
Issue ID: 9600
Summary: Rework lloadd's cn=monitor interface (connections)
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: lloadd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
At the moment, most of the lloadd's monitor entries are generated on demand for
the search. To support management of the server and its connections, an entry
should be created when a connection is set up and torn down accordingly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9958
Issue ID: 9958
Summary: Problem extracting openldap-2.5.5.tgz
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.5
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Windows
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: harshad.ghorpade(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 931
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=931&action=edit
7zip extracting issue
Hello,
we have downloaded the the openldap version
2.5.5(https://www.openldap.org/software/download/OpenLDAP/openldap-release/…
from the given link but we are seeing a problem unzipping those tgz files via 7
zip on windows platform, seems like symlinks are broken(find attached
screenshot).
This is causing us a issue in one of our tool used for software composition
analysis when it unzips the archive, if the archives are fixed that would be
great.
if you see in screenshot, it points to 2 files in "servers\lload\design.md" and
"servers\lload\nt_svc.c". we tried removing these files(as they are of 0 size)
and tar it back again and creating a tgz file out of it, it works.
but we would like to use the official released version rather than one changed
by us.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9948
Issue ID: 9948
Summary: tls_ciphers with TLSv1.2 cipher_suite gives list of
TLSv1.3 ciphers in TLS Client Hello message
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: client tools
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: nikigen68(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 928
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=928&action=edit
TLS server only supports TLSv1.3 in this case, and I would expect it to be
rejected.
For example:
ldap.conf::
tls_ciphers ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305
will give ClientHello with these cipher suites:
TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305
and supported versions:
TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
Why do we have listed default TLSv1.3 ciphers? I would expect only
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305. Also, why do we have listed TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1
as supported versions when those are considered vulnerable?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9955
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Note:
Not exploitable, no operational or security impact.
head:
• 31e6efeb
by Howard Chu at 2022-12-01T14:58:37+00:00
ITS#9955 liblunicode: fix buffer size in UTF8bvnormalize
RE26:
• 261a4185
by Howard Chu at 2022-12-05T16:29:07+00:00
ITS#9955 liblunicode: fix buffer size in UTF8bvnormalize
RE25:
• cd1d0886
by Howard Chu at 2022-12-05T16:30:29+00:00
ITS#9955 liblunicode: fix buffer size in UTF8bvnormalize
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9955
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group|OpenLDAP-devs |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916
Issue ID: 9916
Summary: slapd crashes due to unaligned access in mdb.c on
Linux SPARC
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.3
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: glaubitz(a)physik.fu-berlin.de
Target Milestone: ---
The testsuite of the openldap package in Debian unstable fails on sparc64 with
a "bus error" which indicates an unaligned access [1]:
>>>>> Test succeeded
>>>>> 00:00:02 Finished test000-rootdse for mdb after 1 seconds.
>>>>> 00:00:02 Starting test001-slapadd for mdb...
running defines.sh
Running slapadd to build slapd database...
Bus error
slapadd failed (138)!
>>>>> 00:00:03 Failed test001-slapadd for mdb after 1 seconds
(exit 138)
Building openldap from git and running the affected test with GDB results in
the following backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000100000cc36c in mdb_node_add (mc=0x100004316e8, indx=<optimized out>,
key=0x7feffffe570, data=0x7feffffe560, pgno=0, flags=0)
at ./../../../libraries/liblmdb/mdb.c:7358
#1 0x00000100000d0894 in mdb_cursor_put (mc=0x100004316e8, key=0x7feffffe570,
data=0x7feffffe560, flags=16) at ./../../../libraries/liblmdb/mdb.c:6960
#2 0x00000100000d1224 in mdb_cursor_put (mc=0x10000431560, key=0x7feffffe6b0,
data=0x7feffffe6c0, flags=36) at ./../../../libraries/liblmdb/mdb.c:7007
#3 0x00000100000f0d24 in mdb_dn2id_add (op=0x7feffffea28, mcp=0x10000431560,
mcd=0x100004267a0, pid=<optimized out>, nsubs=<optimized out>,
upsub=<optimized out>, e=0x1000044c6b8) at dn2id.c:141
#4 0x00000100000dd79c in mdb_tool_next_id (op=0x7feffffea28, tid=<optimized
out>, e=0x1000044c6b8, text=0x7feffffec78, hole=<optimized out>)
at tools.c:519
#5 0x00000100000de67c in mdb_tool_entry_put (be=0x100003d9080,
e=0x1000044c6b8, text=0x7feffffec78) at tools.c:731
#6 0x00000100000b72f4 in slapadd (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>)
at slapadd.c:453
#7 0x0000010000016858 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7fefffff438) at
main.c:540
(gdb)
This was reproduced with:
$ gdb --args /home/glaubitz/openldap/servers/slapd/slapd -Ta -d 0 -f
/home/glaubitz/openldap/tests/testrun/slapadd.conf -l
./testdata/test-ordered.ldif
On the machine gcc202 running Debian on sparc64 in the GCC compile farm. Access
to the machines in the GCC compile farm can be obtained by any developer [2].
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openldap&arch=sparc64&ver=2.…
> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9806
Issue ID: 9806
Summary: MDB_PAGE_FULL on mdb_put
Product: LMDB
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: Mac OS
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: liblmdb
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: casey(a)rodarmor.com
Target Milestone: ---
I'm using the using latest lmdb from OpenLDAP, commit
e8813b12b6188d5ba5f174ff8726c438c8ca4bfd.
I'm getting an MDB_PAGE_FULL error after calling `mdb_put`. If I delete the
database and perform the same sequence of inserts, I get the same error in on
the same mdb_put.
If there's any information I can provide to help debug this, let me know.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
Issue ID: 9954
Summary: RE26 make test fails on riscv64
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 929
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=929&action=edit
Excerpt of OBS' build log
In openSUSE build system make test fails for RE26 on riscv64 (see attached file
including tests/testrun/slapd.1.log).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9950
Issue ID: 9950
Summary: Need example configuration backend-sock
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: earyutin(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi all !
I set up two backends on different ports, one is a proxy for MS AD, and the
second is a backend shell. I want to update to the latest version of OpenLDAP,
but there is no backend shell support in the next versions. I can't find any
documentation or examples that I could rely on to set up a backend for backend
sock.
Added the following to the files:
port 389
include /etc/ldap/schema/core.schema
include /etc/ldap/schema/cosine.schema
include /etc/ldap/schema/nis.schema
include /etc/ldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
modulepath /usr/lib/ldap
moduleload back_ldap.la
moduleload rwm.la
pidfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.pid
argsfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.args
database ldap
readonly yes
protocol-version 3
rebind-as-user yes
uri "ldap://ldap.test.com"
suffix "dc=test,dc=com"
overlay rwm
rwm-map attribute uid sAMAccountName
rwm-map attribute mail proxyAddresses
rebind-as-user yes
access to attrs=userPassword
by self write
by anonymous auth
by * none
access to *
by self write
by * none
port 9000
modulepath /usr/lib/ldap
moduleload back_sock.la
moduleload back_sock
database sock
suffix "dc=test,dc=com"
socketpath /tmp/slapd.sock
Next, I don't know where to go.
Could you demonstrate a working example of running and processing scripts based
on the backend-sock?
I need to launch my own script that would check the second factor (should check
for the presence of a certain attribute in the Active Directors directory and
then skip or not skip authorization based on a given condition).
Help me figure it out please..
Thank you !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9949
Issue ID: 9949
Summary: MDB_RDONLY txn segfaults on newly created database
Product: LMDB
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: liblmdb
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: jeffrey.reynolds(a)ticketmaster.com
Target Milestone: ---
The very simple code will cause a seg fault.
```
auto env = create_env("env_name");
// creates the environment. not included here because this part is in rust
// it will open or create the database. i don't think the problem lies in
here.
MDB_txn* txn{};
mdb_txn_begin(*env, nullptr, MDB_RDONLY, &txn);
MDB_dbi dbi{};
mdb_dbi_open(txn, "db_name", MDB_CREATE, &dbi);
```
This segfaults on `liblmdb/mdb.c:11050`. Specifically `tracked->mc_next = *tp;`
However, the problem isn't in mdb_dbi_open, it is failing because mt_cursors is
never initialized.
A small change ` mdb_txn_begin(*env, nullptr, 0, &txn);` and mt_cursors will
be initialized with the default env->me_txn0, that has a properly initialized
mt_cursors, per this line `liblmdb/mdb.c:5581`, `txn->mt_cursors = (MDB_cursor
**)(txn->mt_dbs + env->me_maxdbs);`
for the MDB_RDONLY transaction, it looks like it will initialize mt_cursors
_if_ it happens to have a parent, `liblmdb/mdb.c:3178`, but otherwise it leaves
it uninitialized.
Is this a bug, or do have i have to a parent to start a readonly transaction on
a new database?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8988
--- Comment #24 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to openldap-technical(a)kolttonen.fi from comment #21)
> Hello,
> Spending long time on comp.lang.c should be mandatory for all C
> programmers out there. It is shocking to invoke UB and not bother to fix
> it, instead blaming compiler writers and C standard writers.
>
> Best regards,
> Jokke Hämäläinen
I'm quite sure I've spent more time on comp.lang.c than most people out there.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c/c/BiVJrHbtZE4/m/W1C3fC-n2pEJhttps://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c/c/3TGIxk3epBw/m/CXVzV5aEehsJ
...
I was also a gcc maintainer from gcc 1.x to 2.x days.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9946
Issue ID: 9946
Summary: TLS: could not load verify locations
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hrishikesh.durg(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
Am seeing below errors on one of ldap proxy server --ANy clue how to fix it ?
===============
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: server_url =
https://iad37-c-sec-afe-01.us6.oraclecloud.com:443/openotp/,https://ch3-c-s…
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: soap_timeout = 10
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: user_settings = ChallengeMode=No
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: uid_attribute = uid, cn
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: client_id = LDAP
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: default_domain = oraclecloud
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: server_policy = 1
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: status_cache = 10
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: nolock_usernames =
ldapro-oci-sharedservices,ldapro-saas,ldapro-sbs
635a3252 openotp_parse_conf: global: denied_usernames = (none)
635a3252 openotp_init: Initializing libopenotp
TLS: could not load verify locations (file:`/opt/ldproxy/conf/ca.crt',dir:`').
TLS: error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory
bss_file.c:175
TLS: error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such file bss_file.c:182
TLS: error:0B084002:x509 certificate routines:X509_load_cert_crl_file:system
lib by_file.c:253
635a3252 main: TLS init def ctx failed: -1
635a3252 slapd stopped.
635a3252 connections_destroy: nothing to destroy.
===========
Not seeing anything when checked on location specified from logs :
[root@ldap-proxy-01 certs]# ls -l /opt/ldproxy
total 0
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 48 Nov 4 08:27 logs
[root@ldap-proxy-01 certs]#
==============
ldap.conf file looks as below :
#
# LDAP Defaults
#
# See ldap.conf(5) for details
# This file should be world readable but not world writable.
#BASE dc=example,dc=com
#URI ldap://ldap.example.com ldap://ldap-master.example.com:666
#SIZELIMIT 12
#TIMELIMIT 15
#DEREF never
TLS_CACERTDIR /etc/openldap/certs
# Turning this off breaks GSSAPI used with krb5 when rdns = false
SASL_NOCANON on
Any help /clue is much appreciated
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9945
Issue ID: 9945
Summary: Unable to import initial configuration (cn=config)
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: annamariet(a)crimsonlogic.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 927
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=927&action=edit
slapd.ldif
I was able to install openldap 2.5.13 successfully but I was getting error
below whenever I will import the initial configuration using this command:
/usr/local/sbin/slapadd -n 0 -F /usr/local/etc/slapd.d -l
/usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.ldif
Error:
str2entry: entry -1 has multiple DNs "cn=config" and "cn=module,cn=config"
slapadd: could not parse entry (line=1)
Closing DB...
In my slapd.ldif file, both DNs are enabled. Only this cn=module is throwing
error while other dn e.g. dn: cn=schema,cn=config are accepted. Am I missing
some packages or RPMs?
dn: cn=config
objectClass: olcGlobal
cn: config
.
.
.
dn: cn=module,cn=config
objectClass: olcModuleList
cn: module
olcModulepath: /usr/local/libexec/openldap
olcModuleload: back_mdb.la
olcModuleload: back_ldap.la
olcModuleload: back_passwd.la
olcModuleload: back_shell.la
.
.
.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9045
--- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Removed from RE25 as it is missing the requisite libldap functionality to fix
the issue there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9045
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.14 |2.6.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.