- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 8835] update admin guide to use "openssl rehash" instead of c_rehash
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8835 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 58caa2f8 by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2021-02-22T15:59:15+00:00 ITS#8835 - Update to use rehash command from OpenSSL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9476] New: Documentation error for MDB_GET_BOTH_RANGE
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9476 Issue ID: 9476 Summary: Documentation error for MDB_GET_BOTH_RANGE Product: LMDB Version: 0.9.28 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: jaqenn(a)hotmail.com Target Milestone: --- The documentation for MDB_GET_BOTH_RANGE is incorrect. This operation is documented as 'position at key, nearest data'. It appears to me that it should instead say 'position at key, first data greater than or equal to specified data'. If I call mdb_cursor_get with a valid key and a data smaller than all existing values, then lmdb returns MDB_SUCCESS and the cursor is positioned at the first value. If I call mdb_cursor_get with a valid key and a data larger than all existing values, then lmdb returns MDB_NOTFOUND and the cursor is not repositioned. The documentation 'nearest data' makes me expect that if I call mdb_cursor_get with a valid key and a data larger than all existing values, then lmdb would return MDB_SUCCESS and the cursor is positioned at the last value. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 9332] New: Compilation of 2.4.52 fails: "init.c", line 45: too many initializers for scalar
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9332 Issue ID: 9332 Summary: Compilation of 2.4.52 fails: "init.c", line 45: too many initializers for scalar Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.52 Hardware: All OS: Solaris Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stacey.marshall(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- The addition of integer ldo_tls_require_san to structure requires an additional initialization digit to macro LDAP_LDO_TLS_NULLARG. --- openldap-2.4.52/libraries/libldap/ldap-int.h 2020-08-28 09:10:00.000000000 -0700 +++ openldap-2.4.52.x/libraries/libldap/ldap-int.h 2020-09-01 10:08:44.661226154 -0700 @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ int ldo_tls_impl; int ldo_tls_crlcheck; int ldo_tls_require_san; -#define LDAP_LDO_TLS_NULLARG ,0,0,0,{0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},0,0,0,0 +#define LDAP_LDO_TLS_NULLARG ,0,0,0,{0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},0,0,0,0,0 #else #define LDAP_LDO_TLS_NULLARG #endif -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9161] Codespell report for "OpenLDAP" (on fossies.org)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '21

19 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161 --- Comment #19 from jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org <jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org> --- > Feel free to configure it to email me directly for both openldap master and > lmdb master. Done. And congratulations for the now "perfect" status. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9161] Codespell report for "OpenLDAP" (on fossies.org)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161 --- Comment #18 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org from comment #13) > By the way, there exists also the possibility to be informed by email if new > misspellings are detected but that may be a bit annoying ;-) Feel free to configure it to email me directly for both openldap master and lmdb master. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9161] Codespell report for "OpenLDAP" (on fossies.org)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED --- Comment #17 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • a48d8b48 by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2021-02-18T20:25:35+00:00 ITS#9161 - A few more typo fixes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8977] Make IDL sizes configurable in back-mdb
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8977 --- Comment #13 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #8) > --On Thursday, June 27, 2019 8:56 PM +0000 quanah(a)symas.com wrote: > > > --On Thursday, June 27, 2019 8:35 PM +0000 hyc(a)symas.com wrote: > > > >> No, because order is irrelevant for these. > > > > Cool, thanks! I'll continue on with deeper testing then. :) > > Given the current implementation of OpenLDAP, this feature is impossible to > use w/o recompiling OpenLDAP when a change to the IDL size is made. This > is because LDAP_PVT_THREAD_STACK_SIZE must be adjusted as well and that > requires a recompile. > > The default size for LDAP_PVT_THREAD_STACK_SIZE is: > > ( 1 * 1024 * 1024 * sizeof(void *) ) > > which works for an IDL size of 16 (2^16) which is 65536. > > If you change the IDL size, say to 22, then the new IDL size is: 4,194,304. > We then use this difference to find the offset we need to adjust > LDAP_PVT_THREAD_STACK_SIZE by: > > 4194304/65536 = 64 > > So it needs to be 64 time larger: > > ( 64 * 1024 * 1024 * sizeof(void *) ) > > > Generally, this feature is simply unusuable (currently) as a tunable given > the requirement for recompiling OpenLDAP to use it. I believe the above explanation is incorrect, so want to update it. 1024*1024^2 = 1,048,576 This appears to work with an idlexp of 20, which is also 1,048,576 So really what is required is that the LDAP_PVT_THREAD_STACK_SIZE_VALUE total needs to match the 2^idlexp value. So, 2^22 is 4,194,304, so in this case, the LDAP_PVT_THREAD_STACK_SIZE_VALUE would need to be recompiled as ( 4 * 1024 * 1024 * sizeof(void *) ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9469] New: Codespell report for "LMDB" (on fossies.org)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9469 Issue ID: 9469 Summary: Codespell report for "LMDB" (on fossies.org) Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- From https://fossies.org/linux/test/lmdb-master.tar.gz/codespell.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 8977] Make IDL sizes configurable in back-mdb
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8977 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ, reviewed | Target Milestone|2.4.53 |2.6.0 Assignee|quanah(a)openldap.org |bugs(a)openldap.org --- Comment #12 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • a40f6bff by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2021-02-18T18:47:40+00:00 ITS#8977 - Remove documentation for idlexp The idlexp feature depends on additional work that is not yet done. Remove documentation for the feature -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8835] update admin guide to use "openssl rehash" instead of c_rehash
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8835 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |2.5.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8835] update admin guide to use "openssl rehash" instead of c_rehash
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8835 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/246 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9180] Update slapo-memberOf man page about replication
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9180 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |TEST Target Milestone|--- |2.5.2 --- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • e6cf2378 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2021-02-18T16:28:12+00:00 ITS#9180 Mark memberof deprecated -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9161] Codespell report for "OpenLDAP" (on fossies.org)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9161] Codespell report for "OpenLDAP" (on fossies.org)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|TEST |--- Status|RESOLVED |CONFIRMED --- Comment #16 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- For the remaining typos in master: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/244 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8865] Publish admin guide in epub format
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8865 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8865] Publish admin guide in epub format
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8865 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8104] Admin Guide 2.4 pdf
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8104 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7744] [Patch] TLS_REQCERT section in ldap.conf is confusing
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7744 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|has_patch | Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.5.2 --- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • c25fa7b0 by Jan Synacek at 2021-02-18T14:45:51+00:00 ITS#7744 Fix TLS_REQCERT description -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8861] slapd-(async)meta(5) tls option missing ldaps
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8861 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.5.2 Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ | --- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • dfd8515e by Howard Chu at 2021-02-18T14:33:16+00:00 ITS#8861 clarify tls keyword -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7795] "manage" access right needs better description
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7795 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.5.2 --- Comment #12 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 70a7f517 by Howard Chu at 2021-02-18T13:23:47+00:00 ITS#7795 more detail for "manage" priv -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7744] [Patch] TLS_REQCERT section in ldap.conf is confusing
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7744 Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |TEST Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- in master -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8861] slapd-(async)meta(5) tls option missing ldaps
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8861 Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |TEST Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- fixed in master -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8861] slapd-(async)meta(5) tls option missing ldaps
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8861 --- Comment #5 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #4) > (In reply to Howard Chu from comment #3) > > > Sounds more like the back-ldap manpage is wrong. The use of "ldaps" is > > implicit in the URI, so there's no point in supporting it here and it should > > be an error to allow it here. In particular it makes no sense to allow it > > here if it differs from the URI. > > Ok, although that doesn't entirely answer the rest of my question (i.e., > about tls_reqcert etc missing from back-meta). > > Ironically I would note you're literally the person who added the "ldaps" > option to back-ldap. > > a6a8fb514b (Howard Chu 2007-01-08 23:36:24 +0000 511) { > BER_BVC( "ldaps" ), LDAP_BACK_F_TLS_LDAPS }, The original text in that commit is more clear: +Specify the use of TLS when a regular connection is initialized. The +StartTLS extended operation will be used unless the URI directive protocol +scheme is \fBldaps://\fP. In that case this keyword may only be +set to "ldaps" and the StartTLS operation will not be used. So this setting is required to agree with the URI. The only reason this keyword is defined here is because slap_bindconf_unparse emits it for ldaps URIs and it would have taken extra work to omit it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9161] Codespell report for "OpenLDAP" (on fossies.org)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161 --- Comment #15 from jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org <jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org> --- Oops, again overseen, now corrected. By the way, the according Doxygen related information are also used by Fossies https://fossies.org/dox/openldap/lmdb_8h.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8104] Admin Guide 2.4 pdf
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '21

18 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8104 Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- images are present. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs