https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8659
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.5.2
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/254
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8454
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.5.2
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8454
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/254
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8659
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
reqEntryUUID was added in 4035016796f2d505d3b6885002339b8c20581ada
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7262
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 38ea26b3
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-02-24T22:15:48+00:00
ITS#7262 Retrieve the policy from the correct backend
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9293
Issue ID: 9293
Summary: slapo-ppolicy stores pwdGraceUseTime only with seconds
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.50
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com
Target Milestone: ---
If password is expired slapo-ppolicy can return the number of grace logins for
changing own password (graceAuthNsRemaining).
slapd derives graceAuthNsRemaining from number of pwdGraceUseTime values. But
those timestamps are only stored with a granularity of a second.
Thus multiple grace logins are possible within a second without decremeting
graceAuthNsRemaining value.
This is unexpected and also leads to absurd work-arounds when writing automated
tests like this:
https://gitlab.com/ae-dir/python-ldap0/-/blob/master/tests/test_ppolicy.py#…
Either a real Integer counter should be used or fraction of seconds should be
used in pwdGraceUseTime values.
This is a similar problem like pwdFailureTime solved in ITS#7161.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7596
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7596
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• d1799a50
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-02-24T17:03:22+00:00
ITS#7596 Report correct number of grace authentications left
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |2.5.3
Severity|normal |blocker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |OL_2_5_REQ
--- Comment #6 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Since we're about to release a new version and I think we're bumping ABI again,
we should really get this in.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7259
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7259
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 3925b8e0
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-02-24T13:19:40+00:00
ITS#7259 Clarify password length considerations
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7832
--- Comment #18 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #17)
> (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #16)
>
> > > - I get a segfault when my client first connects to slapd when I compile
> > > master branch with:
>
> Also please provide the exact configuration file or cn=config database you
> are testing with.
Additionally, file the fact it's crashing as its own issue with the above
config as an attachment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9347
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group|OpenLDAP-devs |
--- Comment #2 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
This is certainly not an integer overflow of any kind, just an invalid policy,
hence it is ignored and an error is logged. Whether that is a security issue is
debatable, as every policy admin should make sure the policy they set is valid
and is enforced correctly.
As an aside, it might be worth trying to apply the default policy if a
specified policy doesn't exist/doesn't validate, but that would be a change
from existing behaviour as enshrined in the test suite.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7832
--- Comment #17 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #16)
> > - I get a segfault when my client first connects to slapd when I compile
> > master branch with:
Also please provide the exact configuration file or cn=config database you are
testing with.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7832
--- Comment #16 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to David Coutadeur from comment #14)
> Hello,
>
> I have made some progress in ppm integration, but I have some blocking
> questions:
>
> - I suppose you want a merge request on openldap/openldap master branch and
> not OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5, am I right?
Correct, all merges go against master.
> - I get a segfault when my client first connects to slapd when I compile
> master branch with:
> Do you have the same error? Is this due to a specific option?
I've not encountered any segfaults, so it may be a compile specific option.
The master branch goes through constant CI/CD with the full test suite and is
not exhibiting any problems. I will see if I can reproduce the issue with your
specific compile options.
> - I noticed nssov overlay does not compile correctly: there is a missing
> #include <errno.h> somewhere, and other remaining bugs.
Ok, feel free to open up issue reports about it.
> - do you expect other integration things than the code deployed into
> contrib/slapd-modules with an appropriate Makefile, README, LICENSE,...?
Yes.
> - about the Notice, I have made two separate files in the ppm directory:
> LICENSE and NOTICES. The license is the OpenLDAP License. The notice is the
> following:
The IPR notification goes into this bug, not as a separate file. The LICENSE
file itself sounds fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7832
--- Comment #14 from David Coutadeur <david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com> ---
Hello,
I have made some progress in ppm integration, but I have some blocking
questions:
- I suppose you want a merge request on openldap/openldap master branch and not
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5, am I right?
- I get a segfault when my client first connects to slapd when I compile master
branch with:
```
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/openldap --libdir=/usr/local/openldap/lib64
--enable-overlays --enable-modules --enable-dynamic=yes --with-tls=openssl
--enable-debug --with-cyrus-sasl --enable-spasswd --enable-ppolicy
--enable-crypt --enable-ldap -enable-slapi --enable-meta --enable-sock
--enable-wrappers --enable-rlookups
```
Do you have the same error? Is this due to a specific option?
ppm was working with my last test with Ondrej 6 month ago, so I suppose when
this segfault is fixed it will work quite fast.
- I noticed nssov overlay does not compile correctly: there is a missing
#include <errno.h> somewhere, and other remaining bugs.
- do you expect other integration things than the code deployed into
contrib/slapd-modules with an appropriate Makefile, README, LICENSE,...?
- about the Notice, I have made two separate files in the ppm directory:
LICENSE and NOTICES. The license is the OpenLDAP License. The notice is the
following:
"The attached modifications to OpenLDAP Software are subject to the following
notice:
Copyright 2021 David Coutadeur
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP Public License."
Does it seem correct to you?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7262
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/250
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8950
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.1 |2.5.2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8950
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|VERIFIED |CONFIRMED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7768
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.2 |---
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
Keywords|reviewed |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7768
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
slapo-chain already says "All URIs not listed in the configuration are chained
anonymously", works as designed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.