- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 10155] New: Invalid [aka FUZZ] -F and -T options can core dump ldapsearch
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10155 Issue ID: 10155 Summary: Invalid [aka FUZZ] -F and -T options can core dump ldapsearch Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: doug.leavitt(a)oracle.com Target Milestone: --- A customer reported core dumps in ldapsearch which has been tracked to the the improper use of the -F and -T options. The customer confirmed removing the invalid -F and -T options from their script eliminated the core dumps. The CLI arguments of the failing ldapsearch look like: ldapsearch <good CLI args> -F , -T u <good filter and attr args> The good CLI args include proper uses of -H... -x -D ... -w ... -b ... -s ... The good filter and attrs are also valid CLI inputs. The "bad" args are <sp>-F<sp><COMMA><sp>-T<sp>-u<sp> The -u is also valid but it is consumed as a directory name of -T From man page and code review the the -F argument is supposed to be a valid URL. and the -T argument is supposed to be a valid directory The core file output indicates that main calls free after the search takes place. The location is believed to be here: 1658 if ( urlpre != NULL ) { 1659 if ( def_urlpre != urlpre ) 1660 free( def_urlpre ); <--------- 1661 free( urlpre ); 1662 } ... 1672 tool_exit( ld, rc ); ... This is the first example of the use of -F we have seen so it is unclear how this should be fixed. But code review of ldapsearch.c and common.c exposed a few weaknesses that could help in addressing the issue. Observed weaknesses: The getopt processing code for -T does not check that the arg is actually a directory and fail/error when bad input is provided. Perhaps at least an access(2) check should be performed? It is unclear if -F should only accept file:// URLs. The existing code does not sufficiently check any URL format instead it processes the argument by looking for the first '/' [no error checking] and determine the remainder to be a tmpdir location similar to the -T argument. So, Fuzz input of <COMMA> seems to eventually lead to the core files. It is unclear if -F and -T should be mutually exclusive or not. It seems like the fix to this issue is to add better error checking and to fail on FUZZ inputs. I defer a solution to upstream as it probably requires project direction I lack. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 10272] New: translucent regression when asking for attributes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10272 Issue ID: 10272 Summary: translucent regression when asking for attributes Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.8 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: mike(a)nolta.net Target Milestone: --- Hi, Attached please find a translucent overlay regression testcase. The test works in version 2.4.59, but fails in versions 2.5.5 and 2.6.8. Basically, `ldapsearch "employeeType=fulltime"` returns the expected entries, but `ldapsearch "employeeType=fulltime" cn` returns nothing. -Mike -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10227] New: Asyncmeta will not reset a connection if a bind operation fails with LDAP_OTHER, leaving the connection in invalid state
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10227 Issue ID: 10227 Summary: Asyncmeta will not reset a connection if a bind operation fails with LDAP_OTHER, leaving the connection in invalid state Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.8 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- The issue is difficult to reproduce, it can happen under heavy traffic if the target is configured to do a sasl bind with a custom saslmech. In any case, currently asyncmeta only resets the connection of the error is LDAP_UNAVAILABLE, which is incorrect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10219] New: Modify of olcDisabled by removing and adding a value invokes db_open twice
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10219 Issue ID: 10219 Summary: Modify of olcDisabled by removing and adding a value invokes db_open twice Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- A database is enabled by default, and therefore a missing olcDisabled attribute is equivalent to a value of FALSE. This means that currently a modify operation that removes a olcDisabled value will invoke the db_open handler for that database, even if in the same modify operation a value of TRUE is added. A modify operation like this: dn: olcDatabase={1}asyncmeta,cn=config changetype: modify delete: olcDisabled olcDisabled: FALSE - add: olcDisabled olcDisabled: TRUE - will call both db_open and db_close. This could be potentially harmful if the backend type allocates memory on db_open like asyncmeta, for example. It is a rare case, but it is best to fix it just in case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10224] New: tlso_session_pinning: return codes from EVP* calls are not checked; can result in crashes or undefined behavior in library
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10224 Issue ID: 10224 Summary: tlso_session_pinning: return codes from EVP* calls are not checked; can result in crashes or undefined behavior in library Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: yaneurabeya(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- EVP* calls made in tlso_session_pinning on lines 1189-1191 [1] are not checked when computing the digest which is eventually placed in `keyhash.bv_val` on line [2]. Not checking the EVP* calls can result in undefined behavior, e.g., a library crash with SIGBUS, SIGSEGV, etc, and/or incorrect results when analyzing `keyhash.bv_val` later. The calls should be checked to avoid this scenario. Reported by Coverity. 1. https://github.com/openldap/openldap/blob/15edb3b30f2b6a3dbdf77cc42d39466d5… 2. https://github.com/openldap/openldap/blob/15edb3b30f2b6a3dbdf77cc42d39466d5… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10280] New: Combining positive & negated filters doesn't work with dynlist
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10280 Issue ID: 10280 Summary: Combining positive & negated filters doesn't work with dynlist Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.18 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: code(a)pipoprods.org Target Milestone: --- The directory contains 3 users & 2 groups. user1 is in group1, user2 is in group2, user3 isn't is any group. Filter [1] matches users that are either: - member of group1 - member of group2 ✅ It returns user1 & user2 Filter [2] matches user that are: - not member of group1 nor group2 ✅ It returns user3 Filter [3] should match users that are either: - member of group1 - member of group2 - not member of group1 nor group2 ❌ It should return the 3 users but only returns users matched by the first part of the filter (whatever the first part, if we swap both parts we get the complementary search results) Filter [1]: (|(memberOf=cn=group1,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com)(memberOf=cn=group2,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com)) Filter [2]: (!(|(memberOf=cn=group1,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com)(memberOf=cn=group2,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com))) Filter [3]: (|(memberOf=cn=group1,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com)(memberOf=cn=group2,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com)(!(|(memberOf=cn=group1,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com)(memberOf=cn=group2,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com)))) Here's my dynlist config: ``` dn: olcOverlay={2}dynlist,olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcDynListConfig olcOverlay: {2}dynlist olcDynListAttrSet: {0}groupOfURLs memberURL member+memberOf@groupOfNames structuralObjectClass: olcDynListConfig entryUUID: 7df8328a-fd72-103e-82df-6fed25d5f6c8 creatorsName: cn=config createTimestamp: 20240902122741Z entryCSN: 20240902122741.257759Z#000000#000#000000 modifiersName: cn=config modifyTimestamp: 20240902122741Z ``` Here's a LDIF to initialise directory contents: ``` dn: ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com changetype: add objectClass: organizationalUnit ou: example-groups dn: ou=example-users,dc=example,dc=com changetype: add objectClass: organizationalUnit ou: example-users dn: uid=user1,ou=example-users,dc=example,dc=com changetype: add objectClass: inetOrgPerson cn: User sn: One uid: user1 dn: uid=user2,ou=example-users,dc=example,dc=com changetype: add objectClass: inetOrgPerson cn: User sn: Two uid: user2 dn: uid=user3,ou=example-users,dc=example,dc=com changetype: add objectClass: inetOrgPerson cn: User sn: Three uid: user3 dn: cn=group1,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com changetype: add objectClass: groupOfNames cn: group1 member: uid=user1,ou=example-users,dc=example,dc=com dn: cn=group2,ou=example-groups,dc=example,dc=com changetype: add objectClass: groupOfNames cn: group2 member: uid=user2,ou=example-users,dc=example,dc=com ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10287] New: Add test case for mdb_get
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10287 Issue ID: 10287 Summary: Add test case for mdb_get Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ahmed.zaki(a)imperial.ac.uk Target Milestone: --- Added a new file mtest7.c which tests the export mdb_get(). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10282] New: MSVC builds are not supported
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10282 Issue ID: 10282 Summary: MSVC builds are not supported Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.18 Hardware: All OS: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: cmb(a)php.net Target Milestone: --- I'm a maintainer of an OpenLDAP port[1] which is used to build liblber and libldap for PHP on Windows. So far this uses hand-made configuration and Visual Studio solutions, but that is not sustainable in the long run. Instead, I'd rather like to use the autotools based build chain with MSYS2 (or Cygwin), but still using the MSVC build tools (cl.exe, link.exe, etc.) and the MS Windows SDK for best compatibility with other builds for PHP on Windows. Apparently, this is not yet supported by OpenLDAP (2.5.18). I've managed to add some patches[2] to get where I'd like this to go[3]. Some of the patches are highly PHP (BC) specific, some are just quick hacks (because I don't know better), but some appear to be appropriate for inclusion into the OpenLDAP sources. Are you generally interested in supporting MSVC tools and MS Windows SDKs? If so, what would be the best way to contribute -- sending MRs to the repo[4]? Should these tackle individual issues, or rather be complete (note that I'm likely not able to provide a full-fledged solution due to my very limited knowledge of autotools and Linux, and limited time). [1] <https://github.com/winlibs/openldap> [2] <https://github.com/winlibs/openldap/tree/cmb/2.5.18> [3] <https://github.com/cmb69/winlib-builder/actions/runs/11713086509> [4] <https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 7249] slapd segfault with memberof overlay on frontend db
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.6.9 |2.6.10 --- Comment #20 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Need to see if a fix similar to what was done in 10135 needs doing here -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10135] New: dynlist (and maybe others) doesn't use the right overinst context in callbacks
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10135 Issue ID: 10135 Summary: dynlist (and maybe others) doesn't use the right overinst context in callbacks Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Running the test suite with `-fsanitize=address` picks up a bug in https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/860b61f41dfeeb19cc0eb011f… Here, op->o_bd->bd_info isn't actually dynlist but mdb's own static bi, so overlay_entry_get_ov then reaches into the void when reading on->on_info. It's very likely that other places/overlays share the same bug as it is subtle and doesn't get picked up immediately (slap_overinst embeds a BackendInfo and oi_orig is not often set). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 7249] slapd segfault with memberof overlay on frontend db
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=10135 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10071] New: Extra sids in cookie should only be ignored for replay consideration
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10071 Issue ID: 10071 Summary: Extra sids in cookie should only be ignored for replay consideration Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- A consumer's cookie might contain sids that the provider is not aware of. Those are currently screened out. This is appropriate for initial checks whether/how to allow the operation to go ahead but might be needed for content determination in refresh/persist. As such the cookie should be retained rather than edited in place. I don't have the logs from a failed test at hand but will post the analysis/logs if I find them again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10271] New: EINTR is handled as LDAP_SERVER_DOWN in socket operation in ldap client APIs
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10271 Issue ID: 10271 Summary: EINTR is handled as LDAP_SERVER_DOWN in socket operation in ldap client APIs Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.18 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: volan.shu(a)nokia.com Target Milestone: --- In case EINTR fired by OS in any case in ldap client api for socket related operation, the ldap client API returns LDAP_SERVER_DOWN which is not correct. In this case, I suppose the ldap client need retry socket operateion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10284] New: RFE: retain subordinate entries to cn=connections,cn=monitor branch for a configurable duration
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10284 Issue ID: 10284 Summary: RFE: retain subordinate entries to cn=connections,cn=monitor branch for a configurable duration Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: chris.paul(a)rexconsulting.net Target Milestone: --- Please consider an enhancement to retain entries under the cn=connections,cn=monitor branch for a configurable duration. This would enable monitoring of short-lived connections that currently disappear between polling intervals, significantly increasing the utility of this metric for connection tracking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10285] New: Account on gitlab -- gitlab account awaiting approval
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285 Issue ID: 10285 Summary: Account on gitlab -- gitlab account awaiting approval Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ahmed.zaki(a)imperial.ac.uk Target Milestone: --- Dear, I have some test cases I would like to contribute to LMDB. I created an account using the email address: ahmed.zaki(a)imperial.ac.uk Would it be possible to approve the account ? Kind regards, Ahmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10106] New: Add organization to web list of OpenLDAP support providers
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106 Issue ID: 10106 Summary: Add organization to web list of OpenLDAP support providers Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sudo(a)migrateq.io Target Milestone: --- Hello! This request is being opened as suggested by Quanah Gibson-Mount. Could you please add Migrateq to your OpenLDAP Support page on https://openldap.org/support Company: Migrateq Inc. Website: https://migrateq.io/support/tech/openldap Migrateq provides migrations, integrations and advanced 24/7/365 technical support for OpenLDAP and most Linux and Open Source Software. Thank you =) Richard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

[Issue 10281] New: Update organization on web list of OpenLDAP support providers
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10281 Issue ID: 10281 Summary: Update organization on web list of OpenLDAP support providers Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sudo(a)migrateq.io Target Milestone: --- Hello, this OpenLDAP support provider on the OpenLDAP support page, Migrateq, has recently changed their name to "Linux Pro", and kindly request an update: Company: Linux Pro Website: https://linux.pro/support/tech/openldap Linux Pro provides migrations, integrations and advanced 24/7/365 technical support for OpenLDAP and most Linux and Open Source Software. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10141] New: 100% CPU consumption with ldap_int_tls_connect
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10141 Issue ID: 10141 Summary: 100% CPU consumption with ldap_int_tls_connect Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: vivekanand754(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- While doing secure ldap connection, i'm seeing that connection is getting stuck in read block in case it is unable to connect active directory sometime: ~ # strace -p 15049 strace: Process 15049 attached read(3, 0x55ef720bda53, 5) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) read(3, 0x55ef720bda53, 5) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) .. .. .. .. After putting some logs, I can see that "ldap_int_tls_start" function of "openldap-2.6.3/libraries/libldap/tls2.c" calls "ldap_int_tls_connect" in while loop. It seems to be blocking call, as it try to connect continuously until it get connected(ti_session_connect returns 0) and thus consumes 100% CPU during that time. Is there any known issue ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 17

[Issue 8047] TIMEOUT and NETWORK_TIMEOUT don't work properly with SSL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8047 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vivekanand.devworks(a)gmail.c | |om --- Comment #16 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- *** Issue 10141 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8047] TIMEOUT and NETWORK_TIMEOUT don't work properly with SSL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8047 --- Comment #15 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- RE26: • 5645e370 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2024-11-12T17:55:56+00:00 ITS#8047 Fix TLS connection timeout handling -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8047] TIMEOUT and NETWORK_TIMEOUT don't work properly with SSL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8047 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED --- Comment #14 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- head: • d143f7a2 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2024-10-26T20:51:35+00:00 ITS#8047 Fix TLS connection timeout handling -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8047] TIMEOUT and NETWORK_TIMEOUT don't work properly with SSL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8047 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |2.6.9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9393] New: Provider a LDAP filter validation function
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9393 Issue ID: 9393 Summary: Provider a LDAP filter validation function Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.56 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: best(a)univention.de Target Milestone: --- In many situations I need to validate if a user submitted LDAP filter has valid syntax. It seems there is no official function to check this. Could you provide one? libraries/libldap/filter.c: ldap_pvt_put_filter() can be used as a basis. -- My current workaround is using a unconnected ldap connection and do a search with that filter. This yields a FILTER_ERROR (invalid filter) or a SERVER_DOWN error (invalid filter). See also: https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/pull/272 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 12

[Issue 9042] loglevel setting that allows seeing attribute values for MOD operations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9042 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 4b8e60f8 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2024-10-25T20:02:19+00:00 ITS#9042 Log modify values under STATS2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9914] New: Add OS pagesize to the back-mdb monitor information
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Nov '24

12 Nov '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9914 Issue ID: 9914 Summary: Add OS pagesize to the back-mdb monitor information Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The pagesize that back-mdb is using for pages should be exposed via the cn=monitor backend, as a remote client doing a query will not have that information available to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs