https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5271
--- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Probably timelimit should have this as well
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5271
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |2.6.0
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=9512
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9001
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ, reviewed |
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• e36d1e31
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-03-30T15:46:40+01:00
ITS#9001 manual changes
• 3bd1b090
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-03-30T15:46:40+01:00
ITS#9001 Use a TAvl for request tracking in libldap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8698
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ, reviewed |
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 0df931b9
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-03-30T02:10:19+00:00
ITS#8698 Only remove our own callback
• 51c444b0
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-03-30T02:10:19+00:00
ITS#8698 Defer policy checker cleanup if it's a pw extop
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847
--- Comment #43 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• bc0d62db
by Howard Chu at 2021-03-27T10:38:59+00:00
Revert "ITS#8847 more fallout from ldap_pvt_sockaddrstr move"
This reverts commit f2ddf89e3cbe2ba65728cfc7b4c022d72192f442.
Move Sockaddr def to ac/socket.h instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
--- Comment #9 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 38d1ac04
by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2021-03-29T18:11:00+00:00
ITS#5365 - Add support for symbol versioning libldap and lilber
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9510
Issue ID: 9510
Summary: Build fails with slibtool and --disable-shared with
undefined pthread references
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: orbea(a)riseup.net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 810
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=810&action=edit
Build log with rdlibtool.
When building openldap with --disable-shared and slibtool
(https://dev.midipix.org/cross/slibtool) the build fails with many undefined
pthread references.
My understanding is that building static libraries exposes undefined references
that otherwise would be exposed with -no-undefined. I am not sure how GNU
libtool avoids this, perhaps it silently adds -lpthread? For the record GNU
libtool will silently ignore -no-undefind while slibtool will not.
This exposes several related issues in openldap.
* libldap has no configure check indicating it requires --with-threads.
* libldap does add $(LTHREAD_LIBS) to its $(LINK_LIBS), but then actually fails
to use it.
* The client tools requires threads, but they also have no configure check
indicating so.
* The client tools do not have a configure check to disable them, but there is
a --without-threads.
* The client tools really do needs $(LTHREAD_LIBS) added to the $(LINK_LIBS)
I made a MR that fixes these problems or see the attached patch.
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/303
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7832
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
--- Comment #20 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• f3975b3f
by David Coutadeur at 2021-03-26T15:01:36+00:00
Proposing ppolicy extended module for OpenLDAP (issue #7832)
• c81bb207
by David Coutadeur at 2021-03-26T15:01:36+00:00
clean and homogenize ppm files for integration into contrib (issue #7832 !252)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847
--- Comment #42 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 829263c4
by Howard Chu at 2021-03-26T13:45:26+00:00
ITS#8847 move lutil_sockaddrstr() to ldap_pvt_sockaddrstr()
Commits:
• f2ddf89e
by Howard Chu at 2021-03-26T14:12:47+00:00
ITS#8847 more fallout from ldap_pvt_sockaddrstr move
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8698
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/304
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9347
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ, reviewed |
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 61e9b6d3
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-03-25T23:57:07+00:00
ITS#9347 Log which policy attribute is invalid
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7788
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |2.5.3
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 109d967f
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2021-03-25T19:43:18+00:00
ITS#7788 Hashing should be independent of a useable policy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #41 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 8ebd0650
by HoweverAT at 2021-03-25T17:37:26+00:00
ITS#8847 Print local address in connection dump
• 9d594a11
by HoweverAT at 2021-03-25T18:47:11+00:00
ITS#8847 Add SOCKET_BIND_ADDRESSES Option
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.4 |2.5.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7786
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/299
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |quanah(a)openldap.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9509
Issue ID: 9509
Summary: ldap_pvt_tls_check_hostname missing prototype
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: Other
OS: Mac OS
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: noloader(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi Everyone,
I'm building OpenLDAP 2.4.57 on Apple M1. Apple turned on -Werror for missing
prototypes. It results in:
tls2.c:378:9: error: implicit declaration of function
'ldap_pvt_tls_check_hostname' is invalid in C99
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
err = ldap_pvt_tls_check_hostname( ld, ssl, host );
You can access an Apple M1 machine on the GCC Compile Farm. It is GCC304, port
2409. If needed you can get an account at
https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/users/new/.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9508
Issue ID: 9508
Summary: Add support for maxentrysize for slapd-mdb
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Symas has code to set a max entry size limitation on entries in back-mdb. This
code needs upstreaming for 2.5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8707
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.5.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8707
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |CONFIRMED
--- Comment #30 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
This patch is seriously deficient and will be rejected unless there is follow
up in the near future from the patch author.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8950
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |TEST
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• c6e521fa
by Howard Chu at 2021-03-23T14:58:09+00:00
ITS#8950 move txn setup to frontend
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.3 |---
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668
--- Comment #4 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Howard Chu from comment #3)
> I was able to reproduce the behavior, but there is no bug here.
>
> You're seeing the old entry because it's left over from a previous run of
> slapd.
> The pcache overlay will forget what it knows about the cache contents on a
> restart, unless you configure pcachePersist. When you enable this setting,
> then it remembers its cached queries across restarts and will expire old
> entries instead of returning them in new search requests.
To be clear: I could only reproduce this behavior if slapd was stopped and
restarted between queries:
1: perform a cacheable search
2: shutdown slapd and restart before cached query expires
3: move entry on remote server
4: repeat the cacheable search
5: repeat the cacheable search again
On step 1, pcache will query the remote and store a copy of the returned entry.
On step 2, the restart will make pcache forget it stored anything.
On step 4, pcache will query the remote server because it thinks its cache is
empty, and store and return the new result (only).
On step 5, pcache will serve the request entirely from cache, and return both
the old and new entries.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
I was able to reproduce the behavior, but there is no bug here.
You're seeing the old entry because it's left over from a previous run of
slapd.
The pcache overlay will forget what it knows about the cache contents on a
restart, unless you configure pcachePersist. When you enable this setting,
then it remembers its cached queries across restarts and will expire old
entries instead of returning them in new search requests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9251
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ, reviewed |
--- Comment #8 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• f1ebb456
by Howard Chu at 2021-03-22T17:31:13+00:00
ITS#9251 make max filter depth configurable
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.