- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

(ITS#5278) doc contribution - set examples - recursive groups
by andreas＠mandriva.com.br 13 Dec '07

13 Dec '07

Full_Name: Andreas Hasenack Version: 2.4.6 OS: Linux URL: http://users.mandriva.com.br/~andreas/ldap-doc/doc-set-examples/set-recursi… Submission from: (NULL) (200.140.247.99) Please find at http://users.mandriva.com.br/~andreas/ldap-doc/doc-set-examples/set-recursi… a documentation contribution giving set examples. So far, it has one example (recursive groups) and I will expand it to include more examples in the future. It is not in the form of a patch because I'm not sure in the guide where it would fit in, considering that the ACL part is duplicated (cn=config and slapd.conf) and will probably be changed. These files are derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Andreas Hasenack <andreas(a)mandriva.com.br>. These modifications are not subject to any license of Mandriva. I, Andreas Hasenack, hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice.

1 0

Re: (ITS#5274) add search to online docs
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 13 Dec '07

13 Dec '07

kurt(a)OpenLDAP.org writes: > There are lots of existing ways of searching an admin guide. > > First, most web search engines can be told to localize their search to > a set of pages. For instance: > http://www.google.com/search?q=site:www.openldap.org/doc/admin24+rwm Not everyone knows how to do that. And in some cases such a Google search gives a better interface than a browser search, since it can show all resulsts together, with some context. The HTML seems easy enough - I derived this from a "search within results" form in a Google search: <form action="http://www.google.com/search"> <input type=hidden name=q value="site:openldap.org/doc/admin24"> <input type=text name=as_q size=31 maxlength=256 value=""> <input type=submit name=btnG VALUE="Search Admin Guide"> </form> I don't know how easy it is to auto-insert it in the Guide though. (Could easily be put as a third column in the /doc/index.html table I imagine.) -- Regards, Hallvard

1 0

Re: (ITS#5274) add search to online docs
by kurt＠OpenLDAP.org 13 Dec '07

13 Dec '07

On Dec 12, 2007, at 12:02 PM, craig5(a)pobox.com wrote: > Full_Name: Craig Sebenik > Version: 2.3.35 > OS: CentOS 4.5 > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (209.220.152.66) > > > It would be helpful if the admin documentation on the OpenLDAP web > pages had > some way to search. There are lots of existing ways of searching an admin guide. First, most web search engines can be told to localize their search to a set of pages. For instance: http://www.google.com/search?q=site:www.openldap.org/doc/admin24+rwm Second, the guide is available as a readily searchable single HTML document. Third, the guide is available as readily searchable PDF document. > > > http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/ > > IMO, it would be fantastic if there was a simple search box on each > page and an > "advanced search page" with more options. Use your browsers built-in search functions to search any single page, and if they aren't advanced enough for you, try a different browser. > However, a simple search box on just > the main page would be a great start. See above suggestions. Lastly, such things are easier said than done. I simply don't see sufficient value here to warrant expending the significant resources it would take to design, implement, test, and deploy a solution fulfilling this request. -- Kurt

1 0

Re: (ITS#5274) add search to online docs
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 13 Dec '07

13 Dec '07

craig5(a)pobox.com wrote: > Full_Name: Craig Sebenik > Version: 2.3.35 > OS: CentOS 4.5 > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (209.220.152.66) > > > It would be helpful if the admin documentation on the OpenLDAP web pages had > some way to search. > > http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/ > > IMO, it would be fantastic if there was a simple search box on each page and an > "advanced search page" with more options. However, a simple search box on just > the main page would be a great start. > > Maybe htdig or similar, or a custom Google link? -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. OpenLDAP Engineering Team. E ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org Community developed LDAP software. http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#5277) Feature request: Impose SSL/TLS for some addresses/interfaces
by michele.codutti＠uniud.it 13 Dec '07

13 Dec '07

Full_Name: Michele Codutti Version: 2.3 OS: Linux/Debian URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (158.110.7.132) Recently I need to implement a clustered system of OpenLDAP with syncrepl replication method. Every node has two interfaces: one public (let's say eth0) and one connected to a private subnet (let's say eth1). What I want is to impose only SSL/TLS connection on eth0 and unencrypted connection on eth1. I want this because is useless to encrypt syncrepl traffic through the private (dedicated and secured) subnet. I haven't found any directive that do what I want. At last I've implemented a solution suggested by Pierangelo Masaratti. I imposed TLS/SSL by these ACL's: access to * by sockurl="ldap://$PUBLIC_NAME" ssf=128 break by sockurl="ldap://$PUBLIC_NAME" stop by sockurl="ldaps://$PUBLIC_NAME" ssf=128 break by sockurl="ldaps://$PUBLIC_NAME" stop by * break Pierangelo also suggested me to write an ITS to ask for a specific directive to do this more naturaly. So here I'm. Could it be done?

1 0

(ITS#5236) core.ldif differs from core.schema
by hyc＠symas.com 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

Michael Ströder wrote: > HI! > > following up on this because some older schema files reference > 'countryName' (and worked with RE23). > > Howard Chu wrote: >> I'm puzzled why RFC4519 drops the 'countryName' alias for this type >> from the RFC2256 definition. > > Me too... > > How to deal with that (except changing the schema files of other vendors)? After chatting with Kurt, we confirmed that there was no reason to drop the alias from our schema files, so I've restored it. (Implementations are allowed to recognize multiple names for the same attribute. Since slapd still only generates the canonical name in its output, we are still conformant.) -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5261) Samba4 can 'hang' OpenLDAP slapd
by hyc＠symas.com 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 14:22 -0800, Howard Chu wrote: >> Andrew Bartlett wrote: >>> I wonder if there is a known issue with db 4.6 and OpenLDAP, as Fedora's >>> OpenLDAP seems to include it's own libslapd_db-4.4.so (it has a >>> slapd_db_stat to match, for 4.4). >> I think they packaged that to avoid using BDB 4.3 which was known to be >> broken. I've been using OpenLDAP with BDB 4.6.1 thru 4.6.3, and 4.6.18 thru >> 4.6.21 without any trouble. > > Where there any further clues on my deadlock in the db_stat output? I've just built Samba4 from svn and tried to run this test, but it fails much earlier on my AMD64 system. It looks like your ldbsearch client is generating an invalid request, perhaps it's not 64-bit aware. In st/dc/private/ldap/logs I see: >>> slap_listener(ldapi://%2Fhome%2Fsoftware%2FSAMBA_4_0%2Fsource%2Fst%2Fdc%2Fprivate%2Fldap%2Fldapi) daemon: activity on 1 descriptor daemon: activity on: daemon: epoll: listen=7 active_threads=0 tvp=NULL daemon: listen=7, new connection on 20 daemon: activity on 1 descriptor daemon: activity on: 20r daemon: read active on 20 daemon: added 20r (active) listener=(nil) daemon: epoll: listen=7 active_threads=0 tvp=NULL connection_get(20) connection_get(20): got connid=0 connection_read(20): checking for input on id=0 ber_get_next ldap_read: want=8, got=8 0000: 80 04 00 0a 01 00 0a 01 ........ ber_get_next on fd 20 failed errno=34 (Numerical result out of range) connection_read(20): input error=-2 id=0, closing. All LDAP requests should begin with 0x30, the BER Sequence tag. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5275) Poor LDAP performance when we reach 1000 connections
by hyc＠symas.com 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

The ITS is for tracking actual bugs. There is no evidence of anything other than a misconfiguration issue here. Use the OpenLDAP-software mailing list for questions about how to use the software. This ITS will be closed. hodson.chris(a)orbital.com wrote: > Full_Name: Chris Hodson > Version: 2.3.32 > OS: Red Hat EL 4 Rel 4 > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (198.207.0.5) > > > We're using a Red Hat EL 4 release 4 box to run openLDAP version 2.3.32. > Every night we find ourselves reaching 1000+ (netstat | grep ldap | wc -l) > connections to our LDAP server and have found the only resolution to restart the > LDAP service daily. When we get to 1000+ connections performance takes a huge > hit and no one is able to login to any box utilizing LDAP. This server consists > of 2 dual core Opeterons with 8 GBs of memory, so its not a hardware performance > issue. > We're able to duplicate this issue on a RHEL 4 release 5 box also when we reach > 1000+ connections using the same config files. Is there a setting that needs > adjusting so connections timeout or some other config file misconfiguration? > > > Any help would be much appreciated. > Thank you. > > > . > -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#5276) include handler broken
by quanah＠zimbra.com 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount Version: 2.3.39 OS: Linux 2.6 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (66.92.25.194) In discussions with a fellow on IRC, it looks like the include handler has some serious problems. For example with this slapd.conf, we get: #ucdata-path "/opt/zimbra/openldap/ucdata" include "/opt/zimbra/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema" include "/opt/zimbra/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema" include "/opt/zimbra/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema" include "/opt/zimbra/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/amavisd.schema" include "/opt/zimbra/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/zimbra.schema" include "/opt/zimbra/lib/conf/zimbra-ext.schema" threads 8 pidfile "/opt/zimbra/openldap/var/run/slapd.pid" argsfile "/opt/zimbra/openldap/var/run/slapd.args" TLSCertificateFile /opt/zimbra/conf/slapd.crt TLSCertificateKeyFile /opt/zimbra/conf/slapd.key TLSVerifyClient never loglevel 32768 # Load dynamic backend modules: modulepath /opt/zimbra/openldap/libexec/openldap moduleload back_bdb.la moduleload back_monitor.la moduleload syncprov.la moduleload accesslog.la <acl lines snipped> database config rootpw {SSHA}+wKEnqbcbxssdGDKx1LeNsoL90Ha2Lzx database monitor rootdn "cn=config" access to dn.children="cn=monitor" by dn.children="cn=admins,cn=zimbra" read include /opt/zimbra/conf/bdb-conf include /opt/zimbra/conf/syncrepl-conf bdb-conf is: database bdb suffix "" rootdn "cn=config" cachesize 10000 idlcachesize 10000 checkpoint 64 5 directory "/opt/zimbra/openldap-data" index objectClass eq sizelimit unlimited timelimit unlimited And we can see it is clearly processed, so why is the syncrepl line getting tagged to the monitor backend? line 47 (index entryCSN eq) index entryCSN 0x0004 line 48 (sizelimit unlimited) line 49 (timelimit unlimited) line 154 (include /opt/zimbra/conf/syncrepl-conf) reading config file /opt/zimbra/conf/syncrepl-conf line 13 (syncrepl ***) /opt/zimbra/conf/syncrepl-conf: line 13: database monitor does not support operations required for syncrepl /opt/zimbra/conf/slapd.conf: line 154: <include> handler exited with 1! Another example of this problem can be seen at: http://pastebin.com/d16e9b905

1 0

Re: (ITS#5275) Poor LDAP performance when we reach 1000 connections
by quanah＠zimbra.com 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

So fix your file descriptors. --Quanah --On December 12, 2007 11:02:51 PM +0000 hodson.chris(a)orbital.com wrote: > Full_Name: Chris Hodson > Version: 2.3.32 > OS: Red Hat EL 4 Rel 4 > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (198.207.0.5) > > > We're using a Red Hat EL 4 release 4 box to run openLDAP version 2.3.32. > Every night we find ourselves reaching 1000+ (netstat | grep ldap | wc > -l) connections to our LDAP server and have found the only resolution to > restart the LDAP service daily. When we get to 1000+ connections > performance takes a huge hit and no one is able to login to any box > utilizing LDAP. This server consists of 2 dual core Opeterons with 8 GBs > of memory, so its not a hardware performance issue. > We're able to duplicate this issue on a RHEL 4 release 5 box also when we > reach 1000+ connections using the same config files. Is there a setting > that needs adjusting so connections timeout or some other config file > misconfiguration? > > > Any help would be much appreciated. > Thank you. > > -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

(ITS#5275) Poor LDAP performance when we reach 1000 connections
by hodson.chris＠orbital.com 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

Full_Name: Chris Hodson Version: 2.3.32 OS: Red Hat EL 4 Rel 4 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (198.207.0.5) We're using a Red Hat EL 4 release 4 box to run openLDAP version 2.3.32. Every night we find ourselves reaching 1000+ (netstat | grep ldap | wc -l) connections to our LDAP server and have found the only resolution to restart the LDAP service daily. When we get to 1000+ connections performance takes a huge hit and no one is able to login to any box utilizing LDAP. This server consists of 2 dual core Opeterons with 8 GBs of memory, so its not a hardware performance issue. We're able to duplicate this issue on a RHEL 4 release 5 box also when we reach 1000+ connections using the same config files. Is there a setting that needs adjusting so connections timeout or some other config file misconfiguration? Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.

1 0

(ITS#5274) add search to online docs
by craig5＠pobox.com 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

Full_Name: Craig Sebenik Version: 2.3.35 OS: CentOS 4.5 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (209.220.152.66) It would be helpful if the admin documentation on the OpenLDAP web pages had some way to search. http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/ IMO, it would be fantastic if there was a simple search box on each page and an "advanced search page" with more options. However, a simple search box on just the main page would be a great start.

1 0

(ITS#5273) ldap.conf and TLS as a default
by cardoe＠gentoo.org 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

Full_Name: Douglas Klima Version: 2.3. OS: Linux URL: Submission from: (NULL) (216.155.111.10) I was looking for a way to make TLS the default in /etc/openldap/ldap.conf however it currently seems impossible. You can specify LDAP over clear text and LDAP over SSL but you can't specify LDAP over TLS (I'm talking about "start_tls"). It seems like ldaps:// is deprecated in favor of ldap:// + TLS, which is why I'm trying to configure this. Currently my /etc/openldap/ldap.conf looks like: BASE dc=example,dc=com URI ldap://srv1.example.com ldap://srv2.example.com TLS_REQCERT demand TLS_CACERTDIR /etc/ssl/certs If I do the following: $ ldapsearch ldap_bind: Confidentiality required (13) additional info: TLS confidentiality required If I change URI to have "ldaps://srv1.example.com:389", then $ ldapsearch just hangs until it times out. Clearly it's not using start_tls. Now if I change URI back to it's original setting and do: $ ldapsearch -Z .... # search result search: 3 result: 0 Success # numResponses: 54 # numEntries: 53 I get a successful lookup. I'm basically looking for a way to pass "-Z" in /etc/openldap/ldap.conf and in .ldaprc Initially I tried to send this to the OpenLDAP ML but was told by MacJobBz to submit this to ITS.

1 0

Re: (ITS#5261) Samba4 can 'hang' OpenLDAP slapd
by hyc＠symas.com 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 14:22 -0800, Howard Chu wrote: >> Andrew Bartlett wrote: >>> I wonder if there is a known issue with db 4.6 and OpenLDAP, as Fedora's >>> OpenLDAP seems to include it's own libslapd_db-4.4.so (it has a >>> slapd_db_stat to match, for 4.4). >> I think they packaged that to avoid using BDB 4.3 which was known to be >> broken. I've been using OpenLDAP with BDB 4.6.1 thru 4.6.3, and 4.6.18 thru >> 4.6.21 without any trouble. > > Where there any further clues on my deadlock in the db_stat output? Yes, it showed a transaction waiting for a write lock on an object that was held by a non-transactional reader. Normally that sort of thing should never deadlock. I would have to dig with gdb to identify which threads owned the locks in question. I guess I may have to build your source to try to duplicate the problem, unless you're up for walking thru a debug session thru IM/etc. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5261) Samba4 can 'hang' OpenLDAP slapd
by abartlet＠samba.org 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

--=-5OIFeVOYW+hUABHuhQBa Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 14:22 -0800, Howard Chu wrote: > Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > I wonder if there is a known issue with db 4.6 and OpenLDAP, as Fedora'= s > > OpenLDAP seems to include it's own libslapd_db-4.4.so (it has a > > slapd_db_stat to match, for 4.4). >=20 > I think they packaged that to avoid using BDB 4.3 which was known to be=20 > broken. I've been using OpenLDAP with BDB 4.6.1 thru 4.6.3, and 4.6.18 th= ru=20 > 4.6.21 without any trouble. Where there any further clues on my deadlock in the db_stat output? Andrew Bartlett --=20 Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. --=-5OIFeVOYW+hUABHuhQBa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHXw8iz4A8Wyi0NrsRAsqOAJ44WnvMZZCXxu3KWaXpG80h98a9RQCfby5v h3+M0ny5D6JqcytP+00anRs= =huku -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5OIFeVOYW+hUABHuhQBa--

1 0

Re: (ITS#5261) Samba4 can 'hang' OpenLDAP slapd
by hyc＠symas.com 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

Andrew Bartlett wrote: > I wonder if there is a known issue with db 4.6 and OpenLDAP, as Fedora's > OpenLDAP seems to include it's own libslapd_db-4.4.so (it has a > slapd_db_stat to match, for 4.4). I think they packaged that to avoid using BDB 4.3 which was known to be broken. I've been using OpenLDAP with BDB 4.6.1 thru 4.6.3, and 4.6.18 thru 4.6.21 without any trouble. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5265) back-ldif flunks test004-modify
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

Pierangelo Masarati writes: >> test017-syncreplication-refresh > > works for me (in HEAD) For me too. Likely you fixed it with ldapdelete. However now HEAD run -b ldif test011-glue-slapadd fails with differently sorted entries: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com is out of place. >> test025-limits [didn't bump into server-side unchecked limit] > > no notion of "unckecked" (should walk the tree to find out how many > entries are there...) Or backends could count down from sizelimit.unchecked while examining and returning entries/referrals. Then fail with adminLimitExceeded if they reach zero. Is it OK to return entries followed by adminLimitExceeded? I don't see any protest in the LDAP RFCs, but I remember vaguely that the code may be mimicing X.500 errors which should not be combined with result entries. (I'll need to reread X.500 soon, it's been too long...) -- Regards, Hallvard

1 0

Re: (ITS#5265) back-ldif flunks test004-modify
by ando＠sys-net.it 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no wrote: test004 & test008: fixed (incorrect handling of file deletion) > While I'm checking this - other tests that fail with back-ldif: > test027-emptydn [cannot slapadd to a database with suffix ""] fixed > Unsupported operations, I guess: > test016-subref todo > test017-syncreplication-refresh works for me (in HEAD) > test025-limits [didn't bump into server-side unchecked limit] no notion of "unckecked" (should walk the tree to find out how many entries are there...) > test037-manage manage not supported > OK failure - compare fails because of entry order from ldapsearch: > test012-glue-populate todo > test026-dn fixed (search results not sorted by DN, thus insertion order not preserved by fs) > test004, test008 and test017 succeed in 2.3.38. Maybe the fix to > ITS#4627 (back-ldif issues) was bad? > Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

1 0

Re: (ITS#5272) facsimileNumber matching rules status
by ando＠sys-net.it 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

anders(a)anduras.de wrote: > I'm filing this new bug report, because I cannot add the question to the real > issue with number 2571 (it's always "Rejected; blocked by automated review > system"). Just send a message to openldap-its(a)openldap.org with ITS#2571 in the subject. > > So, take a look at: > http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Contrib?id=2571 > > My questions are: > > - What is the current status of this issue / patch? > (I want to see it supported as soon as possible.) Just edit the schema files, adding the desired matching rules. > - What does "Await IETF action" mean?? Presumably, there's an action open with IETF about modifying that schema item. As soon as it's officially modified, OpenLDAP will modify the schema files accordingly. In the meanwhile, all we can do is release schema files that comply with the current standard. This ITS will be closed. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

1 0

(ITS#5272) facsimileNumber matching rules status
by anders＠anduras.de 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

Full_Name: Sven Anders Version: 2.3.35 OS: Linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (84.145.248.173) Hello! I'm filing this new bug report, because I cannot add the question to the real issue with number 2571 (it's always "Rejected; blocked by automated review system"). So, take a look at: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Contrib?id=2571 My questions are: - What is the current status of this issue / patch? (I want to see it supported as soon as possible.) - What does "Await IETF action" mean?? Regards S.

1 0

(ITS#5271) size limit by ip (feature request)
by phr2101＠columbia.edu 10 Dec '07

10 Dec '07

Full_Name: Patrick Radtke Version: 2.3.24 OS: RHEL4 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (68.145.98.209) The limits 'who' clause should be extended to allow control by ip address. Pierangelo Masarati said "Your problem sounds general enough to deserve an extension of the limits "who" clause semantics (I don't see it quite high-priority, though). In any case, the modification should be trivial enough. I suggest you file an ITS for a feature request." in response to my problem > Basically we have software running on a host that is > unable to authenticate (due to 3rd party software) > and we need to increase the size limits for queries coming from it, > without increasing that limit for all anonymous binds.

1 0

(ITS#5270) admin24/replication.html spelling
by msporleder＠gmail.com 10 Dec '07

10 Dec '07

Full_Name: Matthew Sporleder Version: 2.4 OS: netbsd URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (24.248.74.254) Try accepted here: As long as one Master is operational, writes can safely be excepted

1 0

Re: (ITS#5267) slapo-dds prevents slapd from starting in case of an empty DB
by michael＠stroeder.com 09 Dec '07

09 Dec '07

Pierangelo Masarati wrote: >> Pierangelo Masarati wrote: >>> Should be fixed in HEAD. Please test. p. >> Nope. Synced head, make distclean and re-installed. But still it does >> not start (see log below). > > Should be fixed now (no need to distclean; just make sure dds is re-built > and re-installed!). Please, re-test. Yupp. Works as expected now. Thank you. Ciao, Michael.

1 0

Re: (ITS#5268) dSAOperation attributes should not be replicated
by ghenry＠suretecsystems.com 08 Dec '07

08 Dec '07

hyc(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > Full_Name: Howard Chu > Version: HEAD/RE24/RE23 > OS: > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (76.91.220.157) > Submitted by: hyc > > > Operational attributes like auditContext and contextCSN that are specific to a > particular DSA should never be replicated. > > It may make sense to add a check in slap_send_search_entry to skip all > dSAOperation attributes at that point. That would catch all instances, but it > would mean they were generated needlessly by whatever code manages the > attribute. > > For now, patching accesslog.c and syncprov.c seems more useful. > Excellent, this solves having to load accesslog on the consumer. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5267) slapo-dds prevents slapd from starting in case of an empty DB
by ando＠sys-net.it 08 Dec '07

08 Dec '07

> Pierangelo Masarati wrote: >> Should be fixed in HEAD. Please test. p. > > Nope. Synced head, make distclean and re-installed. But still it does > not start (see log below). Should be fixed now (no need to distclean; just make sure dds is re-built and re-installed!). Please, re-test. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs