- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

Re: (ITS#7389) [PATCH] MozNSS: load certificates from certdb, fallback to PEM
by jvcelak＠redhat.com 31 Oct '12

31 Oct '12

I'm sorry, there is an updated version of the patch: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/jvcelak-20121031-update-moznss-load-certs-f… The attached file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Red Hat. Red Hat has not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. I, Jan Vcelak am authorized by Red Hat, my employer, to release this work under the following terms. Red Hat hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice.

1 0

Re: (ITS#7367) [PATCH] MozNSS: update list of supported cipher suites
by hyc＠symas.com 31 Oct '12

31 Oct '12

Rich Megginson wrote: > On 10/03/2012 10:18 AM, Howard Chu wrote: >> Thanks for your comments, Rich. >>> Maybe we could use nss_compat_ossl to do the mapping of cipher names >>> from openssl to moznss? >> >> That makes sense to me, although if as you say it hasn't been actively >> maintained, that sounds like another problem. But certainly if other >> apps are using it, then aren't they going to want new cipher suite >> support too? >> > Yes, and imho nss_compat_ossl is the place to do this. > > But, would it be possible to update the cipher suite list in tls_m.c > first, to bring it up to date, then work on updating the compat library? I discussed this with Kurt; the Project's policy on issues like this in the past has been not to commit any backward-compatibility fixes of this sort until the real fix has already been released. I.e., we should wait until nss_compat_ossl has been updated. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#7423) [PATCH] Update slapo-constraint tests
by michael＠stroeder.com 29 Oct '12

29 Oct '12

This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms040205010803070807010603 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable jsynacek(a)redhat.com wrote: > On 10/27/2012 12:53 PM, Michael Str=F6der wrote: >> jsynacek(a)redhat.com wrote: >>> This patch updates the slapo-constraint testsuit. It adds additional = tests for >>> any constraints using 'uri'. Furthermore, it improves testing of the = 'restrict' >>> parameter. >> >> In my RE24 working tree: >> >> git apply --stat jsynacek-20121025-constraint-tests-update.patch >> >> Then I expected >> ./run -b hdb test064 to fail (without the patch in ITS#7418) but it re= turned >> "Test succeeded". > I'm sorry, one hunk didn't apply correctly. >=20 > New URL: > ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/jsynacek-20121029-constraint-tests-upda= te.patch >=20 > All the tests should fail without the patch in ITS#7418. I can confirm that it now works as expected. Thank you. Ciao, Michael. --------------ms040205010803070807010603 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILHzCC BT8wggQnoAMCAQICDwCmSwABAAIAivjZQ8SBvzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADB8MQswCQYDVQQG EwJERTEcMBoGA1UEChMTVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgR21iSDElMCMGA1UECxMcVEMgVHJ1c3RD ZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBMMSBDQTEoMCYGA1UEAxMfVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBM MSBDQSBJWDAeFw0xMjA2MDYxOTAyMTZaFw0xMzA2MDcxOTAyMTZaMCgxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRkwFwYDVQQDDBBNaWNoYWVsIFN0csO2ZGVyMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIB CgKCAQEAxXZGav40rnGNLxEggBW94MILWHlfC8a23Jew5U1gPlfRTXOjjzmoaZ1uCyGdgF6M VvuO9T1aTQNGH+OdeGe3P7Tfc/NsLJFJ2wtd8blvhmodUgse2eypiWjNOd4gZuhalBhgsQ0K b5D6/1foghII4E264iZlJ7AJ+UYcO+GxvFWT0YMTbLckgDkZk7c3qwTozdhYvXarvqx+8Ou/ kuxpQQhac/ebzxpu0N+RHSf2KIUS0g0tEGnPtGv6iL+9QNHc4JKo9Y9KKVw3tQy+Re+FQLxB 1fPE5F+qxuD3AUENpOwkMsqWLM94ohtx3CFqLpxfUPrnKFLAHOhHEbByYGvFPwIDAQABo4IC EDCCAgwwgaUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGYMIGVMFEGCCsGAQUFBzAChkVodHRwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0 Y2VudGVyLmRlL2NlcnRzZXJ2aWNlcy9jYWNlcnRzL3RjX2NsYXNzMV9MMV9DQV9JWC5jcnQw QAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGNGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLml4LnRjY2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1 c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAU6bgoHUbP/M34TpvF7ktg69g7P9EwDAYDVR0TAQH/ BAIwADBKBgNVHSAEQzBBMD8GCSqCFAAsAQEBATAyMDAGCCsGAQUFBwIBFiRodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnRydXN0Y2VudGVyLmRlL2d1aWRlbGluZXMwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgTwMB0GA1UdDgQWBBS2 KAWfTfgJ/JQ63qLGwTXYLnI+LzBiBgNVHR8EWzBZMFegVaBThlFodHRwOi8vY3JsLml4LnRj Y2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY3JsL3YyL3RjX0NsYXNzMV9M MV9DQV9JWC5jcmwwMwYDVR0lBCwwKgYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDBwYK KwYBBAGCNxQCAjAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRtaWNoYWVsQHN0cm9lZGVyLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFAAOCAQEAQ3bvVUpEq+cQrLpcogyt5BJNk/WvUvOHqhzyj28M9pg9hcDl1+MYl5qqj6tR GSTLPQZyf287pcmbMwbcTGZO/gbW9v7RYcut6RauWdwKMCUmKC3J4fVfDq9ZETA2WOV68ef4 B3Gzdhghsbp3Rhp5dDmrCVKAHlafm6ZwJrEQ9P76fxnQZzRLgeKpZep5ePH5YHUB3+YaOQvJ FG0bOXvfHhRiRG7/HW2G+yDgjHSxDz8AFzMWL/RFePqZ4pn6T/SM/qU6WEpW39MWyJNoH/Kx QDYK8gGYuesn1ciMCTnjrvZQj0fonGTO4SfWekJRkuGrJ7dYSZRjYbDcWBBkdFLWzzCCBdgw ggTAoAMCAQICDgboAAEAAkqWLSQM/sXJMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHkxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSQwIgYDVQQLExtUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBVbml2ZXJzYWwgQ0ExJjAkBgNVBAMTHVRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIFVuaXZlcnNhbCBDQSBJ MB4XDTA5MTEwMzE0MDgxOVoXDTI1MTIzMTIxNTk1OVowfDELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxHDAaBgNV BAoTE1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIEdtYkgxJTAjBgNVBAsTHFRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNz IDEgTDEgQ0ExKDAmBgNVBAMTH1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNzIDEgTDEgQ0EgSVgwggEi MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC75pBuz2Lp6QuqthDVR+V8XSsncZpozVVt 5KLv5P7yemMRwleKyH3PjmYfZUVL64Biab1GjovFblqVGCrep/EfdRonq20yU+P7TVhiLP8Z 5cegDZotIYhZhM0d8cPIij6w5d4IJM/8QCy6QSOUu4ASiTVItoYE4AFPjLqpmPwcie0fiqHH hpgmHnJla/7PZdkMZEsaCfVDEWBmJuMzVprJPT40anjG5VBLyM2I5DlsUCaeQCy2O3w3sqf1 3dyzUcv03IICuNc63towXA31Qt0TaVNU6YAmQjMepdfMbspmCZ+G8D2+xophEPPR/1vkstst smUMqX0XrLonTUJczglPAgMBAAGjggJZMIICVTCBmgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgY0wgYowUgYIKwYB BQUHMAKGRmh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY2VydHNlcnZpY2VzL2NhY2VydHMv dGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcnQwNAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGKGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnRjdW5p dmVyc2FsLUkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUkqR1LKSevoFE63n8isWVpesQ dXMwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBSBgNVHSAESzBJMAYGBFUdIAAwPwYJKoIUACwBAQEB MDIwMAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvZ3VpZGVsaW5lczAO BgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOm4KB1Gz/zN+E6bxe5LYOvYOz/RMIH9BgNVHR8E gfUwgfIwge+ggeyggemGRmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGN1bml2ZXJzYWwtSS50cnVzdGNlbnRlci5k ZS9jcmwvdjIvdGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcmyGgZ5sZGFwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0Y2Vu dGVyLmRlL0NOPVRDJTIwVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIlMjBVbml2ZXJzYWwlMjBDQSUyMEksTz1UQyUy MFRydXN0Q2VudGVyJTIwR21iSCxPVT1yb290Y2VydHMsREM9dHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIsREM9ZGU/ Y2VydGlmaWNhdGVSZXZvY2F0aW9uTGlzdD9iYXNlPzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAOcjE m+6+mO5Icm+N53G2DpCM07LBFSGoRpBoX0oE8TrJaIQh2KXmBHVdn9LU8kt3QzLclctgvwJV 0KwcsMUUl5tlCsMPpR3s2Ek5lbWpvvr0HqtW56blAQiINV9nBd1EJFASIkRjefGbV2nOq9Yz UU+N8HA7jq1ROhd/NZZraGhjthwKyfjfHV7PKxGlY+3M0MbTIG+q/GhIfm0euDpFqhKG88e9 ALXr/uoSn3MzeOcoOWjTpW3adtFO4VWVgKbgG7jNrFbvRVlHmFLbOm4msjE5aXWxLiTwpJ2X iF4zKca1vAdAOgw9us90jEtOeiH6GzjNxEMvb7TfeO6Zkuc6HDGCA84wggPKAgEBMIGPMHwx CzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQLExxU QyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBD bGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAhMwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTIxMDI5MTg1NzA4WjAjBgkq hkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUz+3vB7XiNjVbIeSJjJ5+VggGD/4wbAYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMV8wXTALBglg hkgBZQMEASowCwYJYIZIAWUDBAECMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggq hkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDCBoAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMYGSMIGP MHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQL ExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wgaIGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYGS oIGPMHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYD VQQLExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENl bnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAkvHorLvWhpJwgew8K8iwnc2cMUtOtcK4ZYYZCPThJIZSkfvVFhamuAO86D96VPsdU+rA +S6eohY9eGJwYHJJ+TqqVQXC7vl2odxBCLePbAkKVRaqTrgC3Mhl400pCWSVKVQjowGoVhfr xTSb1KGR09j4HnCGZhSSyTxHXTkQzrAIfY0ug8MFzliznTvI3WL+u1liy72a3sGn6HpZVCwe OgbIsv5Qz9PdtPuLRUNDmXLMP3dRZf0zoMpTtWZjEqgNifBUY9+mDlKUPaf1JHulz9FMdBU/ Qs7uTpByT7X52C4Oe5X9KlwmcdaLBYg3Z2NytP7m6pBPGQXT/iHIuRTYfwAAAAAAAA== --------------ms040205010803070807010603--

1 0

Re: (ITS#7423) [PATCH] Update slapo-constraint tests
by Sascha.Kuehndel＠deka.de 29 Oct '12

29 Oct '12

--_000_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A05BD7F1EXCCREX9dekag_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Jan, i tested the test-cases: without patch in 7418, all test cases of test064-constraint failed. with patch in 7418, test064-constraint was successful. Bye, Sascha --_000_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A05BD7F1EXCCREX9dekag_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content= =3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Micr= osoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style></style></head><body lang=3DDE link=3Dblue vlink= =3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1>Hello Jan,<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p></span= >i t= ested the test-cases:<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>without patch in 74= 18, all test cases of test064-constraint failed.<o:p></o:p>with patch in= 7418, test064-constraint was successful.<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p></s= pan>= Bye,<o:p></o:p>Sascha<o:p></o:p></div></body></html>= --_000_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A05BD7F1EXCCREX9dekag_--

1 0

Re: (ITS#7423) [PATCH] Update slapo-constraint tests
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 29 Oct '12

29 Oct '12

On 10/27/2012 12:53 PM, Michael Ströder wrote: > jsynacek(a)redhat.com wrote: >> This patch updates the slapo-constraint testsuit. It adds additional tests for >> any constraints using 'uri'. Furthermore, it improves testing of the 'restrict' >> parameter. > > In my RE24 working tree: > > git apply --stat jsynacek-20121025-constraint-tests-update.patch > > Then I expected > ./run -b hdb test064 to fail (without the patch in ITS#7418) but it returned > "Test succeeded". > > Ciao, Michael. > I'm sorry, one hunk didn't apply correctly. New URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/jsynacek-20121029-constraint-tests-update.p… All the tests should fail without the patch in ITS#7418. Cheers, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat

1 0

(ITS#7425) documentation for slapo-pcache when using slapd-config
by btb＠bitrate.net 28 Oct '12

28 Oct '12

Full_Name: ben blewett Version: 2.4.31 OS: ubuntu 12.10 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (216.176.19.106) documentation in the admin guide and the man pages for setup of slapo-pcache when using slapd-config [cn=config] seems to be a bit sparse. just wanted to put this on the list if it's not already.

1 0

Re: (ITS#7424) Accept patch? Add option for not folding ldapsearch LDIF output lines
by masarati＠aero.polimi.it 28 Oct '12

28 Oct '12

Upgrade? This ITS will be closed. > No such option in OpenLDAP 2.4.23 as delivered with RHEL 6. > > man ldapsearch shows the only general option documented > is nettimeout > > ?? > > On 10/28/2012 3:45 PM, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: >> Use ldapsearch -o ldif-wrap=no instead. >> >> p. >> >>> Full_Name: >>> Version: >>> OS: >>> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ >>> Submission from: (NULL) (96.228.233.77) >>> >>> >>> RFC 2849 states: >>> >>> 2) Any non-empty line, including comment lines, in an LDIF file >>> MAY be folded by inserting a line separator (SEP) and a >>> SPACE. >>> Folding MUST NOT occur before the first character of the >>> line. >>> In other words, folding a line into two lines, the first of >>> which is empty, is not permitted. Any line that begins with >>> a >>> single space MUST be treated as a continuation of the >>> previous >>> (non-empty) line. When joining folded lines, exactly one >>> space >>> character at the beginning of each continued line must be >>> discarded. Implementations SHOULD NOT fold lines in the >>> middle >>> of a multi-byte UTF-8 character. >>> >>> OpenLDAP (ldapsearch at least) has taken implemented that folding >>> behavior for LDIF output. >>> >>> This causes trouble for anyone trying to use 'ldapsearch | grep >>> <something>' >>> for one simple example. >>> >>> Would you accept a patch to allow an option which disables line >>> folding? >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- Pierangelo Masarati Associate Professor Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano

1 0

Re: (ITS#7424) Accept patch? Add option for not folding ldapsearch LDIF output lines
by jblaine＠kickflop.net 28 Oct '12

28 Oct '12

No such option in OpenLDAP 2.4.23 as delivered with RHEL 6. man ldapsearch shows the only general option documented is nettimeout ?? On 10/28/2012 3:45 PM, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: > Use ldapsearch -o ldif-wrap=no instead. > > p. > >> Full_Name: >> Version: >> OS: >> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ >> Submission from: (NULL) (96.228.233.77) >> >> >> RFC 2849 states: >> >> 2) Any non-empty line, including comment lines, in an LDIF file >> MAY be folded by inserting a line separator (SEP) and a SPACE. >> Folding MUST NOT occur before the first character of the line. >> In other words, folding a line into two lines, the first of >> which is empty, is not permitted. Any line that begins with a >> single space MUST be treated as a continuation of the previous >> (non-empty) line. When joining folded lines, exactly one space >> character at the beginning of each continued line must be >> discarded. Implementations SHOULD NOT fold lines in the middle >> of a multi-byte UTF-8 character. >> >> OpenLDAP (ldapsearch at least) has taken implemented that folding >> behavior for LDIF output. >> >> This causes trouble for anyone trying to use 'ldapsearch | grep >> <something>' >> for one simple example. >> >> Would you accept a patch to allow an option which disables line folding? >> >> >> >> > >

1 0

Re: (ITS#7424) Accept patch? Add option for not folding ldapsearch LDIF output lines
by masarati＠aero.polimi.it 28 Oct '12

28 Oct '12

Use ldapsearch -o ldif-wrap=no instead. p. > Full_Name: > Version: > OS: > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (96.228.233.77) > > > RFC 2849 states: > > 2) Any non-empty line, including comment lines, in an LDIF file > MAY be folded by inserting a line separator (SEP) and a SPACE. > Folding MUST NOT occur before the first character of the line. > In other words, folding a line into two lines, the first of > which is empty, is not permitted. Any line that begins with a > single space MUST be treated as a continuation of the previous > (non-empty) line. When joining folded lines, exactly one space > character at the beginning of each continued line must be > discarded. Implementations SHOULD NOT fold lines in the middle > of a multi-byte UTF-8 character. > > OpenLDAP (ldapsearch at least) has taken implemented that folding > behavior for LDIF output. > > This causes trouble for anyone trying to use 'ldapsearch | grep > <something>' > for one simple example. > > Would you accept a patch to allow an option which disables line folding? > > > > -- Pierangelo Masarati Associate Professor Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano

1 0

(ITS#7424) Accept patch? Add option for not folding ldapsearch LDIF output lines
by jblaine＠kickflop.net 28 Oct '12

28 Oct '12

Full_Name: Version: OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (96.228.233.77) RFC 2849 states: 2) Any non-empty line, including comment lines, in an LDIF file MAY be folded by inserting a line separator (SEP) and a SPACE. Folding MUST NOT occur before the first character of the line. In other words, folding a line into two lines, the first of which is empty, is not permitted. Any line that begins with a single space MUST be treated as a continuation of the previous (non-empty) line. When joining folded lines, exactly one space character at the beginning of each continued line must be discarded. Implementations SHOULD NOT fold lines in the middle of a multi-byte UTF-8 character. OpenLDAP (ldapsearch at least) has taken implemented that folding behavior for LDIF output. This causes trouble for anyone trying to use 'ldapsearch | grep <something>' for one simple example. Would you accept a patch to allow an option which disables line folding?

1 0

Re: (ITS#7423) [PATCH] Update slapo-constraint tests
by michael＠stroeder.com 27 Oct '12

27 Oct '12

This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070008080905030605060503 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable jsynacek(a)redhat.com wrote: > This patch updates the slapo-constraint testsuit. It adds additional te= sts for > any constraints using 'uri'. Furthermore, it improves testing of the 'r= estrict' > parameter. In my RE24 working tree: git apply --stat jsynacek-20121025-constraint-tests-update.patch Then I expected =2E/run -b hdb test064 to fail (without the patch in ITS#7418) but it ret= urned "Test succeeded". Ciao, Michael. --------------ms070008080905030605060503 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILHzCC BT8wggQnoAMCAQICDwCmSwABAAIAivjZQ8SBvzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADB8MQswCQYDVQQG EwJERTEcMBoGA1UEChMTVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgR21iSDElMCMGA1UECxMcVEMgVHJ1c3RD ZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBMMSBDQTEoMCYGA1UEAxMfVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBM MSBDQSBJWDAeFw0xMjA2MDYxOTAyMTZaFw0xMzA2MDcxOTAyMTZaMCgxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRkwFwYDVQQDDBBNaWNoYWVsIFN0csO2ZGVyMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIB CgKCAQEAxXZGav40rnGNLxEggBW94MILWHlfC8a23Jew5U1gPlfRTXOjjzmoaZ1uCyGdgF6M VvuO9T1aTQNGH+OdeGe3P7Tfc/NsLJFJ2wtd8blvhmodUgse2eypiWjNOd4gZuhalBhgsQ0K b5D6/1foghII4E264iZlJ7AJ+UYcO+GxvFWT0YMTbLckgDkZk7c3qwTozdhYvXarvqx+8Ou/ kuxpQQhac/ebzxpu0N+RHSf2KIUS0g0tEGnPtGv6iL+9QNHc4JKo9Y9KKVw3tQy+Re+FQLxB 1fPE5F+qxuD3AUENpOwkMsqWLM94ohtx3CFqLpxfUPrnKFLAHOhHEbByYGvFPwIDAQABo4IC EDCCAgwwgaUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGYMIGVMFEGCCsGAQUFBzAChkVodHRwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0 Y2VudGVyLmRlL2NlcnRzZXJ2aWNlcy9jYWNlcnRzL3RjX2NsYXNzMV9MMV9DQV9JWC5jcnQw QAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGNGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLml4LnRjY2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1 c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAU6bgoHUbP/M34TpvF7ktg69g7P9EwDAYDVR0TAQH/ BAIwADBKBgNVHSAEQzBBMD8GCSqCFAAsAQEBATAyMDAGCCsGAQUFBwIBFiRodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnRydXN0Y2VudGVyLmRlL2d1aWRlbGluZXMwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgTwMB0GA1UdDgQWBBS2 KAWfTfgJ/JQ63qLGwTXYLnI+LzBiBgNVHR8EWzBZMFegVaBThlFodHRwOi8vY3JsLml4LnRj Y2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY3JsL3YyL3RjX0NsYXNzMV9M MV9DQV9JWC5jcmwwMwYDVR0lBCwwKgYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDBwYK KwYBBAGCNxQCAjAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRtaWNoYWVsQHN0cm9lZGVyLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFAAOCAQEAQ3bvVUpEq+cQrLpcogyt5BJNk/WvUvOHqhzyj28M9pg9hcDl1+MYl5qqj6tR GSTLPQZyf287pcmbMwbcTGZO/gbW9v7RYcut6RauWdwKMCUmKC3J4fVfDq9ZETA2WOV68ef4 B3Gzdhghsbp3Rhp5dDmrCVKAHlafm6ZwJrEQ9P76fxnQZzRLgeKpZep5ePH5YHUB3+YaOQvJ FG0bOXvfHhRiRG7/HW2G+yDgjHSxDz8AFzMWL/RFePqZ4pn6T/SM/qU6WEpW39MWyJNoH/Kx QDYK8gGYuesn1ciMCTnjrvZQj0fonGTO4SfWekJRkuGrJ7dYSZRjYbDcWBBkdFLWzzCCBdgw ggTAoAMCAQICDgboAAEAAkqWLSQM/sXJMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHkxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSQwIgYDVQQLExtUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBVbml2ZXJzYWwgQ0ExJjAkBgNVBAMTHVRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIFVuaXZlcnNhbCBDQSBJ MB4XDTA5MTEwMzE0MDgxOVoXDTI1MTIzMTIxNTk1OVowfDELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxHDAaBgNV BAoTE1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIEdtYkgxJTAjBgNVBAsTHFRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNz IDEgTDEgQ0ExKDAmBgNVBAMTH1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNzIDEgTDEgQ0EgSVgwggEi MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC75pBuz2Lp6QuqthDVR+V8XSsncZpozVVt 5KLv5P7yemMRwleKyH3PjmYfZUVL64Biab1GjovFblqVGCrep/EfdRonq20yU+P7TVhiLP8Z 5cegDZotIYhZhM0d8cPIij6w5d4IJM/8QCy6QSOUu4ASiTVItoYE4AFPjLqpmPwcie0fiqHH hpgmHnJla/7PZdkMZEsaCfVDEWBmJuMzVprJPT40anjG5VBLyM2I5DlsUCaeQCy2O3w3sqf1 3dyzUcv03IICuNc63towXA31Qt0TaVNU6YAmQjMepdfMbspmCZ+G8D2+xophEPPR/1vkstst smUMqX0XrLonTUJczglPAgMBAAGjggJZMIICVTCBmgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgY0wgYowUgYIKwYB BQUHMAKGRmh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY2VydHNlcnZpY2VzL2NhY2VydHMv dGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcnQwNAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGKGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnRjdW5p dmVyc2FsLUkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUkqR1LKSevoFE63n8isWVpesQ dXMwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBSBgNVHSAESzBJMAYGBFUdIAAwPwYJKoIUACwBAQEB MDIwMAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvZ3VpZGVsaW5lczAO BgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOm4KB1Gz/zN+E6bxe5LYOvYOz/RMIH9BgNVHR8E gfUwgfIwge+ggeyggemGRmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGN1bml2ZXJzYWwtSS50cnVzdGNlbnRlci5k ZS9jcmwvdjIvdGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcmyGgZ5sZGFwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0Y2Vu dGVyLmRlL0NOPVRDJTIwVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIlMjBVbml2ZXJzYWwlMjBDQSUyMEksTz1UQyUy MFRydXN0Q2VudGVyJTIwR21iSCxPVT1yb290Y2VydHMsREM9dHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIsREM9ZGU/ Y2VydGlmaWNhdGVSZXZvY2F0aW9uTGlzdD9iYXNlPzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAOcjE m+6+mO5Icm+N53G2DpCM07LBFSGoRpBoX0oE8TrJaIQh2KXmBHVdn9LU8kt3QzLclctgvwJV 0KwcsMUUl5tlCsMPpR3s2Ek5lbWpvvr0HqtW56blAQiINV9nBd1EJFASIkRjefGbV2nOq9Yz UU+N8HA7jq1ROhd/NZZraGhjthwKyfjfHV7PKxGlY+3M0MbTIG+q/GhIfm0euDpFqhKG88e9 ALXr/uoSn3MzeOcoOWjTpW3adtFO4VWVgKbgG7jNrFbvRVlHmFLbOm4msjE5aXWxLiTwpJ2X iF4zKca1vAdAOgw9us90jEtOeiH6GzjNxEMvb7TfeO6Zkuc6HDGCA84wggPKAgEBMIGPMHwx CzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQLExxU QyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBD bGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAhMwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTIxMDI3MTA1MzQ1WjAjBgkq hkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUbmzaJFtkRvKKODnnBAp8DLfiWrIwbAYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMV8wXTALBglg hkgBZQMEASowCwYJYIZIAWUDBAECMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggq hkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDCBoAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMYGSMIGP MHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQL ExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wgaIGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYGS oIGPMHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYD VQQLExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENl bnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAdf/2uF/F/Htah4Ot/ms0g9WO2JlUz97qvAXbU2mDCwC+VqjzfrRYDbSP9kxVwPGhh3/h Cp1GbtrPxzT7nhWhpdURwh6JULcOtAWMUawCwyY87DsbcrKD5kDZTi61lGpSO2JbMmfxcEft 1nlBhzuWFMsyPMjsunjumxstBpbn65+1vcaYN8KMz3CGP2gRniG411zOchah31lA6h+dvEnc z6zzsjw2Z7P8Xuqh1MV39im/HPsgnHEzMTyIwywlLNH6HEwqKH7ELjhlQEpNtIqRvdRQKLY8 85lnO/FMH2ujpxhx1c+FgjHtqOHXSJzzApWaIcqKC4yCxtLQ+EZebM3obgAAAAAAAA== --------------ms070008080905030605060503--

1 0

(ITS#7423) [PATCH] Update slapo-constraint tests
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

Full_Name: Jan Synacek Version: master OS: linux-fedora17 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/jsynacek-20121025-constraint-tests-update.p… Submission from: (NULL) (209.132.186.34) This patch updates the slapo-constraint testsuit. It adds additional tests for any constraints using 'uri'. Furthermore, it improves testing of the 'restrict' parameter. The attached file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Red Hat. Red Hat has not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. I, Jan Synacek am authorized by Red Hat, my employer, to release this work under the following terms. Red Hat hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice.

1 0

Re: AW: AW: (ITS#7418) slapo-constraint are broken
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

On 10/25/2012 01:41 PM, Sascha.Kuehndel(a)deka.de wrote: > Hi, > > it looks better. > make test an my own tests was successful. Great. URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/jsynacek-20121025-slapo-constraint-uri-rest… The attached file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Red Hat. Red Hat has not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. I, Jan Synacek am authorized by Red Hat, my employer, to release this work under the following terms. Red Hat hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat

1 0

AW: AW: (ITS#7418) slapo-constraint are broken
by Sascha.Kuehndel＠deka.de 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

Hi, it looks better. make test an my own tests was successful. Thanks, Sascha --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #!RESULT OK dn: dc=1,ou=user,ou=deka,dc=example,dc=com changetype: modify replace: description description: ab - #!RESULT ERROR #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 19 - modify breaks constraint on associatedName] dn: dc=1,ou=user,ou=deka,dc=example,dc=com changetype: modify replace: associatedName associatedName: uid=15,ou=group,ou=deka,dc=example,dc=com - #!RESULT OK dn: uid=14,ou=group,ou=deka,dc=example,dc=com changetype: delete #!RESULT OK dn: dc=1,ou=user,ou=deka,dc=example,dc=com changetype: modify replace: description description: abc - #!RESULT ERROR #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 19 - modify breaks constraint on associatedName] dn: dc=1,ou=user,ou=deka,dc=example,dc=com changetype: modify replace: associatedName associatedName: uid=14,ou=group,ou=deka,dc=example,dc=com -

1 0

Re: AW: (ITS#7418) slapo-constraint are broken
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030809010302060201080601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/22/2012 09:14 PM, Sascha.Kuehndel(a)deka.de wrote: > Hello, > > i have reduced the configuration and the DIT to a minium. > So i can now send the slapd.conf, the initial dit and the test-change. > > I hope you can reproduce the error, with it. > > The uses software: > OpenLDAP: 2.4.33 > BDB: 5.3.21 > OpenSSL: 1.0.1c > > Thanks, > Sascha Kuehndel > Could you please try the attached patch? Thank you, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat --------------030809010302060201080601 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="constraint2.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="constraint2.patch" diff --git a/servers/slapd/overlays/constraint.c b/servers/slapd/overlays/constraint.c index 2d943a2..e7b5689 100644 --- a/servers/slapd/overlays/constraint.c +++ b/servers/slapd/overlays/constraint.c @@ -845,9 +845,6 @@ constraint_check_count_violation( Modifications *m, Entry *target_entry, constra unsigned ca; int j; - if ( cp->set ) - return 0; - for ( j = 0; cp->ap[j]; j++ ) { /* Get this attribute count */ if ( target_entry ) @@ -905,7 +902,6 @@ constraint_update( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs ) int rc; char *msg = NULL; int is_v; - int first = 1; if (get_relax(op)) { return SLAP_CB_CONTINUE; @@ -933,15 +929,17 @@ constraint_update( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs ) return(rs->sr_err); } + op->o_bd = on->on_info->oi_origdb; + rc = be_entry_get_rw( op, &op->o_req_ndn, NULL, NULL, 0, &target_entry ); + op->o_bd = be; + /* Do we need to count attributes? */ for(cp = c; cp; cp = cp->ap_next) { - if (cp->count != 0 || cp->set || cp->restrict_lud != 0) { - if (first) { - op->o_bd = on->on_info->oi_origdb; - rc = be_entry_get_rw( op, &op->o_req_ndn, NULL, NULL, 0, &target_entry ); - op->o_bd = be; - first = 0; - } + if (cp->restrict_lud && constraint_check_restrict(op, cp, target_entry) == 0) { + continue; + } + + if (cp->count != 0) { if (rc != 0 || target_entry == NULL) { Debug(LDAP_DEBUG_TRACE, "==> constraint_update rc = %d DN=\"%s\"%s\n", @@ -964,6 +962,7 @@ constraint_update( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs ) } } + rc = LDAP_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION; for(;m; m = m->sml_next) { unsigned ce = 0; --------------030809010302060201080601--

1 0

Re: (ITS#7421) olcExtraAttrs documentation incorrect
by hyc＠symas.com 24 Oct '12

24 Oct '12

k3kk0n3n(a)gmail.com wrote: > Full_Name: > Version: 2.4.32 > OS: Ubuntu 10, Debian Squeeze > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (130.233.152.136) > > > The documentation in the slapd-config manpage is incorrect. The olcExtraAttrs > setting is said to be a global configuration setting when in reality it seems to > be database specific. In the slapd.conf manpage, the corresponding setting > (extra_attrs) is listed as being database-specific. I believe that is correct > although I have not checked it. > > ( Taken from my post on the openldap-technical mailing list: > http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201210/msg00104.html ) > > Thanks, fixed now in git master. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#7422) olcExtraAttrs doesn't work
by k3kk0n3n＠gmail.com 24 Oct '12

24 Oct '12

Full_Name: Version: 2.4.32 OS: Ubuntu 10, Debian Squeeze URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (130.233.152.136) olcExtraAttrs does not seem to work with the rwm overlay (like in ITS#6513). With the rwm overlay present, ACIs are not evaluated when requesting a specific attribute, regardless of whether olcExtraAttrs is specified or not. In order to apply the ACI, you can pass the ACI attribute name in the search. I'm providing a configuration file that can be used to reproduce the problem as well as some search examples to demonstrate the issue. ----Configuration file---- dn: cn=config objectClass: olcGlobal cn: config olcPidFile: /usr/local/var/run/slapd.pid olcArgsFile: /usr/local/var/run/slapd.args #olcLogLevel: -1 olcToolThreads: 1 dn: olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcFrontendConfig olcDatabase: {-1}frontend olcAccess: {0}to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth manage by * break olcAccess: {1}to dn.base="" by * read olcAccess: {2}to dn.base="cn=subschema" by * read olcRequires: authc dn: olcDatabase=config,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig olcDatabase: config olcAccess: to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth manage by * break dn: cn=schema,cn=config objectClass: olcSchemaConfig cn: schema include: file:///usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.ldif dn: cn=module,cn=config objectClass: olcModuleList cn: module olcModuleload: back_hdb olcModuleLoad: rwm dn: olcOverlay=rwm,olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcRwmConfig olcOverlay: rwm dn: olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcHdbConfig olcDatabase: hdb olcSuffix: dc=example,dc=com olcDbDirectory: /var/lib/ldap olcRootDN: cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com olcRootPW: pass olcDbConfig: set_cachesize 0 2097152 0 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_objects 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_locks 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_lockers 1500 olcExtraAttrs: OpenLDAPaci olcAccess: to attrs=userpassword by anonymous auth olcAccess: to dn.base="dc=example,dc=com" by * search olcAccess: to * by self manage by dynacl/aci=OpenLDAPaci manage ----Note---- To disable the rwm overlay, comment the following 4 lines in the config: dn: olcOverlay=rwm,olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcRwmConfig olcOverlay: rwm ----Test data---- dn: dc=example,dc=com objectClass: dcObject objectClass: top objectClass: organization dc: example o: example dn: cn=a,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: person cn: a sn: a userPassword: pass dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: person cn: b sn: b userPassword: pass OpenLDAPaci: 1#entry#grant;r,s,c;[all]#access-id#cn=a,dc=example,dc=com ----Search examples---- Without rwm, requesting the whole object (works as expected): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com # b, example.com dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: person cn: b sn: b # numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1 Without rwm, requesting an attribute (works as expected): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn # b, example.com dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn: b # numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1 With rwm, requesting the whole object (works as expected): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com # b, example.com dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: person cn: b sn: b # numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1 With rwm, requesting an attribute (notice the object is not returned here): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn # numResponses: 1 With rwm, requesting an attribute and openldapaci (works as expected): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn openldapaci # b, example.com dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn: b OpenLDAPaci: 1#entry#grant;r,s,c;[all]#access-id#cn=a,dc=example,dc=com # numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1 ( Taken from my post on the openldap-technical mailing list: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201210/msg00104.html )

1 0

(ITS#7421) olcExtraAttrs documentation incorrect
by k3kk0n3n＠gmail.com 24 Oct '12

24 Oct '12

Full_Name: Version: 2.4.32 OS: Ubuntu 10, Debian Squeeze URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (130.233.152.136) The documentation in the slapd-config manpage is incorrect. The olcExtraAttrs setting is said to be a global configuration setting when in reality it seems to be database specific. In the slapd.conf manpage, the corresponding setting (extra_attrs) is listed as being database-specific. I believe that is correct although I have not checked it. ( Taken from my post on the openldap-technical mailing list: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201210/msg00104.html )

1 0

Re: AW: (ITS#7418) slapo-constraint are broken
by quanah＠zimbra.com 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

--On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 5:26 AM +0000 jsynacek(a)redhat.com wrote: > On 10/22/2012 09:19 PM, quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote: >> --On Monday, October 22, 2012 7:14 PM +0000 Sascha.Kuehndel(a)deka.de >> wrote: >> >>> --_004_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A046FAB9EXCCREX9dekag_ >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> i have reduced the configuration and the DIT to a minium. >>> So i can now send the slapd.conf, the initial dit and the test-change. >>> >>> I hope you can reproduce the error, with it. >> >> Hi Jan, >> >> It appears your changes to slapo-constraint broke at least one >> configuration option. Can you please review the information in this ITS >> and update your changes. Thanks. >> > > Hi, > > those changes were made by me (different Jan). > I will look into it and update the testcases. Thanks. Sorry for the mixup, I picked the first Jan that came up in my mailbox search. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

Re: (ITS#7420) Way to bypass overlay unique and constranit
by hyc＠symas.com 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

kmenshikov(a)hostcomm.ru wrote: > Full_Name: Konstantin Menshikov > Version: 2.4.33 > OS: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p4 > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (212.116.101.94) > > > Overlay unique and constraint use list attributes for check. > If we use restriction by rdn (attribute cn for example), and don`t add attribute > cn in ldif-file, we can bypass restriction. > > Overlay unique look list attributes in op->ora_e->e_attrs, > if this list not contain attribute cn, checks isn`t running. > > IMHO: problem not in overlays, but in slapd code, that allow add object without > explicit set rdn. The slapd behavior was discussed long ago, in ITS#2243. The current slapd behavior is consistent with RFC4511 (though this differs from older releases and the now obsoleted RFC2251). It seems that because of this behavior, the fix will have to be made to each overlay accordingly. It would be nice if we had a more centralized approach though. > > Example configuration: > [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# cat slapd.conf > # > # See slapd.conf(5) for details on configuration options. > # This file should NOT be world readable. > # > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/corba.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/dyngroup.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/java.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/openldap.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/ppolicy.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/sudo.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/spamassassin.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/openssh-lpk.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/vega-base.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/vega-corp.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/vega-net.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/oversun-base.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/oversun-corp.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/oversun-mail.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/oversun-net.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/asterisk.schema > > > # Define global ACLs to disable default read access. > > # Do not enable referrals until AFTER you have a working directory > # service AND an understanding of referrals. > #referral ldap://root.openldap.org > > pidfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.pid > argsfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.args > loglevel config stats sync trace > > # Load dynamic backend modules: > modulepath /usr/local/libexec/openldap > moduleload back_hdb > > database hdb > suffix "o=company" > rootdn "cn=ldapadm,o=company" > rootpw password > directory /var/db/openldap-data/o=company > > overlay unique > unique_uri ldap:///ou=groups,o=company?cn?sub > > How to repeat: > > [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# ldapadd -D cn=ldapadm,o=company -wpassword -H > ldap://127.0.0.5:389 -f /root/add.ldif.false > adding new entry "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > ldap_add: Constraint violation (19) > additional info: some attributes not unique > > [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# cat /root/add.ldif.false > dn: cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company > changetype: add > objectClass: posixGroup > description: test > cn: test > gidNumber: 1000 > [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# ldapadd -D cn=ldapadm,o=company -wpassword -H > ldap://127.0.0.5:389 -f /root/add.ldif.true > adding new entry "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > > [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# cat /root/add.ldif.true > dn: cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company > changetype: add > objectClass: posixGroup > description: test > gidNumber: 1000 > [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# diff -U 3 /root/add.ldif.false /root/add.ldif.true > > --- /root/add.ldif.false 2012-10-23 06:22:16.000000000 +0000 > +++ /root/add.ldif.true 2012-10-23 06:22:25.000000000 +0000 > @@ -2,5 +2,4 @@ > changetype: add > objectClass: posixGroup > description: test > -cn: test > gidNumber: 1000 > > > Log file records: > > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: slap_listener_activate(6): > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> slap_listener(ldap://) > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 fd=10 ACCEPT from IP=127.0.0.5:17098 > (IP=0.0.0.0:389) > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1006 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on > id=1006 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x60, time 1350973401 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=0 do_bind > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> dnPrettyNormal: <cn=ldapadm,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <<< dnPrettyNormal: <cn=ldapadm,o=company>, > <cn=ldapadm,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=0 BIND dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" > method=128 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: do_bind: version=3 dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" > method=128 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=0 BIND dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" > mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: do_bind: v3 bind: "cn=ldapadm,o=company" to > "cn=ldapadm,o=company" > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1006 op=0 p=3 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_response: msgid=1 tag=97 err=0 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1006 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on > id=1006 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x68, time 1350973401 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_input: conn=1006 deferring > operation: binding > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=1 do_add > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> dnPrettyNormal: > <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <<< dnPrettyNormal: > <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company>, > <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=1 ADD > dn="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: > bdb_dn2entry("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => > hdb_dn2id("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <= hdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_NOTFOUND: No > matching key/data pair found (-30989) > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_referrals: tag=104 > target="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > matched="ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: ==> unique_add > <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: ==> unique_search (|(cn=test)) > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => hdb_search > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: bdb_dn2entry("ou=groups,o=company") > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: search_candidates: base="ou=groups,o=company" > (0x00000002) scope=2 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => hdb_dn2idl("ou=groups,o=company") > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => bdb_equality_candidates (objectClass) > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <= bdb_equality_candidates: (objectClass) not > indexed > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => bdb_equality_candidates (cn) > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <= bdb_equality_candidates: (cn) not indexed > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: bdb_search_candidates: id=-1 first=2 last=5 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_search: 2 does not match filter > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_search: 3 does not match filter > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_search: 4 does not match filter > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: ==> count_attr_cb > <cn=test,ou=personal,ou=groups,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1006 op=1 p=3 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => unique_search found 1 records > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1006 op=1 p=3 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_response: msgid=2 tag=105 err=19 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=1 RESULT tag=105 err=19 text=some > attributes not unique > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1006 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on > id=1006 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x42, time 1350973401 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: ber_get_next on fd 10 failed errno=0 > (Undefined error: 0) > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=2 do_unbind > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=2 UNBIND > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_close: conn=1006 sd=10 > Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 fd=10 closed > > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: slap_listener_activate(6): > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> slap_listener(ldap://) > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 fd=10 ACCEPT from IP=127.0.0.5:20738 > (IP=0.0.0.0:389) > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1007 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on > id=1007 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x60, time 1350973432 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=0 do_bind > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> dnPrettyNormal: <cn=ldapadm,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <<< dnPrettyNormal: <cn=ldapadm,o=company>, > <cn=ldapadm,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=0 BIND dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" > method=128 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: do_bind: version=3 dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" > method=128 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=0 BIND dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" > mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: do_bind: v3 bind: "cn=ldapadm,o=company" to > "cn=ldapadm,o=company" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1007 op=0 p=3 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_response: msgid=1 tag=97 err=0 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1007 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on > id=1007 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x68, time 1350973432 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_input: conn=1007 deferring > operation: binding > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=1 do_add > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> dnPrettyNormal: > <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <<< dnPrettyNormal: > <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company>, > <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=1 ADD > dn="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: > bdb_dn2entry("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => > hdb_dn2id("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= hdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_NOTFOUND: No > matching key/data pair found (-30989) > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_referrals: tag=104 > target="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > matched="ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: ==> unique_add > <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_required entry > (cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company), objectClass "posixGroup" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "objectClass" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "description" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "gidNumber" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "structuralObjectClass" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "cn" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x7ffffebfc160 > 20121023062352.127471Z#000000#000#000000 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: > bdb_dn2entry("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => > hdb_dn2id("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= hdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_NOTFOUND: No > matching key/data pair found (-30989) > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => hdb_dn2id_add 0x6: > "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= hdb_dn2id_add 0x6: 0 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => index_entry_add( 6, > "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" ) > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= index_entry_add( 6, > "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" ) success > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => entry_encode(0x00000006): > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= entry_encode(0x00000006): > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_add: added id=00000006 > dn="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1007 op=1 p=3 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_response: msgid=2 tag=105 err=0 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=1 RESULT tag=105 err=0 text= > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x80197aeb0 > 20121023062352.127471Z#000000#000#000000 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1007 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on > id=1007 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x42, time 1350973432 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: ber_get_next on fd 10 failed errno=0 > (Undefined error: 0) > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=2 do_unbind > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=2 UNBIND > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_close: conn=1007 sd=10 > Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 fd=10 closed > > > -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#7420) Way to bypass overlay unique and constranit
by kmenshikov＠hostcomm.ru 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

Full_Name: Konstantin Menshikov Version: 2.4.33 OS: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p4 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (212.116.101.94) Overlay unique and constraint use list attributes for check. If we use restriction by rdn (attribute cn for example), and don`t add attribute cn in ldif-file, we can bypass restriction. Overlay unique look list attributes in op->ora_e->e_attrs, if this list not contain attribute cn, checks isn`t running. IMHO: problem not in overlays, but in slapd code, that allow add object without explicit set rdn. Example configuration: [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# cat slapd.conf # # See slapd.conf(5) for details on configuration options. # This file should NOT be world readable. # include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/corba.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/dyngroup.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/java.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/openldap.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/ppolicy.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/sudo.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/spamassassin.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/openssh-lpk.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/vega-base.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/vega-corp.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/vega-net.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/oversun-base.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/oversun-corp.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/oversun-mail.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/oversun-net.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/asterisk.schema # Define global ACLs to disable default read access. # Do not enable referrals until AFTER you have a working directory # service AND an understanding of referrals. #referral ldap://root.openldap.org pidfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.pid argsfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.args loglevel config stats sync trace # Load dynamic backend modules: modulepath /usr/local/libexec/openldap moduleload back_hdb database hdb suffix "o=company" rootdn "cn=ldapadm,o=company" rootpw password directory /var/db/openldap-data/o=company overlay unique unique_uri ldap:///ou=groups,o=company?cn?sub How to repeat: [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# ldapadd -D cn=ldapadm,o=company -wpassword -H ldap://127.0.0.5:389 -f /root/add.ldif.false adding new entry "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" ldap_add: Constraint violation (19) additional info: some attributes not unique [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# cat /root/add.ldif.false dn: cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company changetype: add objectClass: posixGroup description: test cn: test gidNumber: 1000 [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# ldapadd -D cn=ldapadm,o=company -wpassword -H ldap://127.0.0.5:389 -f /root/add.ldif.true adding new entry "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# cat /root/add.ldif.true dn: cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company changetype: add objectClass: posixGroup description: test gidNumber: 1000 [root(a)rdn.problem openldap]# diff -U 3 /root/add.ldif.false /root/add.ldif.true --- /root/add.ldif.false 2012-10-23 06:22:16.000000000 +0000 +++ /root/add.ldif.true 2012-10-23 06:22:25.000000000 +0000 @@ -2,5 +2,4 @@ changetype: add objectClass: posixGroup description: test -cn: test gidNumber: 1000 Log file records: Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: slap_listener_activate(6): Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> slap_listener(ldap://) Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 fd=10 ACCEPT from IP=127.0.0.5:17098 (IP=0.0.0.0:389) Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1006 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1006 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x60, time 1350973401 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=0 do_bind Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> dnPrettyNormal: <cn=ldapadm,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <<< dnPrettyNormal: <cn=ldapadm,o=company>, <cn=ldapadm,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=0 BIND dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" method=128 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: do_bind: version=3 dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" method=128 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=0 BIND dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: do_bind: v3 bind: "cn=ldapadm,o=company" to "cn=ldapadm,o=company" Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1006 op=0 p=3 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_response: msgid=1 tag=97 err=0 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1006 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1006 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x68, time 1350973401 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_input: conn=1006 deferring operation: binding Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=1 do_add Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> dnPrettyNormal: <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <<< dnPrettyNormal: <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company>, <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=1 ADD dn="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: bdb_dn2entry("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => hdb_dn2id("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <= hdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found (-30989) Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_referrals: tag=104 target="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" matched="ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: ==> unique_add <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: ==> unique_search (|(cn=test)) Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => hdb_search Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: bdb_dn2entry("ou=groups,o=company") Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: search_candidates: base="ou=groups,o=company" (0x00000002) scope=2 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => hdb_dn2idl("ou=groups,o=company") Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => bdb_equality_candidates (objectClass) Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <= bdb_equality_candidates: (objectClass) not indexed Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => bdb_equality_candidates (cn) Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: <= bdb_equality_candidates: (cn) not indexed Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: bdb_search_candidates: id=-1 first=2 last=5 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_search: 2 does not match filter Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_search: 3 does not match filter Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_search: 4 does not match filter Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: ==> count_attr_cb <cn=test,ou=personal,ou=groups,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1006 op=1 p=3 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: => unique_search found 1 records Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1006 op=1 p=3 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_response: msgid=2 tag=105 err=19 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=1 RESULT tag=105 err=19 text=some attributes not unique Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1006 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1006 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x42, time 1350973401 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: ber_get_next on fd 10 failed errno=0 (Undefined error: 0) Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=2 do_unbind Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 op=2 UNBIND Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_close: conn=1006 sd=10 Oct 23 06:23:21 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1006 fd=10 closed Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: slap_listener_activate(6): Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> slap_listener(ldap://) Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 fd=10 ACCEPT from IP=127.0.0.5:20738 (IP=0.0.0.0:389) Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1007 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1007 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x60, time 1350973432 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=0 do_bind Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> dnPrettyNormal: <cn=ldapadm,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <<< dnPrettyNormal: <cn=ldapadm,o=company>, <cn=ldapadm,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=0 BIND dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" method=128 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: do_bind: version=3 dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" method=128 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=0 BIND dn="cn=ldapadm,o=company" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: do_bind: v3 bind: "cn=ldapadm,o=company" to "cn=ldapadm,o=company" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1007 op=0 p=3 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_response: msgid=1 tag=97 err=0 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1007 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1007 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x68, time 1350973432 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_input: conn=1007 deferring operation: binding Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=1 do_add Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: >>> dnPrettyNormal: <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <<< dnPrettyNormal: <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company>, <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=1 ADD dn="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: bdb_dn2entry("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => hdb_dn2id("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= hdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found (-30989) Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_referrals: tag=104 target="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" matched="ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: ==> unique_add <cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company> Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_required entry (cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company), objectClass "posixGroup" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "objectClass" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "description" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "gidNumber" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "structuralObjectClass" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: oc_check_allowed type "cn" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x7ffffebfc160 20121023062352.127471Z#000000#000#000000 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: bdb_dn2entry("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => hdb_dn2id("cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company") Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= hdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found (-30989) Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => hdb_dn2id_add 0x6: "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= hdb_dn2id_add 0x6: 0 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => index_entry_add( 6, "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" ) Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= index_entry_add( 6, "cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" ) success Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: => entry_encode(0x00000006): Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: <= entry_encode(0x00000006): Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: hdb_add: added id=00000006 dn="cn=test,ou=system,ou=groups,o=company" Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_result: conn=1007 op=1 p=3 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: send_ldap_response: msgid=2 tag=105 err=0 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=1 RESULT tag=105 err=0 text= Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x80197aeb0 20121023062352.127471Z#000000#000#000000 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_get(10): got connid=1007 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1007 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: op tag 0x42, time 1350973432 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: ber_get_next on fd 10 failed errno=0 (Undefined error: 0) Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=2 do_unbind Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 op=2 UNBIND Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: connection_close: conn=1007 sd=10 Oct 23 06:23:52 rdn slapd[44326]: conn=1007 fd=10 closed

1 0

Re: AW: (ITS#7418) slapo-constraint are broken
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

On 10/22/2012 09:19 PM, quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote: > --On Monday, October 22, 2012 7:14 PM +0000 Sascha.Kuehndel(a)deka.de wrote: > >> --_004_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A046FAB9EXCCREX9dekag_ >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> >> Hello, >> >> i have reduced the configuration and the DIT to a minium. >> So i can now send the slapd.conf, the initial dit and the test-change. >> >> I hope you can reproduce the error, with it. > > Hi Jan, > > It appears your changes to slapo-constraint broke at least one > configuration option. Can you please review the information in this ITS > and update your changes. Thanks. > Hi, those changes were made by me (different Jan). I will look into it and update the testcases. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat

1 0

Re: AW: (ITS#7418) slapo-constraint are broken
by quanah＠zimbra.com 22 Oct '12

22 Oct '12

--On Monday, October 22, 2012 7:14 PM +0000 Sascha.Kuehndel(a)deka.de wrote: > --_004_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A046FAB9EXCCREX9dekag_ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hello, > > i have reduced the configuration and the DIT to a minium. > So i can now send the slapd.conf, the initial dit and the test-change. > > I hope you can reproduce the error, with it. Hi Jan, It appears your changes to slapo-constraint broke at least one configuration option. Can you please review the information in this ITS and update your changes. Thanks. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

AW: (ITS#7418) slapo-constraint are broken
by Sascha.Kuehndel＠deka.de 22 Oct '12

22 Oct '12

--_004_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A046FAB9EXCCREX9dekag_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, i have reduced the configuration and the DIT to a minium. So i can now send the slapd.conf, the initial dit and the test-change. I hope you can reproduce the error, with it. The uses software: OpenLDAP: 2.4.33 BDB: 5.3.21 OpenSSL: 1.0.1c Thanks, Sascha Kuehndel --_004_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A046FAB9EXCCREX9dekag_ Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="initial.ldif" Content-Description: initial.ldif Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="initial.ldif"; size=1490; creation-date="Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:06:34 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:41:40 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ZG46IG91PWRla2EsZGM9ZXhhbXBsZSxkYz1jb20Kb3U6IGRla2FuZXQKb2JqZWN0Q2xhc3M6IG9y Z2FuaXphdGlvbmFsVW5pdApzdHJ1Y3R1cmFsT2JqZWN0Q2xhc3M6IG9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbmFsVW5p dAplbnRyeVVVSUQ6IDdiOWRkOWQyLWIwYmMtMTAzMS05ZjI1LTA1OWJlYjBiYjUzYwplbnRyeUNT TjogMjAxMjEwMjIxNzQ4NTAuODEwNDY3WiMwMDAwMDAjMDAwIzAwMDAwMAoKZG46IG91PWdyb3Vw LG91PWRla2EsZGM9ZXhhbXBsZSxkYz1jb20Kb3U6IFppZWxncnVwcGVuCmRlc2NyaXB0aW9uOiBD b250YWluZXIgZnVlciBaaWVsZ3J1cHBlbmVpbnRyYWVnZQpvYmplY3RDbGFzczogb3JnYW5pemF0 aW9uYWxVbml0CnN0cnVjdHVyYWxPYmplY3RDbGFzczogb3JnYW5pemF0aW9uYWxVbml0CmVudHJ5 VVVJRDogODQwNTExMTItYjBiYy0xMDMxLTlmMjYtMDU5YmViMGJiNTNjCmVudHJ5Q1NOOiAyMDEy MTAyMjE3NDkwNC45MDg2NjBaIzAwMDAwMCMwMDAjMDAwMDAwCgpkbjogdWlkPTE0LG91PWdyb3Vw LG91PWRla2EsZGM9ZXhhbXBsZSxkYz1jb20KdWlkOiAxNApvYmplY3RDbGFzczogYWNjb3VudApv YmplY3RDbGFzczogdG9wCnN0cnVjdHVyYWxPYmplY3RDbGFzczogYWNjb3VudAplbnRyeVVVSUQ6 IDg0N2VhYzVjLWIwYmMtMTAzMS05ZjM2LTA1OWJlYjBiYjUzYwplbnRyeUNTTjogMjAxMjEwMjIx NzUxMjcuNzIyNzQ3WiMwMDAwMDAjMDAwIzAwMDAwMAoKZG46IG91PXVzZXIsb3U9ZGVrYSxkYz1l eGFtcGxlLGRjPWNvbQpvdTogQmVudXR6ZXIKb2JqZWN0Q2xhc3M6IG9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbmFsVW5p dApzdHJ1Y3R1cmFsT2JqZWN0Q2xhc3M6IG9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbmFsVW5pdAplbnRyeVVVSUQ6IDhh ZDhjYTEwLWIwYmMtMTAzMS05ZjNhLTA1OWJlYjBiYjUzYwplbnRyeUNTTjogMjAxMjEwMjIxNzQ5 MTYuMzYyNTU1WiMwMDAwMDAjMDAwIzAwMDAwMAoKZG46IGRjPTEsb3U9dXNlcixvdT1kZWthLGRj PWV4YW1wbGUsZGM9Y29tCmRjOiAxCm9iamVjdENsYXNzOiBkb21haW4Kb2JqZWN0Q2xhc3M6IHRv cAphc3NvY2lhdGVkTmFtZTogdWlkPTE0LG91PWdyb3VwLG91PWRla2EsZGM9ZXhhbXBsZSxkYz1j b20Kc3RydWN0dXJhbE9iamVjdENsYXNzOiBkb21haW4KZW50cnlVVUlEOiA3ODgwZDBlNi1iMGMy LTEwMzEtODk1Yi1hMWEzZjJmYmFjYjcKZW50cnlDU046IDIwMTIxMDIyMTgzMTQyLjU2NzI3OVoj MDAwMDAwIzAwMCMwMDAwMDAKCmRuOiBkYz0yLG91PXVzZXIsb3U9ZGVrYSxkYz1leGFtcGxlLGRj PWNvbQpkYzogMgpvYmplY3RDbGFzczogZG9tYWluCm9iamVjdENsYXNzOiB0b3AKYXNzb2NpYXRl ZE5hbWU6IHVpZD0xNCxvdT1ncm91cCxvdT1kZWthLGRjPWV4YW1wbGUsZGM9Y29tCnN0cnVjdHVy YWxPYmplY3RDbGFzczogZG9tYWluCmVudHJ5VVVJRDogODA0MTUyNTYtYjBjMi0xMDMxLTg5NWMt YTFhM2YyZmJhY2I3CmVudHJ5Q1NOOiAyMDEyMTAyMjE4MzE1NS41NzMwNThaIzAwMDAwMCMwMDAj MDAwMDAwCgo= --_004_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A046FAB9EXCCREX9dekag_ Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="slapd.conf" Content-Description: slapd.conf Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="slapd.conf"; size=818; creation-date="Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:06:27 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:05:29 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 IyBTY2hlbWF0YSBhdXMgZGVyIE9wZW5MREFQLURpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbgppbmNsdWRlCSAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgc2xhcGQvZXRjL29wZW5sZGFwL3NjaGVtYS9jb3JlLnNjaGVtYQppbmNsdWRlCSAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgc2xhcGQvZXRjL29wZW5sZGFwL3NjaGVtYS9jb3NpbmUuc2NoZW1hCgoj IExvYWQgbW9kdWxlcwptb2R1bGVwYXRoICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgc2xhcGQvbGliZXhlYy9vcGVu bGRhcAptb2R1bGVsb2FkICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgYmFja19oZGIubGEKbW9kdWxlbG9hZCAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIGNvbnN0cmFpbnQubGEKCiMgQmFzZSBrb25maWd1cmF0aW9uCnBpZGZpbGUgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICBzbGFwZC5waWQKYXJnc2ZpbGUgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHNsYXBkLmFy Z3MKCiMgRGF0YWJhc2UKZGF0YWJhc2UgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGhkYgoKc3VmZml4ICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICJvdT1kZWthLGRjPWV4YW1wbGUsZGM9Y29tIgpkaXJlY3RvcnkgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgZXhhbXBsZQpyb290ZG4gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgImNuPXJvb3Qsb3U9ZGVr YSxkYz1leGFtcGxlLGRjPWNvbSIKcm9vdHB3ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHJvb3QKCm92ZXJs YXkgY29uc3RyYWludApjb25zdHJhaW50X2F0dHJpYnV0ZSBhc3NvY2lhdGVkTmFtZSB1cmkKICBs ZGFwOi8vL291PWdyb3VwLG91PWRla2EsZGM9ZXhhbXBsZSxkYz1jb20/ZW50cnlETj9vbmU/KG9i amVjdENsYXNzPWFjY291bnQpCiAgcmVzdHJpY3Q9bGRhcDovLy9vdT11c2VyLG91PWRla2EsZGM9 ZXhhbXBsZSxkYz1jb20/P29uZQo= --_004_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A046FAB9EXCCREX9dekag_ Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="test.ldif" Content-Description: test.ldif Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="test.ldif"; size=96; creation-date="Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:07:18 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:07:00 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ZG46IGRjPTIsb3U9dXNlcixvdT1kZWthLGRjPWV4YW1wbGUsZGM9Y29tCmNoYW5nZXR5cGU6IG1v ZGlmeQphZGQ6IGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uCmRlc2NyaXB0aW9uOiBhCi0K --_004_F12A906A1F17554CB9CDFC8F4779F3C469A046FAB9EXCCREX9dekag_--

1 0

Re: (ITS#7367) [PATCH] MozNSS: update list of supported cipher suites
by quanah＠zimbra.com 19 Oct '12

19 Oct '12

--On Monday, October 08, 2012 9:49 AM +0200 Jan Včelák <jvcelak(a)redhat.com> wrote: > I would like to see newer OpenLDAP in RHEL because it would be easier for > me to maintain it. But I'm not sure if the advantages will outweight the > disadvantages and if our customers will benefit from it rather than be > forced to deal with new problems. The lack of a current version of OpenLDAP exposes your customers to numerous significant issues, whether or not you choose acknowledge that. >> Ok. One thing I do with Debian is help triage issues that are reported >> there with the upstream ITS system if the issues do not appear to be due >> to the usage of an old version. If there is a simple way to do that >> with Red Hat, I could help there as well. > > When there is a new bug report, I usualy try to reproduce with the > package from RHEL or Fedora. And then with the newest OpenLDAP from git > master. If I'm able to reproduce, I always create a report in your ITS. I was curious more in a list like pkg-openldap-devel w/ Debian, which also gets cc'd on all ldap related tickets. But it sounds like you are already doing what I was thinking of. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs