- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 7239] slapo-accesslog: not all write operations logged with 'logops all'
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Jan '22

18 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7239 --- Comment #14 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 7e923c72 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2022-01-18T20:11:46+00:00 ITS#7239 Do not log internal ops -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 5972] Send newCookie sync info messages
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 Jan '22

13 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5972 --- Comment #6 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- If a Delete touches an entry not matching search filter, syncprov will not send out a new cookie to that consumer. Fixed in MR!471: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/471 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9538] New: Accesslog entryCSN ordering is not always monotonous
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9538 Issue ID: 9538 Summary: Accesslog entryCSN ordering is not always monotonous Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- For delta-sync replication, we rely on CSN order being preserved at all times. When logops includes anything more than "writes", we don't use li_op_rmutex to maintain serialisation. A concurrent write and another operation (like bind) can have the write have its csn assigned before the bind. But before the write finishes on the main DB and is logged, the bind has already hit accesslog. This entry out of order doesn't match the usual filter, so non-persist sessions will not notice, however running persist sessions could get a new cookie sent, depending on how things are ordered when they hit syncprov. A sample: ---- 8< ---- Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 ADD dn="uid=dm01-R1H2-41660,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com" Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=reqStart=20210426195604.000350Z,cn=accesslog on opc=0x7d3d2800dc50 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_get_csn: conn=1003 op=42 generated new csn=20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 manage=1 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7d3d38148f60 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 BIND dn="dc=example,dc=com" method=128 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 BIND dn="dc=example,dc=com" mech=SIMPLE bind_ssf=0 ssf=256 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 RESULT tag=105 err=0 qtime=0.005874 etime=0.015182 text= Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_get_csn: conn=1005 op=1 generated new csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 manage=1 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x561f09113f80 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=reqStart=20210426195604.000364Z,cn=accesslog on opc=0x561f0900fcf0 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1002 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1001 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1000 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x561f09113f80 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 RESULT tag=97 err=0 qtime=0.000020 etime=0.004297 text= Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7d3d38148250 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7d3d38148250 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7d3d38148f60 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 ---- 8< ---- Example entries in the order slapcat sees them: ---- 8< ---- dn: reqStart=20210426195604.000364Z,cn=accesslog objectClass: auditBind reqStart: 20210426195604.000364Z reqEnd: 20210426195604.000365Z reqType: bind entryCSN: 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 dn: reqStart=20210426195604.000351Z,cn=accesslog objectClass: auditAdd reqStart: 20210426195604.000351Z reqEnd: 20210426195604.000366Z reqType: add entryCSN: 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 ---- 8< ---- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 20

[Issue 7080] post read control in back-config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7080 --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- head: • 2bf59ff6 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2022-01-06T03:05:45+00:00 ITS#7080 Find config entry before processing pre-read on delete RE26: • cf2a4a60 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2022-01-12T22:38:11+00:00 ITS#7080 Find config entry before processing pre-read on delete -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9768] New: slapo-translucent handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9768 Issue ID: 9768 Summary: slapo-translucent handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- If olcTranslucentLocal/olcTranslucentRemote is passed multiple attribute names in a single value that (or one further down the list) is later removed, the overlay doesn't handle its removal correctly. We should encourage users to provide a single attribute name per value, just like we do in EMIT for those provided in slapd.conf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 9767] New: slapo-unique handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9767 Issue ID: 9767 Summary: slapo-unique handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- If olcUniqueIgnore/olcUniqueAttribute is passed multiple names in a single value that is later removed, the overlay doesn't handle its removal correctly. We should encourage users to provide a single attribute name per value, just like we do in EMIT for those provided in slapd.conf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9556] New: slapd-config should return invalidAttributeSyntax if parsing schema description fails
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9556 Issue ID: 9556 Summary: slapd-config should return invalidAttributeSyntax if parsing schema description fails Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- I'm currently testing error handling and interacting with LDAP clients (e.g. my web2ldap). Sending an invalid attribute type description results in an error (as expected) returned by slapd-config: RESULT tag=103 err=80 qtime=0.000032 etime=0.001271 text=olcAttributeTypes: Unexpected token before SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 ) But result code other(80) seems not very useful. It's too unspecific to decide on specific error handling. It would be much more useful if slapd-config returns invalidAttributeSyntax(21) in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9576] New: Add ConfigTable link into ConfigArgs
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9576 Issue ID: 9576 Summary: Add ConfigTable link into ConfigArgs Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Would make it possible to examine defaults if necessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9729] New: Allow setting multiprovider before adding syncrepl stanzas
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9729 Issue ID: 9729 Summary: Allow setting multiprovider before adding syncrepl stanzas Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- It should be possible to set multiprovider first, avoiding the window of the DB being read-only while performing an online upgrade of a single provider to an MPR set up and generally simplifying configuration. Instead, the only requirement should be that serverID has been explicitly set (hopefully != 0). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 6097] MMR problems with deletes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jan '22

10 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6097 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.6.2 |2.6.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9778] New: Can't find the back-xxx.la libraries
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 Jan '22

06 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9778 Issue ID: 9778 Summary: Can't find the back-xxx.la libraries Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: burt.stampfl(a)amsc.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 870 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=870&action=edit Output from the build steps I described in the 'description' above. Hi, I'm new to OpenLDAP. Pulled down the current 2.6 release to a Debian target and am having trouble figuring out how to build the backend modules for dynamic use. What I did: 1. Downloaded openldap-2.6.0.tgz and extracted the source on my Debian target. 2. configured the 'build' via (output indicated it was successful) : ./configure --enable-sql=no --enable-wt=no --enable-spasswd=yes --enable-passwd=yes --enable-perl=yes --enable-crypt=yes --enable-ldap=yes --enable-slapd=yes --enable-ppolicy=yes --enable-otp=yes --enable-auditlog=yes --enable-modules=yes --with-cyrus-sasl=yes 3. ran 'make depend' (output indicated it was successful). 4. ran 'make' (output indicated it was successful). 5. ran the tests via 'env SLAPD_DEBUG=1 make test' (output indicated it was successful). 6. Installed it via 'su root -c 'make install' I was able to pretty easily get the slapd server running, create a database (mdb) add users, etc, and access via a remote client. Once I was able to do that I wanted to enable the ppolicy backend/overlay and have not been able to get this to work. Looking online it appears I need some 'backend' modules like back-mdb.la, ppolicy.la, etc and I cannot find them anywhere in my build tree. I had thought the --enable-xxx directives I used in the config step would have forced this to build them, but I guess not. How do I create these dynamic backend modules and is there any documentation on how to use them in the newer dynamic configuration schema ? I've attached a file with the output from the steps I performed above. Thank you Burt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 8988] Undefined Behavior in slapadd
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 Jan '22

06 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8988 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|FIXED |INVALID -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8988] Undefined Behavior in slapadd
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 Jan '22

06 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8988 --- Comment #23 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- > Running slapadd to build slapd database... ../../../libraries/liblmdb/mdb.c:7544:26: runtime error: member access within misaligned address 0x0000023fe67a for type 'struct MDB_page', which requires 8 byte alignment 0x0000023fe67a: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 52 00 10 00 66 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 The code in question is accessing an unsigned short on a 2 byte boundary. I.e., its alignment is correct. UBsan is incorrect here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9775] New: fresh git clone will not build
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 Jan '22

04 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9775 Issue ID: 9775 Summary: fresh git clone will not build Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nick(a)folino.us Target Milestone: --- git clone https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap.git cd openldap ./configure make depend Entering subdirectory tests make[1]: Entering directory 'openldap/tests' Making depend in openldap/tests Entering subdirectory modules make[2]: Entering directory 'openldap/tests/modules' make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'depend'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory 'openldap/tests/modules' make[1]: *** [Makefile:430: depend-common] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory 'openldap/tests' make: *** [Makefile:356: depend-common] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 9774] New: Add and maintain file CHANGES for 2.6.x
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jan '22

03 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9774 Issue ID: 9774 Summary: Add and maintain file CHANGES for 2.6.x Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- In opposite to rel eng branches for 2.4.x and 2.5.x the branch for 2.6.x is still missing a CHANGES files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9773] New: slapo-allowed should also list "operational" attributes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jan '22

03 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9773 Issue ID: 9773 Summary: slapo-allowed should also list "operational" attributes Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- When using slapo-allowed a client may disable input fields for attributes not listed in 'allowedAttributesEffective'. This helps the user to understand that he/she should not even try to modify the attribute (better UX). But slapo-allowed never shows operational attributes in allowedAttributesEffective. In most use-cases this is understandable but there are some nice use-cases (e.g. setting pwdPolicySubentry) where it should be possible for the client to display an enabled input field even for operational attributes. See also: * Discussion in ITS#9671 * https://code.stroeder.com/ldap/web2ldap/issues/24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 9769] New: Patch new feature batch get
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jan '22

03 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9769 Issue ID: 9769 Summary: Patch new feature batch get Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: rouzier(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 859 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=859&action=edit New functionality mdb_cursor_get_batch New functionality mdb_cursor_get_batch mdb_cursor_get_batch retrieves a page worth of key/values. This is to reduce the number of function calls when doing a scan of the database. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 8988] Undefined Behavior in slapadd
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Dec '21

16 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8988 --- Comment #22 from noloader(a)gmail.com <noloader(a)gmail.com> --- On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:59 AM Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote: > > noloader(a)gmail.com wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:32 AM Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote: > >> > >> noloader(a)gmail.com wrote: > >> ... > >>> I encourage OpenLDAP to fix the undefined behavior. OpenLDAP is an > >>> important project, and the undefined behavior is causing too many > >>> tangential problems. > >> > >> Undefined behavior is not a bug, nor is it prohibited by the C spec. It is a necessary > >> part of the language for its intended use as a system programming language, writing > >> machine-specific programs. Anyone who says it is prohibited by the spec is wrong. The kernel recently got bitten using the same pattern of unaligned short pointers through casts. GCC produced code which corrupted initramfs during unpacking. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363. OpenLDAP should fix that code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9771] New: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp'
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Dec '21

15 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9771 Issue ID: 9771 Summary: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: shoober420(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 861 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=861&action=edit openldap build log When trying to build openldap from current master commit (https://github.com/openldap/openldap/commit/75636a407e38f1502c592566b5bf4c3…), I get the following error. Full build log attached. libtool: link: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -m32 -march=native -O3 -pipe -fno-plt -fno-common -fipa-pta -falign-functions=32 -fdevirtualize-at-ltrans -fuse-linker-plugin -floop-nest-optimize -fgraphite-identity -fexcess-precision=fast -w -flto=auto -Wl,-O1 -o .libs/ftest ftest.o -Wl,--as-needed ./.libs/libldap.so /var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-9999/work/openldap-9999-abi_x86_32.x86/libraries/liblber/.libs/liblber.so ../../libraries/liblber/.libs/liblber.so ../../libraries/liblutil/liblutil.a -lgnutls -luuid /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:338: urltest] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:326: apitest] Error 1 make[2]: *** [Makefile:334: testavl] Error 1 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:330: ftest] Error 1 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:328: dntest] Error 1 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:332: ltest] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-9999/work/openldap-9999-abi_x86_32.x86/libraries/libldap' make[1]: *** [Makefile:312: all-common] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-9999/work/openldap-9999-abi_x86_32.x86/libraries' make: *** [Makefile:320: all-common] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9493] New: slapo-accesslog handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Dec '21

14 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9493 Issue ID: 9493 Summary: slapo-accesslog handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.57 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: svella(a)technologist.com Target Milestone: --- I observed this in the debugger while working on a small feature addition to slapo-accesslog. log_cf_gen(), when handling the initial configuration of oldAccessLogOldAttr (accesslog.c:989), linked list li_oldattrs is being built by inserting each value in order at the head of the list, resulting in the list being in reverse order. But when handling LDAP_MOD_DELETE of same attribute (accesslog.c:989), it is using the index of the removed value (valx) to find and removed the entry in the linked list, but it's counting from the head of li_oldattrs and not the tail, resulting in the wrong item being removed from the list unless counting from the head or the tail happens find the same item. (Line numbers refer to commit 6c469f07935e351e349bf38fc223dab704c51a76) Handling of oldAccessLogBase appears to have the same problem, and a cursory glance through the source of other overlays reveals a similar pattern, and I'm guessing the same problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 21

[Issue 9282] New: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9282 Issue ID: 9282 Summary: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.50 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Scenario: 2 node Multi-provider replication Add database to provider A ensure database replicates to provider B Stop provider A delete entry on provider B Start provider A Wait for provider B to reconnect to provider A Deleted entry re-appears -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 22

[Issue 9765] New: slapd crash
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Dec '21

08 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9765 Issue ID: 9765 Summary: slapd crash Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.46 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: shivaprasadtp(a)yahoo.in Target Milestone: --- Start-up two slapd server instances. Configure syncreply overlay with one of the servers as a provider and the other one as consumer. Create around 100 users. Now start changing syncrepl configuration for one of the slapd servers, lets say the consumer server, in a loop with 5 seconds delay. After few mins the slapd server crashes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9757] New: The private key of the ldap certificate
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '21

02 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9757 Issue ID: 9757 Summary: The private key of the ldap certificate Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.59 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ydgdsnn(a)163.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 856 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=856&action=edit prikey.key Current situation: The private key of the ldap certificate is used to set LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_KEYFILE when bind, and this file is currently stored in plain text. Appeal: Can we store the ciphertext of the file, and then decrypt it when we use it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 8485] [PATCH] Adding support for encrypted server private keys
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '21

02 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8485 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ydgdsnn(a)163.com --- Comment #13 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- *** Issue 9757 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9754] New: segfault after adding olcAccess
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '21

02 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754 Issue ID: 9754 Summary: segfault after adding olcAccess Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: goudal(a)enseirb.fr Target Milestone: --- On a new production server 2.6.0 on ubuntu 20.04 LTS uptodate. After adding an olcAccess attribute I got a segfault. The aclValue added is {9}to attrs=ipbCompteValide,ipbEtendue,mailForwardingAddress by dn.base="uid=cptadmin,ou=people,dc=ipb,dc=fr" write by * read (the ipbXXX attrs are local ones). I have tried to add it twice and it did segfault twice. Here are the last logs for the server (logLevel was on sync). Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7f3a475615c0 20211125133351.609580Z#000000#00a#000000 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291397 MOD dn="dc=ipb,dc=fr" Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291397 MOD attr=contextCSN Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291397 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=dc=ipb,dc=fr on opc=0x7f3a48001440 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1053 op=1 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=2 csn= Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291397 RESULT tag=103 err=0 qtime=0.000017 etime=0.003762 text= Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291398 SRCH base="dc=ipb,dc=fr" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(entryUUID=29a4991c-9dda-103b-98c2-c3fe49d4fff9)" Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291398 SRCH attr=* + Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291398 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 qtime=0.000028 etime=0.000285 nentries=1 text= Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 MOD dn="uid=pbouchevrea,ou=people,dc=ipb,dc=fr" Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 MOD attr=ipbDateFin entryCSN modifiersName modifyTimestamp Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=uid=pbouchevrea,ou=people,dc=ipb,dc=fr on opc=0x7f3a48001630 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 syncprov_findbase: searching Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7f3a438bc700 20211125133351.654596Z#000000#00a#000000 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1053 op=1 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=2 csn=20211125133351.654596Z#000000#00a#000000 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 RESULT tag=103 err=0 qtime=0.000025 etime=0.022224 text= Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7f3a438bc700 20211125133351.654596Z#000000#00a#000000 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291400 MOD dn="dc=ipb,dc=fr" Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291400 MOD attr=contextCSN Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291400 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=dc=ipb,dc=fr on opc=0x7f3a50003440 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 kernel: [262778.995540] slapd[68072]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f4ea0d3553e sp 00007f4e9dae9f48 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f4ea0cad000+178000] Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 kernel: [262778.995584] Code: b6 07 29 c8 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 89 f8 31 d2 66 0f ef ff 09 f0 25 ff 0f 00 00 3d c0 0f 00 00 0f 8f 74 02 00 00 <f3> 0f 6f 0f f3 0f 6f 06 66 0f 74 c1\ 66 0f da c1 66 0f ef c9 66 0f Nov 25 14:34:36 ldap2021 slapd[70083]: * Stopping OpenLDAP slapd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs