- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 9000] memberOf value is lost when group DN is modified with only case change
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 Feb '22

04 Feb '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9000 --- Comment #7 from sebastien.chaumat(a)qspin.be --- This bug is still present in 2.4.49 (ubuntu). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8375] paged results control results in full db search?
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '22

31 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8375 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.6.2 |2.7.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8255] slapd-sock: response parsing in str2result() is broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '22

31 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9792] New: During replication, slapd tries to modify hasSubordinates (and fails)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '22

31 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9792 Issue ID: 9792 Summary: During replication, slapd tries to modify hasSubordinates (and fails) Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.9 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: christophe(a)armaghast.eu Target Milestone: --- During relication, this strange error occurs: Jan 25 14:46:42 annu slapd[471040]: conn=1001 op=2796 MOD attr=userPassword pwdChangedTime pwdHistory entryCSN modifiersName modifyTimestamp hasSubordinates Jan 25 14:46:42 annu slapd[471040]: conn=1001 op=2796 RESULT tag=103 err=16 qtime=0.000030 etime=0.000462 text=modify/delete: hasSubordinates: no such attribute Why does slapd try to modify this (virtual) attribute ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9350] New: Expand test suite for null base
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '22

31 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9350 Issue ID: 9350 Summary: Expand test suite for null base Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Currently we have no tests that use the empty suffix (null base). This is an entirely valid configuration setup, and there are unique challenges and bugs that crop up with this usage. We need to ensure we're covering this use case, particularly with syncrepl and delta-syncrepl configurations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 8255] slapd-sock: response parsing in str2result() is broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '22

31 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #10 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/487 for the clarification. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8255] slapd-sock: response parsing in str2result() is broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '22

31 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 --- Comment #9 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- (In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #8) > and probably need to stop referencing the slapd-shell manpage too. Ah, we already did that, forgot I was reading the installed, not the local manpage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8255] slapd-sock: response parsing in str2result() is broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '22

31 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|backends |documentation --- Comment #8 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- (In reply to Howard Chu from comment #7) > (In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #6) >> str2result() doesn't expect "msgid:" to be passed in the response, even >> though that's part of the protocol as documented. > > Incorrect. The docs clearly show msgid: is not part of the response message. True, I misread the manpage because there is little structure in there to support quick reference. I think we should put the "sockresp result" string in the relevant paragraph and probably need to stop referencing the slapd-shell manpage too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8255] slapd-sock: response parsing in str2result() is broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Jan '22

28 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 --- Comment #7 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #6) > str2result() doesn't expect "msgid:" to be passed in the response, even > though that's part of the protocol as documented. Incorrect. The docs clearly show msgid: is not part of the response message. >>>> The commands - except unbind - should output: RESULT code: <integer> matched: <matched DN> info: <text> where only RESULT is mandatory, and then close the socket. <<<< The msgid: is only included in messages from back-sock to the external program. There is no bug in back-sock or in its documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8255] slapd-sock: response parsing in str2result() is broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Jan '22

28 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 --- Comment #6 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- str2result() doesn't expect "msgid:" to be passed in the response, even though that's part of the protocol as documented. Now that back-sock is its only user, it should just be added. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9793] New: Question regarding password dictionary rules for when a user changes their password.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Jan '22

27 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9793 Issue ID: 9793 Summary: Question regarding password dictionary rules for when a user changes their password. Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: alan_andrea(a)yahoo.com Target Milestone: --- I have a question regarding password rules that are enforced when a user changes their password. We have a need to implement a dictionary rule whereby words and phrases in a dictionary are not allowed in a users password. I am not able to see currently where such functionality exists in OpenLDAP and am wondering if there are any extensions to OPenLDAP that were developed to support this or if it would be required to write code to support this feature. If you can please give me some guidelines here, that would be really great ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9742] New: syncprov-nopresent is harmful
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Jan '22

27 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9742 Issue ID: 9742 Summary: syncprov-nopresent is harmful Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- If setting up a new delta-MPR environment such that: - server A has been slapadd-ed the seed data - accesslog is set to "logops all" There is a sequence of events where servers are started and replicate from each other before they get a chance to talk to A, they will each generate a CSN and replicate it. Once they start talking to A, it will see that it has a CSN (its own) that none of them have sent and "syncprov-nopresent" makes it just go ahead where the only sane outcome is to send SYNC_REFRESH_REQUIRED. Am I missing a usecase for this or should it just have been this way all along? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 13

[Issue 9750] New: global vs. frontend config in slapd.conf - misleading warning message
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9750 Issue ID: 9750 Summary: global vs. frontend config in slapd.conf - misleading warning message Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- Since the fix for ITS#9575 there is this misleading message even when invoking slapcat: /opt/openldap-ms/etc/openldap/slapd.conf: line 126: setting password scheme in the global entry is deprecated. The server may refuse to start if it is provided by a loadable module, please move it to the frontend database instead There is currently no way to rearrange something in slapd.conf to make this confusing message go away. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9738] New: entry_schema_check: Assertion `a->a_vals[0].bv_val != NULL' failed.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9738 Issue ID: 9738 Summary: entry_schema_check: Assertion `a->a_vals[0].bv_val != NULL' failed. Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- slapd 2.6.0 exits when an LDAP client sends an add operation with invalid data: 2021-11-04T22:07:36.790594+01:00 itn-dir-1 slapd[32415]: 61844b98.2ef8df5c 0x7fe42d9a6700 Entry (mail=michael(a)stroeder.com,ou=ext,ou=metadir,o=itn): object class 'itnmetaPerson' requires attribute 'displayName' 2021-11-04T22:07:36.790694+01:00 itn-dir-1 slapd[32415]: slapd: schema_check.c:89: entry_schema_check: Assertion `a->a_vals[0].bv_val != NULL' failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 13

[Issue 9730] New: logfile-rotate directive fails in 2.6.0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730 Issue ID: 9730 Summary: logfile-rotate directive fails in 2.6.0 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hello, When setting the logfile-rotate, I get: 617bc9ae.1b73de17 0x7f44f87c9740 /usr/local/openldap/etc/openldap/slapd.conf: line 12 (logfile-rotate 10 100 24) 617bc9ae.1b759154 0x7f44f87c9740 /usr/local/openldap/etc/openldap/slapd.conf: line 12: <logfile-rotate> handler exited with 16384! My configuration file is below. I am using the 2.6.0 release. The strange part is that the same configuration converted into cn=config seems to work well. # # See slapd.conf(5) for details on configuration options. # This file should NOT be world readable. # include /usr/local/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /usr/local/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /usr/local/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /usr/local/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/dyngroup.schema logfile-rotate 10 100 24 logfile /var/log/slapd-ltb/slapd.log logLevel 256 sasl-host ldap.my-domain.com pidfile /usr/local/openldap/var/run/slapd.pid argsfile /usr/local/openldap/var/run/slapd.args # Load dynamic backend modules: # moduleload back_ldap.la modulepath /usr/local/openldap/libexec/openldap moduleload argon2.la moduleload back_mdb.la moduleload dynlist.la moduleload memberof.la moduleload ppolicy.la moduleload syncprov.la moduleload unique.la access to dn.base="" by * read access to dn.base="cn=subschema" by * read ####################################################################### # config database definitions ####################################################################### database config rootdn cn=config rootpw secret access to attrs="userPassword" by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth =wdx by * auth access to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth manage ####################################################################### # MDB database definitions ####################################################################### database mdb maxsize 4294967296 suffix dc=my-domain,dc=com rootdn cn=Manager,dc=my-domain,dc=com rootpw secret directory /usr/local/openldap/var/openldap-data index objectClass eq index cn eq,sub index uid pres,eq index givenName pres,eq,sub index l pres,eq index employeeType pres,eq index mail pres,eq,sub index sn pres,eq,sub limits group="cn=admin,ou=groups,dc=my-domain,dc=com" size=unlimited time=unlimited access to attrs="userPassword" by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth =wdx by group.exact="cn=admin,ou=groups,dc=my-domain,dc=com" =wdx by self =wdx by * auth access to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth manage by group.exact="cn=admin,ou=groups,dc=my-domain,dc=com" write by users read -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9725] New: attribute olcLastBindPrecision redefined in slapo-lastbind
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9725 Issue ID: 9725 Summary: attribute olcLastBindPrecision redefined in slapo-lastbind Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- An attribute type description for 'olcLastBindPrecision' is present in servers/slapd/bconfig.c and contrib/slapd-modules/lastbind/lastbind.c. Thus the migration of deployments using slapo-lastbind is not as smooth as it should be. With release 2.6.0 one is forced to disable slapo-lastbind. Removing the attribute type description for 'olcLastBindPrecision' from contrib/slapd-modules/lastbind/lastbind.c should work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 9647] New: Glue entry creation doesn't replicate properly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9647 Issue ID: 9647 Summary: Glue entry creation doesn't replicate properly Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- In plain syncrepl, when an entry is turned into glue (to remove it when it still has children), it won't replicate correctly to its consumers - a NEW_COOKIE intermediate message is sent instead. Scenario: - 4 servers (A, B, C, D) and a tree with two entries - cn=parent,cn=suffix and its parent, the database suffix - D replicates from C, C replicates from A and B, no other links set up for this Now: 1. add an entry "cn=child,cn=parent,cn=suffix" on A 2. remove "cn=parent,cn=suffix" from B As things settle, cn=parent,cn=suffix is retained on D while being deleted from C. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 12

[Issue 9758] New: slapd-sock cn=config issues
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9758 Issue ID: 9758 Summary: slapd-sock cn=config issues Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- This module has multiple issues with cn=config processing: - empty/missing sockdnpat can trigger an assert - adding multiple olcDbSocketExtensions/olcOvSocketOps/olcOvSocketResps does not work as expected, deletes are also broken -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9740] New: olcPPolicyCheckModule not working in 2.6.0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9740 Issue ID: 9740 Summary: olcPPolicyCheckModule not working in 2.6.0 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Following: https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9666, we must now use the olcPPolicyCheckModule directive in the overlay configuration, instead of the pwdCheckModule in the password policy. I have 3 remarks: 1/ it's a pity we can't define the chosen module in the corresponding ppolicy. It prevents having multiple extension to password policies (one for each policy) 2/ it does not seem to work. (ie the extended module is not launched). See below for my config and data. 3/ the slapo-ppolicy is quite unclear about the configuration. For example, I can read: ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.4754.2.99.1 NAME 'pwdPolicyChecker' AUXILIARY SUP top MAY ( pwdCheckModule $ pwdCheckModuleArg $ pwdUseCheckModule ) ) Does pwdCheckModule and pwdUseCheckModule still have sense? Here is my configuration: dn: olcOverlay={0}ppolicy,olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcPPolicyConfig olcOverlay: {0}ppolicy olcPPolicyDefault: cn=default,ou=ppolicies,dc=my-domain,dc=com olcPPolicyHashCleartext: TRUE olcPPolicyUseLockout: FALSE olcPPolicyForwardUpdates: FALSE olcPPolicyDisableWrite: FALSE olcPPolicySendNetscapeControls: FALSE olcPPolicyCheckModule: /usr/local/openldap/libexec/openldap/ppm.so Here are my data: dn: cn=default,ou=ppolicies,dc=my-domain,dc=com objectClass: pwdPolicy objectClass: pwdPolicyChecker objectClass: organizationalRole cn: default pwdAttribute: userPassword pwdCheckQuality: 2 pwdMaxAge: 7776000 pwdInHistory: 5 pwdLockout: TRUE pwdMaxFailure: 5 pwdFailureCountInterval: 86400 pwdMinLength: 8 pwdMaxLength: 30 pwdExpireWarning: 432000 pwdMustChange: TRUE pwdAllowUserChange: TRUE pwdMaxIdle: 31536000 pwdCheckModuleArg: bWluUXVhbGl0eSAzCmNoZWNrUkROIDAKZm9yYmlkZGVuQ2hhcnMKbWF4Q29uc2VjdXRpdmVQZXJDbGFzcyAwCnVzZUNyYWNrbGliIDAKY3JhY2tsaWJEaWN0IC92YXIvY2FjaGUvY3JhY2tsaWIvY3JhY2tsaWJfZGljdApjbGFzcy11cHBlckNhc2UgQUJDREVGR0hJSktMTU5PUFFSU1RVVldYWVogMCAxCmNsYXNzLWxvd2VyQ2FzZSBhYmNkZWZnaGlqa2xtbm9wcXJzdHV2d3h5eiAwIDEKY2xhc3MtZGlnaXQgMDEyMzQ1Njc4OSAwIDEKY2xhc3Mtc3BlY2lhbCA8Piw/Oy46LyHCp8O5JSrCtV7CqCTCo8KyJsOpfiIjJ3soWy18w6hgX1zDp17DoEApXcKwPX0rIDAgMQ== dn: uid=jack.oneill,ou=people,dc=my-domain,dc=com objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: organizationalPerson objectClass: person objectClass: top cn: Jack O Neill givenName: Jack mail: jack.oneill(a)my-example.com sn: O Neill uid: jack.oneill userPassword: {ARGON2}$argon2id$v=19$m=65536,t=2,p=1$LiSaGIqce9o2C6T8d2BOfg$BpPpokTfKY9/X7/jkvG1SXBcsNnm95UbTGSstc2aHKk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 9743] New: LDAP_OPT_SOCKET_BIND_ADDRESSES - sin_port is not initialized
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9743 Issue ID: 9743 Summary: LDAP_OPT_SOCKET_BIND_ADDRESSES - sin_port is not initialized Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.6 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dg0319q(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- When LDAP_OPT_SOCKET_BIND_ADDRESSES is set, and ldap_search_s is being called, valgrind detects uninitialised value (ip4addr.sin_port). Valgrind log: =52721== Syscall param socketcall.bind(my_addr.sin_port) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==52721== at 0x54C7F2B: bind (syscall-template.S:120) ==52721== by 0x52434A5: ldap_connect_to_host (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldap-2.5.so.0.1.1) ==52721== by 0x52352CD: ldap_int_open_connection (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldap-2.5.so.0.1.1) ==52721== by 0x524875B: ldap_new_connection (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldap-2.5.so.0.1.1) ==52721== by 0x523494D: ldap_open_defconn (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldap-2.5.so.0.1.1) ==52721== by 0x52493F7: ldap_send_initial_request (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldap-2.5.so.0.1.1) ==52721== by 0x52387E7: ldap_search (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldap-2.5.so.0.1.1) ==52721== by 0x52388AD: ldap_search_s (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldap-2.5.so.0.1.1) ==52721== by 0x28565F: check_ldap (simple.c:83) ==52721== Address 0x1ffeff6122 is on thread 1's stack ==52721== in frame #1, created by ldap_connect_to_host (???:) ==52721== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==52721== at 0x5242DE0: ldap_connect_to_host (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldap-2.5.so.0.1.1) Looks like, the ip4addr.sin_port should be set to 0 in ldap_connect_to_host. It works, but it looks like it is a bug, and may fail under other circumstances. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9728] New: For lastbind-precision, note it is important in busy replicated environments
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9728 Issue ID: 9728 Summary: For lastbind-precision, note it is important in busy replicated environments Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- It would be good to note in the slapd.conf(5)/slapd-config(5) man pages that the lastbind-precision setting can be very important to set in busy, replicated environments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9727] New: slapd-watcher fails to start if any slapd instance is down
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9727 Issue ID: 9727 Summary: slapd-watcher fails to start if any slapd instance is down Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: gnoe(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- When starting slapd-watcher and slapd isn't running on one of the monitored servers, slapd-watcher fails to start: Example w/host2 slapd not running: [user@host]# slapd-watcher -xD dc=example,dc=com -w secret -b dc=example,dc=com -s 1,2 ldap://host1/ ldap://host2/ slapd-watcher PID=11892: ldap_sasl_bind_s: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) I would expect that slapd-watcher would start up completely and indicate the host was down, like in the case where a host goes down while slapd-watcher is running. This would allow slapd-watcher to start when one or more replication node is down for maintenance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 9733] New: ppolicy.c:66:2: error: unknown type name ‘lt_dlhandle’
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9733 Issue ID: 9733 Summary: ppolicy.c:66:2: error: unknown type name ‘lt_dlhandle’ Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: smillerdev(a)me.com Target Milestone: --- On both Linux and macOS in Homebrew, there is a failure trying to compile OpenLDAP 2.6.0: /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=disable-shared --mode=compile gcc-5 -g -O2 -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -I./../slapi -c log.c ppolicy.c:66:2: error: unknown type name ‘lt_dlhandle’ lt_dlhandle pwdCheckHandle; /* handle from lt_dlopen */ ^ on macOS there is also an additional errror: ppolicy.c:458:4: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant (void *)offsetof(pp_info,hash_passwords), ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ See https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/88036 for the full output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9691] New: Allow syncrepl persist sessions against empty DBs
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691 Issue ID: 9691 Summary: Allow syncrepl persist sessions against empty DBs Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review, replication Severity: enhancement Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- One way to set up an environment is to start with a completely empty DB, configure all nodes and replication paths and then populate them. Right now, the syncrepl sessions get rejected with a 32 NO_SUCH_OBJECT, triggering the retry cascade. Both the consumer and provider have an empty cookie, so they are in sync and we could actually transition to a persist phase and let the session proceed. This way the environment would start replicating almost immediately after first entries are added. Mind that ITS#9584 still pushes concurrent refreshes into the retry logic adding a short delay before *all* configured links are set up. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9776] New: Deleting syncrepl config does not close the connection to the provider
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9776 Issue ID: 9776 Summary: Deleting syncrepl config does not close the connection to the provider Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: tero.saarni(a)est.tech Target Milestone: --- I have set up replication between two slapd instances and it works OK. When I remove olcSyncRepl from the consumer, it seems that the connection to provider is never closed. I have observed this with lsof -p $(pidof slapd). When using Monitor it can be also observed (from cn=Tasklist,cn=Threads,cn=Monitor) that the do_syncrepl task is not removed when deleting olcSyncRepl. If repeatedly deleting and adding olcSyncRepl it can be observed that the number of connections and tasks increases continuously. At some point, around adding/deleting 1000 times, the modify operation will fail: ldap_modify: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80) slapd logs have error 61d574b9.1ff5d9a7 0x7fcfddfdc700 ldif_read_file: Too many open files for "/home/tsaarni/work/openldap/tests/testrun/slapd.1.d/cn=config/olcDatabase={1}mdb.ldif" 61d574b9.1ff64149 0x7fcfddfdc700 send_ldap_result: conn=3034 op=1 p=3 61d574b9.1ff679b8 0x7fcfddfdc700 send_ldap_result: err=80 matched="" text="internal error (cannot read some entry file)" 61d574b9.1ff70008 0x7fcfddfdc700 send_ldap_result: conn=3034 op=1 p=3 Number of established connections to provider 1011 $ lsof -p 4101355 | grep "localhost:9012 (ESTABLISHED)" | wc -l 1011 Number of do_syncrepl tasks is also 1011 $ ldapsearch -LLL -x -D cn=config -wsecret -b cn=Tasklist,cn=Threads,cn=Monitor -H ldap://localhost:9011/ monitoredInfo ... monitoredInfo: {1008}do_syncrepl(rid=002) monitoredInfo: {1009}do_syncrepl(rid=002) monitoredInfo: {1010}do_syncrepl(rid=002) Maximum number of file handles for the process was 1024. I'm using openldap master branch. I have a test case for reproducing the problem, which I will add to this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs