https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10609
Issue ID: 10609
Summary: slapd SIGABRT/core dump when modifying
olcRemoteAuthDNAttribute in cn=config for
olcOverlay={0}remoteauth
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.8
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: alain.raimbault(a)thalesgroup.com
Target Milestone: ---
Vendor Escalation Report — OpenLDAP remoteauth crash & AD bind failures
Vendor/Product: OpenLDAP (slapd + remoteauth overlay/module)
Module: /usr/lib64/openldap/remoteauth.so.2.0.200 (packaged by
openldap-servers)
OS: RHEL/CentOS 9 (el9 based; from environment)
Symptoms:
slapd SIGABRT/core dump when modifying olcRemoteAuthDNAttribute in cn=config
for olcOverlay={0}remoteauth
AD authentication fails with LDAP bind error Invalid credentials (49) / AD data
52e for multiple username formats
1. Environment Details
1.1 Installed OpenLDAP RPMs
markdown
content_copy
openldap-2.6.8-4.el9.x86_64
openldap-servers-2.6.8-2.el9.x86_64
openldap-clients-2.6.8-4.el9.x86_64
1.2 remoteauth module packaging
markdown
content_copy
rpm -qf /usr/lib64/openldap/remoteauth.so.2.0.200
openldap-servers-2.6.8-2.el9.x86_64
1.3 Module binary location
markdown
content_copy
/usr/lib64/openldap/remoteauth.so -> remoteauth.so.2.0.200
/usr/lib64/openldap/remoteauth.so.2.0.200
1.4 Shared library dependencies
(From ldd)
libldap.so.2, libsasl2.so.3, libssl.so.3, libcrypto.so.3, libevent-2.1.so.7,
etc.
2. Configuration Under Investigation
2.1 Overlay entry (active config)
Example retrieved via:
markdown
content_copy
ldapsearch -Q -LLL -Y EXTERNAL -H ldapi:/// \
-b 'olcOverlay={0}remoteauth,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config' -s base \
'(objectClass=*)' '*'
Key attributes observed:
olcRemoteAuthDNAttribute: cn
olcRemoteAuthDomainAttribute: associatedDomain (as per your dump)
olcRemoteAuthMapping: ntdsi ldap://laselainfadc01p.ntdsi.airsystems.thales and
mapping to ntdsi.airsystems.thales DC URL
olcRemoteAuthTLS: tls_reqcert=never
olcRemoteAuthStore: FALSE
2.2 User entry (local LDAP)
User searched with:
objectClass: domainRelatedObject
associatedDomain: ntdsi
plus cn and uid values
Verified by:
markdown
content_copy
ldapsearch -x -LLL -D 'cn=ldapadmin,...' -W \
-b 'cn=A0007972-R(a)rah-r.thales,ou=Users,...' \
-s base '(objectClass=*)' objectClass associatedDomain
Result:
objectClass: domainRelatedObject
associatedDomain: ntdsi
3. Reproduction of the Crash (Primary Defect)
3.1 How to reproduce
slapd is running with remoteauth overlay configured (operational at least prior
to this change).
Modify the overlay attribute:
Change: olcRemoteAuthDNAttribute from cn to uid
Example LDIF used:
ldif
content_copy
dn: olcOverlay={0}remoteauth,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config
changetype: modify
replace: olcRemoteAuthDNAttribute
olcRemoteAuthDNAttribute: uid
Applied with:
bash
content_copy
ldapmodify -Q -Y EXTERNAL -H ldapi:/// -f
change-remoteauth-dnattribute-to-uid.ldif
3.2 Result
ldapmodify returns: “Can't contact LDAP server (-1)”
slapd.service fails with core-dump / SIGABRT
4. Crash Evidence (Backtrace)
From coredumpctl info slapd stack trace (repeated across multiple dumps):
Crash location:
remoteauth_cf_gen (remoteauth.so.2 + 0x2aee)
called from: config_set_vals → config_parse_add → remoteauth_cf_gen
Relevant frames:
markdown
content_copy
#5 slap_bv2ad
#6 slap_str2ad
#7 remoteauth_cf_gen (remoteauth.so.2 + 0x2aee)
#8 config_set_vals
#9 config_parse_add
#10 config_modify_add...
Signal:
SIGABRT (signal 6)
aborted by __assert_fail path
4.3 Service status snippet
From systemctl status slapd:
“Active: failed (Result: core-dump) … Main PID dumped, signal=ABRT”
5. Additional Observation: AD Bind Failures (Secondary Issue)
Multiple direct AD DC bind tests all fail with:
ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49)
Additional info: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 52e
Tests performed against:
ldap://laselainfadc01p.ntdsi.airsystems.thales
Tried DN/username forms:
A0007972-R(a)rah-r.thales
a0007972-r
a0007972-r(a)ntdsi.airsystems.thales
NTDSI\a0007972-r
DN-style bind attempts (e.g., cn=a0007972-r,ou=Users,...)
All failed with data 52e.
6. Evidence of remoteauth module being loaded
From config dump / module list:
cn=module{0},cn=config includes olcModuleLoad: {0}remoteauth
module path: /usr/lib64/openldap
7. Expected vs Actual Behavior
Expected
Changing olcRemoteAuthDNAttribute from cn to uid should:
either succeed cleanly, or
return a validation/config error to LDAP client
slapd should never crash on a config value update.
Actual
slapd SIGABRTs and produces a core dump during config modify.
Crash occurs inside remoteauth_cf_gen() and OpenLDAP attribute string parsing
(slap_str2ad, slap_bv2ad).
8. Impact
Any attempt to update olcRemoteAuthDNAttribute to uid breaks the LDAP server
(core-dump).
This prevents applying the likely correct attribute mapping for AD username
derivation.
In parallel, AD binds return 52e for all tested identifiers/password
combinations, which remains unresolved.
9. Suggested Areas for Vendor Investigation
Bug/defect in remoteauth overlay when processing olcRemoteAuthDNAttribute value
uid
especially during config generation (remoteauth_cf_gen)
should validate/return error instead of triggering assert() and aborting
Potential ABI/config parsing mismatch between:
openldap vs openldap-servers builds (mixed releases)
Validate correct handling of attribute types / syntax in config parsing:
crash path suggests OpenLDAP attribute-name parsing (slap_str2ad / slap_bv2ad)
is being fed invalid/unsupported content during overlay config generation
10. Files/Artifacts to Attach (for faster vendor triage)
coredumpctl info slapd output(s)
stack trace text (as included above)
LDIF used for the config modify (the LDIF file contents)
slapcat -n 0 section around:
olcOverlay={0}remoteauth
cn=module{0},cn=config
rpm -qi for openldap-servers
ldd /usr/lib64/openldap/remoteauth.so.2.0.200 output
system logs around the modify attempt:
journalctl -u slapd -b -n 200 --no-pager
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10596
Issue ID: 10596
Summary: back-ldap: tainting of a cached connection doesn't
remove it from cache
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.14
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
The patch for ITS#10550 was incomplete and missed the removal when only
tainting. This eventually leaves a freed connection in the tree.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7649
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.7.2 |2.7.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8375
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.7.2 |2.7.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9782
Issue ID: 9782
Summary: regression test its8752 failure
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
If a contextCSN update (new cookie) goes from server A through server B to
server C, server C will use that CSN to update entryCSN as well (which neither
A nor B did). This fails the initial replication check.
The issue has likely existed since deltasync was made possible, a version of
this is confirmed at least in 2.4.60 onwards to current master. In principle,
it is related to concerns raised in ITS#9580.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9256
Bug ID: 9256
Summary: The ACLs required for SASL binding are not fully
documented
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: kop(a)karlpinc.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 727
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=727&action=edit
Patch massaging the SASL binding requirement docs
While some ACL requirements for SASL binding are documented, some are not.
E.g, that olcAuthzRegexp requires =x on objectClass when direct DN mapping is
not documented. Other requirements can be reasoned out based on the existing
documentation, but this can be very difficult when unfamiliar with all the
moving parts and the places they are documented. E.g. knowing that
(objectClass=*) is the default filter, and that there's _always_ _some_ filter,
and connecting this with ACLs required to do search-based SASL mapping.
The attached patch brings all the SASL binding requirements together in one
place in the docs and makes everything explicit. The word "SASL" is included,
for those searching for that keyword.
I, Karl O. Pinc, hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software
(and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these
modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or
without attribution and/or other notice.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10257
Issue ID: 10257
Summary: Documentation assessment
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.8
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 1031
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1031&action=edit
Admin guide assessment
Last month I commissioned a tech writer to review the current 2.6 Admin Guide
to see what needs to be worked on before the 2.7 release. I'm attaching the
report here so we can reference it. Should have distributed it sooner but Life
got in the way.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10269
Issue ID: 10269
Summary: slap-constraint: Refactor to use a sorted array
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.8
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
As noted in the comments for slapo-constraint:
/*
* Linked list of attribute constraints which we should enforce.
* This is probably a sub optimal structure - some form of sorted
* array would be better if the number of attributes constrained is
* likely to be much bigger than 4 or 5. We stick with a list for
* the moment.
*/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10583
Issue ID: 10583
Summary: lloadd logging enhancements
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.7.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: enhancement
Priority: ---
Component: lloadd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: smckinney(a)symas.com
Target Milestone: ---
The logs do not contain the bind result or the identity of the caller which
complicates troubleshooting issues.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10086
Issue ID: 10086
Summary: test059 does not set up valid cn=config replication
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.4
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: test suite
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
For cn=config replication to be valid, the entryUUIDs must match throughout the
config database. However, this is not the case when test059 executes. The
entryUUID for 'dn: cn=config' differs between the two.
Example:
quanah@apito1:~/git/quanah/openldap-scratch/tests/testrun$ grep entryUUID:
cfcon.d/cn\=config.ldif
entryUUID: aea058c4-bf6e-103d-9e18-4582986e9372
quanah@apito1:~/git/quanah/openldap-scratch/tests/testrun$ grep entryUUID:
db.1.a/cn\=config\,cn\=consumer.ldif
entryUUID: ae9bd858-bf6e-103d-871e-5daccf782d22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10403
Issue ID: 10403
Summary: Add a configuration directive that uses the OpenSSL
CONF API to allow openldap config files to set any
configuration supported by that API, and to get new
OpenSSL configuration capabilities through that API
with no changes in openldap.
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: stephen.wall(a)redcom.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 1090
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1090&action=edit
Add a configuration directive that uses the OpenSSL CONF API to allow openldap
config files to set any configuration supported by that API, and to get new
OpenSSL configuration capabilities through th
I am submitting a patch to create a new directive for OpenLDAP config files
that uses the OpenSSL SSL_CONF API to allow configuration of any aspect of
OpenSSL that the API supports without adding specific directives to OpenLDAP
for them. When OpenSSL extends that API, all versions of OpenLDAP with thie
patch will also support those extensions with no additional code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7335
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.7.2 |2.7.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10549
Issue ID: 10549
Summary: lloadd rejects proxied connections: proxyp() cannot
read PROXY header on non-blocking socket
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: lloadd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: tim.wagner(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
# Overview
When an lloadd listener is configured with the PROXY protocol enabled, a large
fraction of incoming connections are dropped before they are accepted as
clients. We're using HAProxy 3.4 (asme with 3.3, 3.2) to distribute the
connections across 3 lloadd proxies. The log of lloadd fills with:
```
proxyp(<fd>): header read failed 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable)
lload_listener: proxyp(<fd>) failed
```
The root cause is that `proxyp()` is written for a *blocking* socket, but the
socket lloadd hands it is *non-blocking*.
`proxyp()` (`servers/slapd/proxyp.c`) reads the PROXY header with a single
synchronous `tcp_read()` that expects the whole header at once, and its retry
loop only handles `EINTR`:
```c
/* servers/slapd/proxyp.c:73 */
do {
ret = tcp_read( SLAP_FD2SOCK( sfd ), (char *)&pph, sizeof(pph) );
} while ( ret == -1 && errno == EINTR );
if ( ret == -1 ) {
... "header read failed %d (%s)" ... /* EAGAIN lands here */
return 0;
}
```
In lloadd, the accept callback runs on a non-blocking fd. The listener is
created via libevent without `LEV_OPT_LEAVE_SOCKETS_BLOCKING`:
```c
/* servers/lloadd/daemon.c:945 */
listener = evconnlistener_new( listener_base, lload_listener, ls,
LEV_OPT_THREADSAFE|LEV_OPT_DEFERRED_ACCEPT,
SLAPD_LISTEN_BACKLOG, ls->ls_sd );
```
libevent's `evconnlistener` sets every accepted socket non-blocking unless that
flag is set. `lload_listener()` then calls `proxyp( s, from, &dummy )`
(`daemon.c:788`) synchronously, without ever making the fd blocking. So
whenever
the full PROXY header is not already buffered in the kernel at the moment the
accept callback fires, `tcp_read()` returns -1/`EAGAIN`, `proxyp()` returns 0,
and lloadd closes the connection.
slapd is not affected: it `accept()`s the fd itself and calls `proxyp()` while
the fd is still blocking (only the *listening* socket is made non-blocking,
`servers/slapd/daemon.c:2624`; Linux `accept()` does not inherit `O_NONBLOCK`),
so the single-shot reads block until the header arrives.
# Actual Results
Many connections are refused with (we see 7-12/s on every ldap proxy):
```
proxyp(<fd>): header read failed 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable)
lload_listener: proxyp(<fd>) failed
```
The PROXY header is never parsed; the connection is closed.
# Expected Results
`proxyp()` should wait for the PROXY header to arrive (up to a timeout) on a
non-blocking socket, parse it, and let the connection proceed — matching the
behavior lloadd users get from slapd.
# Additional Information (my speculation and assumptions)
1. **Primary trigger.** The specific errno-11 message requires an open,
non-blocking fd with *zero* bytes buffered. A peer that completes the TCP
handshake but has not yet sent the header produces exactly this.
`TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT`
(from `LEV_OPT_DEFERRED_ACCEPT`) reduces the race but does not remove it:
its
retransmit-based timeout delivers a data-less established connection, and
health checkers/scanners that connect and stay silent hit the same path.
(A peer that connects and immediately sends FIN would instead yield
`ret == 0` → the "header read insufficient data" branch, not EAGAIN.)
2. **Latent secondary bug (same root cause).** Even when some bytes are present
but not the full header, the non-blocking `tcp_read()` returns a short read,
hitting the "header read insufficient data" branch (`proxyp.c:85`). A PROXY
header split across TCP segments is therefore also rejected. The same
applies
to the address (`proxyp.c:129`) and options (`proxyp.c:206`) reads.
3. **Suggested fix direction.** Harden `proxyp()` for non-blocking sockets:
on `EAGAIN`, `poll()`/`select()` for readability with a bounded timeout and
retry; accumulate the header/address/options across partial reads instead of
assuming a single `tcp_read()` delivers each field in full. This fixes both
the EAGAIN rejection and the split-header rejection, and keeps proxyp()
correct for both slapd (blocking) and lloadd (non-blocking) callers.
(An alternative — temporarily setting the fd blocking around the proxyp()
call in `lload_listener()` — is simpler but blocks the accept thread on a
slow/malicious peer and still needs a timeout.)
If you nee additional information please let me know.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9284
Issue ID: 9284
Summary: Need man page for vc contrib overlay
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.50
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: contrib
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
The verified credentials overlay in contrib is missing a man page describing
its purpose
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9272
Issue ID: 9272
Summary: Invalid search results for subordinate/glued database
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.47
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: grapvar(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Here is a trivial test case. Look at the following bunch of glued
dit's/databases, declared in this order:
| suffix ou=a,ou=1,ou=T # subordinate; contains only one (top-level) entry
| suffix ou=2,ou=T # subordinate; contains only one (top-level) entry
| suffix ou=b,ou=1,ou=T # subordinate; contains only one (top-level) entry
| suffix ou=T # master database, has two entries, top-level
| ` ou=1 # ... and this child entry
let's query the united database:
| $ ldapsearch -b ou=1,ou=T -s sub '' nx
| dn: ou=1,ou=T
| dn: ou=a,ou=1,ou=T
| dn: ou=b,ou=1,ou=T
Nice! But wait, what if ...
| $ ldapsearch -b ou=1,ou=T -s sub -E\!pr=2/noprompt '' nx
| dn: ou=1,ou=T
| dn: ou=a,ou=1,ou=T
|
| # pagedresults: cookie=//////////8=
... BANG! ...
| Server is unwilling to perform (53)
The problem is the glue_op_search(), which has issues
* different parts of code make different assumptions about data structures
* different parts of code track state inconsistently
* code that looks like a highly probably dead code
I mean that likely possible to build another bug-triggering test cases, and
glue_op_search() needs not just a fix of the bug above, but intense cleaning
and structuring.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9002
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.7.2 |2.7.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217
Issue ID: 10217
Summary: autoca should support more key types
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.7
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: enhancement
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Currently autoca only creates certificates using RSA keypairs. It should at
least have an option to use Elliptic Curve keypairs. It probably also needs
options to specify other signature algorithms other than the default of SHA256.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10277
Issue ID: 10277
Summary: How to deal with desync between cn=config and
back-ldif DNs
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
If someone deletes a cn=config entry offline (or through bugs in cn=config,
they exist, will file as I isolate), the X-ORDERED RDNs will not be contiguous.
cn=config papers over this internally at a cost of never being able to modify
the entries affected.
Right now the only remedy is slapcat+slapadd of the whole config DB, is that
the best we can do? When we detect this (doesn't always happen), should we fix
the on-disk copy on startup?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8476
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.7.2 |2.7.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8178
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.7.2 |2.7.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10622
Issue ID: 10622
Summary: pcache: add option to passthru pagedResults searches
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.7.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: enhancement
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Currently pcache just silently ignores the pagedResults control, but clients
setting the control aren't expecting the unpaged search responses. Add an
option for pcache to pass the search through unmodified (and uncached).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10383
Issue ID: 10383
Summary: slapd-meta ignores olcDbIDAssertBind if olcDbURI
defined after it
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.9
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: david.frickert(a)protonmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
We are using slapd-meta to connect an OpenLDAP server to another external LDAP
server and it works well on first configuration.
However, if we want to update any info, e.g. the external LDAP URI, we must
replace the olcDbURI attribute. This means that the ordering of the attributes
change and this attribute is now defined after olcDbIDAssertBind.
Didn't think this would be important, but after this change the "meta"
connection stops working and upon enabling debugging i can see that the
external LDAP server is responding with:
"ldap_bind: Inappropriate authentication (48)
additional info: Anonymous Simple Bind Disabled"
This seems to imply that the olcDbIDAssertBind attribute is being ignored,
likely due to being defined before olcDbURI (my assumption).
Is this intended? If so, what can we do to mitigate this problem?
Do we need to perform a replace on all attributes of the object to ensure
correct ordering, or is there any way to perform an in-place attribute
modification without making it shift its position in the object?
Example:
First configuration (OK):
# {0}uri, {2}meta, config
dn: olcMetaSub={0}uri,olcDatabase={2}meta,cn=config
objectClass: olcMetaTargetConfig
olcMetaSub: {0}uri
--> olcDbURI: ldap://REDACTED/ou=users,REDACTED
olcDbIDAssertBind: bindmethod=simple starttls=yes tls_reqcert=demand
binddn="REDACTED" credentials="REDACTED"
olcDbRewrite: {0}suffixmassage REDACTED REDACTED
olcDbKeepalive: 0:0:0
olcDbBindTimeout: 100000
olcDbCancel: abandon
After URI update (NOK):
# {0}uri, {2}meta, config
dn: olcMetaSub={0}uri,olcDatabase={2}meta,cn=config
objectClass: olcMetaTargetConfig
olcMetaSub: {0}uri
olcDbIDAssertBind: bindmethod=simple starttls=yes tls_reqcert=demand
binddn="REDACTED" credentials="REDACTED"
olcDbRewrite: {0}suffixmassage REDACTED REDACTED
olcDbKeepalive: 0:0:0
olcDbBindTimeout: 100000
olcDbCancel: abandon
--> olcDbURI: ldap://REDACTED/ou=users,REDACTED
The olcDbURI attribute is shifted to the bottom after a modify operation, and
seems to cause these issues.
Best Regards,
David
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9596
Issue ID: 9596
Summary: Python test suite
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
The bash test suite is extremely limited, hard to write for and slow. We can't
lose it as it is also portable, but something should be introduced for
developers/CI on more modern systems and increase coverage.
A Python 3 seed for one is in development in MR!347.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9398
Issue ID: 9398
Summary: Stale accesslog cookie due to unclean shutdown
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.56
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
If slapd terminates uncleanly, a checkpoint will be lost on the accesslog db.
Depending on the syncprov overlay checkpoint settings (usually no checkpointing
is enabled on the accesslog db) this can cause the system to refuse engage in
replication at startup.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10311
Issue ID: 10311
Summary: Work with IETF LDAP working group to update password
hashing mechanism RFC
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Work with the IETF ldap working group to update the RFC to make the suggested
hashing mechanism be what is currently "best practice" rather than a specific
hashing mechanism.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.