https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8159
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/131
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8333
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |2.6.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6151
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Status|IN_PROGRESS |CONFIRMED
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |2.6.0
--- Comment #21 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Punting to 2.6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8175
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |TEST
--- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 04124c1f
by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2020-09-01T18:04:06+00:00
ITS#8175 - Fix missing descriptions for olcDisallows for
proxy_authz_non_critical and dontusecopy_non_critical
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8047
--- Comment #6 from Allen Zhang <allen.zhang(a)audiocodes.com> ---
HI
what we see is, we get stuck at connect() below 120 seconds.
if opt_tv is set, the connect will work in non-block mode and return
immediately.
later in ldap_int_poll(), the network timeout will take effect.
what do you think?
static int
ldap_pvt_connect(LDAP *ld, ber_socket_t s,
struct sockaddr *sin, ber_socklen_t addrlen,
int async)
{
int rc, err;
struct timeval tv, *opt_tv = NULL;
#ifdef LDAP_CONNECTIONLESS
/* We could do a connect() but that would interfere with
* attempts to poll a broadcast address
*/
if (LDAP_IS_UDP(ld)) {
if (ld->ld_options.ldo_peer)
ldap_memfree(ld->ld_options.ldo_peer);
ld->ld_options.ldo_peer=ldap_memcalloc(1,
sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage));
AC_MEMCPY(ld->ld_options.ldo_peer,sin,addrlen);
return ( 0 );
}
#endif
if ( ld->ld_options.ldo_tm_net.tv_sec >= 0 ) {
tv = ld->ld_options.ldo_tm_net;
opt_tv = &tv;
}
osip_debug(ld, "ldap_pvt_connect: fd: %d tm: %ld async: %d\n",
s, opt_tv ? tv.tv_sec : -1L,
async);
if ( opt_tv && ldap_pvt_ndelay_on(ld, s) == -1 )
return ( -1 );
do{
osip_debug(ld, "attempting to connect: \n", 0,
0, 0);
if ( connect(s, sin, addrlen) !=
AC_SOCKET_ERROR ) {
osip_debug(ld, "connect
success\n", 0, 0, 0);
if ( !async && opt_tv &&
ldap_pvt_ndelay_off(ld, s) == -1 )
return ( -1 );
return ( 0 );
}
err = sock_errno();
osip_debug(ld, "connect errno: %d\n", err, 0,
0);
} while(err == EINTR &&
LDAP_BOOL_GET( &ld->ld_options,
LDAP_BOOL_RESTART ));
if ( err != EINPROGRESS && err != EWOULDBLOCK ) {
return ( -1 );
}
if ( async ) {
/* caller will call ldap_int_poll() as
appropriate? */
return ( -2 );
}
rc = ldap_int_poll( ld, s, opt_tv, 1 );
osip_debug(ld, "ldap_pvt_connect: %d\n", rc, 0, 0);
return rc;
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8159
--- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
So if the argument is "hard", then the code will use the "hard" limit set to
the general "sizelimit" parameter.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8047
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |---
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Not possible until all SSL engines support async in the underlying SSL library,
which is currently not the case
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8047
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |allen.zhang(a)audiocodes.com
--- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
*** Issue 9320 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9022
--- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
An ability to do this for environments where old serverIDs have been retired
would be useful as well. This came up today on the -technical list, where
there are 4 SIDs in the DB, but some have been retired and are left over from
previous migrations.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7639
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• edc94862
by Howard Chu at 2020-08-29T00:13:19+00:00
ITS#7639 fix crash in config_delete
Additional fix to 41352ea34da225375b77254efdcde8e6e5a1a515
The overlay must be deleted from the backend before the
callback can execute. In particular, it must be done before
the threadpool is unpaused.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8427
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
--- Comment #29 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• f883a575
by Howard Chu at 2020-08-28T18:44:35+01:00
ITS#8427 don't set tls_ctx if TLS wasn't requested
Also, set any remaining TLS options that weren't carried along
in the TLS ctx.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6225
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |OL_2_5_REQ
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Need to check the last bit here about the potential memory leak fix
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6198
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |2.6.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6010
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |OL_2_5_REQ
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5908
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5908
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=9264
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #14 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
With Issue#9264 it is now possible to do full locking with slapo-unique if in
single master, which resolves this issue.
With multi-provider, there can never be a fixed guarantee if two conflicting
write operations come into two different providers at near the same time. This
sort of limitation with MPR is already well documented however.
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 9264 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5875
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5875
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5714
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |2.6.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5654
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |---
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5654
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
memberOf is deprecated with openldap 2.5, use dynlist to handle memberOf
population instead, which allows configuration for multiple contexts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5628
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |2.6.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5601
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |2.6.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.