Michael Ströder wrote:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> --On Friday, December 19, 2014 11:29 PM +0100 Michael Ströder
>> <michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> 2.4 is for bugfixes and regressions only.
>>
>> See above.
>
> Well, I consider it to be a serious defect that the old *Record attribute type
> descriptions defined in obsoleted RFC 1274 are still in cosine.(ldif|schema)
> even though they are not in RFC 4524.
>
> I also consider it to be a bug that aRecord and aAAARecord don't have the same
> attribute type description.
Hmm, this issue with cosine.(ldif|schema) is sitting in ITS since more than
four years:
ITS#6151 (slipped from my memory before filing this issue)
Ciao, Michael.