openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20959 discussions

Re: (ITS#6208) Timelimit exceeded error when using unlimited timelimits
by quanah＠zimbra.com 10 Jul '09

10 Jul '09

--On Friday, July 10, 2009 6:49 PM +0000 quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote: > Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount > Version: 2.4.16 > OS: Linux 2.6 > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (75.111.29.239) > > > I executed the following search: > ldap-uat1:/etc/ldap# ldapsearch -LLL -Q -h ldap-uat1 -b > "dc=stanford,dc=edu" >> /dev/null > > Which ended with this error: > Time limit exceeded (3) A second run hit the same error: ldap-uat1:/root# time ldapsearch -LLL -Q -h ldap-uat1 -b "dc=stanford,dc=edu" >/dev/null Time limit exceeded (3) real 60m1.827s user 0m0.008s sys 0m0.004s So it looks like OpenLDAP has a hard coded 1 hour time limit. Which, of course, is not correct. Of course, this search shouldn't take an hour, either. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

(ITS#6208) Timelimit exceeded error when using unlimited timelimits
by quanah＠zimbra.com 10 Jul '09

10 Jul '09

Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount Version: 2.4.16 OS: Linux 2.6 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (75.111.29.239) I executed the following search: ldap-uat1:/etc/ldap# ldapsearch -LLL -Q -h ldap-uat1 -b "dc=stanford,dc=edu" >/dev/null Which ended with this error: Time limit exceeded (3) Which should never happen, because my bind ID is part of the ldapadmin group, which is allowed to make searches completely free of time or sizelimit restrictions: # Let ldapadmin have limitless searches limits group="cn=ldapadmin,cn=applications,dc=stanford,dc=edu" time.soft=unlimited time.hard=unlimited size.soft=unlimited size.hard=unlimited

1 0

Re: (ITS#5836) hung writers
by jorge.perez＠adaptia.net 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount<quanah(a)zimbra.com> wrot= e:. > > I think you mean compiling --with-debug, as opposed to debug symbols (-g = to > gcc). =C2=A0All asserts get added to the code path if you build with > --with-debug, but that is not the same as having debug symbols (which is > generally good practice to have available). Exactly, depends on the testing phase, the slapd are compiled with-debug and -g or it's not compiled with-debug and it's stripped. Regards

1 0

Re: (ITS#5836) hung writers
by quanah＠zimbra.com 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

--On Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:23 AM +0000 jorge.perez(a)adaptia.net wrote: > The last testing was wrong due to an old slapd.conf without > writetimeout keyword, my apologies. We have been testing for 2 days to > reproduce this problem and we have not seen the problem again, even > though with debug symbols the assert ""assert( SLAP_SOCK_IS_ACTIVE( s > ))"" still fails. I think you mean compiling --with-debug, as opposed to debug symbols (-g to gcc). All asserts get added to the code path if you build with --with-debug, but that is not the same as having debug symbols (which is generally good practice to have available). --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

RE: (ITS#6201) Double free in syncprov
by quanah＠zimbra.com 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

--On Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:18 AM +0000 Alister.Winfield(a)sns.bskyb.com wrote: > I think I have it (bad configuration)... > > Okay so it might be a configuration 'error' but I guess its worth trying > to= avoid the crash. Hi Alister, Can you provide an example of your misconfigured slapd for ease of debugging? Obviously, this is non-critical but I agree it would be nice to make sure this sort of configuration error is caught more gracefully. Thanks, Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

(ITS#6207) Build farm
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Full_Name: Gavin Henry Version: OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.59.85) Submitted by: ghenry Build farm should be complete by now.

1 0

(ITS#6206) Admin guide appendices or tools in contrib should be better than Ubuntu docs
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Full_Name: Gavin Henry Version: OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.59.85) Submitted by: ghenry Must beat or match: https://help.ubuntu.com/9.04/serverguide/C/openldap-server.html

1 0

(ITS#6205) Discuss slapadd -S in Admin guide appendix
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Full_Name: Gavin Henry Version: OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.59.85) Submitted by: ghenry As per http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200809/msg00140.html

1 0

(ITS#6204) General upgrade procedure missing from Admin guide
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Full_Name: Gavin Henry Version: HEAD OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.59.85) Submitted by: ghenry Documenting this procedure should be in the Admin Guide like http://www.openldap.org/faq/index.cgi?file=842 Gavin.

1 0

Re: (ITS#6202) adding command line option to disable line breaking in ldif output
by dieter＠bloms.de 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Hi, On Thu, Jul 09, Michael Str=F6der wrote: > > I want to do an enhancement request for ldapsearch, because it insert a= line > > break after 78 characters. > > Many people like me use the ldapsearch command in shell script and have= to > > workaround this issue. > > Maybe it make sense to add a command line option to deactivate this lin= e breaks. >=20 > I'd rather recommend to use a decent scripting language with LDAP and/or > LDIF modules than using ldapsearch in shell scripts. This gives better > control over data and error handling. there are several ldapsearch binaries from other distributor, which includes an option -T for this concern. http://www.koders.com/c/fidD1B671B4DA7CB116CA077E4694EEBAE167D3F85E.aspx http://docs.sun.com/source/816-6400-10/lsearch.html =2E.. so why doesn't ldapsearch from openldap inlcude this option. It doesn't break any rfc and historcal implementation and as far as I can see (with google), there are many admins who have to workaround this with a little perl script. I think it must be a little diff, with a few lines I can write it, but is someone willing to inlcude it in the upstream versions ? --=20 Gru=DF Dieter -- I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software. If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the =46rom field.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs