https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9886
Issue ID: 9886
Summary: At "sync" logging, nothing shows how long a write op
took on consumers
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
If sync logging is enabled on a consumer, there's no etime logged which means
it is not possible to see how long a write op took on that consumer. This can
be useful information to see how the node is performing, particularly if it is
a read only node where there will be no general MOD timing logged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
Issue ID: 10024
Summary: MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT broken
Product: LMDB
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: liblmdb
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: markus(a)objectbox.io
Target Milestone: ---
It seems that the patch #9496 had a negative side effect on MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT.
In certain cases, when opening the DB using MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT, the previous (2nd
latest) commit is not selected. Instead, reads show that the latest commit was
selected voiding the effect of MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT.
I observed this in our test cases a while back. Today, I was finally able to
reproduce it and debug into it.
When creating the transaction to read the data, I debugged into mdb_txn_renew0.
Here, ti (MDB_txninfo; env->me_txns) was non-NULL. However, ti->mti_txnid was 0
(!) and thus txn->mt_txnid was set to 0. That's the reason for always selecting
the first (index 0) meta page inside mdb_txn_renew0:
meta = env->me_metas[txn->mt_txnid & 1];
This line occurs twice (once for read txn and once for write txn; it affects
both txn types).
Thus, the chances of MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT selecting the correct meta page is 50-50.
It's only correct if the first meta page (index 0) is the older one.
I believe that this is related to #9496 because the patch, that was provided
there, removed the initialization of "env->me_txns->mti_txnid" in
mdb_env_open2. This would explain why txn->mt_txnid inside mdb_txn_renew0 was
set to 0.
I can confirm that adding back the following two lines back in fixes
MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT:
if (env->me_txns)
env->me_txns->mti_txnid = meta.mm_txnid;
The said patch including the removal of these two lines was applied in the
commit(s) "ITS#9496 fix mdb_env_open bug from #8704" (Howard Chu on 09.04.21).
I hope this information is useful to find a suitable fix. Please let me know if
you have questions. Also, I'd be happy to help confirming a potential fix with
our test suite.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10229
Issue ID: 10229
Summary: ldap_result, when invoked with MSG_RECEIVED and a
timeout value set to 0 (polling), does not return all
available messages until it is called again
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.8
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com
Target Milestone: ---
The issue is noticeable when ldap_result is used by the proxy back-ends. It has
not affected back-meta behavior, because when a first call is unsuccessful, it
retries with a small timeout. back-asyncmeta will also usually call it twice on
the same connection from different threads, although this is not a desired
behavior.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10235
Issue ID: 10235
Summary: Configure without --enable-nestgroup=no enables
feature
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.8
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: stacey.marshall(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
OpenLDAP 2.6.8 configured with --enable-overlays.
Some openldap commands output a Duplicate attributeType notice, for example
# /sbin/slapcat -b cn=config -H ldap:///???olcTLSCertificateKeyFile=\* | grep
olcTLSCertificateKeyFile
register_at: AttributeType "( 1.2.840.113556.1.2.102 NAME 'memberOf' DESC
'Group that the entry belongs to' SYNTAX '1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12'
EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch USAGE dSAOperation NO-USER-MODIFICATION
X-ORIGIN 'iPlanet Delegated Administrator' )": Duplicate attributeType,
1.2.840.113556.1.2.102
olcTLSCertificateKeyFile: /etc/certs/localhost/host.key
Specifying configure option --enable-nestgroup=no prevents nestgroup feature
and the message from being displayed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10234
Issue ID: 10234
Summary: syncrepl does not reset the retrynum
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.8
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp
Target Milestone: ---
```
syncrepl
retry="5 10 30 +"
```
When replication fails with the above settings, syncrepl retries "10 times at 5
second intervals". Then, the retry count should be reset on the next
replication failure.
In actual, it does not reset. The behavior is as follows:
```
(first time replication failure)
do_syncrepl: rid=001 rc -1 retrying (9 retries left)
do_syncrepl: rid=001 rc -1 retrying (8 retries left)
(resume replication)
(second time replication failure)
do_syncrepl: rid=001 rc -1 retrying (7 retries left)
do_syncrepl: rid=001 rc -1 retrying (6 retries left)
```
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10249
Issue ID: 10249
Summary: slapo-nestgroup leak with non-nested groups
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Searching for a member= of a group when no nesting is in place will leak
memory.
It seems to stem from a few `gi.gi_numDNs` tests that should most likely be
against `gi.gi_DNs` instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10218
Issue ID: 10218
Summary: Disabling and re-enabling an asyncmeta database via
cn=config leaks memory
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.7
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com
Target Milestone: ---
To reproduce - run OpenLDAP with valgrind, and set the olcDisabled attribute of
an asyncmeta database to TRUE, then again to FALSE. The connection structures
of the database are subsequently shown as leaked.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10230
Issue ID: 10230
Summary: memberof addcheck must ignore other overlays
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.8
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
The addcheck feature added in ITS#10167 does a search to see if a newly added
entry is already a member of any existing groups, and fixes its memberof
attribute appropriately if so.
The values written here should only be static values, but if the nestgroup
overlay was configured, dynamic values were also being included.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10256
Issue ID: 10256
Summary: Custom attribute disappears after slapd restart
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: heinrich.blatt(a)googlemail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
i want to use a custom attribute in my schema. I use that ldif:
dn: cn=schema,cn=config
changetype: modify
add: olcAttributeTypes
olcAttributeTypes: ( 1.2.840.113556.1.4.7000 NAME 'rfidtoken' DESC 'RFID Token'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
This i inject via ldapmodify. For the session it works, but after restarting
slapd the attribute disappears. If i add it again via ldapmodify it is there
for the session again. My /etc/ldap/slapd.d/cn=config/cn=schema.ldif contains
the change.
This seems related to #9066, however the documentation indicates that i can
make the changes via ldapmodify persistent.
What is the right approach there? What i can do to persist the change?
Thanks in advance for support
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10231
Issue ID: 10231
Summary: slapadd segfault on non-configured backend
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.8
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
If the LDIF being loaded corresponds to a different backend than the one
specified (or the default backend, if none was specified), and the specified
backend's configuration is incomplete and lacks a suffix, slapadd will SEGV
when trying to print the error message about the LDIF not matching the
specified
backend, because it tries to print the suffix but the suffix is NULL.
E.g. using this setup:
###
mkdir dumb dumb/db
cat > dumb/slapd.conf <<EOF
include schema/core.schema
backend ldif
database ldif
directory dumb/db
EOF
slapd -Ta -f dumb/slapd.conf -l schema/inetorgperson.ldif
###
When fixed, the normal error message will be shown instead:
slapadd: line 1: database #1 ((null)) not configured to hold
"cn=inetorgperson,cn=schema,cn=config"; did you mean to use database #0
(cn=config)?
Closing DB...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.