https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8757
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.7.0 |3.0.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8673
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8617
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |hyc(a)openldap.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10261
Issue ID: 10261
Summary: draft-behera-ldap-password-policy - evolution
pwdAccountDisabled
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hello,
For information, I tried to send a mail at:
draft-behera-ldap-password-policy(a)ietf.org first, but I get a: Recipient
address rejected: User unknown
I'd like to propose an evolution for the current version of
draft-behera-ldap-password-policy.
Indeed, in the specification, there is the notion of locked or blocked account,
with the presence of pwdAccountLockedTime, preventing users from
authenticating.
However:
* any account with sufficient privileges can modify the userPassword
* when he does so, the pwdAccountLockedTime is removed
This behaviour is advisable most of the time. But sometimes we need a more
restrictive policy.
The goal of this evolution is to propose an alternate behaviour where the
"disabling attribute" is never removed unless asked explicitely, and where
userPassword cannot be modified until the "disabling attribute" is present.
This attribute could be named pwdAccountDisabled.
Here is the proposed evolution:
4.1.1. Password Validity Policy
...
A password cannot be used to authenticate while the corresponding account has
been disabled.
4.2.8. Disabled account
A password cannot be changed while the password owner has been disabled. While
doing so, the LDAP directory should send a Constraint violation (19) error code
with additional info: Account is disabled.
5.3.12. pwdAccountDisabled
This attribute holds the time that the user's account was disabled. A disabled
account means that the password may no longer be used to authenticate and none
can change the userPassword until it is disabled.
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.8.1.33
NAME 'pwdAccountDisabled'
DESC 'The time an user account was disabled'
EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch
ORDERING generalizedTimeOrderingMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24
SINGLE-VALUE
USAGE directoryOperation )
Thanks in advance for your consideration. Of course, it is opened to
discussion, and maybe can I help a little for the implementation.
Regards,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.