https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6198
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |9204
Referenced Issues:
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9204
[Issue 9204] slapo-constraint allows anyone to apply Relax control
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8884
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |hyc(a)openldap.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8498
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8852
--- Comment #6 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
attr_cmp should check the attribute is a sortval and if so, should diff without
resolving to a double loop.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8498
--- Comment #5 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
Fixed in master 2939df1a1dead2a11d1878ccd246660cda2b41a6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8852
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
May be possible to improve diff code for standard syncrepl to improve
performance on the consumer side if the attribute is sorted via sortvals, needs
investigation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8852
--- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Similarly, when I used AWS, it was necessary to have the consumers be set at 4k
IOPS while the providers were 3k IOPS. I.e., it's generally necessary that
consumers be faster than providers when processing large sequences of write
updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8826
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8678
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |hyc(a)openldap.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.