openldap-bugs January 2023

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
141 discussions

[Issue 9926] New: Bad file links in openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5.tar.gz
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9926 Issue ID: 9926 Summary: Bad file links in openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5.tar.gz Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ksmith(a)blackducksoftware.com Target Milestone: --- The current archive openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5.tar.gz (downloaded 10/4/22) contains files that were included as invalid links. This causes errors when trying to unzip via 7zip or trying to scan with various software tools. The tar.gz is successfully expanded using "tar -xvzf" but the problem files do not exist. Error output in 7zip is: Can not create symbolic link: A required priviledge in not held by the client.: openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5\servers\lloadd\design.md openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5\servers\lloadd\nt_svc.c openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5\tests\data\homedir\skel\directory\broken link openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5\tests\data\homedir\skel\svmlink Bad file links in openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 9900] New: configure.ac contains non-portable statement (bashism)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9900 Issue ID: 9900 Summary: configure.ac contains non-portable statement (bashism) Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael.osipov(a)siemens.com Target Milestone: --- My shell on HP-UX tells me: ./configure[22349]: ==: A test command parameter is not valid. which is causes by > 2038 if test $ol_enable_slapd == no && test $ol_enable_balancer != yes ; then in configure.ac. Similar I have reported to BIND9: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2873. POSIX expects one equals sign. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9894] New: NetBSD build needs gmake, the default make utility does not have all the necessary features.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9894 Issue ID: 9894 Summary: NetBSD build needs gmake, the default make utility does not have all the necessary features. Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Other Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: lucio.dere(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Please include in your build instructions that NetBSD's "make" (bmake, I seem to recall) rejects some Makefile stuff (for the bare "make" command, "make depend" completed successfully). Perhaps configure can figure that out or just check for gmake and use it if found? I did not try "make test". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9942] New: back-mdb fails to release Added entries
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9942 Issue ID: 9942 Summary: back-mdb fails to release Added entries Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Detected by valgrind on test002. Appears to be a regression since some time after ITS#7915. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9895] New: Increase max number of index DBs in back-mdb
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9895 Issue ID: 9895 Summary: Increase max number of index DBs in back-mdb Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Currently there is a hardcoded limit of 128 index DBs in back-mdb. Some sites want more than this (although there's no evidence they actually use more than 128 attributes in all of their applications' search filters). For 2.5/2.6 we can simply double the constant. For 2.7 consider making it configurable. Note that increasing the number increases the size of an LMDB transaction structure, and also increases the time needed to initialize it whenever creating a transaction, so it's a bad idea to just set this to an arbitrarily large number. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9992] New: Requesting information about libraries/ldap_r
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 01 Feb '23

01 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9992 Issue ID: 9992 Summary: Requesting information about libraries/ldap_r Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: jjrobert(a)lexmark.com Target Milestone: --- Apologies if this is a duplicate - the tracking system seemed to glitch when I submitted so I'm typing it up again. We are upgrading our stack from using openldap 2.4.57 to 2.5.12 and one of our dependencies is missing lldap_r. I searched and only really found this, which gives me some idea of its purpose: https://marc.info/?l=openldap-devel&m=95218635611825 Is it simply gone now, or does it exist as a separate library? Is there any guidance on what to do if you were using it previously? Thanks, -Jeff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 7933] [PATCH] fix frontend config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '23

31 Jan '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7933 --- Comment #8 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 01:53:22PM +0000, openldap-its(a)openldap.org wrote: > Could this be the reason why I get `attribute 'olcPasswordHash' not allowed` > when trying to apply an .ldif file such as: > > dn: olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config > changetype: modify > add: olcPasswordHash > olcPasswordHash: {CRYPT} > > This has popped up in Fedora > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061966) which seem to have copied > the respective default frontend config file before this patch (see > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openldap/blob/f37/f/slapd.ldif#_105). As you suggest, this seems to be a Fedora packaging issue: them shipping an out of date ldif file where they might have been able to copy it from upstream source. Pretty sure in that case there's nothing that can be done on the OpenLDAP project side. Someone might need to step up and help Fedora package maintainers deal with it if they say the existing team don't have the capacity. Regards, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9718] New: test022 can fail on expiry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 30 Jan '23

30 Jan '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9718 Issue ID: 9718 Summary: test022 can fail on expiry Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- >>>>> Starting test022-ppolicy for mdb... running defines.sh Starting slapd on TCP/IP port 9011... Using ldapsearch to check that slapd is running... Testing redundant ppolicy instance... Using ldapadd to populate the database... Testing account lockout... Waiting 13 seconds for lockout to reset... Testing password expiration Waiting seconds for password to expire... sleep: missing operand Try 'sleep --help' for more information. Password expiration test failed >>>>> test022-ppolicy failed for mdb after 43 seconds (exit 1) The issue here is apparently that line 122-123 failed to populate the DELAY variable. 121 122 DELAY=`$LDAPSEARCH -D "$MANAGERDN" -H $URI1 -w $PASSWD \ 123 -b "$USER" -E accountUsability 1.1 | sed -n -e 's/.*expire=$\d*$/\1/p'` 124 125 echo "Testing password expiration" 126 echo "Waiting $DELAY seconds for password to expire..." 127 sleep $DELAY 128 sleep 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 8102] syncrepl_entry: be_modify failed (16)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 30 Jan '23

30 Jan '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8102 --- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- head: • 868309c9 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T12:06:24+00:00 ITS#8102 Do not continue if deconfigured during pause RE26: • 0b2f5ad7 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T19:01:00+00:00 ITS#8102 Do not continue if deconfigured during pause RE25: • 6733fe4d by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T19:02:48+00:00 ITS#8102 Do not continue if deconfigured during pause -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9045] Crashes in cn=config (test050)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 30 Jan '23

30 Jan '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9045 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.6.4 |2.5.14 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- head: • 12bf5a95 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-23T11:53:36+00:00 ITS#9045 rlock only if there may be other threads RE26: • 66c2b5ad by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T18:57:18+00:00 ITS#9045 rlock only if there may be other threads RE25: • 2f3b77d4 by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2023-01-30T18:58:16+00:00 Revert "Revert "ITS#9045 Do not share cn=config entries with outside code"" This reverts commit 393308ac1c3eb9d65b682c06826d60a0bf856070. • 5936d721 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-01-30T18:59:26+00:00 ITS#9045 rlock only if there may be other threads -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs January 2023