openldap-bugs May 2022

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
144 discussions

[Issue 9808] New: olcLastBind populated incorrectly when converting from slapd.conf
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9808 Issue ID: 9808 Summary: olcLastBind populated incorrectly when converting from slapd.conf Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Fix coming shortly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9801] New: Segmentation Fault of Openldap 2.6.1 when the syncprov overlay tries to synchronize from ODSEE an attribute that it does not know.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9801 Issue ID: 9801 Summary: Segmentation Fault of Openldap 2.6.1 when the syncprov overlay tries to synchronize from ODSEE an attribute that it does not know. Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: laurent.revillion(a)icloud.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 877 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=877&action=edit The files from gdb Hello, I just tested Opendlap 2.6.1 synchronization from ODSEE. It seemed to me that everything was going very well but I had a "Segmention Fault" when I tested on ODSEE to add the nsAccountLock: TRUE attribute. This attribute does not exist in the Openldap schema. The Openldap server detects the thing well but ... segmentation fault.:(( 620f6bd2.1b555d23 0x7fd0c9aff700 ldap_get_attribute_ber 620f6bd2.1b556639 0x7fd0c9aff700 ber_scanf fmt ({mM}) ber: 620f6bd2.1b5576f3 0x7fd0c9aff700 ldap_get_attribute_ber 620f6bd2.1b55b147 0x7fd0c9aff700 syncrepl_changelog_mods: rid=002 Invalid attribute nsAccountLock, attribute type undefined ./start-consumer1.sh : ligne 3 : 12531 Erreur de segmentation /opt/symas/lib/slapd -d 1 -u ldap -g ldap -h "ldap://:5389/" -f /opt/symas/config/static-test/slapd-dsee-consumer1.conf Attached are the files generated via gdb. Thanks Laurent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9584] New: cn=config replication ops/refresh should pause server
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584 Issue ID: 9584 Summary: cn=config replication ops/refresh should pause server Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Looking into this crash: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/jobs/7286 The thread in question is running a plain syncrepl refresh while another thread seems to have done the same. This thread fetched the entryUUID attribute of the 'cn=config' entry as 'a' and in the meantime, that entry has been rewritten, with 'a' presumably cleaned up and returned to the pool, so addressing a->a_nvals[0] is a NULL-dereference now. This might or might not be related to the fix in ITS#8102. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 18

[Issue 9791] New: Build failure with certain disabled features in openssl
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9791 Issue ID: 9791 Summary: Build failure with certain disabled features in openssl Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: orgads(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- If openssl is configured with either OPENSSL_NO_MD4 or OPENSSL_NO_MD5 the build fails. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9794] New: Define behaviour for pwdChangedTime modifications
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9794 Issue ID: 9794 Summary: Define behaviour for pwdChangedTime modifications Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- This issue applies to: - draft-behera-ldap-password-policy - openldap 2.5 - openldap 2.6 It is a proposition of behaviour for pwdChangedTime modifications. modification of the draft: -------------------------- In section: "8.2.7. Policy State Updates", change this paragraph: If the value of either pwdMaxAge or pwdMinAge is non-zero, the server updates the pwdChangedTime attribute on the entry to the current time. into: If the value of either pwdMaxAge or pwdMinAge is non-zero, the server MUST update the pwdChangedTime attribute on the entry according to this workflow: Then insert a new paragraph: - if the current operation (add or modify) on the password includes adding or modifying a valid pwdChangedTime attribute, then use this pwdChangedTime. A "Valid" pwdChangedTime means a syntactically correct value, compliant with the schema, approved by access rules, and MAY require a relax control according to the schema defined in section 5.3.2. See Relax control RFC for more information: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zeilenga-ldap-relax - an invalid pwdChangedTime value MUST result in an error, and the pwdChangedTime MUST NOT be stored - in any other case, compute the current date and store it in a GeneralizedTime format Feel free to comment or propose other ideas. modification of the code: -------------------------- If this behaviour makes a consensus, it would be useful to patch both OpenLDAP 2.5 and 2.6. NOTE: current OpenLDAP 2.5 allows modifying pwdChangedTime alone, but fails to add a user with both userPassword and pwdChangedTime (it results in a duplicated pwdChangedTime error) modification of the documentation: ---------------------------------- In slapo-ppolicy, it can be useful to add a comment in "OPERATIONAL ATTRIBUTES" section: Every attribute defined as "NO-USER-MODIFICATION" SHOULD not be written by standard users. If needed, an administrator MAY modify them with the relax control. See Relax control RFC for more information: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zeilenga-ldap-relax -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 12

[Issue 9825] New: MemberOf group in group search not working
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9825 Issue ID: 9825 Summary: MemberOf group in group search not working Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: erikdewaard(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 891 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=891&action=edit database ldif dynlist group in group search not working correctly. Multiple queries needed before returning correct answer. ldapsearch -H ldap:/// -LLL -x -b 'dc=example,dc=com' '(&(uid=user1)(memberOf=cn=groupingroup,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com))' uid ldapsearch -H ldap:/// -LLL -x -b 'dc=example,dc=com' '(&(uid=user1)(memberOf=cn=groupingroup,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com))' uid ldapsearch -H ldap:/// -LLL -x -b 'dc=example,dc=com' '(&(uid=user1)(memberOf=cn=groupingroup,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com))' uid dn: uid=user1,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com uid: user1 -conf # stand-alone slapd config include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/rfc2307bis.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/dyngroup.schema # allow big PDUs from anonymous (for testing purposes) sockbuf_max_incoming 4194303 moduleload back_ldap moduleload dynlist ####################################################################### # database definitions ####################################################################### database config database mdb suffix "dc=example,dc=com" rootdn "cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com" rootpw secret directory /var/lib/ldap lastbind off overlay dynlist dynlist-attrset groupOfURLs memberURL uniqueMember+memberOf@groupOfUniqueNames* database monitor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9820] New: v2.5 and 2.6 closed (idletimeout) during ldapsearch (work fine with v2.4)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9820 Issue ID: 9820 Summary: v2.5 and 2.6 closed (idletimeout) during ldapsearch (work fine with v2.4) Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.1 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: jlbs.gregoire(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hello, Please excuse me for my bad English. Is there a bug with openldap 2.5 and 2.6 ? When I launch a ldapsearch on the whole directory, the connection is abruptly cut during the search (same problem with syncrepl). All work fine with openldap 2.4.48 and 2.4.59. Tested on Debian 10 buster and openssl 1.1.1n (also tested with openssl 1.1.1d and 1.1.1k). The directory contains over one million entries. OpenLDAP 2.6.1 compiled with the following options ./configure --prefix=/opt/openldap-2.6.1 --disable-ipv6 --enable-debug --enable-syslog --enable-slapd --enable-cleartext --enable-crypt --enable-wrappers --enable-backends=no --enable-mdb --enable-overlays --with-tls /opt/openldap-2.6.1/bin/ldapsearch -x -D cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com -w 'password' ... # numResponses: 50146 # numEntries: 50146 ldap_result: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) Apr 8 21:28:37 debian slapd[20880]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.6.1 (Apr 8 2022 20:34:26) $#012#011root@debian:/opt/src/openldap-2.6.1/servers/slapd Apr 8 21:28:37 debian slapd[20881]: slapd starting Apr 8 21:29:12 debian slapd[20881]: conn=1000 fd=11 ACCEPT from PATH=/opt/openldap-2.6.1/var/run/ldapi (PATH=/opt/openldap-2.6.1/var/run/ldapi) Apr 8 21:29:12 debian slapd[20881]: conn=1000 op=0 BIND dn="cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com" method=128 Apr 8 21:29:12 debian slapd[20881]: conn=1000 op=0 BIND dn="cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com" mech=SIMPLE bind_ssf=0 ssf=71 Apr 8 21:29:12 debian slapd[20881]: conn=1000 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 qtime=0.000005 etime=0.000041 text= Apr 8 21:29:12 debian slapd[20881]: conn=1000 op=1 SRCH base="dc=societe,dc=com" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" Apr 8 21:29:57 debian slapd[20881]: conn=1000 fd=11 closed (idletimeout) OpenLDAP 2.5.11 compiled with the following options ./configure --prefix=/opt/openldap-2.5.11 --disable-ipv6 --enable-debug --enable-syslog --enable-slapd --enable-cleartext --enable-crypt --enable-wrappers --enable-backends=no --enable-mdb --enable-overlays --with-tls /opt/openldap-2.5.11/bin/ldapsearch -x -D cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com -w 'password' ... # numResponses: 44638 # numEntries: 44638 ldap_result: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) Apr 8 21:44:18 debian slapd[21063]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.5.11 (Apr 8 2022 20:55:50) $#012#011root@debian:/opt/src/openldap-2.5.11/servers/slapd Apr 8 21:44:18 debian slapd[21064]: slapd starting Apr 8 21:44:45 debian slapd[21064]: conn=1000 fd=11 ACCEPT from PATH=/opt/openldap-2.5.11/var/run/ldapi (PATH=/opt/openldap-2.5.11/var/run/ldapi) Apr 8 21:44:45 debian slapd[21064]: conn=1000 op=0 BIND dn="cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com" method=128 Apr 8 21:44:45 debian slapd[21064]: conn=1000 op=0 BIND dn="cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com" mech=SIMPLE bind_ssf=0 ssf=71 Apr 8 21:44:45 debian slapd[21064]: conn=1000 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 qtime=0.000006 etime=0.000045 text= Apr 8 21:44:45 debian slapd[21064]: conn=1000 op=1 SRCH base="dc=societe,dc=com" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" Apr 8 21:45:30 debian slapd[21064]: conn=1000 fd=11 closed (idletimeout) OpenLDAP 2.4.59 compiled with the following options ./configure --prefix=/opt/openldap-2.4.59 --disable-ipv6 --enable-debug --enable-syslog --enable-slapd --enable-cleartext --enable-crypt --enable-wrappers --enable-backends=no --enable-mdb --enable-overlays --with-tls /opt/openldap-2.4.59/bin/ldapsearch -x -D cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com -w 'password' Apr 8 21:53:22 debian slapd[17963]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.4.59 (Apr 8 2022 21:51:41) $#012#011root@debian:/opt/src/openldap-2.4.59/servers/slapd Apr 8 21:53:22 debian slapd[17964]: slapd starting Apr 8 21:53:54 debian slapd[17964]: conn=1000 fd=11 ACCEPT from PATH=/opt/openldap-2.4.59/var/run/ldapi (PATH=/opt/openldap-2.4.59/var/run/ldapi) Apr 8 21:53:54 debian slapd[17964]: conn=1000 op=0 BIND dn="cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com" method=128 Apr 8 21:53:54 debian slapd[17964]: conn=1000 op=0 BIND dn="cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 Apr 8 21:53:54 debian slapd[17964]: conn=1000 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= Apr 8 21:53:54 debian slapd[17964]: conn=1000 op=1 SRCH base="dc=societe,dc=com" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" Apr 8 22:06:02 debian slapd[17964]: conn=1000 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=1021397 text= Apr 8 22:06:02 debian slapd[17964]: conn=1000 op=2 UNBIND Apr 8 22:06:02 debian slapd[17964]: conn=1000 fd=11 closed OpenLDAP 2.4.48 compiled with the following options ./configure --prefix=/opt/openldap-2.4.48 --disable-ipv6 --enable-debug --enable-syslog --enable-slapd --enable-cleartext --enable-crypt --enable-wrappers --enable-backends=no --enable-mdb --enable-overlays --with-tls /opt/openldap-2.4.48/bin/ldapsearch -x -D cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com -w 'password' Apr 8 21:30:44 debian slapd[20942]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.4.48 (Apr 8 2022 20:58:01) $#012#011root@debian:/opt/src/openldap-2.4.48/servers/slapd Apr 8 21:30:44 debian slapd[20943]: slapd starting Apr 8 21:31:05 debian slapd[20943]: conn=1000 fd=11 ACCEPT from PATH=/opt/openldap-2.4.48/var/run/ldapi (PATH=/opt/openldap-2.4.48/var/run/ldapi) Apr 8 21:31:05 debian slapd[20943]: conn=1000 op=0 BIND dn="cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com" method=128 Apr 8 21:31:05 debian slapd[20943]: conn=1000 op=0 BIND dn="cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 Apr 8 21:31:05 debian slapd[20943]: conn=1000 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= Apr 8 21:31:05 debian slapd[20943]: conn=1000 op=1 SRCH base="dc=societe,dc=com" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" Apr 8 21:43:15 debian slapd[20943]: conn=1000 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=1021397 text= Apr 8 21:43:15 debian slapd[20943]: conn=1000 op=2 UNBIND Apr 8 21:43:15 debian slapd[20943]: conn=1000 fd=11 closed Content of slapd.conf : pidfile /opt/openldap/var/run/slapd.pid argsfile /opt/openldap/var/run/slapd.args tool-threads 2 require ldapv3 authc disallow bind_anon loglevel stats modulepath /opt/openldap/libexec/openldap moduleload back_mdb moduleload syncprov include /opt/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /opt/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /opt/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /opt/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/dyngroup_cgi.schema include /opt/openldap/etc/openldap/schema/qmail_cgi.schema defaultsearchbase "dc=societe,dc=com" backend mdb database mdb directory "/ldap/base-ldap" suffix "dc=societe,dc=com" rootdn "cn=manager,dc=societe,dc=com" rootpw password maxsize 12884901888 mode 600 checkpoint 10240 2 dbnosync lastmod on include /opt/openldap/etc/openldap/acl.conf idletimeout 120 reverse-lookup off sizelimit 100 timelimit unlimited include /opt/openldap/etc/openldap/index.conf index_substr_if_minlen 2 index_substr_if_maxlen 4 index_substr_any_len 4 index_substr_any_step 2 When I set loglevel -1 it works correctly (but generates a very huge log file). It's very strange. If you need any further information, feel free to contact me. Jean-Loup Gregoire -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 12

[Issue 9815] Serious SQL injection vulnerability in back-sql
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9815 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|OpenLDAP-devs | Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9837] New: Don't throw exceptions when requesting empty integer fields
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9837 Issue ID: 9837 Summary: Don't throw exceptions when requesting empty integer fields Product: JLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: JDBC Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: fredrik(a)roubert.name Target Milestone: --- LibreOffice Base expects to be able to call LdapResultSet.getLong() on an empty Types.INTEGER field without any exception being thrown and the exception that Long.parseLong() throws when passed an empty string will terminate the query with an error message. While I don't know if the JDBC standard says anything about how this is supposed to be handled, it seems reasonable (and harmless) for JDBC-LDAP to accomodate the existing behaviour such a popular open source software package as LibreOffice Base. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 9836] New: Support for TLS is needed
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 May '22

02 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9836 Issue ID: 9836 Summary: Support for TLS is needed Product: JLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: JDBC Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: fredrik(a)roubert.name Target Milestone: --- Using TLS is becoming increasingly more common and the LDAP library has support for this since a long time already, the JDBC connection string just needs to support a new property to allow this to be configured. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs May 2022