https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9939
Issue ID: 9939
Summary: datamorph test fails
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.3
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: test suite
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: patrick+openldap.org(a)laimbock.com
Target Milestone: ---
[snip]
+ for MOD in datamorph ppm variant
+ pushd contrib/slapd-modules/datamorph
~/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/contrib/slapd-modules/datamorph
~/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3
+ /usr/bin/make -O -j1 V=1 VERBOSE=1 test
ln -s /builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/clients clients
ln -s /builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/servers servers
ln -s /builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/tests/progs tests/progs
cd tests; \
SRCDIR=/builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3 \
LDAP_BUILD=/builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3 \
TOPDIR=/builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/contrib/slapd-modules/datamorph \
LIBTOOL=/builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/libtool \
/builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/contrib/slapd-modules/datamorph/tests/run
all
Running
/builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/contrib/slapd-modules/datamorph/tests/scripts/all
for mdb...
>>>>> Executing all LDAP tests for mdb
>>>>> Starting test001-config for mdb...
running defines.sh
/builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/contrib/slapd-modules/datamorph/tests/scripts/common.sh:
line 26: /servers/slapd/slapd: No such file or directory
/builddir/build/BUILD/openldap-2.6.3/contrib/slapd-modules/datamorph/tests/scripts/common.sh:
line 28: /servers/slapd/slapd: No such file or directory
Starting slapd on TCP/IP port 9011 for configuration...
Waiting 7 seconds for slapd to start...
Waiting 7 seconds for slapd to start...
Waiting 7 seconds for slapd to start...
Waiting 7 seconds for slapd to start...
Waiting 7 seconds for slapd to start...
Waiting 7 seconds for slapd to start...
Failed testing for module load entry
>>>>> test001-config failed for mdb
(exit 127)
make: *** [tests/Rules.mk:12: test] Error 127
This test also fails on the latest 2.6 branch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8610
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
The FAQ is historic, 99% of what's in it is incorrect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9933
Issue ID: 9933
Summary: pamcompany
Product: JLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: JDBC
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: packersnmoversservices(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
A trustworthy and expert moving business in Bangalore's Hebbal is PAM
Bangalore. This business is regarded as one of the top packers and movers
hebbal service providers because of its reputation for offering high-quality
moving and shifting services at reasonable pricing. Relocators who require
storage or house transferring services in Bangalore seek them. A firm with a
team of professional packers and movers offers a hassle-free, damage-free, and
stress-free move at a reasonable cost.
https://www.packersmoversinbangalore.co.in/packers-and-movers-in-hebbal/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9927
Issue ID: 9927
Summary: mdb/0.9 update makes strange problems
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: dpa-openldap(a)aegee.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 919
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=919&action=edit
strace outfput of failed start
I changed on the 2.6 branch at this
commit 18f6cc1609fe80ae30702f68875a6fc793e29ffd (origin/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_6,
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_6)
Merge: 8b4c915a6 d87d682b6
Author: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org>
Date: Tue Oct 4 14:29:39 2022 +0000
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/mdb.RE/0.9' into OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_6
and things stopped working: after several times restarting slapd refused to
start.
Then I went back to commit:
commit 8b4c915a655373973a834719f942bcdc09a7b516 (HEAD)
Author: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org>
Date: Mon Oct 3 20:26:19 2022 +0000
ITS#9915
and things worked again. I changed back to commit 18f6cc1609fe8, and slapd
does run properly.
Of course, I assume the LMDB database format has not changed and I have not
done export to LDIF and then import from LDIF to LMDB.
I have disabled syslog and debugging:
$ ./configure --disable-ipv6 --enable-spasswd --disable-static --disable-syslog
--disable-debug --enable-sssvlv --disable-relay
The file FAILED.txt, produced on dysfunctional slapd by executing
# strace /usr/local/libexec/slapd -d0 -u openldap -r /home/openldap -F
/etc/openldap/ -h'ldap://ldap.aegee.org/ldaps://ldap.aegee.org
ldapi://%%2Fvar%%2Frun%%2Fldapi' > FAILED.txt
is attached.
This is very similar to https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9879 :
upgrading to the newest version fails. Using a slightly older version than the
tip of the tree does not fail any more. Then upgrading to the newest version
does work.
Note that yesterday, or two-three days ago I also upgraded to the newest tip of
git and things worked, but I cannot say which commit was this.
# journalctl --unit openldap
Oct 04 08:04:31 mail systemd[1]: Stopping OpenLDAP...
Oct 04 08:04:33 mail systemd[1]: openldap.service: Deactivated successfully.
Oct 04 08:04:33 mail systemd[1]: Stopped OpenLDAP.
Oct 04 08:04:33 mail systemd[1]: openldap.service: Consumed 50.080s CPU time.
Oct 04 08:04:33 mail systemd[1]: Starting OpenLDAP...
Oct 04 08:04:36 mail systemd[1]: Started OpenLDAP.
Oct 04 08:10:33 mail systemd[1]: Stopping OpenLDAP...
Oct 04 08:10:34 mail systemd[1]: openldap.service: Deactivated successfully.
Oct 04 08:10:34 mail systemd[1]: Stopped OpenLDAP.
Oct 04 08:10:37 mail systemd[1]: Starting OpenLDAP...
Oct 04 08:10:37 mail systemd[1]: Started OpenLDAP.
Oct 05 07:33:36 mail systemd[1]: Stopping OpenLDAP...
Oct 05 07:33:37 mail systemd[1]: openldap.service: Failed with result
'resources'.
Oct 05 07:33:37 mail systemd[1]: Stopped OpenLDAP.
Oct 05 07:33:37 mail systemd[1]: openldap.service: Consumed 7.453s CPU time.
Oct 05 07:33:37 mail systemd[1]: Starting OpenLDAP...
Oct 05 07:33:38 mail systemd[1]: openldap.service: Main process exited,
code=exited, status=255/EXCEPTION
Oct 05 07:33:38 mail systemd[1]: openldap.service: Failed with result
'exit-code'.
Oct 05 07:33:38 mail systemd[1]: Failed to start OpenLDAP.
Oct 05 07:33:43 mail systemd[1]: Starting OpenLDAP...
Oct 05 07:33:43 mail systemd[1]: openldap.service: Main process exited,
code=exited, status=255/EXCEPTION
Oct 05 07:33:43 mail systemd[1]: openldap.service: Failed with result
'exit-code'.
Oct 05 07:33:43 mail systemd[1]: Failed to start OpenLDAP.
Oct 05 07:38:22 mail systemd[1]: Starting OpenLDAP...
so it worked likely without problems on the most current 2.6 commit at Oct 04
08:04:33 UTC.
Note that the failing slapd does terminate before reading the configuration
files with
newfstatat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/openldap/", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096,
...}, 0) = 0
newfstatat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/openldap/", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096,
...}, 0) = 0
mmap(NULL, 1052672, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f03c36d1000
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/openldap//cn=config.ldif", O_RDONLY) = 9
newfstatat(9, "", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0600, st_size=817, ...}, AT_EMPTY_PATH) = 0
so it shall be irrelevant how MDB handles the data.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9932
Issue ID: 9932
Summary: Sync failing between two LDAP servers
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.58
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: shikhar81(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi Team,
We have noticed a sync issue in our environment.
We have two production servers namely A and B and two DR servers namely C and
D.
A and B are in bi-directional sync
A and C are in bi-directional sync
B and D are in bi-directional sync
Since the last few days the sync between A and C and B and D has broken and we
are unable to see any concrete error in logs
Just to add here that server A and server B are in the same subnet and server C
& server D are in a different subnet. However, this setup has been working fine
since the last many years with no issues at all.
Since the last few days the connection has broken as mentioned earlier.
Now we also tried to initiate a sync between C and D (DR servers) which are in
the same subnet. But still it is not syncing and we get a "no connection" error
message in the logs after trying for 2-3 hrs.
Can you please suggest what can be done here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9928
Issue ID: 9928
Summary: ldap_search_ext_s always hangs on 2.6.3
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.3
Hardware: All
OS: Mac OS
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: filipe.custodio(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 920
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=920&action=edit
Minimal AD query that consistently hangs on ldap_search_ext_s call
Dear Experts,
When using ldap_search_ext_s() from libldap v2.6.3 to do a simple search on our
production Windows Domain Controller, the client consistently hangs forever.
Using ldap_search_ext() & ldap_result() also hangs after delivering the first
information item. It seems the client is left waiting, not realising no more
results are coming from the server.
Using the development image from Oct. 9 2022, the ldap_search_ext_s() call
works, although it gives an "Operations Error".
Shall I deploy the new libldap from the development branch in our production
environment to solve this problem or is there another way around the issue?
Best regards,
Filipe Custódio
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919
Issue ID: 9919
Summary: The use of a separate section for cold code can cause
linking issues on macOS
Product: LMDB
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: liblmdb
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: mh-bcrayqnc(a)glandium.org
Target Milestone: ---
See e.g. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52767
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9365
Issue ID: 9365
Summary: Mem leaks with Æ-DIR providers
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.53
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 772
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=772&action=edit
valgrind output on openSUSE Tumbleweed x86_64
An Æ-DIR installation with self-compiled OpenLDAP 2.4.53 on Debian (now
buster) has memory leak issues on the Æ-DIR providers. The read-only
consumers do not have this issue. The provider config is more complex
with more overlays and more ACLs.
In this production deployment slapd is automatically restarted (by monit) when
memory consumption reaches 80%. Thus monitoring clearly shows a frequent saw
tooth pattern.
I've also tested on openSUSE Tumbleweed x86_64 with a RE24 build [1] by running
slapd under control of valgrind for a couple of minutes continously sending
simple bind operations (additional to the monitoring and other back-ground jobs
running).
Find valgrind output of my first attempt attached.
Does that make sense at all?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.