October 2021 - openldap-bugs

[Issue 9729] New: Allow setting multiprovider before adding syncrepl stanzas

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9729 Issue ID: 9729 Summary: Allow setting multiprovider before adding syncrepl stanzas Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- It should be possible to set multiprovider first, avoiding the window of the DB being read-only while performing an online upgrade of a single provider to an MPR set up and generally simplifying configuration. Instead, the only requirement should be that serverID has been explicitly set (hopefully != 0). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year

1
3
0 / 0

[Issue 9493] New: slapo-accesslog handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9493 Issue ID: 9493 Summary: slapo-accesslog handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.57 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: svella(a)technologist.com Target Milestone: --- I observed this in the debugger while working on a small feature addition to slapo-accesslog. log_cf_gen(), when handling the initial configuration of oldAccessLogOldAttr (accesslog.c:989), linked list li_oldattrs is being built by inserting each value in order at the head of the list, resulting in the list being in reverse order. But when handling LDAP_MOD_DELETE of same attribute (accesslog.c:989), it is using the index of the removed value (valx) to find and removed the entry in the linked list, but it's counting from the head of li_oldattrs and not the tail, resulting in the wrong item being removed from the list unless counting from the head or the tail happens find the same item. (Line numbers refer to commit 6c469f07935e351e349bf38fc223dab704c51a76) Handling of oldAccessLogBase appears to have the same problem, and a cursory glance through the source of other overlays reveals a similar pattern, and I'm guessing the same problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year, 1 month

1
21
0 / 0

[Issue 9282] New: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9282 Issue ID: 9282 Summary: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.50 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Scenario: 2 node Multi-provider replication Add database to provider A ensure database replicates to provider B Stop provider A delete entry on provider B Start provider A Wait for provider B to reconnect to provider A Deleted entry re-appears -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year, 1 month

1
22
0 / 0

[Issue 9356] New: Add list of peerSIDs to consumer cookie to reduce cross traffic

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9356 Issue ID: 9356 Summary: Add list of peerSIDs to consumer cookie to reduce cross traffic Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- If we add a list of peersids to the cookie, each consumer can tell the providers who else the consumers talk to and then the provider can omit sending updates to that consumer, originating from those peers There's some special handling needed if a connection dies If a consumer loses one of its peer connections, and after N retries is still not connected, it should send a new cookie to its remaining peers saying "here's my new peer list" with the missing one removed. Likewise, if a retry eventually connects again, it can send a new cookie again Make that peer list reset configurable in the syncrepl config stanza. This can help account for end admin knowledge that some links may be more or less stable than other ones. The idea here is that if one of your other peers can still see the missing peer, they can start routing updates to you again It should abandon all existing persist sessions and send a new sync search with the new cookie to all remaining peers For consumer side, also means adding the sid for a given provider into the syncrepl stanza to save on having to try and discover the peer sid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year, 2 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Issue 9732] New: OpenLDAP TLS ciphersuite and groups limit issue

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9732 Issue ID: 9732 Summary: OpenLDAP TLS ciphersuite and groups limit issue Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.54 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: narayananballem(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hi Team, Hope you can help with this issue. I am trying to disable SSLV3 on OpenLDAP servers we are using OpenLDAP as a proxy with upstream Active directory servers. we are using CA certs on this openssl we would like to disable SSLV3 I added the below entry slapd.conf but when I tried to start slapd it's failing to start TLSCipherSuite HIGH:MEDIUM:!SSLv2:!SSLV3 errors as below slapd[19899]: main: TLS init def ctx failed: -1 slapd[19899]: slapd stopped. slapd[19899]: connections_destroy: nothing to destroy. debug logs restart as below TLS: could not set cipher list HIGH:MEDIUM:!SSLv2:!SSLV3. 617c64c1 main: TLS init def ctx failed: -1 617c64c1 slapd stopped. Also, did anybody notice this issue? I am facing the issue with a group display we have several users in group while looking for groups in getent group we are seeing a few groups not sure if there is any limit on group filed in Database -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year, 3 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Issue 9002] Add option to slapcat to honor rtxnsize setting

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9002 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=8226 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 8226] long searches are bad for back-mdb

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8226 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=9002 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 9719] New: refreshOnly sends empty cookie when client up to date

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9719 Issue ID: 9719 Summary: refreshOnly sends empty cookie when client up to date Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Syncprov will send an empty cookie if the consumer has the same cookie as provider. To the best of my knowledge this is not in line with RFC4533 and consumers would effectively drop their cookie when the search finishes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year, 3 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Issue 9714] New: Use xorshift in libldap/dnssrv.c

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9714 Issue ID: 9714 Summary: Use xorshift in libldap/dnssrv.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- As discussed in https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/417 we may want to shift to using xorshift in libldap/dnssrv.c in a future release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year, 3 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Issue 9393] New: Provider a LDAP filter validation function

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9393 Issue ID: 9393 Summary: Provider a LDAP filter validation function Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.56 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: best(a)univention.de Target Milestone: --- In many situations I need to validate if a user submitted LDAP filter has valid syntax. It seems there is no official function to check this. Could you provide one? libraries/libldap/filter.c: ldap_pvt_put_filter() can be used as a basis. -- My current workaround is using a unconnected ldap connection and do a search with that filter. This yields a FILTER_ERROR (invalid filter) or a SERVER_DOWN error (invalid filter). See also: https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/pull/272 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 year, 3 months

1
3
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs October 2021