openldap-bugs September 2020

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

4 participants
301 discussions

[Issue 8055] High CPU usage with syncrepl and wrong port
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8055 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Unable to reproduce in current RE24 or master. Seems as though this was fixed long ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7790] config.h filename clash. include path broken.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7790 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ryan(a)openldap.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8102] syncrepl_entry: be_modify failed (16)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8102 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|replication | Resolution|TEST |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- RE24: • 178ca23e by Howard Chu at 2020-09-09T16:39:15+00:00 ITS#8102 serialize plain syncrepl Using cs_pmutex. Reverts the addition of cs_modmutex in ITS#9330, use cs_pmutex for both delta and plain writes. Note that plain syncrepl already used cs_pmutex when a cookie CSN was present in the op. Now it is used for all writes, regardless of presence of cookie. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9334] New: slapo-ppolicy: mutex ownership issues
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9334 Issue ID: 9334 Summary: slapo-ppolicy: mutex ownership issues Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When building OpenLDAP trunk with: CPPFLAGS="-DLDAP_THREAD_DEBUG" ./configure --enable-overlays --enable-ldap --enable-meta --with-tls=openssl test022-ppolicy dies with: 5f514ef2 mdb_entry_get: rc=0 5f514ef2 => mdb_entry_get: ndn: "cn=standard policy,ou=policies,dc=example,dc=com" 5f514ef2 => mdb_entry_get: oc: "(null)", at: "(null)" 5f514ef2 mdb_dn2entry("cn=standard policy,ou=policies,dc=example,dc=com") 5f514ef2 => mdb_dn2id("cn=standard policy,ou=policies,dc=example,dc=com") 5f514ef2 <= mdb_dn2id: got id=0x4 5f514ef2 => mdb_entry_decode: 5f514ef2 <= mdb_entry_decode 5f514ef2 mdb_entry_get: rc=0 5f514ef2 send_ldap_result: conn=1006 op=0 p=3 5f514ef2 send_ldap_result: err=49 matched="" text="" thr_debug.c:1046: ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_unlock error: !THREAD_MUTEX_OWNER( mutex ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9323] New: For 2.5, only support OpenSSL 1.0 or later
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9323 Issue ID: 9323 Summary: For 2.5, only support OpenSSL 1.0 or later Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Need to abort configure at the least if the OpenSSL release is less than the 1.0.x series when compiling against OpenSSL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9043] Improve loglevel sync logging
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9043 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8102] syncrepl_entry: be_modify failed (16)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8102 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |TEST Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • e02b1d94 by Howard Chu at 2020-09-09T15:35:59+00:00 ITS#8102 serialize plain syncrepl Using cs_pmutex. Reverts the addition of cs_modmutex in ITS#9330, use cs_pmutex for both delta and plain writes. Note that plain syncrepl already used cs_pmutex when a cookie CSN was present in the op. Now it is used for all writes, regardless of presence of cookie. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8102] syncrepl_entry: be_modify failed (16)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8102 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |2.4.54 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8768] Syncprov shouldn't send a new cookie at the end of delete phase
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8768 --- Comment #7 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- There is another element to this issue, the consumer that is receiving these deletes might also be a provider with active persist sessions. It needs to be able to pass the right information onwards so that its own consumers do not risk diverging either. I better add some kind of regression test to make sure this is handled, it might already be fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8102] syncrepl_entry: be_modify failed (16)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8102 --- Comment #5 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to tpretz(a)gmail.com from comment #3) > When a cookie is not sent with an entry the cs_pmutex is not acquired. > Without having some protection, non-cookie modifications will race > each other between syncrepl threads. > > So, i am testing surrounding the syncrepl_entry "if" block (line 1036) > with a cs_pmutex lock/release (when punlock < 0) to serialize > non_cookie mods just like the cookie ones. > So far this is running tests and i haven't seen the null_callback > issue, either when catching up from the session log, or running with > ongoing out of order writes being replicated (running alongside > unmodified 2.4.44 to compare differences). > > When acquiring the cs_pmutex i have used the same logic as at line 958 > (using trylock, with a shutdown check). I wonder if it is safe to > acquire the mutex with a standard ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_lock at this > point without spinning. Sounds like you've done things correctly. It's not safe to do a normal mutex_lock here because the wait time could be quite long, and interfere with other the pool pause or shutdown operations. We'll be adding the same code now. > > line numbers from RELENG_2_4 (721a038b7bc9732f52eeef5324c180c4f137cd75) > > Thanks > > Tom -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
...
31
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs September 2020