https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9121
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 12e11c9b
by Howard Chu at 2020-08-18T23:49:26+00:00
ITS#9121 slapo-dynlist, -memberof: define memberOf if needed
Ignore if it's defined already. Make it no-user-mod.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8702
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=7926
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
--- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Fixed as a part of ITS#7926
Commits:
• 2f94318f
by Howard Chu at 2020-08-18T22:00:58+01:00
ITS#7926 support multiple config cleanup functions per op
Prep for main changes
• 9d2f1530
by Howard Chu at 2020-08-18T22:37:50+01:00
ITS#7926 dynamic changes to olcListenerThreads
Reallocates sockets from old to new listener threads
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7926
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=8702
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7926
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 2f94318f
by Howard Chu at 2020-08-18T22:00:58+01:00
ITS#7926 support multiple config cleanup functions per op
Prep for main changes
• 9d2f1530
by Howard Chu at 2020-08-18T22:37:50+01:00
ITS#7926 dynamic changes to olcListenerThreads
Reallocates sockets from old to new listener threads
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
In our last blog we discussed the UGC NET JRF Eligibility Criteria (UGC NET JRF Admit Card, Eligibility Criteria & Exam Result).
Hence the checklist for you to know your eligibility, let’s discuss the checklist of the UGC NET JRF exam that checks your efficiency.
<a href="https://www.anujjindal.in/ugc-net-apply-online-syllabus-selection-criteria/">UGC NET JRF Selection Criteria</a>
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FIXED |TEST
--- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• b0d73083
by Howard Chu at 2020-08-13T18:18:45+01:00
ITS#9135 fix index error on collapsed range
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Konstantin Andreev from comment #0)
> Full_Name: Konstantin Andreev
> Version: 2.4.48, git/master/44a7b46/20191203
> OS: Solaris 11.3 x64
> URL:
> Submission from: (NULL) (79.135.238.172)
>
>
> Here is a test case.
>
> 1) choose an attribute that has an equality index in your dit;
>
> 2) for this attribute choose a value that does not (and did not) exist in
> the dit yet;
>
> Let assume you chose [o=1] attr/val pair.
>
> 3) add MDB_IDL_DB_MAX+1 ( = 0x10000 = 65536 ) entries having [o=1]
> attr/val
> pair.
>
> 4) delete last MDB_IDL_DB_MAX-1 of them in the order inverted as
> compared to
> the order of addition
>
> Now you have two entries having [o=1] attr/val pair. Let assume they are
>
> | $ ldapsearch -s sub -b 'ou=T' '(o=1)' o
> | dn: cn=1,ou=T
> | o: 1
> |
> | dn: cn=2,ou=T
> | o: 1
>
> 5) delete one of the remaining entries, e.g. cn=2,ou=T
>
> Repeat the search:
>
> | $ ldapsearch -s sub -b 'ou=T' '(o=1)' o
> | $
>
> Nope, the remaining entry has been lost from the index forever. But it is
> still
> in the dit:
>
> | $ ldapsearch -s one -b 'ou=T' '(objectclass=*)' o
> | dn: cn=1,ou=T
> | o: 1
> |
> | dn: ou=A,ou=T
> | ...
>
> You need to slapindex to restore `o' index to a valid state, but you may not
> know you need to repair the index.
>
> The probability of this scenario is negligible, because indexed entries never
> form continuous block of ids of many-thousand length, but the code for this
> scenario exists and has a bug.
Thanks for the report. Fixed now in master.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9312
Issue ID: 9312
Summary: Getting connection_read(23): no connection!
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.44
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: shaheena.kazi(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
I have a connection_read(23): no connection! message in my syslog.
This does not affect the functionality of anything on system but is simply
present in the logs.
Also, it comes randomly. No wrong password error or no such issues.
I have referred the ID's - 8781 and 6548.
But it does not help.
Secondly, I have updated the consolidated patch for the openldap version from
the openldap/patches website. that too does not help.
We want to know why this messages come in the logs ?
Regarding, This commonly occurs when a client ends the connection
without properly ending an unbind request first. The solution would be to
fix the client involved.
-- What does the client server need to do here ? I mean what is to be handled
correctly ? Is there any configuration miss ?
Awaiting your response.
- Shaheena K
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9313
Issue ID: 9313
Summary: TLS 1.3 Support on 2.4.44
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.44
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: shaheena.kazi(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hello,
I wanted to know if TLSv1.3 is supported on openldap 2.4.44
If no, then what about on openldap 2.4.47 ?
Awaiting your response.
Regards,
Shaheena K
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.