https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9176
Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ryan(a)openldap.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
5c0efb9c by Howard Chu at 2020-04-27T03:41:12+01:00
ITS#9176 Add TLS SNI support to libldap
Implemented for OpenSSL, GnuTLS just stubbed
Assigning to myself to fill in the GnuTLS side.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9176
Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|libldap support for TLSv1.3 |ldap.google.com requires
|Encrypted SNI |TLS SNI
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7573
Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CONFIRMED
Resolution|SUSPENDED |---
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ryan(a)openldap.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8591
Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7573 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7573
Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hark(a)puscii.nl
--- Comment #5 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> ---
*** Bug 8591 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017
--- Comment #22 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 8d0cbbc9
by Howard Chu at 2020-04-25T00:46:58+01:00
ITS#9017 cleanup Windows off_t
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017
--- Comment #21 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to kriszyp(a)gmail.com from comment #20)
> > You ought to be able to use int64_t instead, or any other explicitly
> > 64-bit signed integer type.
>
> Yes, that (#define MDB_OFF_T int64_t) compiles and works fine in all
> my tests (including with >2GB dbs). I assume you can commit/fix this
> (or do we want me to make a patch)?
> Thanks,
> Kris
Committed with int64_t. Thanks for testing/verifying.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017
--- Comment #20 from kriszyp(a)gmail.com <kriszyp(a)gmail.com> ---
> You ought to be able to use int64_t instead, or any other explicitly
> 64-bit signed integer type.
Yes, that (#define MDB_OFF_T int64_t) compiles and works fine in all
my tests (including with >2GB dbs). I assume you can commit/fix this
(or do we want me to make a patch)?
Thanks,
Kris
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.