On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:41:07PM +0000, Howard Chu wrote:
> Thanks for the report. Note that if you simply set a "timeout" with no specific
> qualifiers, it would have worked for you as well.
Oh dear. Of course. And it says so cleary on the man page, too. Thank you!
> At this point, the "extended" timeout was meant for the other exops that back-ldap
> supports, e.g. whoami and passwordModify. Since 2.4 is feature frozen we are not
> going to implement the extended timeout feature here.
>
> Instead, I've changed the start_tls code to use the "bind" timeout, since it will
> always be used as part of a bind operation anyway.
OK, thanks a lot!
--Janne / Helsinki Uni