openldap-bugs June 2017

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

22 participants
46 discussions

(ITS#8676) openldap source uses implicit functoin declarations
by slyfox＠gentoo.org 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

Full_Name: Sergei Trofimovich Version: 2.4.44 OS: linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (81.154.9.158) When openldap package is being built in Gentoo GCC C compiler highlights a few problems of implicit function declaration usage as [1]. I've hacked up patches against current master: [2] Why those are problems? implicit function declarations mean the function type will be defaulted to int(int, int). For functions like int slap_sasl_cbinding( Connection *conn, struct berval *cbv ); it might cause pointer-to-int truncation on 64-bit platforms. Simplest way to reproduce the failure is to switch warning into failure as: ./configure CFLAGS="-Werror=implicit-function-declaration" make Many projects enable -Werror=implicit-function-declaration by default to catch that type of failure at development time. Thank you! [1]: * QA Notice: Package triggers severe warnings which indicate that it * may exhibit random runtime failures. * /tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.44/work/openldap-2.4.44/libraries/libldap/open.c:251:7: warning: implicit declaration of function ldap_is_ldapc_url; did you mean ldap_i s_ldapi_url? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * /tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.44/work/openldap-2.4.44/libraries/libldap_r/thr_posix.c:93:9: warning: implicit declaration of function pthread_setconcurrency; did you m ean pthread_setcanceltype? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * /tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.44/work/openldap-2.4.44/libraries/libldap_r/thr_posix.c:107:9: warning: implicit declaration of function pthread_getconcurrency; did you mean ldap_pvt_thread_get_concurrency? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * open.c:251:7: warning: implicit declaration of function ldap_is_ldapc_url; did you mean ldap_is_ldapi_url? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * /tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.44/work/openldap-2.4.44/libraries/libldap/open.c:251:7: warning: implicit declaration of function ldap_is_ldapc_url; did you mean ldap_i s_ldapi_url? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * /tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.44/work/openldap-2.4.44/libraries/libldap_r/thr_posix.c:93:9: warning: implicit declaration of function pthread_setconcurrency; did you m ean pthread_setcanceltype? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * /tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.44/work/openldap-2.4.44/libraries/libldap_r/thr_posix.c:107:9: warning: implicit declaration of function pthread_getconcurrency; did you mean ldap_pvt_thread_get_concurrency? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * open.c:251:7: warning: implicit declaration of function ldap_is_ldapc_url; did you mean ldap_is_ldapi_url? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * /tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.44/work/openldap-2.4.44/servers/slapd/back-ldap/bind.c:722:2: warning: implicit declaration of function slap_client_keepalive; did you me an slap_client_connect? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * /tmp/portage-tmpdir/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.4.44/work/openldap-2.4.44/servers/slapd/back-meta/conn.c:424:2: warning: implicit declaration of function slap_client_keepalive; did you me an slap_client_connect? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * cloak.c:246:4: warning: implicit declaration of function attr_clean; did you mean entry_clean? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] * Please do not file a Gentoo bug and instead report the above QA * issues directly to the upstream developers of this software. * Homepage: http://www.OpenLDAP.org/ [2]: http://dev.gentoo.org/~slyfox/patches/openldap/0001-tls2.c-fix-implicit-lda… http://dev.gentoo.org/~slyfox/patches/openldap/0002-thr_posix.c-fix-implici… http://dev.gentoo.org/~slyfox/patches/openldap/0003-servers-slapd-config.c-… http://dev.gentoo.org/~slyfox/patches/openldap/0004-servers-slapd-connectio…

1 0

Re: (ITS#8668) Cache overlay, unexpected behaviour and occasional segfaults
by acrow＠integrafin.co.uk 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

On 06/06/17 16:42, quanah(a)symas.com wrote: > --On Monday, June 05, 2017 6:08 PM +0000 acrow(a)integrafin.co.uk wrote: > >> Full_Name: Alex Crow >> Version: 2.4.40-13.el7 >> OS: Centos 7.3 >> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ >> Submission from: (NULL) (95.172.237.70) >> >> >> I'm using OpenLDAP with the caching overlay as a proxy to AD, mostly for >> use with Postfix and Dovecot. >> >> I have been experiencing a strange issue whereby, when a user is moved to >> a different OU in AD, the caching server initially returns only the >> original OU until the cache entry expires. However, after this time, it >> returns both the entry in the original OU and the entry in the new OU. >> This does not seem to change even after the next expiry time has elapsed. >> I can only seem to clear out the "old" result by wiping the cache's >> database. > Hi Alex, > > The first thing to do would be to upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4.44 or 2.4.45 and > confirm you can reproduce the issue in a current release. If you can, then > you need to provide a full backtrace, where debug symbols are enabled (the > "-g" flag for CFLAGS for gcc), and the slapd binary is not stripped (or if > using packaged RPMs, the debuginfo etc bits are installed). > > You can grab pre-compiled packages for OpenLDAP 2.4.44 from the LTB project > at <http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap>. I expect they'll have > 2.4.45 packages available soon as well. > > Thanks, > Quanah > Hi Quanah, I've installed a new VM with the current LTB release and the crashes don't seem to be happening. However, we're still seeing problems with the cache overlay not working as expected. We had a user account moved between OUs this morning shortly after 9am, and now at after 2pm the cache is still returning both the entry from the old OU and the new one (where postfix can only deal with one result in this case). Given my configuration I'd expect the cache to at least return the correct result after an hour at the most - or have I made a mistake? pcacheAttrset 0 mail x-mailHost x-mailStore unixHomeDirectory displayName pcacheTemplate (sn=) 0 3600 0 0 1800 pcacheTemplate (cn=) 0 3600 0 0 1800 pcacheTemplate (displayName=) 0 3600 0 0 1800 pcacheTemplate (mail=) 0 3600 0 0 1800 pcacheTemplate (&(objectClass=)(mail=)) 0 3600 0 0 1800 pcacheTemplate (&(objectClass=)(mail=*)) 0 3600 0 0 1800 Postfix is set up as below: ldaptransport_server_host = ldap://ldapcache2 ldap://ldapcache ldaptransport_timeout = 2 ldaptransport_search_base = OU=foo,DC=bar,DC=baz,DC=net ldaptransport_query_filter = (mail=%s) ldaptransport_result_attribute = x-mailHost ldaptransport_result_filter = relay:%s ldaptransport_expansion_limit = 1 Best regards Alex > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Product Architect > Symas Corporation > Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: > <http://www.symas.com> > > > > -- This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential information. Unless you are that person, you may not disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested to delete the message along with any attachments and notify us immediately. This email is not intended to, nor should it be taken to, constitute advice. The information provided is correct to our knowledge & belief and must not be used as a substitute for obtaining tax, regulatory, investment, legal or any other appropriate advice. "Transact" is operated by Integrated Financial Arrangements Ltd. 29 Clement's Lane, London EC4N 7AE. Tel: (020) 7608 4900 Fax: (020) 7608 5300. (Registered office: as above; Registered in England and Wales under number: 3727592). Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (entered on the Financial Services Register; no. 190856).

1 0

Re: (ITS#8675) tools continuing after ldap_start_tls_ returns non-LDAP error
by kurt＠boolean.net 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

it's standard conformance issue.... The spec says that upon StartTLS 'success', both TLS communications is = established on the octet following the Start TLS response (and the = request)... and that once one starts TLS communications, one can never = go back to LDAP without TLS. So if there's a TLS failure (whether as = part of TLS nego or later), LDAP communications cannot be continued = (without TLS). Only ignoring LDAP errors (rc > 0) ensures that if TLS negotiation = fails, we don't attempt to send LDAP operations without TLS. -- Kurt=

1 0

Re: (ITS#6077) Spurious uniqueness errors with filters in unique overlays
by wferi＠niif.hu 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

I guess e338789d is supposed to fix this, and it's present in 2.4.40, but still I'm affected on that version: olcUniqueURI: ldap:///o=niifi,o=niif,c=hu?gidNumber?sub?objectClass=posixGroup rejects setting the gidNumber of a posixAccount to that of an existing posixGroup. The usual workaround of using more specific base DNs doesn't work well for me, because there are multiple branches containing groups. Specifying multiple URIs on the above light might work (man slapd-unique doesn't tell precisely), but requires extra maintenance. -- Feri

1 0

Re: (ITS#8675) tools continuing after ldap_start_tls_ returns non-LDAP error
by hyc＠symas.com 16 Jun '17

16 Jun '17

kurt(a)openldap.org wrote: > Full_Name: Kurt Zeilenga > Version: most every > OS: MacOS > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (2001:470:f052:8000:7cca:294:b2d:2652) > > > The client tools were designed to support optimistic encryption (-Z)... in > cases where the server says "yes, let's start TLS...", TLS negotiations must be > entered into and, if they fail, no further LDAP traffic should be allowed on the > stream. Upon TLS alert, the session should no longer usable. Further attempts > to send any PDU should fail. I guess this was never stated clearly. "-ZZ" meant require TLS, drop the session if TLS fails. "-Z" meant proceed if TLS fails. No one ever specified exactly what types of failures were intended in either situation. > > But one could argue that the bug is simply the LDAP application software > ignoring the local (non-LDAP) errors coming from ldap_start_tls_s(). In this > case, the following trivial patch would address the issue. > > diff --git a/clients/tools/common.c b/clients/tools/common.c > index 7f758cb..089dd9b 100644 > --- a/clients/tools/common.c > +++ b/clients/tools/common.c > @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ dnssrv_free:; > ldap_get_option( ld, > LDAP_OPT_DIAGNOSTIC_MESSAGE, (void*)&msg); > tool_perror( "ldap_start_tls", rc, NULL, NULL, > msg, NULL ); > ldap_memfree(msg); > - if ( use_tls > 1 ) { > + if ( use_tls > 1 || rc < 0) { > tool_exit( ld, EXIT_FAILURE ); > } > } > > However, it might be better to do something at a lower level to ensure that all > subsequent attempts to send LDAP PDUs over the wire after a TLS Alert fail. > > I hereby place the above patch into the public domain. > > -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#8675) tools continuing after ldap_start_tls_ returns non-LDAP error
by kurt＠openldap.org 16 Jun '17

16 Jun '17

Full_Name: Kurt Zeilenga Version: most every OS: MacOS URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (2001:470:f052:8000:7cca:294:b2d:2652) The client tools were designed to support optimistic encryption (-Z)... in cases where the server says "yes, let's start TLS...", TLS negotiations must be entered into and, if they fail, no further LDAP traffic should be allowed on the stream. Upon TLS alert, the session should no longer usable. Further attempts to send any PDU should fail. But one could argue that the bug is simply the LDAP application software ignoring the local (non-LDAP) errors coming from ldap_start_tls_s(). In this case, the following trivial patch would address the issue. diff --git a/clients/tools/common.c b/clients/tools/common.c index 7f758cb..089dd9b 100644 --- a/clients/tools/common.c +++ b/clients/tools/common.c @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ dnssrv_free:; ldap_get_option( ld, LDAP_OPT_DIAGNOSTIC_MESSAGE, (void*)&msg); tool_perror( "ldap_start_tls", rc, NULL, NULL, msg, NULL ); ldap_memfree(msg); - if ( use_tls > 1 ) { + if ( use_tls > 1 || rc < 0) { tool_exit( ld, EXIT_FAILURE ); } } However, it might be better to do something at a lower level to ensure that all subsequent attempts to send LDAP PDUs over the wire after a TLS Alert fail. I hereby place the above patch into the public domain.

1 0

(ITS#8674) Leak in ldap_create_assertion_control
by matt.johnson＠hpe.com 14 Jun '17

14 Jun '17

Full_Name: Matt Johnson Version: 2.4.40 OS: RedHat 7.2 (Maipo) URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (15.203.233.86) The LDAPClient::modify logic has a leak within the ldap_create_assertion_control method. The leaky code occurs when the existing ld_errno is anything but 0 when the method is invoked. Not only that, but your assertion returned is NULL. The workaround is to call the following before calling ldap_create_assertion_control. int lvErrno = 0; ldap_set_option(myLDAPPtr, LDAP_OPT_RESULT_CODE, &lvErrno);

1 0

Re: (ITS#8672) syncrepl with openldap 2.4.{40,42} and mdb backend
by remy.dernat＠univ-montp2.fr 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

Hi Ryan, Quanah, Le 11/06/2017 à 03:57, Ryan Tandy a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:06:21PM +0000, remy.dernat(a)umontpellier.fr > wrote: >> I am able to reproduce the bug quite easily. > > I'm afraid I have not been able to. I followed the steps you posted > (with s/hdb/mdb/) with both servers running slapd 2.4.40+dfsg-1+deb8u3 > and syncrepl seems to work fine. > > https://bugs.debian.org/798964 seems quite similar. R�my, do you think > this problem started for you right after you upgraded to +deb8u3? Indeed, I am afraid that this upgrade causes this issue, or maybe rather the previous one. `2.4.40+dfsg-1+deb8u2` were upgraded on my system in February and syncrepl does not work from this moment. Concerning tests from the latest source, I am not able to reproduce this bug as I get a weird error, with some stuff remaining from my previous install: ``` LDAP vendor version mismatch: library 20440, header 20445 ``` Google leads me to this topics : https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=56872 http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200307/msg00399.html Although I removed every previous packages. Using ldd : ``` ldd `which ldapadd` linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe19765000) libldap-2.4.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldap-2.4.so.2 (0x00007fef25b0d000) liblber-2.4.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblber-2.4.so.2 (0x00007fef258fe000) libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsasl2.so.2 (0x00007fef256e1000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00007fef254aa000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libresolv.so.2 (0x00007fef25293000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fef24ee7000) libgnutls-deb0.so.28 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnutls-deb0.so.28 (0x00007fef24bc7000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fef249aa000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fef247a5000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000055776c6be000) libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007fef2458a000) libp11-kit.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libp11-kit.so.0 (0x00007fef24344000) libtasn1.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtasn1.so.6 (0x00007fef2412f000) libnettle.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnettle.so.4 (0x00007fef23efd000) libhogweed.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhogweed.so.2 (0x00007fef23cce000) libgmp.so.10 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgmp.so.10 (0x00007fef23a4a000) libffi.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.6 (0x00007fef23842000) ``` with strace : http://paste.debian.net/971168/ And no result with: ``` for file in `ldd /usr/local/bin/ldapadd |awk '{print $3}'`; do echo $file && objdump -T $file |grep 2044; done ``` (and nothing in /var/log/slapd.log) I should try to install it from a fresh install, it would be easier. Anyway, as you said, if installing it from a fresh install did not gave you this bug, I think you can close it... In the meantime, I am working with two other servers for production. As it works for me now (with hdb), I think I will remove the 2 others. This bug already took me too many time. Best regards, Rémy -- Rémy Dernat Ingénieur d'Etudes MBB/ISE-M

1 0

Re: (ITS#8672) syncrepl with openldap 2.4.{40,42} and mdb backend
by ryan＠nardis.ca 10 Jun '17

10 Jun '17

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:06:21PM +0000, remy.dernat(a)umontpellier.fr wrote: >I am able to reproduce the bug quite easily. I'm afraid I have not been able to. I followed the steps you posted (with s/hdb/mdb/) with both servers running slapd 2.4.40+dfsg-1+deb8u3 and syncrepl seems to work fine. https://bugs.debian.org/798964 seems quite similar. Rémy, do you think this problem started for you right after you upgraded to +deb8u3?

1 0

Re: (ITS#8664) lmdb fragmentation leads to DDoS for consumers
by quanah＠symas.com 09 Jun '17

09 Jun '17

--On Thursday, June 01, 2017 12:22 AM +0000 quanah(a)openldap.org wrote: > Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount > Version: 2.4.44 > OS: Linux > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (47.208.148.239) Going to close this out, as the problem statement & other bits is incorrect. I will file a new ITS with a better summary of the issues. Looking forward to a different bug tracker that allows modification of the bug summary, etc. ;) --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: <http://www.symas.com>

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs June 2017