openldap-bugs July 2012

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

19 participants
47 discussions

Re: (ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 31 Jul '12

31 Jul '12

On 07/30/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Ströder wrote: > Jan Synacek wrote: >> On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >>> It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a patch for >>> ITS#7168. >> >> This works for me: >> >> slapd.ldif: >> ... >> dn: olcOverlay=constraint,olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config >> objectClass: olcOverlayConfig >> objectClass: olcConstraintConfig >> olcOverlay: constraint >> olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3 >> olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2 >> ... > > From the excerpt above it seems you've only added a count constraint. > > Please use more features of slapo-constraint for testing, e.g. regex- or > URL-based constraints. > > The patch for ITS#7168 broke all my customer setups since I'm slapo-constraint > quite heavily. > > Ciao, Michael. > I'm having hard time reproducing this. Still works for me. Please provide a minimal setup and an example that fails, so I can fix the patch. Thank you. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat

1 0

Re: (ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint
by michael＠stroeder.com 30 Jul '12

30 Jul '12

This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms010302040303070900010905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan Synacek wrote: > On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >> It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a= patch for >> ITS#7168. >=20 > This works for me: >=20 > slapd.ldif: > ... > dn: olcOverlay=3Dconstraint,olcDatabase=3D{1}bdb,cn=3Dconfig > objectClass: olcOverlayConfig > objectClass: olcConstraintConfig > olcOverlay: constraint > olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3 > olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2 > ... =46rom the excerpt above it seems you've only added a count constraint. Please use more features of slapo-constraint for testing, e.g. regex- or URL-based constraints. The patch for ITS#7168 broke all my customer setups since I'm slapo-const= raint quite heavily. Ciao, Michael. --------------ms010302040303070900010905 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILHzCC BT8wggQnoAMCAQICDwCmSwABAAIAivjZQ8SBvzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADB8MQswCQYDVQQG EwJERTEcMBoGA1UEChMTVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgR21iSDElMCMGA1UECxMcVEMgVHJ1c3RD ZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBMMSBDQTEoMCYGA1UEAxMfVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBM MSBDQSBJWDAeFw0xMjA2MDYxOTAyMTZaFw0xMzA2MDcxOTAyMTZaMCgxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRkwFwYDVQQDDBBNaWNoYWVsIFN0csO2ZGVyMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIB CgKCAQEAxXZGav40rnGNLxEggBW94MILWHlfC8a23Jew5U1gPlfRTXOjjzmoaZ1uCyGdgF6M VvuO9T1aTQNGH+OdeGe3P7Tfc/NsLJFJ2wtd8blvhmodUgse2eypiWjNOd4gZuhalBhgsQ0K b5D6/1foghII4E264iZlJ7AJ+UYcO+GxvFWT0YMTbLckgDkZk7c3qwTozdhYvXarvqx+8Ou/ kuxpQQhac/ebzxpu0N+RHSf2KIUS0g0tEGnPtGv6iL+9QNHc4JKo9Y9KKVw3tQy+Re+FQLxB 1fPE5F+qxuD3AUENpOwkMsqWLM94ohtx3CFqLpxfUPrnKFLAHOhHEbByYGvFPwIDAQABo4IC EDCCAgwwgaUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGYMIGVMFEGCCsGAQUFBzAChkVodHRwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0 Y2VudGVyLmRlL2NlcnRzZXJ2aWNlcy9jYWNlcnRzL3RjX2NsYXNzMV9MMV9DQV9JWC5jcnQw QAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGNGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLml4LnRjY2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1 c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAU6bgoHUbP/M34TpvF7ktg69g7P9EwDAYDVR0TAQH/ BAIwADBKBgNVHSAEQzBBMD8GCSqCFAAsAQEBATAyMDAGCCsGAQUFBwIBFiRodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnRydXN0Y2VudGVyLmRlL2d1aWRlbGluZXMwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgTwMB0GA1UdDgQWBBS2 KAWfTfgJ/JQ63qLGwTXYLnI+LzBiBgNVHR8EWzBZMFegVaBThlFodHRwOi8vY3JsLml4LnRj Y2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY3JsL3YyL3RjX0NsYXNzMV9M MV9DQV9JWC5jcmwwMwYDVR0lBCwwKgYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDBwYK KwYBBAGCNxQCAjAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRtaWNoYWVsQHN0cm9lZGVyLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFAAOCAQEAQ3bvVUpEq+cQrLpcogyt5BJNk/WvUvOHqhzyj28M9pg9hcDl1+MYl5qqj6tR GSTLPQZyf287pcmbMwbcTGZO/gbW9v7RYcut6RauWdwKMCUmKC3J4fVfDq9ZETA2WOV68ef4 B3Gzdhghsbp3Rhp5dDmrCVKAHlafm6ZwJrEQ9P76fxnQZzRLgeKpZep5ePH5YHUB3+YaOQvJ FG0bOXvfHhRiRG7/HW2G+yDgjHSxDz8AFzMWL/RFePqZ4pn6T/SM/qU6WEpW39MWyJNoH/Kx QDYK8gGYuesn1ciMCTnjrvZQj0fonGTO4SfWekJRkuGrJ7dYSZRjYbDcWBBkdFLWzzCCBdgw ggTAoAMCAQICDgboAAEAAkqWLSQM/sXJMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHkxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSQwIgYDVQQLExtUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBVbml2ZXJzYWwgQ0ExJjAkBgNVBAMTHVRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIFVuaXZlcnNhbCBDQSBJ MB4XDTA5MTEwMzE0MDgxOVoXDTI1MTIzMTIxNTk1OVowfDELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxHDAaBgNV BAoTE1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIEdtYkgxJTAjBgNVBAsTHFRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNz IDEgTDEgQ0ExKDAmBgNVBAMTH1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNzIDEgTDEgQ0EgSVgwggEi MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC75pBuz2Lp6QuqthDVR+V8XSsncZpozVVt 5KLv5P7yemMRwleKyH3PjmYfZUVL64Biab1GjovFblqVGCrep/EfdRonq20yU+P7TVhiLP8Z 5cegDZotIYhZhM0d8cPIij6w5d4IJM/8QCy6QSOUu4ASiTVItoYE4AFPjLqpmPwcie0fiqHH hpgmHnJla/7PZdkMZEsaCfVDEWBmJuMzVprJPT40anjG5VBLyM2I5DlsUCaeQCy2O3w3sqf1 3dyzUcv03IICuNc63towXA31Qt0TaVNU6YAmQjMepdfMbspmCZ+G8D2+xophEPPR/1vkstst smUMqX0XrLonTUJczglPAgMBAAGjggJZMIICVTCBmgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgY0wgYowUgYIKwYB BQUHMAKGRmh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY2VydHNlcnZpY2VzL2NhY2VydHMv dGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcnQwNAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGKGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnRjdW5p dmVyc2FsLUkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUkqR1LKSevoFE63n8isWVpesQ dXMwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBSBgNVHSAESzBJMAYGBFUdIAAwPwYJKoIUACwBAQEB MDIwMAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvZ3VpZGVsaW5lczAO BgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOm4KB1Gz/zN+E6bxe5LYOvYOz/RMIH9BgNVHR8E gfUwgfIwge+ggeyggemGRmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGN1bml2ZXJzYWwtSS50cnVzdGNlbnRlci5k ZS9jcmwvdjIvdGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcmyGgZ5sZGFwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0Y2Vu dGVyLmRlL0NOPVRDJTIwVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIlMjBVbml2ZXJzYWwlMjBDQSUyMEksTz1UQyUy MFRydXN0Q2VudGVyJTIwR21iSCxPVT1yb290Y2VydHMsREM9dHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIsREM9ZGU/ Y2VydGlmaWNhdGVSZXZvY2F0aW9uTGlzdD9iYXNlPzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAOcjE m+6+mO5Icm+N53G2DpCM07LBFSGoRpBoX0oE8TrJaIQh2KXmBHVdn9LU8kt3QzLclctgvwJV 0KwcsMUUl5tlCsMPpR3s2Ek5lbWpvvr0HqtW56blAQiINV9nBd1EJFASIkRjefGbV2nOq9Yz UU+N8HA7jq1ROhd/NZZraGhjthwKyfjfHV7PKxGlY+3M0MbTIG+q/GhIfm0euDpFqhKG88e9 ALXr/uoSn3MzeOcoOWjTpW3adtFO4VWVgKbgG7jNrFbvRVlHmFLbOm4msjE5aXWxLiTwpJ2X iF4zKca1vAdAOgw9us90jEtOeiH6GzjNxEMvb7TfeO6Zkuc6HDGCA84wggPKAgEBMIGPMHwx CzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQLExxU QyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBD bGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAhMwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTIwNzMwMTgzODQyWjAjBgkq hkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUbkqitqiUB3AUptpJBP8IZf85VpcwbAYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMV8wXTALBglg hkgBZQMEASowCwYJYIZIAWUDBAECMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggq hkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDCBoAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMYGSMIGP MHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQL ExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wgaIGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYGS oIGPMHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYD VQQLExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENl bnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEANow9ad7A3wr3HYgEMXZdssyB+upyWbuJ5LwbagTwOvHqIIJRTaKTIEvnUk09t4Jm5EIn Z0Nx7RX/HhOSbK94k1azYSpfabscyEubVv5tmmIJLJ6uwGIk9+9tMr7D0sXj8AKxc5qb96sc 1Aj3NidCu5dE/qJhdiMK84FTAjqMbouQ0v+DaTuw8BDIjcQL7XNxyu536WAOB/5BGOtfms8e SXH2bvNfYbw25+HdC8OTibBoMJrFXZExyT6lpqjgPcSrcixF1bK/Y9w8kxgqq7keFAw3rcuK 7vXpYMYKdazQFhr6Z4XlvH8AOeSdpDgyy9u3miaV/f5p1TBPyQyMAlq9SgAAAAAAAA== --------------ms010302040303070900010905--

1 0

Re: (ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 30 Jul '12

30 Jul '12

On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > Full_Name: > Version: RE24 8a0ce24c5abaf687a41696d988f6a1330128368d > OS: > URL: > Submission from: (NULL) (79.227.171.183) > > > It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a patch for > ITS#7168. > > If the client sends valid data which not violates a constraint > CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION is returned: > > delete: departmentNumber > departmentNumber: old_number > - > add: departmentNumber > departmentNumber: new_number > - > > It seems turning off only the constraint for departmentNumber does not help. > Turning off all constraints makes it work. > This works for me: slapd.ldif: ... dn: olcOverlay=constraint,olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcConstraintConfig olcOverlay: constraint olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3 olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2 ... root.ldif: dn: dc=my-domain,dc=com objectclass: dcObject objectclass: organization dc: my-domain o: My Domain corp. user.ldif: dn: cn=usr2,dc=my-domain,dc=com objectclass: inetOrgPerson objectclass: organizationalPerson cn: usr2 sn: usr2 mail: original(a)email.com description: desc1 description: desc2 test.ldif: dn: cn=usr2,dc=my-domain,dc=com changetype: modify delete: description description: desc1 - add: description description: desc1-mod < operation is successful > Am I misunderstanding something? If it still doesn't work for you, please, provide more information including your configuration and an example that fails. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat

1 0

(ITS#7341) Ordered list error in overlays.sdf and "attr" in access-control.sdf
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 30 Jul '12

30 Jul '12

Full_Name: Gavin Henry Version: master OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.59.85) Submitted by: ghenry Small typos in access-control.sdf overlays.sdf.

1 0

Re: (ITS#7168) [PATCH] Fix count constraint when using multiple modifications
by quanah＠zimbra.com 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

--On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:19 AM +0000 jsynacek(a)redhat.com wrote: > On 06/07/2012 03:00 PM, Howard Chu wrote: >> jsynacek(a)redhat.com wrote: >>> Full_Name: Jan Synacek >>> Version: 2.4.29 >>> OS: Fedora 16 >>> URL: >>> http://jsynacek.fedorapeople.org/openldap/jsynacek-20120216-constraint- >>> count.patch Submission from: (NULL) (209.132.186.34) >>> This patch is broken. See ITS#7340 and discussion on -technical. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

(ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint
by michael＠stroeder.com 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

Full_Name: Version: RE24 8a0ce24c5abaf687a41696d988f6a1330128368d OS: URL: Submission from: (NULL) (79.227.171.183) It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a patch for ITS#7168. If the client sends valid data which not violates a constraint CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION is returned: delete: departmentNumber departmentNumber: old_number - add: departmentNumber departmentNumber: new_number - It seems turning off only the constraint for departmentNumber does not help. Turning off all constraints makes it work.

1 0

(ITS#7339) back-mdb aborts with online index additions
by hyc＠OpenLDAP.org 26 Jul '12

26 Jul '12

Full_Name: Howard Chu Version: HEAD/RE24 OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (37.19.97.21) Submitted by: hyc Already fixed in d1a7fa267bdb9e27777ba87db44034ce83a75084 If new databases are added (such as when adding a new index via cn=config) they may cause additional pages to be dirtied during txn_commit. The pages would be pulled from the freelist. But the updates occurred after the freelist had already been written out, so the new state of the freelist wasn't being saved. Subsequent transactions would abort due to internal corruption.

1 0

(ITS#7338) Problems changing bdb DB_CONFIG parameters using back-config
by mhardin＠symas.com 26 Jul '12

26 Jul '12

Full_Name: Matthew Hardin Version: 2.4.31 OS: Linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (69.43.206.100) Using back-config to update bdb DB_CONFIG parameters has problems. Changing the parameters with back-config does work, and writes out a new DB_CONFIG file, but a database reopen doesn't occur and therefore the environment is not rebuilt. Furthermore, if one restarts slapd, a checkpoint occurs, which in turn causes mtimes to change in the database and so the rebuild-env-on-dbopen step isn't triggered. The proper sequence should be: close the db write the new DB_CONFIG open the db The checkpoint will take place before DB_CONFIG is written, and on reopen, the environment will be rebuilt.

1 0

(ITS#7337) libmdb can corrupt when reaching maxsize
by hyc＠OpenLDAP.org 26 Jul '12

26 Jul '12

Full_Name: Howard Chu Version: HEAD/RE24 OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (37.19.97.21) Submitted by: hyc Already fixed by commit 234cd9dfb54ef2f7f83963d95b6eb8e9735bb372 If the DB maxsize was reached while pruning consumed records from the free list inside mdb_txn_commit, the error was ignored. As a result the txn_commit would return success even though it only partly succeeded. The code is now fixed to abort the txn and return the error code.

1 0

Re: (ITS#7335) Error in slapo-refint man page
by hyc＠symas.com 25 Jul '12

25 Jul '12

riggs(a)umn.edu wrote: > Full_Name: Benjamin Riggs > Version: 2.4.23 > OS: http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/i386/os/Packages/openlda… > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (128.101.155.71) > > > The slapo-refint man page has only documentation for slapd.conf, not > slapd-config. Normally this wouldn't be a problem, but the configuration > keywords are not the usual map of simply adding 'olc': > > refint_attributes is changed to olcRefintAttribute (no 's'!) > refint_nothing is changed to olcRefintNothing > refint_modifiersname is changed to olcRefintModifiersName That's true. All of the manpages should be updated for cn=config. In that respect this ITS can be combined with ITS#7288. However, we need to decide on how the new information will be presented, to avoid any unnecessary duplication. It's already quite redundant to maintain both the cn=config and slapd.conf chapters of the Admin Guide. Also, the overall issue is an extremely low priority, since all of the schema definitions can simply be read out of the cn=schema,cn=config entry. The slapd-config(5) manpage and Admin Guide already note that all of the schema are present here, so anyone looking for this information should already know to look there. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs July 2012