openldap-bugs March 2009

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

48 participants
245 discussions

Re: (ITS#6010) substitution for acl sets
by hyc＠symas.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

quanah(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount > Version: HEAD > OS: NA > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (75.111.29.239) > > > substitution was added for ACL sets with ITS#2285. However, as per ITS#5804, > the man page is lacking documentation on this feature. It should be added. The man page lacks documentation on sets, period... The examples in the Admin Guide only touch on one use case. I think it's time we acknowledged that this feature exists, largely unchanged from its initial inception. (Yes, features have been added, but there's been no radical redesign.) -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#6004) test039 seg faults
by hyc＠symas.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> --On Monday, March 09, 2009 4:23 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >> >>> michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >>>> Full_Name: Michael Str?der >>>> Version: HEAD >>>> OS: openSUSE Linux 11.1 >>>> URL: >>>> Submission from: (NULL) (84.163.90.131) >>>> >>>> Will try to grab a stack trace. >>> So here's the end of the output of test039 (with HDB) and a backtrace. >>> >>> See also a tar.gz of directory testrun/: >>> http://www.stroeder.com/temp/openldap/testrun-its6004_test039_seg_faults. >>> tar.gz >> Why are the symbols missing from most of the stack frames? The build >> should always have symbols. Do you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH set that's >> causing it to pick up some other libraries on the system that are stripped? > > Hmm, a pre-installed libldap could be picked up if -releng is already > removed from the shared lib names. Since this is switched back and forth > in CVS there's no easy way to keep my system working and maintain a > completely separate build tree. That's an issue Hallvard already raised > (with no success). Hallvard's situation was mainly due to his particular -rpath requirements. The libtool wrapper script will set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include all of the build directories of its dependent libraries, but that didn't help because of his compiled in runpaths. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#6004) test039 seg faults
by michael＠stroeder.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Monday, March 09, 2009 11:39 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > >> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >>> --On Monday, March 09, 2009 4:23 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >>> >>>> michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >>>>> Full_Name: Michael Str?der >>>>> Version: HEAD >>>>> OS: openSUSE Linux 11.1 >>>>> URL: >>>>> Submission from: (NULL) (84.163.90.131) >>>>> >>>>> Will try to grab a stack trace. >>>> >>>> So here's the end of the output of test039 (with HDB) and a backtrace. >>>> >>>> See also a tar.gz of directory testrun/: >>>> http://www.stroeder.com/temp/openldap/testrun-its6004_test039_seg_fault >>>> s. tar.gz >>> >>> Why are the symbols missing from most of the stack frames? The build >>> should always have symbols. Do you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH set that's >>> causing it to pick up some other libraries on the system that are >>> stripped? >> >> Hmm, a pre-installed libldap could be picked up if -releng is already >> removed from the shared lib names. Since this is switched back and forth >> in CVS there's no easy way to keep my system working and maintain a >> completely separate build tree. That's an issue Hallvard already raised >> (with no success). > > Current RE24 is releng, so if your CVS tree is fully up to date, it > should not pick up any other ldap libs. Sorry, I had the RE24 local installation in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Hmm... Ciao, Michael.

1 0

Re: (ITS#6004) test039 seg faults
by quanah＠zimbra.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

--On Monday, March 09, 2009 11:39 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> --On Monday, March 09, 2009 4:23 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >> >>> michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >>>> Full_Name: Michael Str?der >>>> Version: HEAD >>>> OS: openSUSE Linux 11.1 >>>> URL: >>>> Submission from: (NULL) (84.163.90.131) >>>> >>>> Will try to grab a stack trace. >>> >>> So here's the end of the output of test039 (with HDB) and a backtrace. >>> >>> See also a tar.gz of directory testrun/: >>> http://www.stroeder.com/temp/openldap/testrun-its6004_test039_seg_fault >>> s. tar.gz >> >> Why are the symbols missing from most of the stack frames? The build >> should always have symbols. Do you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH set that's >> causing it to pick up some other libraries on the system that are >> stripped? > > Hmm, a pre-installed libldap could be picked up if -releng is already > removed from the shared lib names. Since this is switched back and forth > in CVS there's no easy way to keep my system working and maintain a > completely separate build tree. That's an issue Hallvard already raised > (with no success). Current RE24 is releng, so if your CVS tree is fully up to date, it should not pick up any other ldap libs. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

Re: (ITS#6004) test039 seg faults
by michael＠stroeder.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Monday, March 09, 2009 4:23 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > >> michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >>> Full_Name: Michael Str?der >>> Version: HEAD >>> OS: openSUSE Linux 11.1 >>> URL: >>> Submission from: (NULL) (84.163.90.131) >>> >>> Will try to grab a stack trace. >> >> So here's the end of the output of test039 (with HDB) and a backtrace. >> >> See also a tar.gz of directory testrun/: >> http://www.stroeder.com/temp/openldap/testrun-its6004_test039_seg_faults. >> tar.gz > > Why are the symbols missing from most of the stack frames? The build > should always have symbols. Do you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH set that's > causing it to pick up some other libraries on the system that are stripped? Hmm, a pre-installed libldap could be picked up if -releng is already removed from the shared lib names. Since this is switched back and forth in CVS there's no easy way to keep my system working and maintain a completely separate build tree. That's an issue Hallvard already raised (with no success). Ciao, Michael.

1 0

Re: (ITS#6004) test039 seg faults
by quanah＠zimbra.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

--On Monday, March 09, 2009 4:23 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >> Full_Name: Michael Str?der >> Version: HEAD >> OS: openSUSE Linux 11.1 >> URL: >> Submission from: (NULL) (84.163.90.131) >> >> Will try to grab a stack trace. > > So here's the end of the output of test039 (with HDB) and a backtrace. > > See also a tar.gz of directory testrun/: > http://www.stroeder.com/temp/openldap/testrun-its6004_test039_seg_faults. > tar.gz Why are the symbols missing from most of the stack frames? The build should always have symbols. Do you have an LD_LIBRARY_PATH set that's causing it to pick up some other libraries on the system that are stripped? --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

(ITS#6010) substitution for acl sets
by quanah＠OpenLDAP.org 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount Version: HEAD OS: NA URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (75.111.29.239) substitution was added for ACL sets with ITS#2285. However, as per ITS#5804, the man page is lacking documentation on this feature. It should be added.

1 0

Re: (ITS#6009) test019: test failed - master and R2 slave databases differ
by quanah＠zimbra.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

Yeah, I know. ;) But there's a few fixes left to go in, including what I believe will fix what you saw. That's why I haven't called for testing yet on openldap-devel. --Quanah --On Monday, March 09, 2009 6:30 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> --On Monday, March 09, 2009 3:24 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >> >>> michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >>>> Full_Name: Michael Str?der >>>> Version: RE24 >>> >>> Seems to work in HEAD on the very same system. >> >> RE24 is not ready for testing yet. > > Well, Howard recently recommended to use it (see below). So I'm testing > as usual... > > Ciao, Michael. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: RE24 (2.4.15) slapd consuming large amounts of CPU > Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:47:57 -0800 > From: Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> > To: John Morrissey <jwm(a)horde.net> > CC: openldap-software(a)openldap.org > References: <20090304185521.GA3184(a)boost.horde.net> > <49AEE757.3000502(a)symas.com> <20090306141020.GA7876(a)boost.horde.net> > > John Morrissey wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:40:55PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote: >>> John Morrissey wrote: >>>> A backtrace (below) shows many threads waiting on a mutex in >>>> bdb_cache_*(). >>> From the trace it looks similar to ITS#5860. The patches for this >>> are in HEAD, not yet released. >> >> With an shm_key, slapd CPU consumption dropped noticably and has been >> running long enough to make the leak apparent. >> >> Since this second-round fix for ITS#5860 has been merged into RE24, >> do you recommend running that, or should I cherry-pick >> 1.120.2.{21,22} into our local packaging? > > At this point I would just use RE24. Unless any new critical bugs show > up in the next few days, it's very likely what will be 2.4.16. > > -- > -- Howard Chu > CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com > Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ > Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/ > > -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

Re: (ITS#6009) test019: test failed - master and R2 slave databases differ
by michael＠stroeder.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Monday, March 09, 2009 3:24 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > >> michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >>> Full_Name: Michael Str?der >>> Version: RE24 >> >> Seems to work in HEAD on the very same system. > > RE24 is not ready for testing yet. Well, Howard recently recommended to use it (see below). So I'm testing as usual... Ciao, Michael. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: RE24 (2.4.15) slapd consuming large amounts of CPU Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:47:57 -0800 From: Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> To: John Morrissey <jwm(a)horde.net> CC: openldap-software(a)openldap.org References: <20090304185521.GA3184(a)boost.horde.net> <49AEE757.3000502(a)symas.com> <20090306141020.GA7876(a)boost.horde.net> John Morrissey wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:40:55PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote: >> John Morrissey wrote: >>> A backtrace (below) shows many threads waiting on a mutex in >>> bdb_cache_*(). >> From the trace it looks similar to ITS#5860. The patches for this >> are in HEAD, not yet released. > > With an shm_key, slapd CPU consumption dropped noticably and has been > running long enough to make the leak apparent. > > Since this second-round fix for ITS#5860 has been merged into RE24, > do you recommend running that, or should I cherry-pick > 1.120.2.{21,22} into our local packaging? At this point I would just use RE24. Unless any new critical bugs show up in the next few days, it's very likely what will be 2.4.16. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#6009) test019: test failed - master and R2 slave databases differ
by quanah＠zimbra.com 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

--On Monday, March 09, 2009 3:24 PM +0000 michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >> Full_Name: Michael Str?der >> Version: RE24 > > Seems to work in HEAD on the very same system. RE24 is not ready for testing yet. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

← Newer
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
25
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs March 2009