openldap-bugs August 2007

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

42 participants
211 discussions

Re: (ITS#5104) OpenLDAP build breaks with SSL
by ando＠sys-net.it 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: > ando(a)sys-net.it writes: >> Actually, things seem to work just fine. I erroneously built >> openssl-0.9.8e without shared, and in that case it doesn't work. > > What's wrong with building it without shared? The build instructions > doesn't say we need the shared variant. I screwed things up, because I was building on Opteron, and ld complained about some non-relocatable symbols in libssl.a. Probably it either didn't guess well at my system, or I missed something. So it was probably me. Explicitly adding LIBS=-ldl fixed configure, but not the build later on. But I think this is off-topic with respect to this ITS. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

1 0

Re: (ITS#5104) OpenLDAP build breaks with SSL
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

ando(a)sys-net.it writes: > Actually, things seem to work just fine. I erroneously built > openssl-0.9.8e without shared, and in that case it doesn't work. What's wrong with building it without shared? The build instructions doesn't say we need the shared variant. -- Hallvard

1 0

Re: (ITS#5104) OpenLDAP build breaks with SSL
by ando＠sys-net.it 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

PLEASE KEEP REPLIES IN COPY ON THE ITS! Richard Beckett wrote: > I built openssl with the shared option for the config script. I have the > LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to /usr/local/lib which is where I put the Berkeley > DB libraries. Do I need something else? > > Here is what I get from the"make" after having run "make depend": > > ./.libs/libldap.a(tls.o)(.text+0x593): In function `sb_tls_bio_read': > /usr/local/src/LDAP/openldap-2.3.38/libraries/libldap/tls.c:676: > undefined reference to `BIO_clear_flags' Those symbols (at least in openssl-9.8.0e) are defined in libcrypto. You don't show the linker command line that is failing, but I still believe your build environment is broken, since OpenLDAP explicitly links libcrypto along with libssl. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

1 0

Re: (ITS#5104) OpenLDAP build breaks with SSL
by ando＠sys-net.it 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

Please keep replies on the list Richard Beckett wrote: > Pierangelo, thank you very much for the reply. Can you suggest a > work-around for the time being? Do I need to edit the Makefile? I have > not worked at this level for many years and my knowledge of "make" is > rusty. Actually, things seem to work just fine. I erroneously built openssl-0.9.8e without shared, and in that case it doesn't work. I suspect your build environment is broken (possibly the way you built openssl?). Please check if it's built correctly; if it is, please inspect the config.log resulting from building OpenLDAP to get some hint about the reason of the failure. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

1 0

Re: (ITS#5104) OpenLDAP build breaks with SSL
by ando＠sys-net.it 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

rbeckett(a)exelixis.com wrote: > Full_Name: Richard Beckett > Version: openldap-2.3.38 > OS: Solaris 10/RHEL v4 > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (65.209.203.254) > > > After compiling openssl-0.9.8e and installing it, then configuring > openldap-2.3.38 with ./configure followed by make depends and make, the make > fails. If I remove the /usr/local/lib/*ssl* and /usr/local/include/ssl* > directories and files then the make works fine. This occurs on both the Linux > and Solaris hosts It seems that linking a program with openssl needs to explicitly provide -ldl in LIBS. I'm investigating whether this is related to OpenLDAP's configure or related to libssl's build/installation. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

1 0

(ITS#5104) OpenLDAP build breaks with SSL
by rbeckett＠exelixis.com 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

Full_Name: Richard Beckett Version: openldap-2.3.38 OS: Solaris 10/RHEL v4 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (65.209.203.254) After compiling openssl-0.9.8e and installing it, then configuring openldap-2.3.38 with ./configure followed by make depends and make, the make fails. If I remove the /usr/local/lib/*ssl* and /usr/local/include/ssl* directories and files then the make works fine. This occurs on both the Linux and Solaris hosts

1 0

(ITS#5103) ldap_create_passwordpolicy_control creates illegal pp request control
by kurt＠OpenLDAP.org 22 Aug '07

22 Aug '07

Full_Name: Kurt Zeilenga Version: HEAD OS: Mac OS X 10.4.10 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (24.180.46.200) Submitted by: kurt Fixed in HEAD libraries/libldap/ppolicy.c 1.14,1.15 libraries/libldap/controls.c 1.53,1.55

3 4

Re: (ITS#5102) back-perl build issues
by ando＠sys-net.it 22 Aug '07

22 Aug '07

kurt(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > With perl v5.8.8 from macports (recently upgraded) Works fine here (Linux) > Entering directory `/Users/kurt/Work/devel/servers/slapd/back-perl' > /bin/sh ../../..//libtool --tag=disable-shared --mode=compile cc -g -O2 > -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -I/opt/local/include > -fno-common -DPERL_DARWIN -no-cpp-precomp -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/opt/local/include > -I/opt/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/darwin-2level/CORE -I/usr/pkg/include > -I/usr/pkg/include/db45 -c init.c > cc -g -O2 -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. > -I/opt/local/include -fno-common -DPERL_DARWIN -no-cpp-precomp > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/opt/local/include > -I/opt/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/darwin-2level/CORE -I/usr/pkg/include > -I/usr/pkg/include/db45 -c init.c -o init.o > init.c:90: error: parse error before 'ConfigReply' > init.c: In function 'perl_back_db_init': > init.c:92: error: number of arguments doesn't match prototype > proto-perl.h:27: error: prototype declaration This was recently (sort of: 2 weeks ago) changed. Are you sure you updated? p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

1 0

Saturn v1.1 on openldap v2.4.4alpha
by Domagoj Babic 22 Aug '07

22 Aug '07

Hi, I'd appreciate if anyone could provide feedback on this report from another tool. I've filtered out all the warnings that are provably false. BTW, playing with openldap for a couple of days, I found that the code is of much lower quality than some other open source projects, like ISC bind & ntp, openssh,... Static checkers also find more bugs. Some things I spotted: - code is very non-uniform, the same things are done in very different ways - in several places (10-20) pointers are checked with an assertion, but after the pointer has already been dereferenced. What's the purpose of assertions then? - "fat interfaces" - very long sequences of dereferences, like: *desc->ad_type->sat_equality->smr_normalize make GDB debugging harder, discourage consistency checking, and make static checking reports less readable. - inconsistency, a lot of it, for instance, a pointer is dereferenced, and ten lines below it's actually checked for NULL and then dereferenced Anyways, here is the report, I hope it's going to be helpful: Please replace ??? with Yes/No, and a short explanation. Bad programming practices are not considered bugs. A bug (by my definition) is a sequence of events that would crash the app, no matter how small the probability is, or how irrelevant the app is. Please, also consider the calling context (unlike Calysto, Saturn does not provide a complete trace, so it is hard to figure out whether the functions can be called under the right conditions to trigger the bug). If you can prove that the function can never be called so as to trigger the 'bug', then it's not a bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? @blue @2114 blue __arg0*.bv_val of function select_backend can evaluate to NULL select_backend (2114:servers/slapd/acl.c), final site of dereference is: (678:servers/slapd/backend.c) @servers/slapd/acl.c @Null pointer is passed to a function which dereferences it. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? @violet @774 violet (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference __arg1*.e_nname.bv_val. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 704, and is dereferenced through call chain: servers/slapd/acl.c:regex_matches (774:servers/slapd/acl.c), acl_string_expand (2507:servers/slapd/acl.c), final site of dereference is: (2455:servers/slapd/acl.c) @servers/slapd/acl.c @Interprocedural inconsistency error @violet @837 violet (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference __arg1*.e_nname.bv_val. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 704, and is dereferenced through call chain: acl_string_expand (837:servers/slapd/acl.c), final site of dereference is: (2455:servers/slapd/acl.c) @servers/slapd/acl.c @Interprocedural inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like a bug. @violet @3868 violet (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference __arg0*.si_anlist. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 3859, and is dereferenced through call chain: anlist_unparse (3868:servers/slapd/syncrepl.c), final site of dereference is: (2841:servers/slapd/bconfig.c) @servers/slapd/syncrepl.c @Interprocedural inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like a bug. @red @1753 red Possible NULL dereference of keys+keycount @servers/slapd/schema_init.c @Intraprocedural Null error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? @orange @2212 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable c->be->be_suffix+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 2192 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @2211 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable c->be->be_suffix+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 2192 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @2212 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable c->be->be_suffix+(i+1). This variable is checked for Null at lines: 2192 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @2209 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable c->be->be_suffix+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 2192 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? @orange @3147 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable c->be->be_update_refs+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 3135 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @3149 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable c->be->be_update_refs+(i+1). This variable is checked for Null at lines: 3135 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @3148 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable c->be->be_update_refs+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 3135 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @3149 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable c->be->be_update_refs+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 3135 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? There seems to be some correlation between default_passwd_hash and c->valx interprocedurally, but I couldn't figure it out. @orange @1934 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable default_passwd_hash+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 1938 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @1933 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable default_passwd_hash+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 1938 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @1934 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable default_passwd_hash+(i+1). This variable is checked for Null at lines: 1938 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @1932 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable default_passwd_hash+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 1938 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? The same as above @orange @2743 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable default_referral+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 2731 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @2744 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable default_referral+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 2731 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @2745 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable default_referral+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 2731 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error @orange @2745 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable default_referral+(i+1). This variable is checked for Null at lines: 2731 @servers/slapd/bconfig.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? @orange @377 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable b1. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 348 @servers/slapd/backglue.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like a false positive, but not sure. @violet @463 violet (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference servers/slapd/oc.c:oc_list.stqh_first*.soc_next.stqe_next. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 461, and is dereferenced through call chain: servers/slapd/oc.c:oc_delete_names (463:servers/slapd/oc.c), final site of dereference is: (394:servers/slapd/oc.c) @servers/slapd/oc.c @Interprocedural inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? @orange @2807 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable a->acl_attrs+0. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 2784 @servers/slapd/aclparse.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like attrs_alloc can return NULL @799. @red @869 red Possible NULL dereference of a with trace a @servers/slapd/entry.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation @red @837 red Possible NULL dereference of a with trace a @servers/slapd/entry.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation @red @871 red Possible NULL dereference of a with trace a @servers/slapd/entry.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation @red @856 red Possible NULL dereference of a with trace a @servers/slapd/entry.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation @red @840 red Possible NULL dereference of a with trace a @servers/slapd/entry.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation @red @838 red Possible NULL dereference of a with trace a @servers/slapd/entry.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like out is initialized in the loop body, and the loop is executed at least once, but I'm not sure. @orange @292 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable out+outpos. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 268 @libraries/liblunicode/ucstr.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Bug, pointer returned by realloc not checked. @red @288 red Possible NULL dereference of values+(nvalues+j) with trace values @tests/progs/slapd-search.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like anew->an_name.bv_val can remain uninitialized or NULL @red @943 red Possible NULL dereference of anew->an_name.bv_val+0 with trace anew*.an_name.bv_val @servers/slapd/ad.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation @red @921 red Possible NULL dereference of anew->an_name.bv_val+0 with trace anew*.an_name.bv_val @servers/slapd/ad.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Inconsistency, can it be NULL? @orange @128 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable info. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 136 @libraries/librewrite/rule.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? @blue @172 blue Trace entry of function tests/progs/slapd-modrdn.c:do_modrdn evaluates to NULL and is dereferenced through call chain: tests/progs/slapd-modrdn.c:do_modrdn (172:tests/progs/slapd-modrdn.c), final site of dereference is: (205:tests/progs/slapd-modrdn.c) @tests/progs/slapd-modrdn.c @Interprocedural Null error with loop summary propagation ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like bugs - SF_POP can return NULL. @blue @385 blue __arg1 of function slap_set_join can evaluate to NULL slap_set_join (385:servers/slapd/sets.c), final site of dereference is: (230:servers/slapd/sets.c) @servers/slapd/sets.c @Null pointer is passed to a function which dereferences it. @blue @411 blue __arg1 of function slap_set_join can evaluate to NULL slap_set_join (411:servers/slapd/sets.c), final site of dereference is: (230:servers/slapd/sets.c) @servers/slapd/sets.c @Null pointer is passed to a function which dereferences it. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like bugs. @orange @231 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable rset+j. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 134, 188 @servers/slapd/sets.c @Inconsistency error @orange @244 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable rset+j. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 134, 188 @servers/slapd/sets.c @Inconsistency error @orange @235 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable rset+j. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 134, 188 @servers/slapd/sets.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like bugs. @orange @243 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable lset+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 120, 188 @servers/slapd/sets.c @Inconsistency error @orange @235 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable lset+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 120, 188 @servers/slapd/sets.c @Inconsistency error @orange @230 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable lset+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 120, 188 @servers/slapd/sets.c @Inconsistency error @orange @244 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable lset+i. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 120, 188 @servers/slapd/sets.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? This pointer is checked @210, and if it's NULL a proper msg is printed, and then the pointer can be dereferenced. Would this be considered a bug, or a normal sequence of events? @blue @227 blue __arg0 of function servers/slurpd/ldap_op.c:free_ldmarr can evaluate to NULL servers/slurpd/ldap_op.c:free_ldmarr (227:servers/slurpd/ldap_op.c), final site of dereference is: (574:servers/slurpd/ldap_op.c) @servers/slurpd/ldap_op.c @Null pointer is passed to a function which dereferences it. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Looks like a bug. @red @349 red Possible NULL dereference of ldmarr+nops @servers/slurpd/ldap_op.c @Intraprocedural Null error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? @red @646 red Possible NULL dereference of srs with trace srs @servers/slapd/overlays/syncprov.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation @red @649 red Possible NULL dereference of srs with trace srs @servers/slapd/overlays/syncprov.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation @red @647 red Possible NULL dereference of srs with trace srs @servers/slapd/overlays/syncprov.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Can that pointer be NULL? @orange @545 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable op->o_bd. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 551, 553, 597 @servers/slapd/backover.c @Inconsistency error @orange @477 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable op->o_bd. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 483, 485, 529 @servers/slapd/backover.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Looks like a bug if the loop body @1104 is not executed. @red @1112 red Possible NULL dereference of on with trace on @servers/slapd/backover.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation @red @1113 red Possible NULL dereference of on with trace on @servers/slapd/backover.c @Intraprocedural error with loop summary propagation ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Bad programming practice, what's the point of checking the pointer after dereference?? Is this a bug? @orange @528 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable val. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 534 @servers/slapd/value.c @Inconsistency error @orange @465 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable val. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 471 @servers/slapd/value.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Bad programming practice, is it a bug? @orange @298 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable data. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 302 @libraries/librewrite/ldapmap.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like a bug. @orange @194 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable defaults. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 115, 118, 121, 125 @libraries/liblutil/sasl.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? @red @147 red Possible NULL dereference of p @libraries/liblutil/avl.c @Intraprocedural Null error @red @148 red Possible NULL dereference of p @libraries/liblutil/avl.c @Intraprocedural Null error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? This is definitely a bad programming practice. Can rdn be NULL? @orange @238 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable rdn+iAVA. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 240 @servers/slapd/dn.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? This is definitely a bad programming practice. Can dn be NULL? @orange @1202 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable dn. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 1204 @servers/slapd/dn.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? This is definitely a bad programming practice. Can suffix be NULL? @orange @1202 orange (INCONSISTENT USE) Possible null dereference of variable suffix. This variable is checked for Null at lines: 1205 @servers/slapd/dn.c @Inconsistency error ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bug: ??? Seems like a bug. @red @634 red Possible NULL dereference of avl_list+ciltmp @libraries/liblutil/avl.c @Intraprocedural Null error ---------------------------------------------------------------- Thx, -- Domagoj Babic http://www.domagoj.info/ http://www.calysto.org/

2 2

(ITS#5102) back-perl build issues
by kurt＠OpenLDAP.org 22 Aug '07

22 Aug '07

Full_Name: Kurt Zeilenga Version: HEAD OS: Mac OS X 10.4.10 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (24.180.46.200) Submitted by: kurt With perl v5.8.8 from macports (recently upgraded) Entering directory `/Users/kurt/Work/devel/servers/slapd/back-perl' /bin/sh ../../..//libtool --tag=disable-shared --mode=compile cc -g -O2 -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -I/opt/local/include -fno-common -DPERL_DARWIN -no-cpp-precomp -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/opt/local/include -I/opt/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/darwin-2level/CORE -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/pkg/include/db45 -c init.c cc -g -O2 -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -I/opt/local/include -fno-common -DPERL_DARWIN -no-cpp-precomp -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/opt/local/include -I/opt/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/darwin-2level/CORE -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/pkg/include/db45 -c init.c -o init.o init.c:90: error: parse error before 'ConfigReply' init.c: In function 'perl_back_db_init': init.c:92: error: number of arguments doesn't match prototype proto-perl.h:27: error: prototype declaration init.c:93: error: 'be' undeclared (first use in this function) init.c:93: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once init.c:93: error: for each function it appears in.) init.c: At top level: init.c:106: error: parse error before 'ConfigReply' init.c: In function 'perl_back_db_open': init.c:108: error: number of arguments doesn't match prototype proto-perl.h:28: error: prototype declaration init.c:112: error: 'be' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [init.lo] Error 1

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs August 2007