ando(a)sys-net.it wrote:
> I've an issue with X.509 certificate parsing in HEAD/re24. The certificate,
> according to OpenSSL, has a SerialNumber c8:5b:9a:dd:ea:bf:f9:fa and HEAD fails
> to parse it because it is an integer with length equal to 9, which is larger
> than sizeof(ber_int_t), as tested in ber_getnint() at decode.c:254. The DER
> encoded value is: 2 9 0 200 91 154 221 234 191 249 250. Seems to be time
> to get past the sizeof(ber_int_t) limitation...
... which would violate RFC 4511 where it states that INTEGER means from
0 up to 2^31-1... I have a simple solution for this problem, at the
cost of partially violating rfc 4523: if an integer is larger than
2^31-1, it could be represented in the certificateExactMatch
normalization in hexadecimal form, much like OpenSSL does. This would
increase interoperability with OpenSSL and be at least self-consistent,
since all serialNumbers that large would be consistently expanded that
way. Another solution, preserving the decimal representation, would
probably require some arbitrary precision support from external
libraries. If there's consensus, I'd post my simple patch.
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Full_Name: Pierangelo Masarati
Version: HEAD/re24
OS: irrelevant
URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
Submission from: (NULL) (81.72.89.40)
Submitted by: ando
I've an issue with X.509 certificate parsing in HEAD/re24. The certificate,
according to OpenSSL, has a SerialNumber c8:5b:9a:dd:ea:bf:f9:fa and HEAD fails
to parse it because it is an integer with length equal to 9, which is larger
than sizeof(ber_int_t), as tested in ber_getnint() at decode.c:254. The DER
encoded value is: 2 9 0 200 91 154 221 234 191 249 250. Seems to be time
to get past the sizeof(ber_int_t) limitation...
p.
On Friday 27 July 2007 17:19:26 pbrinette(a)cc.in2p3.fr wrote:
> > 1) both 2.0 and 2.2 are ancient. OpenLDAP 2.3 is mature, and 2.4 is
> > about to exit beta stage. Unless the problem is related to a real
> > software bug, and it persists either in HEAD/2.4 or in 2.3 code, this
> > ITS will be closed.
>
> Currently, I've no mean to use an openldap 2.3 unless exists an RPM
> update package for RHEL 4 (or CentOS).
There is no update from RHEL or CentOS, but there are these (mine):
http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel4/openldap/
Since you can install them in parallel, the upgrade path is quite easy ...
(slapcat|slapadd2.3 after configuration).
There is also:
http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel3/openldap/
Regards,
Buchan
Full_Name: Hadmut Danisch
Version: 2.3.35
OS: linux
URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
Submission from: (NULL) (85.180.64.215)
This is an enhancement request:
When having a distributed LDAP structure with a master and several SyncRepl
clients, the clients can do the SyncRepl only on fixed refresh intervals (e.g.
type=refreshOnly,
interval=00:00:20:00)
However, there are many situations where this is inappropriate, e.g. on dial-on
connections, roaming notebooks, and things like that.
Therefore, slapd should have a client mode where the SyncRepl process is
performed only on request, but then immediately. There should be an external
trigger to pull, e.g. send a signal oder do a special LDAP request. slapd should
then start a SyncRepl.
E.g. this could be put in scripts run at connect-time (pppd provides that kind
of scripting), or when notebook autoconfiguration detects (e.g. with tools like
guessnet) that it is connected to the home network to update it's local slapd.
regards
Hadmut
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Tuesday, July 31, 2007 4:35 AM +0000 ando(a)sys-net.it wrote:
>
>> quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote:
>>> Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount
>>> Version: 2.3.37
>>> OS: NA
>>> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
>>> Submission from: (NULL) (66.92.25.194)
>>>
>>>
>>> When using cn=config with a slapd.conf driven slapd, the value for
>>> olcLogLevel is not correct:
>>>
>>> ldapsearch -LLL -x -h build -b "cn=config" -s base -D "cn=config" -W
>>> olcLogLevel
>>> Enter LDAP Password:
>>> dn: cn=config
>>> olcLogLevel: None
>>>
>>> However:
>>>
>>> grep loglevel conf/slapd.conf
>>> loglevel 32768
>>>
>>> And the logging that is happening is actually for level 32768.
>>> Modifying the loglevel works, and once that is done, the right loglevel
>>> is shown. However, this makes it impossible to know what loglevel is
>>> set via a remote query unless it has been changed.
>>
>>> From slapd.conf(5), loglevel:
>> 32768 (0x8000 none) only messages that get logged
>> whatever log level is set
>>
>> Seems to be correct.
>
> Yet if I modify it to be "256", then olcLogLevel is "256". If I modify
> it to be "32768", then it is "32768".
That's because in EMIT the loglevel goes through loglevel2bvarray(),
which turns the level into an array of pretty values. You're supposed
to modify the loglevel by adding multiple values, each with the
descriptive name of the level you're using. The use of loglevel with
OR'ed integers is stylistically deprecated.
> So if the loglevel setting in
> slapd.conf is "32768", then that is what it should match. In any case,
> "None" has the unfortunate ring of sounding like an unset value.
In LDAP, if the value were unset, the attribute would be missing, which
is what you get if, for example, you set loglevel to 0.
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
--On Tuesday, July 31, 2007 4:35 AM +0000 ando(a)sys-net.it wrote:
> quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote:
>> Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount
>> Version: 2.3.37
>> OS: NA
>> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
>> Submission from: (NULL) (66.92.25.194)
>>
>>
>> When using cn=config with a slapd.conf driven slapd, the value for
>> olcLogLevel is not correct:
>>
>> ldapsearch -LLL -x -h build -b "cn=config" -s base -D "cn=config" -W
>> olcLogLevel
>> Enter LDAP Password:
>> dn: cn=config
>> olcLogLevel: None
>>
>> However:
>>
>> grep loglevel conf/slapd.conf
>> loglevel 32768
>>
>> And the logging that is happening is actually for level 32768.
>> Modifying the loglevel works, and once that is done, the right loglevel
>> is shown. However, this makes it impossible to know what loglevel is
>> set via a remote query unless it has been changed.
>
>> From slapd.conf(5), loglevel:
> 32768 (0x8000 none) only messages that get logged
> whatever log level is set
>
> Seems to be correct.
Yet if I modify it to be "256", then olcLogLevel is "256". If I modify it
to be "32768", then it is "32768". So if the loglevel setting in
slapd.conf is "32768", then that is what it should match. In any case,
"None" has the unfortunate ring of sounding like an unset value.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote:
> Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Version: 2.3.37
> OS: NA
> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
> Submission from: (NULL) (66.92.25.194)
>
>
> When using cn=config with a slapd.conf driven slapd, the value for olcLogLevel
> is not correct:
>
> ldapsearch -LLL -x -h build -b "cn=config" -s base -D "cn=config" -W
> olcLogLevel
> Enter LDAP Password:
> dn: cn=config
> olcLogLevel: None
>
> However:
>
> grep loglevel conf/slapd.conf
> loglevel 32768
>
> And the logging that is happening is actually for level 32768. Modifying the
> loglevel works, and once that is done, the right loglevel is shown. However,
> this makes it impossible to know what loglevel is set via a remote query unless
> it has been changed.
>From slapd.conf(5), loglevel:
32768 (0x8000 none) only messages that get logged
whatever log level is set
Seems to be correct.
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
--On July 30, 2007 9:28:06 PM +0000 mb(a)g10code.com wrote:
> Full_Name: Marcus Brinkmann
> Version: 2.1.30
> OS: GNU/Linux
> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
> Submission from: (NULL) (87.123.156.61)
OpenLDAP 2.1 is no longer a supported release. The current release branch
is OpenLDAP 2.3. Please do not file ITSes on dead releases.
Thanks.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount
Version: 2.3.37
OS: NA
URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
Submission from: (NULL) (66.92.25.194)
When using cn=config with a slapd.conf driven slapd, the value for olcLogLevel
is not correct:
ldapsearch -LLL -x -h build -b "cn=config" -s base -D "cn=config" -W
olcLogLevel
Enter LDAP Password:
dn: cn=config
olcLogLevel: None
However:
grep loglevel conf/slapd.conf
loglevel 32768
And the logging that is happening is actually for level 32768. Modifying the
loglevel works, and once that is done, the right loglevel is shown. However,
this makes it impossible to know what loglevel is set via a remote query unless
it has been changed.