masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote:
> h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no wrote:
>> Hopefully fixed with the latest ITS#6632/6720 commits.
>
> You mean ITS#6727, I guess. I fixed ITS#6720 (rwm.c 1.132 -> 1.133),
> it looked unrelated. For me, ITS#6727 is now fixed with your patch.
> Can you confirm, Michael?
30 test iterations without problems. Seems to be fixed now.
Ciao, Michael.