2014-02-03 Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com:
--On Monday, February 03, 2014 4:48 PM +0100 Clément OUDOT < clem.oudot@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
as Howard said in his conference at FOSDEM, back-bdb is deprecated, and is disabled by default.
Should I fill an ITS?
No. It is deprecated in 2.5 and later.
If I remember well, BDB should be deprecated for 2.4 and HDB deprecated for 2.5. See slide 37 of this presentation: http://fr.slideshare.net/ldapcon/whats-new-in-openldap
Clément.
Clément OUDOT wrote:
2014-02-03 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com mailto:quanah@zimbra.com>:
--On Monday, February 03, 2014 4:48 PM +0100 Clément OUDOT <clem.oudot@gmail.com <mailto:clem.oudot@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, as Howard said in his conference at FOSDEM, back-bdb is deprecated, and is disabled by default. Should I fill an ITS? No. It is deprecated in 2.5 and later.If I remember well, BDB should be deprecated for 2.4 and HDB deprecated for 2.5. See slide 37 of this presentation: http://fr.slideshare.net/ldapcon/whats-new-in-openldap
Indeed. We disabled back-bdb in HEAD September 2008. commit 6dfa7b760e14a051ee15ea6fac5cc1784ef0883b
Apparently that was not propagated to the RE24 configure.in.
--On Monday, February 03, 2014 9:26 AM -0800 Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:
Indeed. We disabled back-bdb in HEAD September 2008. commit 6dfa7b760e14a051ee15ea6fac5cc1784ef0883b
Apparently that was not propagated to the RE24 configure.in.
Likely due to the fact that OpenLDAP 2.4 had been out nearly a year by then. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Architect - Server Zimbra, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
openldap-technical@openldap.org
-
Clément OUDOT -
Howard Chu -
Quanah Gibson-Mount