--On Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:46 AM -0400 "David N. Blank-Edelman" <dnb(a)ccs.neu.edu&gt; wrote: > (taking this to a new thread) > > Sorry for such a vague question, but my (perhaps failing) memory is once > upon a time there were still certain backends or overlays that couldn't > yet be configured via cn=config and had to be specified in slapd.conf. > > Has 2.4 has already cleared up all of those legacy configuration > requirements or is that a 2.5 goal? Thanks! It is a 2.5 goal.

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:46 AM -0400 "David N. Blank-Edelman" > <dnb(a)ccs.neu.edu&gt; wrote: > >> (taking this to a new thread) >> >> Sorry for such a vague question, but my (perhaps failing) memory is >> once >> upon a time there were still certain backends or overlays that couldn't >> yet be configured via cn=config and had to be specified in slapd.conf. >> >> Has 2.4 has already cleared up all of those legacy configuration >> requirements or is that a 2.5 goal? Thanks! > > It is a 2.5 goal. As of several months ago, only back-sql and back-meta remain incompatible. All of the overlays have already been converted.