On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote:
Shankar Anand R wrote:
> Is there any workaround way by which we will be able to do a DIGEST-MD5 -
> LDAP bind asynchronously?
> Howard: Is there a plan to have an asynchronous ldap_sasl_interactive_bind
> the near future? Any time lines for that?
No future plan. It's in CVS as of October 13, so it's already in the past.
Great! Thanks for the information.
I understand that the openldap project does not follow strict release dates.
But I see that there is an average of 3 months between 2.4.x and 2.4.x+1.
Can you help me by giving an approximate date when 2.4.24 will be released
(with this fix)?
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com
> <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote:
> William Ahern wrote:
> Excepting DNS, is the latest release of OpenLDAP fully
> even with TLS? Perusing the source code I can't find any obvious
> other than DNS where things might block, but it's harder to prove
> I remember many years ago this wasn't the case, and I had to thread
> connect phase, but the ChangeLog suggests that things have changed
> Connect has been asynch for years, though an option to configure the
> connect timeout is a more recent addition.
> The only significant thing left that I can think of that's still only
> synchronous is ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s(), and I have some plans to
> fix that.
> -- Howard Chu
> CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
> Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
> Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/