Am Montag, 06. Februar 2017 08:34 CET, "Ulrich Windl" Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de schrieb:
Why not? That's the "dirty" part of the quick response: People may be started quickly, but have to fix the dirty details if they are affected.
I strongly disagree (note: this is not a comment on the script posted but a general remark). Your standpoit assumes that the person asking for a solution is able to judge the quality/completeness/bugs /corner cases of the solution provided before running the script. But a person with such knowlege would never need to ask for such a solution. And "if they are affected" might translate into "once they've lost valuable data".
BTW: If ldapsearch had the same option that slapcat has, namely "ldif-wrap={no|<n>}", the simple script could work.
It does have such an option.
Cheers, Ralf Mattes
Ulrich
thanks again, regards, Jephté
2017-02-02 1:45 GMT+04:00 Dieter Klünter dieter@dkluenter.de:
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2017 22:21:31 +0400 schrieb Jephte Clain jephte.clain@univ-reunion.fr:
hello,
he asked for a quick and dirty way with bash, so that's what I gave him. however, I'm curious: can you give me an example of input my script can't handle?
Just an example:
dn:: Y249TWFudWVsIE3DvGhsYmVjayxvdT1hZHJlc3NidWNoLG89YXZjaSxjPWRl cn:: TWFudWVsIE3DvGhsYmVjaw==
-Dieter
-- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung http://sys4.de GPG Key ID: E9ED159B 53°37'09,95"N 10°08'02,42"E
-- Jephté CLAIN | Développeur, Intégrateur d'applications Service Système d'Information Direction des Systèmes d'Information Tél: +262 262 93 86 31 || Gsm: +262 692 29 58 24