Re: Getting around the single-threaded syncrepl model?

Hi Michael, > > If we're primarily adding or deleting entire objects, however, > > not modifying single attributes, won't delta-syncrepl just fall > > back to syncrepl anyway? > > Can't you change your modification process to modify entries > instead of deleting and re-adding them? I didn't say we deleted and re-added stuff. We will modify if the object needs modifying, but most of our operations involve either adding brand new objects, or deleting old ones. > > And this still doesn't change the fact that I'm now going to have > > to spin up 10-20 LDAP replicas on a single machine to get around > > the single-threaded replication engine problem. > > This is the concept of "replication hubs". You can do this to > spread the syncrepl load. Ah, "replication hubs", yes. I'd rather not have to go down this route unless I have to, but at the moment it seems there is little choice.