On 8/31/11 7:41 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Clément OUDOT wrote:
I tried to know if the persistent search control (OID 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.3) was supported in OpenLDAP. The latests messages I read were saying "no", as we can see in this discussion: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201008/msg00246.html
draft-ietf-ldapext-psearch is not supported in OpenLDAP. This standard has serious deficiencies anyway making it almost unusable. I know what I'm talking about since I have to use that with eDirectory in a customer project.
But this blog entry is saying this control was introduced in OpenLDAP 2.2: http://www.connexitor.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=112
This mentions syncrepl (see RFC 4533) as noted in this blog entry.
The funny thing is that the way SyncRepl is implemented, it uses a mechanism which is a persistentSearch for the RefreshAndPersist mode.
What kind of deficiencies have you found that make the original PSearch spec unusable ? What would be needed to use the same mechanism than in Syncrepl to get it working ?