Re: CN must be indexed?

On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 22:37 -0800, Howard Chu wrote:

Howard Chu wrote:

...

You have "index name eq" which is a supertype of cn. That means cn is going to be indexed anyway. It could be that we have a bug here, not checking the supertype's index. I'll look into that.

There was a bug in HEAD due to the broken component matching support code. This bug doesn't occur in 2.4 or 2.3 since that code is already disabled in the releases. I've #if'd it out of HEAD as well. But in the meantime, you should rethink what you're indexing.

Ahh, yes. I no longer use 'name' (instead adding a new attribute samba4RDN to hold the relative distinguished name), so I shall move the index to that attribute.

Andrew Bartlett